, however, is reduced due to limited interaction, delayingfeedback until after an exam, and tediousness of many repeating laboratory sessions.We are implementing steps to teach manufacturing laboratory to a large class of 250 studentseach semester. Complementary online instructional videos and class lectures, Clickerassessment, regular grade feedback, and cellular manufacturing laboratory exercises are utilized.Laboratory exercises are grouped into cellulars to save resources, space, and are synchronizedwith relevant lectures to facilitate students’ understanding. For each laboratory exercise, theoverall lab objectives are covered in class, but details of tooling and machine operation areshown using online professional videos so that students can
been chosen as the teaching medium. Three main aspects of theteaching methods include: 1) In-class teaching of lecture material (i.e., casting processes) 2)Hands-on sand casting laboratory where students are engaged in conducting and assisting invarious steps of sand casting process (i.e., premixing, mold preparation, actual casting process,trimming sprues, runners, gates etc.) 3) Numerical and graphical analysis of the casting processthrough simulation. The integrated methodology would be comprised of classroom and labactivities, in which two sessions are conducted in the classroom environment, and one session isconducted in the casting lab. The first classroom lecture incorporates describing the variousaspects of the casting processes such
collision with the gripper and a piece of loading equipment. Thegripper was demolished. The student was able to use rudimentary machine shop knowledgeand guidance from the Laboratory Engineer to fabricate a new part and later created aSolidWorks file to allow for 3D printing of replacement parts (Appendix A). It was a chanceto learn more advanced machining techniques and also a lesson for the necessity of slowspeeds while teaching new points.The tight working space students had to program in at the screw presentation area wasexceedingly difficult to work in due to the nature of robots. The expected motion of the robotand what the robot actually does (or does not do) tend to be two very different issuesaltogether. There were several close calls with
Lowell.3.1 Lab Setup and Facility RequirementsThe requirements of a successful CNC laboratory include: adequate space, proper electrical ser-vice, and adequate personnel resources, such as teaching assistants and IT support for the com-puters.34 The laboratory at University of Massachusetts Lowell has been setup in “CNC bays” toaccommodate groups of up to four students per CNC machine. A CNC mill and a computer canbe seen in Figure 3-1. Figure 3-1: Single Table Setup for a ShapeOko II CNC Mill.The CNC laboratory space occupies approximately 750 ft2 of a 1700+ ft2 laboratory that whatwas formerly used for aerodynamics experiments and senior capstone design. The space satisfiesmany requirements for setting up a lab including
Paper ID #12305Experience with Enhancement of Green Energy Manufacturing Learning inCourse and Laboratory DevelopmentDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different engineering and technology courses at undergraduate and
basedapproach and the kinesthetic learning style has been adopted throughout all laboratory sections.From students’ comments, the teaching approach was very successful. By the end of theacademic year, students have developed their own various projects using the knowledge theylearned from PLC Programming and Industrial Automation courses. Some of the projects havebeen further advanced as a student research paper published at the college technology dayconference, ASEE regional conferences or the Latin American Caribbean Conference forEngineering and Technology. Moreover, these courses are intended to enhance careeropportunities for the students in Mechatronics Engineering program. Currently some of ourgraduates have chosen their careers in the area of
Paper ID #12289Incorporating Emerging and Sustainable Practices in Teaching Manufactur-ing MaterialsDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel UniversityDr. Michael G Mauk P.E., Drexel UniversityProf. Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso Dr. Tseng is a Professor and Chair of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering at UTEP. His research focuses on the computational intelligence, data mining, bio- informatics and advanced manu- facturing. Dr. Tseng published in many refereed journals such as IEEE Transactions, IIE Transaction, Journal of Manufacturing Systems and others. He has been serving as a principle investigator of
, G. A., & Kazlauskas, E. J. (1998), A Virtual Factory Teaching System in Support of Manufacturing Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 459-467.[6] Radharamanan, R, & Jenkins, H. E. (2008), Laboratory learning modules on CAD/CAM and robotics in engineering education. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 4(2), 433- 443.[7] Bischoff, R., Kurth, J., Schreiber, G.R, Koeppe, R. Albu-Schäffer, A., Beyer, A., Grunwald, G. (2010), The KUKA-DLR Lightweight Robot arm-a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing. Paper presented at the Robotics (ISR), 2010 41st international symposium on and 2010 6th German conference on robotics
Paper ID #12552The Chisel Test: A Simple, Scalable Learning Activity to Compare ColdWorking, Hot Working, and Quench Hardening of SteelsProf. Julia L. Morse, Kansas State University Salina Julia Morse is Associate Professor and Program Coordinator for Mechanical Engineering Technology at Kansas State University, K-State Salina. A Certified Manufacturing Engineer (CMfgE) and a Certified Enterprise Integrator (CEI), she teaches lecture and laboratory courses in the areas of computer-aided design, manufacturing and materials, and automation systems. Prof. Morse earned a B.S in Industrial Engineering from the University of
Patents on Computer Science. He also serves as honorary professor and visiting professor for a number of institutions including Xiamen University, Dalian University of Technology, and Zhejiang University of Technology. Dr. Huang received the Robert A. Dougherty Outstanding Young Manufacturing Engineer Award from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) in 2005. In addition to many industrial projects (supported by federal agencies including US Army Benet Laboratories and NASA, state agencies including Ohio Department of Development and Ohio Aerospace Institute, and companies including Procter & Gamble, Daimler- Chrysler, and Pilkington North America), he has been awarded five grants from the National Science
Paper ID #13396Hands-on Manufacturing Concepts Taught to Sophomore Level Students Dur-ing a Unique Field Session ExperienceProf. Jenifer Blacklock, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Jenifer Blacklock is the Assistant Department Head in the Mechanical Engineering department at Col- orado School of Mines. Jenifer is active in the Undergraduate Curriculum in the Mechanical Engineering department and is an advocate of using hands-on-learning tools to help develop strong math, science and engineering foundations.Dr. Derrick Rodriguez P.E., Colorado School of Mines Dr. Rodriguez is a Teaching Associate Professor at the Colorado School
Exposition. [4] Felder, M. and Brent, R., 1996, “Navigating the bumpy road to student-centered instruction”, College Teaching, Vol. 44, No. 2, p. 43 - 47. [5] Bonwell, J. & Eison, J., 1991, “Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom”, Technical Report AHSE-ERIC, Higher Education Report No. 1. [6] Adams, S., 2000, “Project-based learning in a statistical quality control course”, Proceedings of 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. [7] Schmahl, K., 1997, “Unique approach to total quality management in a quality planning and control laboratory”, Proceedings of 1997 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. [8] Besterfield, D., 2009, Quality Control (8th edition), Prentice Hall Inc
Paper ID #11329Development of a Solvent-Based Prepreg TreaterMs. Nikki Larson, Western Washington University After receiving my bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering from Bradley University, I started working for Boeing. While at Boeing I worked to receive my master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis in Materials and Manufacturing. After leaving Boeing I spent several years in equipment research and development at Starbucks Coffee Company. From there I decided my heart lied in teaching and left Starbucks to teach Materials Science Technology at Edmonds Community College. I eventually moved to
pedagogical research and undergraduate research projects, and his research interests include manufacturing laboratory pedagogy and writing pedagogy.Dr. Wendy M. Olson, Washington State University Vancouver Dr. Wendy Olson is a tenured Associate Professor of English and specialist in rhetoric and composition. She serves as the Director of Composition and Writing Assessment at Washington State University Van- couver, where she teaches undergraduate courses in first-year composition and professional and technical writing, as well as graduate courses in writing studies theory and pedagogy. Page 26.924.1
electrical engineering teaching lab with equipment such as power supplies, soldering stations, oscilloscopes, and other diagnostic equipment, which became essential in the latter steps of the project. The shop spaces are shown in Figure 4. Other tools the students were allowed indirect access to included CNC machining equipment, located in a different machine shop in the same building, and an abrasive waterjet cutter. Figure 4: The MIT International Design Center rapid prototyping laboratory (left) and
, skills and attitude required for value creation…’(http://www.engr.uky.edu/mfs/). One aspect of the program that makes it more innovative than just another onlineprogram is the transformation of features unique to MFS from a face-to-face format to a virtualformat for effective and successful online delivery. A high level of faculty-student interactions,laboratory work and interactive simulations are hallmarks of MFS coursework. The program alsobenefits from instruction by the very successful lean manufacturing systems group established atthe University of Ketnucky to teach the practices of the Toyota Production System forcontinuous improvement. Lastly, the MFS boasts faculty with internationally recognizedexpertise in sustainable
the National Network in Manufacturing Innovation-NNMIinitiative6-7 is still extremely minimal. The course structure focuses on gaining self-awareness ofprofessional motivations and provides a knowledge set of the latest innovations, advancements,and entrepreneurship concepts in today’s manufacturing field overall. Guest lectures providedthroughout the semester focus of these key deliverables.A number of tools in teaching with technology is also practiced in MET3060. They are listedbelow: • Classroom Response Systems known as Clickers are frequently used to receive quick feedbacks from course students. Such tools are also efficient to keep students focused on lecture topics and laboratory practices. • G and M functions are
Paper ID #12556Anatomy of Assessment of Manufacturing Design Engineering Academic Pro-gram – Do’s and Don’tsDr. Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor at the Department of Applied Engineering at National University, Cali- fornia. Dr. Viswanathan is an educator, researcher and administrator with more than twenty-five years of industrial and academic experience encompassing engineering and environmental consulting, research and development, and technology development. Career experience includes teaching at the University level, conducting fundamental research, and developing continuing educational
Paper ID #12629MAKER: Design and Create with Natural DyesDr. Polly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Lafayette College. Besides chemical engineering courses, she teaches an engineering course to nonengineering students. Her current research interests include critical thinking evident in student writing and assessing learning in experiential learning activities. Page 26.1104.1 c American Society for Engineering
time. Contemporary manufacturers have the option of selecting optimumtechnologies or processes to suit their manufacturing environment. Fast paced transformations inEngineering Technology (ET) field require new and enhanced learning and teaching strategies inengineering technology curriculum. More than ever, the educational advance is leaning towardsmeeting the demands of industrial world. Engineering Technology curricula needs to adapt tonovel technologies and modern tools by enabling students to acquire meaningful and relevantpractices. Laboratory activities should be incorporated into dry-lectured courses, being vital toET programs, since they are ultimately enhancing the understanding process, leading towardsdeveloping experience-led
, SouthAfrica.25 Hines and Lethbridge26 also presented a report on development and creation of a leanuniversity.Besides the applicability of lean principles at universities, there have been studies onimplementing lean in the classroom and laboratories. Tatikonda 2 reported that by applying leanprinciples, it is possible to refine the course content to enhance student understanding. Heapplied the lean tools to design, teach, and assess accounting courses that helped students gain abetter knowledge and skills required by the employers. In addition, the applicability of leanmanufacturing to university laboratories was investigated by Sreedharan and Liou.27 It has beenreported that students working on lean projects and following lean in laboratories
Paper ID #11385MAKER: Whack-a-Mole for PLC ProgrammingDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state
teaching that included an emphasis on laboratory experiences, and a willingness to engage undergraduates in scholarship activities. Recent hires (8 in total) have shifted the faculty mix to one that is now predominantly Ph.D. qualified. However, most have some industrial experience, and all have backgrounds that will help in promoting these core values and mission of the department. The old technology programs were effective in their hands-on approach in large part because of a collegial and collaborative environment that existed between faculty and the department’s highly trained technical staff. This was to be maintained in the new programs. The concerns of staff and their role in supporting the new programs was thus a
Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. Page 26.1331.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Research Experiences for Teachers in Mechatronics, Robotics, and Industrial AutomationAbstractU.S. manufacturers are seeking highly skilled workers to hire in industrial automation andcontrol jobs. Encouraging active participation of secondary school teachers and two-year collegefaculty in university
engineering program to the Six Sigma green belt standard. The map shows that programs generally deliver essential statistical methods and content. Other topics in the standard, such as ‘Piloting your solution’, are more suited to experiential activities in laboratories and projects. The outcome of the paper is an indication of how the standard manufacturing curriculum supports the Six Sigma standard. In addition, the paper will highlight aspects of the standard that do not require the addition of new courses but can enhance traditional topic coverage. 2. Six Sigma Green Belt Body of Knowledge The topics listed below are summarized from the American Society for Quality Body of 1Knowledge for
learning and with respect toprograms and courses, they describe how will the successful learner be changed. Theresponsibility of the course provider or instructor is to formulate (i) objectives (ii)instructional activities and materials and (iii) assessments as defined below: i. Objectives: Objectives thoroughly clarify and narrow the outcomes to specific and measurable goals. They identify what is to be accomplished in terms of comprehension, application and integration. ii. Instructional Activities and Materials: Instructional Activities refers to teaching and teaching-related activities such as preparing for and conducting class meetings, including laboratory work and developing instructional materials. iii
to describe the field. The manufacturing engineering education providesproduction related knowledge such as customer focus, quality and continuous improvement,manufacturing processes, product design, process design, laboratories, and many others. Fourpillars are: (i) Materials and manufacturing processes: understanding the behavior and propertiesof materials as they are altered and influenced by processing in manufacturing; (ii) Product,tooling, and assembly engineering: understanding the design of products and the equipment,tooling, and environment necessary for their manufacture; (iii) Manufacturing systems andoperations: understanding the creation of competitive advantage through manufacturingplanning, strategy, and control; (iv
low-cost competingMassive Open Online Courses or MOOCs offered by organizations like Coursera or EdX,with a goal of teaching large numbers of students through automated learning modulesand testing. These phenomena lead to a critical question: What is the value-add of an on-campus experience that cannot be achieved through these emerging online, low-costprograms? In our view, there are at least three responses to this question. First, the active, problem-based learning in teams, coupled with opportunities for community service learningavailable through an on-campus higher educational experience can significantly trumpany online MOOC-type experience. Many higher educational institutions, including ourown, recognize this and actively foster
Paper ID #13651MAKER: Applying 3D Printing to Model Rocketry to Enhance Learning inUndergraduate Engineering Design ProjectsDr. Sven G. Bilen, Pennsylvania State University, University Park SVEN G. BILEN,´ Ph.D., P.E. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Electrical Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering at Penn State and Head of the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs. His educational research interests include developing techniques for enhanc- ing engineering design education, innovation in design, teaching technological entrepreneurship, global product design, and systems
and exploration of diversity through standard coursework are current interests. Page 26.557.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Using Robotics as a Tool to Engage Students in Technical CurriculumAbstractStudent engagement is a necessary but complicated variable within STEM education, especially when dealing withtechnical curriculum. There are fewer curriculum resources available for teachers which are structured around aTechnology and Engineering (T & E) STEM focus, and integrating robotics activities into teaching strategies fortechnical subjects provides an