learning methodologies do necessarily require additional work onthe part of students as well as faculty (Barrows, 2000). A pioneer in the area of problem-basedlearning, McMaster University Professor Emeritus, Dr. Donald R. Woods describes acurriculum that is significantly different from the traditional discipline centered curriculum(Woods, 1994). Discovery approach aims to march a step further, when compared with problem-basedlearning. Here the instructor may benefit from the ideas provided by Intel Education. (http://www.intel.com/education/designprojects/) 1. Authentic project work puts students in the driver's seat of their own learning. 2. Instructors should take advantage of curriculum developed by teachers in a large
Paper ID #23769Mission Engineering CompetenciesMs. Nicole A.C. Hutchison, Stevens Institute of Technology Dr. Nicole Hutchison is a Research Engineer at the SERC. Her primary work through the SERC in- cludes the Helix project. Previously she was a member of the BKCASE research team. Before joining Stevens, she spent 5 years working for Analytic Services, supporting the US Departments of Defense and Homeland Security. She holds a PhD in systems engineering from Stevens and her INCOSE CSEP.Sergio Luna , Stevens Institute of Technology Sergio Luna is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute
, Lessonswere presented and In-Class Problem Solving was conducted with the support of live polling.The Lessons presented in the classroom were the same as the Lessons offered in video form onBlackboard™. However, the Instructor delivered the Lessons live in the classroom andannotated the PowerPoint™ by writing on a tablet PC screen and projecting for student viewing.The classroom environment allowed students to ask questions during the Lesson, and studentscould choose to take notes on printable PowerPoint™ handouts or simply focus on thediscussion. The Lessons were generally short, approximately 5-15 minutes in length, andintroduced theory and equations as well as often a brief example.In addition, students in the classroom participated in In-Class
Paper ID #19345Development of Enhanced Value, Feature, and Stakeholder Views for a Model-Based Design ApproachDr. William A Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Professor of Engineering Management and Associate Dean of Innovation at Rose-Hulman. His teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, quality, manufacturing systems, in- novation, and entrepreneurship. As Associate Dean, he directs the Branam Innovation Center which houses campus competition teams, maker club, and projects. He is currently an associate with IOI Partners, a consulting venture focused on innovation tools and
/computer science program students as a good example of systems engineering. In fact arecent publication by the US Department of Transportation 9 highlights this fact where differentarchitectures (mechanical, electrical, computers and communications), including governmentpolicy, are integrated into designing one product.This paper is organized as follows. In section II theory and impact of this technology is Page 26.745.3discussed. V2V Implementation issues are presented in Section III. Conclusions are given insection IV. The authors stress that this paper is an extension of an Electrical Engineeringundergraduate project presented in the context
computing in the freshman engineering program. Bursic has done research and published work in the areas of engineering and project management and en- gineering education. She is a member of IIE and ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Pennsylvania. Page 25.479.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Does the Use of Clickers Increase Conceptual Understanding in the Engineering Economy Classroom?AbstractResponse devices or “clickers” are seeing increased use in many engineering classrooms. Thesedevices allow students to anonymously
NSF funded project in the area of systems thinking. Morteza’s works have been published in presti- gious journals including, Expert Systems With Applications, Engineering Management Journal, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, International Journal of Procurement Management, Int. Jour- nal of System of Systems Engineering, and Int. Journal of Engineering Education. Moreover, he is a reviewer in several journals and conferences including, IEEE TEM, IEEE Systems, Systems Engineer- ing, IEEE VR, ASEE, ASEM, HAI, TEI, CSCW, CHI PLAY, etc. He is a member of ASEM, ASEE, INFORMS, IEEE, INCOSE, and IISE. His main areas of research interest are systems thinking, complex systems, engineering education
and Discovery Services team by utilizing relational database and data visualization skills. Currently, she is working with the Virginia Department of Transportation to support its project acquisition process with data analysis, systems integration, and risk management.Prof. Reid Bailey, University of Virginia Reid Bailey is an Associate Professor at the University of Virginia in the Department of Systems and Information Engineering.Dr. Michael C Smith, University of Virginia Mike Smith earned his B.S. and M.S. at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville and Ph.D. from the Uni- versity of Missouri - Columbia. He has worked across a variety of application domains including man- ufacturing, transportation, defense
instructional design expert for such a project like an online coursetransformation as described in this paper. Instructional design in engineering education isrelatively new. It would be worth to seek out for help from instructional design expertise. Nomatter how the mode of course delivery is determined, well-designed quality instruction is amust to be considered first for creating a better learning experience. Page 25.787.6Appendix A: Guided Questions for Course Evaluation SurveyQ: Describe your time commitment for this course considering the following questions: • What was the (average) amount of time you spent on this course per week (from Monday
different majors, they canchoose the system they are most familiar with. First they need to gather useful information, andthen set up their system model to simulate its behavior. Two or three students can work as agroup, and they can collaborate and improve the model they created. After completing thesimulation and verification, they need to write a project report and present the result to the wholeclass. Besides, students are also required to write four essays on the remaining five kinds ofsystems. In these essays students need to review the concepts and theories, and include at leastone application.II. Course OutlineThe first part of this course is an introduction to the basic concepts of system thinking. First,stock and flow are introduced as
they seek to modernizeand produce more electricity. They must consider renewable energy systems from the onset ofdevelopment.Renewable EnergyRenewable energy sources offer great potential to solving some of Africa’s energy problems. Asshown in figure four (4), renewable energy use is projected to continue increasing however itdoes not keep pace with use from natural gas or coal. Therefore renewable energy solutions mustbe developed to reduce the dependency on coal for instance.Africa has many avenues for renewable energy including: • Solar power • Geothermal energy • Hydropower • Biomass energy • Wind energy Page 22.1237.7
) Spaceship Earth (4 minutes, 4 team members) Think Globally (4 minutes, 4 team members) International Trade (8 minutes, 4 team members) Letter-to-the-Editor (free topic, solo, letter submitted externally) International Business (8 minutes, 4 team members) Energy (3 minute elevator talk, solo, to Michigan Senator (actor)) Water (3 minute elevator talk, solo, to US Senator (actor)) The Internet (8 minutes, 4 team members, plus formal Q&A section) Water Scarcity (8 minutes, 4 team members, plus formal Q&A section) Final Project Proposal (6 minutes, 4 team members, Q&A section) Page 22.763.4 Final
Paper ID #21024Development of a Survey Instrument to Evaluate Student Systems Engineer-ing AbilityDiane Constance Aloisio, Purdue University Diane Aloisio is a PhD candidate in the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Purdue University. Her research concentrates on taking a systems approach to finding the common causes of systems engineering accidents and project failures. Diane received a dual BS degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from University at Buffalo in New York.Dr. Karen Marais, Purdue University Dr. Karen Marais’ educational research focuses on improving systems engineering education. She is
activities, plans and projects to turn the Strategic Intent into reality.Operations professionals will need to provide company leaders with a clear picture of thecompany’s capabilities in terms of technologies and their innovations. They will need to findchallenges that serve the deployment of the corporate strategies in ways the operation’semployees find interesting and engaging. They will explore new areas of operation andknowledge that take advantage of teamwork and shared technical expertise. They have alsoknowledge of the rhythms and cycles of technological change, which they can apply to decisionsrelated to product innovation.One of the additional resources employed in the class is the analysis and discussion of a videorelated to the
exploration, sys- tem of systems, virtual reality and complex systems, systems simulation, risk, reliability, and vulnerability in critical infrastructures with applications to diverse fields ranging from the military to industry. His pub- lications appeared in several ranking journals including the IEEE Systems Journal, and the Computers & Industrial Engineering Journal. His total awarded projects exceed $ 4.2 M including National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Defense (DOD), Industry, and other Research Laboratories.Dr. Lesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University Lesley Strawderman received her Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Pennsylvania State University in 2005. She has also received a M.S.I.E
pedagogical digital twins in theeducation of automation engineers.Role of digital twin in MBSEModel Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) augments traditional systemsengineering by focusing on the creation and exploitation of domain models as theauthoritative sources of truth and the primary means for information exchangeamong engineering and project management personnel. However, MBSE, whichbegan with an initial focus on upfront engineering, is gradually working its way tospanning the full system life cycle. In particular, MBSE is currently addressingchallenges associated with verification and testing of the system model. This iswhere digital twin technology can play a key role. When incorporated into MBSE,digital twins can greatly enhance verification
need has arisen to define a body ofknowledge relevant to SE.BKCASE is a four year old knowledge-based project with a scope to define a SE Body ofknowledge (SEBoK9) and then use SEBok to develop a graduate reference curriculum for SE,called GRCSE8. A reference curriculum exists at the graduate level for systems engineering(SE), but not at the undergraduate level at present9. The document is ‘forward’ looking withprogram objectives being fulfilled five years after graduation by students in their near to mid-term of their careers. This is in keeping with GRCSE’s goal to develop a professional master’sdegree in SE; that is, a degree intended for someone who will either enter the workforce as asystems engineer, or who is already in the workforces
. The 20 characteristics chosen bythe author was based on Deming’s 14 points that pertained to TQM. This was recorded in a spreadsheet form as shown in Appendix B. Theseportfolios can also be graded, evaluated and assessed using a variety of rubrics andassessment tools. The author has previously presented some of these results in a form atthe 114th ASEE Annual Conference in Honolulu, Hawaii (Narayanan 2007). Theauthor plans to generate and utilize a rubric for purposes of holistic assessment. Thisrubric is based on Washington State University’s Critical Thinking Project. This isshown in Appendix D. The 20 characteristics chosen by the author are recorded and incorporated intoan excel spreadsheet for documenting collected data
project work site was set uponline to allow the teachers to continue to communicate as they implement the activities in theirclassrooms, and provide further feedback and implementation assessment with different settings.Feedback after the workshop was very positive, and the organizers hope to repeat and expand theprogram.Introduction and FormatThe motivation for this workshop arose from a desire to introduce more K-12 educators toconcepts of systems engineering, in an effort to ultimately attract more students into this field.Previous research and experience has shown that if K-12 educators are not familiar with orconfident in basic engineering concepts or specific engineering disciplines, they will not be ableto effectively encourage their
demonstrate a basic understanding of the engineeringdesign process and show basic competency in the KSAs measured by the STSS.KSA # KSA Category Number of Items 1 Identify and define system boundaries and external interfaces 1 2 Identify major stakeholders and understand that stakeholders must 1 be involved early in the project lifecycle 3 Identify possible technical performance measures [specifications] 2 for determining the system’s success 4 Understand the different types of architecture 2 5 Understand the need to explore alternative and innovative ways
systems, systems thinking and complex system exploration, system of sys- tems, virtual reality and complex systems, systems simulation, risk, reliability and vulnerability in critical infrastructures with applications to diverse fields ranging from the military to industry. His publications appeared in several ranking journals including the IEEE Systems Journal, and the Computers & Industrial Engineering Journal. His total awarded projects exceed $ 4.2 M including National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Defense (DOD), Industry, and other Research Laboratories.Dr. Michael Andre Hamilton, Mississippi State University Dr. Michael A. Hamilton is an Associate Director at Mississippi State Institute for System
students reportedmoderate to great learning gains because of their interaction with the faculty, engagement ingroup work and hands-on activities during class, and discussion of course learning goals.In the current paper, we discussed our theoretical framework, analytical methodology, andpreliminary findings. Our future work includes continuing to analyze data from the first year ofthe project. Also, over the next three years, we will collect and analyze data from future offeringsof the Structures course and from the two other courses at our partner institutions.References 1 PCAST (2012). Report To The President Engage To Excel
conceptual discussions.Problem definitionTo overcome that deficiency, to improve teaching, and enhance learning of students, instructorshave over time developed novel and innovative concepts [7] that include, but are not limited, to: 1. Course projects Page 25.231.2 2. Software assignments 3. Journal reading and research 4. Online help, class handouts, and other ancillary materials.However, most of such efforts rely on instructor’s experience and his/ her desire and initiative toimprove teaching skills. Since many OR instructors are not familiar enough with the vastresources available in the area of student learning, they usually do not
between negative feedback and stability. It was also amazing how it applied to different order systems. Was very helpful and useful for me in my senior project class. It is indeed useful. I still visualize it when working with control/feedback systems in other classes. The analogy was very easy to imagine in the case of the car race because I drive a car and have first-hand knowledge of how driving a car works. By taking an analogy that was easily translated and related to everyday life, I believe I was more accurately able to understand steady-state errors. Page 23.1290.14 The analogy helped me to understand what would
development project in responseto a sponsor customer’s needs. The Academy requires foundational core courses for all studentsprovide a broad and thorough general undergraduate education in basic sciences, engineering,humanities, and social sciences [6].The SE Program is governed by a board comprised of the heads of the seven cooperatingacademic departments and an SE academician holding the title of Director of SystemsEngineering. The Director of SE also chairs a working level committee of teaching facultyrepresentatives from each SE-cooperative department. Program modifications, includingassessment changes, typically begin in the SE Committee as proposals that are ultimatelypresented with recommendations to the SE Board for dispositioning. Assessment
, that bench-top lathes can be considered as viable alternatives totheir industrial sized cousins. Similarly, an analysis of the responses from faculty and industrysuggest that bench-top lathes are a viable alternative to larger industrial lathes. Bench-top lathes,because of their size, have limitations, such as reduced capacity and less rigidity, therebyrestricting the size materials that can be produced by these lathes. However, because of materialcosts, it may be more appropriate for students to work on smaller projects in educational settings.Finding ways to continue to educate students using effective pedagogical practices and preparingthem for various field of work may require some creative thinking in a time of fiscal
organized concept maps.Assessment Administration Time and Details Provided. Lavi et al.’s [23] assessment had oneof longest administration times with teams submitting their first version of their concept modelsmid-semester and a second version at the end of a semester. With more time, came more levelsof detail as the first conceptual model had to have at least three levels of detail and the secondmodel had to have four or five levels of detail (see “complexity levels” in “Identifying IndividualElements” above). Rehmann et al.’s [27] assessment took place over seven weeks, or half of onesemester, with instructors providing feedback to students on one part of their projects each week.With more time, came more details about a system. In the case of
and a B.S. in industrial engineer- ing from West Virginia University. Componation works in product and system development with primary research interests in project and systems management, decision theory, and engineering economics. He has managed and supported research efforts with DOD, NASA, and numerous defense and aerospace in- dustries. He a member of the Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE), the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and a Fellow with the American Society of Engineering Management (ASEM). Page 25.923.1