University Dr. Kristen S Cetin is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University in the Department of Civil, Con- struction and Environmental Engineering.Renee FlemingDr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State UniversityDr. Andrea E. Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Andrea Surovek. P.E. is a research scientist in the area of biomimicry for sustainable construction at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology. She is a fellow of both ASCE and the ASCE Structural Engineering Institute and was awarded the ASCE Winter award in 2016 for contributions to the field of structural engineering. She is the recipient of the ASEE CE Division Seeley Fellowship and the Mechanics Division Beer and Johnston Outstanding
Engineering from the Stanford School of Engineering Product Design program and a M.A. in Education from the Stanford School of Education Learning, Design and Technology program. Micah has also been a co-Editor-in-Chief of AMBIDEXTROUS, Stanford Univer- sity’s Journal of Design.Dr. Gary Lichtenstein, Stanford UniversityDennis Lund, University of WashingtonDr. Karl A Smith, Purdue University, West Lafayette KARL SMITH is Cooperative Learning Professor of Engineering Education, School of Engineering Ed- ucation, at Purdue University West Lafayette and is in phased retirement as MorseAlumni Distinguished Teaching Professor and Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota. His research and development interests
New Faculty Fellow Award for his contributions to engineering education.Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Donald Carpenter is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering and the Director of Assessment at Lawrence Technological University. Prior to being Director of Assessment, Dr. Carpenter was the Founding Director for the Center of Teaching & Learning at Lawrence Tech where he was responsible for conducting faculty development programs. In addition, Dr. Carpenter actively conducts educational and pedagogical research on teamwork, leadership, and ethical development and is Kern Fellow for En- trepreneurial Education.Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli
mathematics in engineering education contexts. She also works in mathematics teacher professional development and design research related to students’ learning of mathematics.Judith Zawojewski, Illinois Institute of Technology Judith S. Zawojewski is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mathematics and Science Education at Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, IL. She received her B.S. in mathematics and education at Northwestern University, and her Masters and Ph. D. degrees in mathematics education at National-Louis University and Northwestern University respectively. She works Page
educationprofessionals to improve delivery and assessment is ongoing, and processes to promotetransferability of research findings are under development.References: 1. American Society for Mechanical Engineering web site, accessed May 6, 2014: “Washington Policy Report May 2013.” 2. FEDERAL SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) EDUCATION 5-YEAR STR ATEGIC PLAN, A Report from the Committee on STEM Education National Science and Technology Council, May 2013 3. National Academy of Engineering (2014), Making a World of Difference, National Academies Press. 4. National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering, www.engineeringchallenges.org, updated 9/2013. 5. Johnson, Steven (2012). Future Perfect
Paper ID #32498Work in Progress: The Development of a Tactile Spatial AbilityInstrument for Assessing Spatial Ability in Blind and Low-visionPopulationsDr. Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University Wade Goodridge is a tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. He holds dual B.S. degrees in Industrial Technology Education and also in Civil and Environmental Engineering. His M.S. and Ph.D. are in Civil Engineering with a focus on fluid mechan- ics. Wade has over 20 years of teaching experience, primarily focused at the University level, but also including 3 years
international engineering teamwork behaviors, the integration, and implementation of team-based assignments and projects into STEM course designs and using mixed-method, especially natural language processing to student written research data, such as peer-to-peer comments. Siqing also works as the technical support manager at CATME research group.Dr. Wei Zakharov, Purdue University at West Lafayette Wei Zakharov is an Assistant Professor of Library Science and Engineering Information Specialist in the Purdue University Libraries. Dr.Zakharov is the faculty liaison to Aeronautical and Astronautical Engi- neering, Aviation and Transportation Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering and Engineering Education. Her
University, College Station. She completed her Bachelors in Electrical Engineering with a Minor in Mathematics from Mississippi State University.Hillary E. Merzdorf, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hillary E. Merzdorf is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research interests are in assessment of design skills, educational technology evaluation, and the ethical use of student data in and for assessment.Dr. Blake Williford, Sketch Recognition Lab Blake received a PhD in Computer Science at Texas A&M University. He previously received a M.S. in Human-Computer Interaction and a B.S. in Industrial Design from Georgia Tech, and has worked professionally as an interdisciplinary
Development, 59(6), 841-863.[7] Fila, N. D., McKilligan, S., & Abramsky, S. (2018). How Engineering Educators Use Heuristics When Redesigning an Undergraduate Embedded Systems Course. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.[8] Daly, S. R., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J. L., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2012). Design heuristics in engineering concept generation. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 601-629.[9] Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group, T. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.[10] Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum
design, engineering ethics, and leadership.Dr. Justin L. Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. Justin L Hess is the Assistant Director of the STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute and an Adjunct Assistant Professor of STEM Education Research in the Department of Technology Leader- ship and Communication at IUPUI. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role in engineering and design; designing STEM ethics curricula; and evaluating learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability. Previously, Justin worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Wel- don School of Biomedical Engineering at Purdue University where he created and refined ethical
education using cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11 (2), 178–198.Aryee, M. (2017). College students’ persistence and degree completion in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): The role of non-cognitive attributes of self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and interest (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seton Hall University.Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21 (4), 495–508.Bartholomew, D. J. (1980). Factor analysis for categorical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 42 (3), 293–312.Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., & Teel
understanding of introductory engineering concepts using active learning strategies.Dr. Ashish Agrawal, University of Cape Town Ashish Agrawal is a postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Cape Town. He received his PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Prior to that, he completed his MS from Virginia Tech and B-Tech from Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, both in Electrical Engineering. His research interests include sociology of education, experiences of faculty and students in engineering, and critical and inclusive pedagogies.Dr. Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Tech Jennifer Case is Head and Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at
assets that students frommarginalized groups possess. However, quantitative critical methods, or “QuantCrit,” cancomplement qualitative critical methods by statistically specifying the kinds of assets possessedby students from marginalized populations as a step toward reimagining institutions that elevatethe importance of those assets. This paper develops a quantitative scale of CCW to help clarifyand refine the concept, while acknowledging the overlaps among and the dynamic nature of theforms of capital emphasized in the original conceptualization. We summarize the preliminaryresults from a pilot survey of students affiliated with Pacific Northwest Louis Stokes Alliancesfor Minority Participation (PNW LSAMP) in science, technology, engineering
AC 2008-906: ACADEMIC PATHWAYS STUDY: PROCESSES AND REALITIESMia Clark, Stanford UniversitySheri Sheppard, Stanford UniversityCynthia Atman, University of WashingtonLorraine Fleming, Howard UniversityRonald Miller, Colorado School of MinesReed Stevens, University of WashingtonRuth Streveler, Purdue UniversityKarl Smith, University of Minnesota Page 13.137.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008Academic Pathways Study: Processes and Realities Page 13.137.2AbstractAmid concerns that U.S. educational institutions are not attracting and graduating sufficientnumbers of science, technology, engineering and mathematics
context of science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, some qualitative studies about Page 13.1391.6teacher decisions in higher education do exist. In the United Kingdom, Young and Irvinginterviewed 46 faculty who taught social policy to undergraduates about their teachingapproaches and methods27. They found that while the majority of the faculty participating in thestudy spent a significant amount of time thinking about teaching and preparing to teach, theyrelied primarily on “tacit knowledge based on their experiences as students and couched in termsused by colleagues.” They made little use of specialized or technical
employer] and has a cube in my office even though his real office is in North Carolina. He introduced himself one day this week and invited me to pick his brain later in the week. I did that today. He encouraged me to stay to true to my ideals, saying "you'll go farther if you're suspended from above rather than trying to build your way up from the ground." Meaning, focus on developing technology that improves 7 people's lives, influencing the next generation of engineers, and doing your absolute best work on every problem you work on. He said to treat every person you interact with as your customer, and your job is to make customers happy. I
membership.New members are recruited each year through assorted avenues and technologies. Flyersare posted around the campus announcing team meeting times and locations. The teamrepresentatives and competition vehicle are stationed outside student housing during fallsemester Welcome Week activities to showcase the team and answer questions.Invitations to participate are posted on the team website and Facebook page. Teamrepresentatives attend freshmen engineering classes to provide information and recruitnew members. These efforts generally produce 50 – 100 interested “new guys” at thefirst meetings of the fall semester. Year in and year out, from an average attendance of 75potential new members, participation on TEAM A dwindles to approximately seven
Application of Interrater Reliability as a Solidification Instrument in a Phenomenological Study. The Qualitative Report Volume 2005. 10(3): p. 439-462.35. Nesbit, J., K. Belfer, and J. Vargo, A Convergent Participation Model for Evaluation of Learning Objects. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 2002. 28(3).36. McCabe, W.L., J.C. Smith, and P. Harriot, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. 2005, New York: McGraw-Hill. 1140.AppendicesAppendix ATable A1: Current version of the FAI rubric used in this workScore Levels – Significant Learning Anchor = 3 or B- Page
study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific
Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World, June 12, 2005 - June 15, 2005. 2005. Portland, OR, United states: American Society for Engineering Education.36. van der Hulst, M. and E. Jansen, Effects of curriculum organisation on study progress in engineering studies. Higher Education, 2002. 43(4): p. 489-506.37. Mandel, P. and B. Süssmuth, Size matters. The relevance and Hicksian surplus of preferred college class size. Economics of Education Review, 2011. 30(5): p. 1073-1084.38. Kennedy, P.E. and J.J. Siegfried, Class size and achievement in introductory economics: Evidence from the TUCE III data. Economics of Education Review, 1997. 16(4): p. 385-394.39. De Clemencia Cosentino, C. and N. Deterding
Ethics, Journal of Management History, Ethics & Behavior, Science and Engineering Ethics, and the Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Students' Perceptions of Tablet-Enhanced Learning Environment on the Development of Communication and Critical Thinking Skills: An Interdisciplinary StudyAbstractThe ubiquitous presence of social media and recent advancement in mobile computing has beenreshaping the higher education technology landscape, which leads to a more competency-based,learner-centered, and technology-driven learning environment. In response to this paradigmshift, Fresno State recently launched its
Page 22.828.3 All alternative problems 2 70.0 n/aA private company, Sapling Learning, provided the online homework system employed in thiswork. While Sapling has been providing online homework for several years in areas likechemistry and biology, Fall 2009 was the first time chemical engineering content was available.The questions are organized by chapter and topic to follow the textbook (Felder in this case) andthe course syllabus. Sapling provided a Ph.D. chemical engineer as a “Technology T.A.” to setup the assignments and assist the instructor. In this case, the Technology T.A. kept theinstructor’s extra effort required to use the Sapling system to less than 1 hour per week. Thecontent is web
AC 2011-1798: STUDENT DESIGNED DESKTOP MODULES IN A THER-MODYNAMICS COURSEDonald P. Visco, Jr., University of Akron Donald P. Visco, Jr. is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Undergradu- ate Studies at the University of Akron. Most recently, he was a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Tennessee Technological University. His current research interests include experimental and computa- tional thermodynamics as well as bioinformatics/drug design. He is an active and contributing member of ASEE at the local, regional and national levels. He is the 2006 recipient of the Raymond W. Fahien Award for Outstanding Teaching Effectiveness and Educational Scholarship as well as the 2009 recipient
Paper ID #25523Work in Progress – Development and Validation of the Ambassador Ques-tionnaireMrs. Melissa G. Kuhn, Old Dominion University Melissa G. Kuhn is a PhD Student in Educational Psychology and Program Evaluation at Old Dominion University. Additionally, she works at the Batten College of Engineering and Technology in educational projects and program coordination.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is Executive Director of The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA.Dr. Shanan Chappell, Old Dominion University c American Society for
her research with the Collaborative Learning Lab, exploring ways to to promote collaborative problem solving in engineering education and provide students with team design experiences that mimic authentic work in industry.Dr. LuEttaMae Lawrence, Carnegie Mellon University LuEttaMae Lawrence is a Postdoc Fellow at Carnegie Mellon at the Human-Computer Interaction In- stitute. She received her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction from the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and her BFA in Graphic Design from Iowa State University. As a learning scientist and design researcher, Lu studies co-design processes to build educational technology and investigates how designs are embedded in authentic learning contexts
mathematics in the Chicago Public School system at Orr Academy High School, an AUSL school. Arastoopour is currently working on the Nephrotex project and is interested in how new technologies are effective and increase student engagement in STEM fields.Dr. Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is an Associate Professor of biomedical engineering with an affiliate appointment in educational psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics, and car- diac function, as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Dr. Cynthia M. D’Angelo, University of Wisconsin, MadisonProf
Florida State University followed by a Master’s de- gree and PhD from Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University. After completing his PhD, he spent the next few years at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory as a Postdoctoral Researcher. His research there was focused on developing new technology for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using superconducting materials. Currently he serves as a teaching faculty member in the department of elec- trical and computer engineering at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering as the capstone design project coordinator. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Exploring Antecedents of Engineering Students’Indirect and Direct Feedback-Seeking
—newinsight can be gained from the analysis. During this phase of our analysis we discussed how ourfour primary themes compared to existing research about teaching Millennials and consideredtheir implications for preparing Millennial engineers to meet the criteria of the Engineer of 2020.These implications are discussed at length in the final section of this paper.Table 2. Description of open coding themes organized by the topics emerging from axial coding Defining the “Millennial Generation Teaching Millennials ≠ Behaviors (e.g., use of technology, ≠ Engineering knowledge and skills multitasking, connection with others, (e.g., fundamentals versus applied, etc
Michigan. His undergraduate degree is in Agricultural Engineering Technology from Michigan State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Measuring the Impact of Experiential LearningAbstractThis is a research paper submitted to the Educational Research and Methods Division.Numerous institutions are focusing on expanding experiential learning opportunities (e.g. client-based projects, international service trips, team competitions, etc.) for engineering students. Kolb[1] defines experiential learning as an iterative process involving conceptualization, activeexperimentation, concrete experience, and reflective observation. Experiential learning has alsobeen identified as an
AC 2007-692: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN STUDENT ACADEMICPERFORMANCE AND ATTITUDESIsmail Orabi, University of New Haven Ismail I. Orabi, Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of New Haven. He received his Ph.D. from Clarkson University, and his MS degree from the State University of New York and B.S. from Cairo Institute of Technology (now Helwan University), all in Mechanical Engineering. He has published over 25 technical articles in refereed journals and conference proceedings. His research interests include theoretical and computational investigation in the area of mechanical vibrations and dynamic systems and control. Professor Orabi has taught courses in both undergraduate