leadershipeducation programs in Australia and Europe, this report synthesized the data collected in order topropose an engineering leadership education program structure.The current literature available outlines the importance of engineering leadership education andprovides broad summaries of programs and recommendations for best practices. However it failsto provide an overview of the specific details of current engineering leadership programs. Tofurther this field of research, this paper analyzes the specific program goals and learning outcomesof engineering leadership programs. The findings provide a comprehensive understanding of thefocus of current programs, as well as a detailed summary of the key program competencies
worksettings. This curriculum stresses multidisciplinary knowledge, presented to the students with acombination of theory, lectures, independent research, projects, and presentations, emphasizingand promoting self-directed learning. It also requires students to complete a capstone project intheir final year, as a concluding experience, to determine the students’ ability to apply programknowledge and skills to real-world problems2. These projects are defined, designed,implemented, tested, and presented to a group of experts for thorough review and assessment in athree-month period. This research demonstrates that structuring these capstone projects byfollowing best practice guidelines is a repeatable, measurable and practical way to ensure asuccessful
designed toalso enhance the educational experience. Over 92% of students participants agreed that theexperience enriched their education (Figure 3C). Four percent of students disagreed. Page 26.25.9 Figure 2: Distribution of student responses for survey questions on (a) mentorship and (a) the overall value of the experience. Figure 3: Distribution of student responses for survey questions on the impact of the research experience on (a) interest in pursuing additional undergraduate research experience and/or graduate school, (b) seeking a career in research
& Practices)2. Neural engineering best practices: Oral and written communication of neuralengineering knowledge and research, confidence, working independently, working on a team,participating in a learning community, innovation, and persistence. (Personal Skills)3. Connections to neural engineering industry and careers: Awareness of career options inneural engineering and pathways to a neural engineering degree, industry’s role in neuralengineering, and professional connections. (Professional Skills)The Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering has hosted a total of sixteen students in theYSP during the summers of 2012-2014. The YSP is a commuter program intended for localstudents. High school students spend ten weeks in a neural
education strategies as well as the technologies to support the 21st century classroom (online and face to face). He also has assisted both the campus as well as the local community in developing technology programs that highlight student skills development in ways that engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design new methods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make up a large part of that
-based research topics as students are into the second year of their research projects. Thecurriculum will introduce students to practices in many areas of engineering and relateddisciplines. During the course, students apply programming and electronics knowledge to theRaspberry Pi computer and interface with a variety of sensors for real world data collection, suchas wireless water quality sensors. Students can also use robotics platforms for understandingbasic concepts in kinetics, control, programming, and intelligent systems. Other projects arerelated to the design and development of floating platforms and turbines for offshore windenergy. While the aim of this course is on integrating general engineering practices with scienceconcepts, we
leaders can orient basic research toward Page 26.1211.3developing ambitious technology platforms that can have practical application, fostercollaboration spanning traditional silos, and facilitate a smooth commercialization process thatincludes all relevant players. Our results show building an organizational culture around theseprinciples can have a dramatic impact on technology transfer outputs. We also propose sevenquestions for future research to encourage further work in this important area.Introduction: The innovation imperative Innovation is a key battleground in the twenty-first century. Economic experts agree, ifany country wants to
Paper ID #12879Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Preferences on Student Receptivity to De-sign ThinkingMs. Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Jessica Menold is a second year graduate student interested in entrepreneurship, the design process, and innovativeness of engineering graduates and professionals. She is currently working as a student mentor in the Lion Launch Pad program, where she works to support student entrepreneurs. Jessica is currently conducting her graduate research with Dr. Kathryn Jablokow on a project devoted to the development of a psychometric instrument that will
lecture courses on developing creativity and research skills. Her current research focuses on identifying impacts of differ- ent factors on ideation of designers and engineers, developing instructional materials for design ideation, and foundations of innovation. She often conducts workshops on design thinking to a diverse range of groups including student and professional engineers and faculty member from different universities. She received her PhD degree in Design Science in 2010 from University of Michigan. She is also a faculty in Human Computer Interaction Graduate Program and the ISU Site Director for Center for e-Design.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of MichiganEli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New
engaged inScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) with the ultimate goal of havingthese students join the STEM workforce after a two-year degree, a 2 (AS) + 2 (BS) pathway or afour-year degree. Building upon previous cooperation among these institutions, Best Practicemethods have been identified and are being implemented to bring about a cultural change thatwill lead to a sustained increase in the production of STEM-trained graduates needed by localhigh-tech businesses. In order to expand the diameter of the STEM pipeline, new non-traditionalstudent populations must be recruited, encouraged and not traditionally “weeded-out.” Ourresearch and Best Practices center on two specific populations: females and non-top 15%students that
’ self-confidence. Infact, without self-confidence, it is difficult for a person to do any of these things.While there are all of these positive impacts of a high level of self-confidence, it is also possible tobecome over-confident, or to have a false confidence or bravado that is not based on truecompetence or mastery of one’s profession. If self-confidence becomes over-confidence, theengineer may lose the ability to accept criticism that improves the design or product. Thisbehavior may occur in design team meetings when engineers, in their zeal to promote and selltheir innovation, blind themselves to valid concerns or valuable modifications regarding theconcept or product that could make it even better. For recent engineering graduates, who
Paper ID #13847Examining the Influence of an Ill- and Well-defined Problems in a First-YearEngineering Design CourseMs. Jessica E S Swenson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Jessica Swenson is a graduate student at Tufts University. She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering with a research focus on engineering education. She received a M.S. from Tufts University in science, technology, engineering and math education and a B.S. from Northwestern University in me- chanical engineering. Her current research involves examining different types of homework problems in mechanical engineering
research in thisarea.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the University of Michigan’s Rackham Merit Fellows program, theNational Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship program, the National ScienceFoundation’s Research Initiation Grants in Engineering Education, the National ScienceFoundation’s CAREER program (GARDE-0846471), and the University of Michigan Center forResearch on Learning and Teaching’s Investigating Student Learning Grant. The study teamthanks the students who volunteered as study participants and Ann Stewart for her help inediting.Bibliography1. Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. London: MIT Press; 1996.2. Dym C, Agogino A, Eris O, Frey D, Leifer L. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and
higher education. She has designed, developed and managed degree, and certificate programs, and has experience as an online instructor, and mentor and trainer of other online instructors.Dr. Thema Monroe-White, SageFox Consulting Group Thema Monroe-White is a senior evaluation and research consultant at SageFox Consulting Group. Prior to joining SageFox, Thema worked as a researcher and evaluator in the areas of mental health, STEM education and commercialization. She has taught in the K-12 environment, served as an instructor and invited guest lecturer for courses in leadership, statistics and cross-cultural psychology at the undergradu- ate and graduate levels. Thema completed her Master’s Degree in Developmental
in preparing future scholars.The blended experience was carefully designed for the graduate students to aid theirdevelopment as engineering education scholars. The graduate students had the opportunity tolearn about research activities through online workshops and then immediately implement theseideas. First, the graduate students practiced interviewing and using the protocol by practicingwith another graduate student. Next they transcribed and analyzed the interview with theirpioneer, and finally, the graduate students authored a profile about their pioneer. Literature on Page 26.1783.3informal science education suggests that informal
Paper ID #12090A Pilot for Integrating Capstone Design with a Two-Semester Innovation &Entrepreneurship Course SequenceDr. Keith G. Sheppard, Stevens Institute of Technology (SES) Dr. Keith G. Sheppard is Associate Dean in the Charles V. Schaefer School of Engineering & Science and a professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering & Material Science. His research interests have included electrochemical aspects of materials synthesis and environmental degradation of materials. His education in the U.K. included B.Sc. (University of Leeds) and Ph.D. (University of Birmingham) de- grees in Metallurgy and a
. Hertzberg is currently Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at CU-Boulder. She teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in measurement techniques, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, design and computer tools. She has pioneered a spectacular course on the art and physics of flow visualization, and is conducting research on the impact of the course with respect to visual perception and educational outcomes. Her disciplinary research centers around pulsatile, vortex dominated flows with applications in both combustion and bio-fluid dynamics. She is also interested in a variety of flow field measurement techniques. Current projects include electrospray atomization of jet fuel and velocity and
, Biomedical Device Design and Manufacturing, Automation and Robotics, and CAE in Manufacturing Processes fields.Mr. Keith G Moran JrMr. Christopher Steven Kremer , Robert Morris University Graduated with magna cum laude honors from Robert Morris University in 2014 with a B.S. in Me- chanical Engineering and a B.S. in Manufacturing Engineering. Participated in numerous engineering projects and achieved several academic accolades during my time at Robert Morris. Currently employed for Westinghouse Electric Company, as an engineer, working primarily in the pumps and motors field.Mr. Bruce Allen Barnes Jr, Robert Morris University Projected completed as a senior undergraduate student at RMU.Justin CosgroveSamuel A Colosimo III
. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.16. Strobel, J., Hess, J. L., Pan, R. C., & Wachter Morris, C. A. (2013). Empathy and care within engineering: Qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers. Engineering Studies, 5(3), 137- 159.17. Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students' ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28-59.18. Johnson, D. G., Genco, N., Saunders, M. N., Williams, P., Seepersad, C. C., & Hölttä-Otto, K. (2014). An experimental investigation of the effectiveness of empathic experience design for innovative concept generation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(5).19. Hoffman, M. L
in Problem-Centered Learning. in Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference (2013).24. Jamieson, L. & Lohmann, J. Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education: Ensuring U.S. engineering has the right people with the right talent for a global society. (American Society for Engineering Education, 2009). at 25. Adams, R. S. & Felder, R. M. Reframing Professional Development: A Systems Approach to Preparing Engineering Educators to Educate Tomorrow’s Engineers. J. Eng. Educ. 97, 239–240 (2008).26. Felder, R. M., Brent, R. & Prince, M. J. Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations. J. Eng. Educ. 100, 89–122 (2011).27. Wenger, E
are strong problem solvers, and who understand how toseek assistance and navigate college campuses, are most likely persist to degree completion.Accordingly, this research seeks to examine a sample of non-traditional college students enrolledin science and engineering programs in four urban community colleges to determine (a) the typesand frequency of support practices they utilize, (b) how such practices influence theirachievement, persistence and transfer status to four year colleges and universities, and (c) how inturn their propensity for innovation and creative problem solving affects such choices andpersistence. The study analyzes the pedagogical practices—practices designed to fostersuccessful transfer from community college to four
involvesthe key factors of substantial time investment, systemic support, and opportunities for activelearning.3 Heck et al. further emphasize the importance of time investment, as their research onteacher professional development indicates that teachers’ use of innovation was greatest in thefirst 80 hours of interaction and then leveled off, but after 160 hours, innovation increasedagain.9 This seems to suggest that a one or two day workshop on incorporating engineeringdesign will not be enough to transform teachers’ practices. Likewise, Guskey identifies the twohighest levels of evaluation of professional development as teacher participants’ use of newknowledge and skills and impact on student learning outcomes.7 Training teachers to utilize the
Bachelor of Science in Public Policy from Georgia Tech in 2008. After graduation Anna spent a year working for a private sector event firm before eagerly returning to her alma mater and joining the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathemat- ics, and Computing in January 2010. Anna completed a Master of Science in Educational Research with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics from Georgia State University in May 2013.Ms. Marcela Nicole Moreno, CEISMC Marcela Moreno is an Educational Outreach Coordinator for three National Science Foundation projects, SLIDER (Science Learning Integrating Design, Engineering and Robotics), AMP-IT-UP (Advanced Man- ufacturing & Prototyping Integrated to
and ASU, she is leading enhancement of Life and Environmental Science ethics education materials for the Online Ethics Center as part of a National Science Foundation sponsored project to improve the site. In the School of Life Sciences, she teaches core graduate courses in Respon- sible Conduct of Research. Ellison also fosters graduate education at ASU through her positions as director of the Masters in Applied Page 26.1560.1 Ethics and the Professions, Biomedical and Health Ethics, executive director for the Biology and Society graduate programs, and a founding member of the university’s
. In Fall 2013, he joined the Engineering Innovation Institute. IPPD is an experiential multidisciplinary design program where teams of students complete real projects for sponsoring companies and agencies. Dr. Stanfill has recruited over 300 industry-sponsored projects and directed the efforts of over 1900 senior-level engineering and business students for the IPPD program. In 2003, he helped create the Integrated Technology Ventures (ITV) program and serves as Chair of the ITV Board of Directors. The ITV program exposes students to the realities of technology start-up companies while assisting UF researchers in commercializing their technological innovations. Virtual companies comprised of engineering
as a tool for knowledge transfer thatenhances and improves scholarship in teaching and learning practice through the sharing ofresearch practice and knowledge. The compendium is a resource where a community of facultyleaders decides what information is relevant to their discipline, discovers and extractsinformation, and raises research questions for future investigation. This compendium isconsistent with Daele’s [18] assertion that CoP are “motivated to initiate a collective reificationactivity in relation to their professional practices.” Another example of knowledge transfer inCoP in academia is the Women in STEM Knowledge Center (www.wskc.org). Developed by theWomen in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN), the Women in STEM Knowledge
and oral communications skills and should therefore beinvestigated further for these outcomes.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work funded by a grant received from the Engineering InformationFoundation.The authors would like to thank Dr. Eric Beckman, who co-instructed the two class sections ofthe Introduction to Chemical Product Design course. The authors would also like to thank andacknowledge the support received from the University of Pittsburgh Engineering EducationResearch Center (EERC) and the Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering.References1. Proske, A., Roscoe, R., & McNamara, D. (2014). Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer- based writing strategy training: effects on motivation
is part of the development team for Clarkson’s First Year Engineering/Interdisciplinary course described in this paper. Her current research interests include the implementation and evaluation of evidence-based effective learning practices in STEM education, environmental education, and energy education.Dr. John C. Moosbrugger, Clarkson University John C. Moosbrugger, PhD, is a Professor of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering and Associate Dean for Academic Programs for the Wallace H. Coulter School of Engineering at Clarkson University.Prof. Peter R Turner, Clarkson University Currently Dean of Arts & Sciences having previously served as Chair of Mathematics and Computer Science, and before that on the
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The DeFINE Program: A Clinical Immersion for Biomedical Needs Identification I. IntroductionThere is a need for biomedical engineering students to more fully engage in the problemidentification and needs-finding stages of the biomedical device design process throughexperiential learning and immersive experiences. Many publications have documented theimportance of immersion outcomes in design, technology commercialization, and overall studentlearning.Kline et al. documents eight best practices for technology commercialization projects that fosterinnovation education and fit a variety of innovation stages that might vary per student design.1Zappe et al. agrees
Paper ID #13507Integration of academic advising into a first-year engineering design courseand its impact on psychological constructsDr. William H Guilford, University of Virginia Will Guilford is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. He is also the Undergraduate Program Director for Biomedical Engineering, and the Associate Dean for On- line Innovation. He received his B.S. in Biology and Chemistry from St. Francis College in Ft. Wayne, Indiana and his Ph.D. in Physiology from the University of Arizona. Will did his postdoctoral training in Molecular Biophysics at the University of