engaging industry to guide the department’s professional formation efforts to prepare students for an increasingly global profession. Le- land holds a Bachelor’s of Science in Organizational Communications and Marketing from the University of Central Missouri.Mrs. Olivera Notaros, Colorado State University, ECE Department Olivera Notaros has finished undergraduate and graduate studies in the Electrical and Computer Engi- neering Department in Belgrade, Serbia. She has held different university teaching positions since 1990. She is currently Adjunct Faculty and Head of Senior Design in the ECE Department at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colorado.Mr. Richard F. Toftness, IEEE High Plains Section Richard
And Internships,” Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, Illinois.7. Singh, S. (2007, September), “Internship Program in the Electrical Engineering Department at the University of Tulsa,” Proceedings of the 2007 Midwest Section Conference of the ASEE, Wichita, Kansas.8. Dabipi, I.K., Arumala, J. O., (2003, June), “Using Summer Internship to Enhance Senior Design Projects for Undergraduate Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. Spring 2016 Mid‐Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8‐9, 2016 GWU Appendix A. Student Internship Survey -- 2015Please
license for multiple usersper installation was easy; thus, we were able to install it in our school computer lab to be used bydifferent students. Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWU Figure 1. An example of a RouterSim’s Network Visualizer user-defined lab scenario showing a router physical interfacesIV. The course implementation: The hybrid modelInstead of a regular textbook, we adopted the TestOut’s Switching and Routing Pro courseware.As it was mentioned in the previous section, this courseware is a complete training solution thatgoes beyond of what a book can offer. This software is based on a comprehensive trainingmethodology that includes video, text
understanding of the target studentpopulation, the Picatinny STEM Education Office constructed and adopted many differentoutreach programs. The next section details many of these outreach programs. Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUIV. Provided Outreach ProgramsAs described in the previous sections the Picatinny STEM Education Office has been focusingon developing and delivering STEM outreach for the last 10 years. This includes conductingoutreach in a diverse range of populations as illustrated in Figure 1 based on a survey of 51Science and Engineering (S&E) professionals currently conducting outreach.6 40 35 30 25 20 15
document as studentspresent, and require students to provide a written response with a concrete plan to improve theirtalk within a few days. Instructors reference previous feedback when watching a student toensure that they don’t repeat past difficulties, and that they are continuously improving.4.0 Lessons LearnedIn this section, we focus on lessons learned that might be useful for other institutions. These arebased on our own experience as instructors as well as feedback based on exit surveys, but moreimportantly, from alumni who experienced the new interventions listed earlier. Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUWhat works, according to alumni: ● Almost to a person, alumni are enthusiastically
. Figure 4: Filene’s Construction Site Boston (MA)The Fig. 4 above is a picture of the ongoing construction. It shows an I-section where I-beams areused to transfer the load of one floor to a lower floor. These high beams are high strength structuralsteel member of the entire building. Again one cannot over-emphasized I-beams are stronger becauseit two flanges and it thicker cross-web can hold more load. They are also used because they have abetter strength/mass ratio, in architecture mass is critical as the more mass you use the more supportyou need. And that is also why gantries are made from I-beams only.Student B Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUBecause it is still in its early phase, as the
,” Proceedings of ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring 2015 Conference, Villanova University, PA, April 10-11, 2015, 1-13.8. Konak, A., Kulturel-Konak, S., Okudan Kremer, G.E., Esparragoza, I.E. “Teamwork Attitude, Interest, and Self-Efficacy: Their Implications for Teaching Teamwork Skills to Engineering Students,” IEEE Frontiers in Education, El Paso, TX, October 21-24, 2015, 4 pages. Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWU9. I. E. Allen and J. Seaman (2014). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States, Babson Survey Research Group and Ouahog Research Group Report.10. Summers, J. J., Waigandt, A., and Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and
demonstrations. Fridays were used for team based learning andclinical/research discussions. First exposure to each week’s course material was usually throughshort videos, simulations, and animations. A sample week is illustrated in Fig 2. Figure 2: Sample week depicting the variety of teaching methods for enzymesSpring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUFor example, during the module on Enzymes, students view short videos, read sections of thetextbooks, and/or practice using simulations to gain an introduction to enzyme kinetics,competitive and non-competitive inhibition, and allosteric modification. Lecture time is used toderive equations and graph data with various inhibitors and activators, while incorporating theuse of
. A physicsclass on Electricity and Magnetism has a good platform to include EEG topics while a physicsclass in modern physics provides ample opportunities to include muon decay when teachingrelativistic correction and scattering cross section. The sustainability of such triggered learningmotivation through the teaching of perspectives in science, technology and society could beenhanced if an independent college course in Science, Technology and Society has a STEMcourse as pre-requisite. Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUThe learning assessment rubric of Highly Competent, Competent, and Needs Improvementversus Participant Deliverables was used. An improvement was observed in the grades ofdiscussion
feed inspiration”. Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUIn a study that involved over 200 engineering consultancies it was discovered that “thesecompanies don’t just wait for inspiration to strike, and they don’t just wait for customers todeliver problems to them. They actively seek opportunities for the sort of innovation that willproduce Intellectual Property (IP) that they can sell. What was interesting was that this searchwas not just an individual, ad hoc process, but was something deliberate and thoughtful, and thatthe companies developed methods for pushing their thinking and then propagated those methodsacross the company.”From this study, it is obvious that innovation is an integral part of any
, energyefficiency, material integrity and client/customer needs. The instructor would ask for explicit Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUwriting on cause and effect relationships in the discussion section of a lab report with emphasison the issue of uncertainty. The assessment results showed that deliverables addressing writingskill could use more practice. Whether the advances in working memory brain scan technologycan help students to develop critical thinking skill is an important future development 34.VII. AcknowledgementsPartial supports from several CUNY grants are gratefully acknowledged. We thank AlexeiKisselev for laboratory support. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.VIII
Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUimpressive experience for students to put on their resumes. Another CUNY requirement oftaking an online course on the prevention of work place violence is another remarkableopportunity for project students to learn.V. ConclusionsUsing teaching topics to enhance undergraduate research experience in EXAFS for corrosionstudy and EEG application project has been studied. The comparison to the project pedagogy inspace weather, bio-molecular electrostatics, and noisy data analysis in gravitational wavedetection are highlighted. The learning assessment rubric was used to show an improvement inthe grades of discussion sections of students. Future studies could include the pedagogy ofusing
engineering concepts. There are have beennumerous studies carried out in-order to develop the best pedagogical techniques to be adopted inan online environment. On such is the work by Schmieder, 2008 [1], and Sarder, 2014 [2] haveboth recommended the following techniques that will promote learners’ active involvement and Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUsocial presence in an online classroom environment: discussion forums, chat logs, web-basedmeetings, virtual class rooms, enforced sequential viewing of lecture videos, and virtual classmeetings. Results of their studies showed that these pedagogical techniques help to facilitystudents’ achievement in an online environment and encouraged effective
delivered online; this category includes bothtraditional and web facilitated courses. The remaining alternative, blended (or hybrid)instruction, has between 30 and 80 percent of the course content delivered online. Following theyear of commercialization of internet as World Wide Web, the online education was started by Spring 2016 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, April 8-9, 2016 GWUfew Universities. Commercial use restrictions were lifted in 1995 for internet. Online educationhas been in existence for the past 15 years catering to the needs of most of the educational areas.Increasingly, the internet is used for various types of online learning for various differentcourses.For the educator of innovations, the improvement in the quality
Mid-Atlantic university created a specificprogramming course for materials science undergraduate students4. This department also createdand integrated several computational modules into the six materials science core courses tosupport solving disciplinary problems. This presented an opportunity to conduct research toidentify effective pedagogical strategies to scaffold student learning in this context 4,5.Identifying appropriate scaffolding methods in this endeavor is important because learningcomputer programming is a complex task in itself. Now, pairing programming with disciplinaryconcepts may increase the complexity of this learning process4. To scaffold the integration of programming concepts with disciplinary concepts, thisstudy
classroom setting.The studied classes come from two small private universities, one in the mid-atlantic and theother in the west. At both institutions, the courses of interest are required junior-levelengineering classes that incorporate simulations into the classroom. The study began Fall 2015,and for that semester the class from the mid-atlantic university was chemical engineering courseon separations with a total of 29 students. The course from the western university was twosections of a required aerospace engineering class on orbital mechanics. These two sections hada total of 67 students which were split into sections of 33 and 34. Required junior-level courseswere chosen for this study since by this point in the curriculum students have had a
librarians who were members of SPEE/ASEE in the 1940s and 1950s have written littleabout their experiences. Johanna E. Tallman, head of the Engineering Library at the Universityof California, Los Angeles, joined ASEE in 1948 and was an active member through the mid-1950s. Her autobiography3, which she published in 1985 following her retirement from theCalifornia Institute of Technology, mentions ASEE only in passing.The primary sources consulted for this paper include the Proceedings of the SPEE, whichprovide a record of the society’s meetings, governance, organization, membership anddiscussions from 1893 to the present. The early volumes are rich sources of information becausethey contain lists of members, correspondence, meeting minutes and
Systems. Through this startup experience, Jack has initiated problem based learning pilot programs enabled through interdisciplinary experiences, in engineering education and entrepreneurial training (e.g. The StartUp Class). Jack is also a Co-PI for the NSF I-Corps Mid Atlantic Regional Node (DC I-Corps) and is an instructor for both the Na- tional and Regional training programs guiding technical professionals through the Lean Startup approach. Jack serves on the Executive Board for the GEM National Consortium and on the Boards of Directors for The Commonwealth Center Advanced Manufacturing (CCAM) and the Roanoke-Blacksburg Technology Center. c American Society for Engineering Education
full time faculty member in the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) department at MSU since August 1994 and currently serves as the Interim Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering. Dr. Astatke is the winner of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) ”National Outstanding Teaching Award,” and the 2012 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Region ”Distinguished Teacher” Award. He teaches courses in both analog and digital electronic circuit design and instrumentation, with a fo- cus on wireless communication. He has more than 15 years experience in the development and delivery of synchronous and asynchronous web-based course supplements for electrical engineering courses. Dr
belief surveys. One of the most commonly used measures is Fisherand Peterson’s Adaptive Expertise Beliefs survey [1]. As part of a larger post-semester survey,researchers at a mid-Atlantic university administered Fisher and Peterson's Adaptive ExpertiseBeliefs survey [1] to students enrolled in two sections of a senior design capstone course.Instructors taught one section of the course using methods based on the principles of adaptiveexpertise, while the other course section involved the use of the traditional lecture-based methodof instruction. Results indicated a significant difference in overall adaptive expertise beliefscores. However, researchers did not find significant differences between the two groups on anyof the individual Fisher and
course [5-7]. It is expected that with the development of these skills, higherretention rates of non-calculus ready students could be achieved.Development of the Course:A study has been conducted in an academic institution in the mid-Atlantic region. Participantswere first year engineering students that were non-calculus ready at the time of enrollment in thestudy. This study was reviewed and approved by the WVU-Institutional Review Board.Course Schedule: The course was developed using the CDIO (conceive, design, implement,operate) educational framework and includes activities that promote students’ problem solvingskills, and introduce students to research, experimentation, and engineering design [8-11]. Table1 illustrates the list of topics
represented a case. We analyzed datawithin cases and then looked across cases for patterns to better understand patterns andrelationships between learning approaches, participation in a CBI workshop, and conceptualunderstanding.Settings and participantsWe conducted this study at a large, public university in the mid-Atlantic region. We focused ontwo sections of a heat transfer course. Both sections were taught by the same instructor and bothsections met three times a week for 50 minutes. However, students in the experimental sectionparticipated in six CBI workshops throughout the semester (Table 2). Each workshop lastedapproximately one hour. Students in the experimental section were assigned one less textbookhomework problem during the weeks when
. This is particularly relevant when students are working adults and rely onemployer tuition reimbursement to fund their education, as employers often pro-rate the amount ofreimbursement based on the student’s course grade.Despite the large body of work in this area, most of the studies were conducted with undergraduatestudents. This study investigates use of PA and SA as an assessment tool for a graduate-level softwareengineering course.III. Course DescriptionThe course used in this study is a graduate level software engineering course in software constructiontaught at a large public research university in the Mid-Atlantic. The course is intended to help studentslearn and apply software engineering principles through developing a large-scale
, web-conferencing, message board, automatic reminders, project repository, task progresstracking, etc. The instructional scaffolds were developed during Spring 2014 and baseline datawas collected during four consecutive semesters from 278 undergraduate and graduate studentsfrom the College of Engineering at a mid-Atlantic public university. Students were recruitedfrom courses with a hybrid instructional delivery with some students present on campus andothers attending live via web-based technology. All the participating students were part of avirtual team with at least two remote members.The implementation of the web-based tool and associated scaffolds required some course-specific customization because the nature of the class project, the
in Engineering. Dr. Ladeji-Osias’ involvement in engineering curricular innovations includes outcomes-based articulation and online delivery of undergraduate engineering degrees. In addition to conducting research on color image fusion and real-time implementation of algorithms, she is the immediate past chair of the Middle Atlantic Section of the American Society for Engineering Education and a member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. She enjoys observing the intellectual and professional growth in students as they prepare for engineering careers.Dr. Cindy S Ziker, SRI International Cindy Ziker, Ph.D., M.P.H., is a Senior Researcher at SRI International’s Center for Technology in Learn
overall better results.References[1]Ural, A and Yost, J., Integration of Finite Element Modeling and Experimental Evaluation in a Freshman Project,Mid-Atlantic American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2010.[2] Howard, E., Williams, R., and Gurganus, S.C., Using Additive Manufacturing and Finite Element Analysis in aDesign-Analyze-Build-Test Project, 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Seattle, WA, USA., 2015.[3] ABAQUS, Student Edition, version 6.14-2, 2014, Simulia, Providence, RI.[4] HyperWorks by Altair Engineering.[5] http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2014-2015/[6] Thomson W. T. and M. D.Dahleh, Theory of vibration with applications, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: PrenticeHall, c1998.[7]Ilanko S. and Monterrubio L.E., The
aloud protocol with another 12students, ages 8 and 9, participating in an engineering summer program for academically at-riskstudents at an urban school. Seven of the students were male and five were female; 9 were Blackand 3 were white.Sample and Procedure for Coding AssessmentsWe collected assessments from grades 3-5 students in 274 classes from 129 schools. In eachclass, teachers had just finished implementing one or more engineering units. Schools werelocated in three states on the east coast, one in New England, one in the Mid-Atlantic region, andone in the South. Half the students were male and half female. Further demographics can befound in Table 2. Students completed the EEPA individually. Table 2: Demographics of Participating
formulation activities (e.g., writing requirements) would stem fromsuch observations and interviews – hence why going to the office was the measure.Sample and ResultsThe sample consisted of 148 first-year engineering students at a public university in the mid-atlantic enrolled in a required first-year engineering course between 2012 and 2015. The twoassessment methods were randomly assigned to students, resulting in half of the samplecompleting each assessment method. The assessments were given on the first day of class.All of these 148 students were assigned the design project on the first day of class, too. Theyworked on self-formed teams, performing nearly all of the work outside of class. Between 2012and 2015, a total of 25 teams completed the
theimpact of PFX on students’ prototyping awareness. In this study, students at a large Mid-Atlantic university were taught three prototyping lensesbased on the PFX methodology: (1) Prototyping for Viability, (2) Prototyping for Feasibility, and(3) Prototyping for Desirability. This paper presents preliminary findings on the relationshipbetween these three prototyping lenses and students’ prototyping awareness, which we define asstudents’ ability to identify their mental models during the prototyping process. We useprototyping awareness as a proxy to measure adoption and implementation of PFX methods. ThePrototyping AWareness Scale, or PAWS was created for this study, and we discuss its internalconsistency and future iterations. Data were
evaluates programmatic inter- ventions designed to recruit, retain and advance diverse faculty at UMBC. Dr. Reed also routinely dis- seminates best practices learned from UMBC’s diversity initiatives at national and international venues. Dr. Reed is on the advisory board for the Mid-Atlantic Higher Education Recruitment Consortium.Dr. Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Renetta Garrison Tull is Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Student Professional Development & Post- doctoral Affairs at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC: An Honors University in Mary- land), where she is the Co-PI and Founding Director for the National Science Foundation’s PROMISE: Maryland’s Alliance for