shown by comparison in Table 1.Table 1: Engineering degree recipients for U.S. citizens or permanent residents. UNM, B.S. (21-22) UNM, Ph.D. (21-22) National, Ph.D. (2019)All recipients 266 23 4725U.S., females 79 0 1312Latinas 36 0 91Engineering and research identity has been used as an analytical lens for describing andunderstanding the achievements and persistence of students in engineering curriculums [10]–[16]. These studies have also proposed interventions that might increase student interest andconnection to their engineering field of study [17]–[19]. Further these studies
-semester project course,(3) approaches of ET students in handling cutting-edge technology, (4) the competition rules andscoring, and (5) student feedback and discussion. This paper will serve as a teaching aid for theinstructors currently teaching or planning to teach senior design courses in the near future. Mostspecifically, the paper will help the new junior faculty members in planning the course andadapting grading and reporting procedures. In the next section, a brief overview of the coursestructure, objectives, outcomes with project requirements and team selection are presented.2. Course Structure, Objectives, and Learning OutcomesIn order to offer an interdisciplinary project experience to ET students at OSU, EET and METprogram integrated
Cybersecurity program and serves as Academic Coordinator of the M.S. in Software Engineering Program at West Virginia University. She has served on program and organizing committees of many international conferences and workshops.Dr. Erin Carll, University of Washington Erin Carll is a research scientist at the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Research for STEM Equity. She earned a PhD and MA in Sociology as well as a certificate in demographic methods and a concentration in social statistics from UW. She also earned an MA in Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies from Columbia University, a BA in Political Science and Russian Studies from Central Connecticut State University, and an AA in Liberal
structuredthe methodology as follows: a. Narrative Collection: Each co-author, representing a distinct national background, shares their personal narrative. These narratives encompass their experiences, challenges, and successes in navigating U.S. academia as an international faculty. This process includes documenting instances of cultural adjustment, professional development and encounters with institutional barriers [16]. We presented each narrative based on themes like transitional experiences, our experiences as graduate students, then transitioning into our first professional roles (postdoc, junior faculty etc), and then finally moving towards post- tenure experiences. b. Integration of Insights: Finally, the
virtual lab experiences havemuch more possibilities without being limited to lab courses. The project team and faculty in EEsuccessfully integrated laboratory experiences into purely theoretical courses via Hardware-in-Homework (HiH) concept [13, 14]. The Analog Discovery kit is a good example of HiH, whichcan play an important role for students who learn EE materials in an online setting. The uniquemeasurement features of the Analog Discovery kit can be appropriately applied to lower to upper-level courses [14]. Due to its readily available and portable nature, it will be beneficial forstudents who learn well with hands-on activities. With a growing need of an integration of online labs in engineering curriculum, it isimperative that we
Louisiana State University a gift from an alumnus made possible the establishment of auniversity-wide program to improve undergraduate students’ communication skills. As weinitially described in a 2006 paper, the Communication across the Curriculum (CxC) programwas established in 2004 with an initial emphasis on engineering students.¹ A key element of theCxC program was the inception of Communication-Intensive (C-I) courses. C-I courses areintended to be integrated into existing discipline-specific courses, with additional requirementsfor emphasis on two of the four modes of communication: written, spoken, visual, andtechnological. In a 2007 survey designed to solicit student perceptions of the value of C-Icourses in the engineering curricula, our
Science and to streamline transfer from community colleges to 4-year institutions.Dr. Ruzica Todorovic, City Colleges of Chicago-Wilbur Wright College Ruzica Todorovic, PhD has been an Engineering and Chemistry faculty member at Wilbur Wright College since 2012. She also acts as a coordinator for Wright’s Engineering Program and the NSF: HSI ”Building Bridges into Engineering and Computer Science” grant since its inception. She is committed to cultivating an inclusive educational environment which respects the diversity of students, while providing attentive student support. Prior to joining Wright College, Ruzica obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago, and conducted
, handling stress, etc. Service and Civic Responsibility: Engineering is a service profession. Engineers are charged to use their talents and gifts to solve problems that impact others. The performance and practice of engineering is an act of service. Understanding of Engineering Ethics: Engineers are expected to exhibit the highest standards of honesty and integrity. Engineers are to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public. Those whom engineers serve deserve nothing less. As one example, the competencies are also used in the required first-year seminar course, wherestudents create action plans and write goals to
, the paper identifies biographicalinformation common to those who appear to be most engaged in the topic and compares it toexisting national faculty profiles. These findings are augmented through national survey ofengineering faculty. The survey investigated faculty perceptions on the importance ofengineering leadership development and the manner faculty think these materials should beincorporated in engineering curricula. These perceptions are investigated with respect toparticipant’s backgrounds and experiences outside the academy. This work will be of interest toboth faculty building commitment for and materials supporting integration of engineeringleadership in the curriculum and the engineering leadership profession.IntroductionMany of
experiences through the lens of one’s own cultural worldview. At the acceptance positioncultural difference is experienced as just one of a number of equally complex worldviews. At theadaption position cultural difference is experienced an appropriate alternative behavior in adifferent cultural context. And at the integration position the experience of the person is onewhich allows for movement in and out of cultural worldviews. Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity Copyright, Milton Bennett, Ph.D., used with permissionOutgrowths of the DMIS include the intercultural development continuum (IDC) and theIntercultural Development Inventory (IDI), a 50-item questionnaire. The IDI instrument has
when adoptingcurricular culture. Yet we do see a close approximation to cargo culting as an initial approach bymany faculty members. Comments such as “give me your curriculum,” “tell me what I need todo,” and “never mind the why; just tell me how” are commonplace in our experiences ofcurricular culture change [8]. These requests elide the necessity of context-appropriateadaptation, an integral part of curricular culture change.In contrast, our second frame acknowledges learning and culture transfer as a process ofsupported practice, sensemaking, and growth. Cognitive apprenticeship is scaffoldedparticipation in meaningful work embedded in authentic cultural practice alongside multipleseasoned mentors. Cognitive apprenticeship theory was
Mej´ıa, Northwestern University Dr. Mej´ıa is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences. She also teaches in the Design Thinking and Communication (DTC), Masters in Engineering Management (MEM), and College Prep programs. Her research interests focus on mixed methods research in engineering education, curriculum assessment and development, and engineering identity.Dr. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a Professor of STEM education in the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.Sheila Castro, University of Florida Sheila Castro is a
). Agrowing body of data supports the conclusion that active learning is indeed superior to thetraditional lecture format, both in terms of student retention and student performance(Natl.Acad.Sci, 2009; AAAS, 2011; PCAST, 2012; Singer, 2012). Recent efforts at ColoradoSchool of Mines to integrate biology into our engineering curriculum have led to a revisedfoundational biology course that has rigor and relevance for our engineering students. The movefrom traditional lecture to an active learning environment was key in our efforts to engage ourstudents, with the intent of improving our students’ comprehension of biology. Our course re-design involved a three-pronged approach in which we: (1) renovated a classroom to create astudio environment with wet
students represented 50%of Master's students and 78% of PhD students [2].For many years now, the need for enhancing information literacy (IL) training in universities hasbeen well documented. It has been nearly 20 years since Polytechnique Montréal introduced inits academic curriculum a mandatory and credited IL course for graduate students. This coursewas created and updated with guidance from the Association of College & Research Library(ACRL), most notably the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education [3]and the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education [4].The main objectives of this paper are to describe the evolution of the course and to discuss thefactors that have contributed to its success. An
technical development and an afternoon session focused onprofessional development. Lesson plans were scheduled five days a week during a regular workweek. Fig. 1. Major technical and professional topics introduced in the five-week program.In the technical session, important topics such as Python, microcontroller and circuit basics,machine learning, 3D modeling, PCB design, and app development were covered. These topicswere selected as they lend themselves to preparation for certain advanced coursework in thedepartment curriculum. In the professional session, networking, resume building, industry andfaculty interaction, campus resources, mock interviews were introduced in the form of guestspeakers or workshops. In the last week of the program
mobile devices. Underfunded schoolslack the resources to provide these sorts of devices to all students or even to entire classrooms. This leavestheir students at a disadvantage for learning when compared to students from well-funded schools.Math Quest aims to solve this issue. We have created an inexpensive, effective learning tool to assiststudents and teachers at underfunded schools. When looking at other products in this market, our teamwas surprised to see how clunky and unengaging they were. This led us to design Math Quest to resemblea handheld game controller. We chose this shape since game controllers are a tried and true handheldproduct design that prioritizes comfort, modularity, and ease of use. This design also lets us
effective textbook for reinforcement.• Offer an integrated equity-based curriculum, not just during special months or celebrations This suggestion seems to fall into the same category as the previous in that many courses in a technical engineering curriculum offer little opportunity to support this. Even so, there are some courses that do and those should be carefully leveraged. With issues of sustainability and resiliency becoming better integrated throughout the civil engineering curriculum, there will be more natural opportunities for discussions of social, global and political and equity issues throughout the curriculum. Even the special months or types of equity celebrations can be a more difficult fit into an engineering
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 The STEM Loop: Undergraduate Engineering Students Create a STEM Children’s BookAbstractThis paper documents an innovative project in which undergraduate mechanical engineeringstudents created and produced a children's book about combustion engines. Funded through agrant provided by Texas A&M University at Qatar, students researched, designed, and wrote achildren's book intended to promote interest in STEM fields. The book, written in both Englishand Arabic, will be used in Qatari public schools and in the Texas A&M University at Qatar’sSTEM Outreach Program. The interdisciplinary project was co-led by a mechanical engineeringprofessor and an
Paper ID #43911Take this Job and Love It: Identity-Conscious Self-Reflection as a Tool toSupport Individualized Career Exploration for Graduating Biomedical EngineeringStudentsDr. Uri Feldman, Wentworth Institute of Technology Uri Feldman is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering in the School of Engineering at Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston. He received a Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Media Lab, a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign. As a
that work in the real world, with all the attendantconstraints. Therefore, “a new kind of engineer is needed, an engineer who is fully aware of thesystemic nature of the challenges we face” [10]. In response to this and recently revisedaccreditation requirements, there are currently many efforts to introduce sustainable developmentconcepts in various courses across engineering departments to promote an awareness ofsustainability and environmental impact issues and produce sustainability-conscious engineers.Embedding sustainability within the curriculum does not simply mean including new content[11]. If engineers are to contribute meaningfully to sustainable development, sustainability mustbecome part of their paradigm and affect every day
which improve the efficiencyof delivery of course content while maximizing value-added student activities where interactionswith the instructor and TAs are prized. These techniques include a “flipped classroom” model, on-line video instructional materials, efficient content modularization and customizability, automatedfeedback, integrated assessment mechanisms and team-based in-class activities. A high proportionof class time is structured to support creative project work where students appropriate CAD skillsby applying them to creative problem solving. It is the opinion of the authors that this blendedlearning methodology has the potential to provide a just-in-time delivery of instruction which canbe customized to meet an individual student’s
assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ash- ley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, the integration of engineering education and international development, and building capacity in low and middle income countries through inclusive technical education.Dr. Cherie D. Edwards, Virginia Tech Dr. Cherie D. Edwards is a Postdoctoral Associate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Research and
2011, she has been a Teaching Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. Currently, she is the Education Director for the NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Advanced Self-Powered Systems of Integrated Sensors and Technologies (ASSIST).Dr. Pam Page Carpenter, Pam Page Carpenter, Ed.D is Director of Education programs for the National Science Foundation Fu- ture Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management (FREEDM) Systems Center headquartered at NC State University. She has developed and led K-20 programs in renewable energy and alternative transportation with a focus on and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). She is an
. Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Mosher Syharat is a Ph.D. student in Curriculum and Instruction and a Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engi- neering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity of the Pro- fessional Workforce”. In her time at the University of Connecticut she has also has served as Program Assistant for an summer program in engineering for middle school students with
topic. This paper presents an overview of the development cycle of the portable PLC trainingunits to be used in the engineering technology curriculum. The paper also provides a summary oflab activities developed for the new trainers.MotivationThe assembly and usage of these B&R trainers will be of immense help to students in themechatronics program. Instructors are taught to instruct how to control circuits, using step rationaleand organized content. Programming essentials such as variable revelation, code structure,programming hones, and programmable incitation will be taught to the students. Other importantPLC topics such as inner clocks, outer sensors, CPU, and correspondence modules will be coveredas well.In addition, the new trainers
theclassroom. Often times these courses go on and on about what engineering is, but I need toknow how to implement it in an elementary classroom. Show me examples of lessons.” How to find resources. This category contained responses related to being able to locateresources when they are needed, “Since engineering is now part of the standards, I think how toteach engineering would be important in a class and since curriculum specifically for engineeringwill not always (or even usually?) be provided, I think how to find engineering resources and/orhow to use other materials to teach engineering would also be important.” Another participantwrote, “Knowing where to find the resources is a very important component in including it in theclassroom
energy and promoting diversity and international education between 1998-2012. He served on multiple U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) FOAs merit project proposal committees since 2013.Paul Aden Paschal, Sam Houston State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design and Construction of a Solar Powered Automated Chicken Coop1. IntroductionThe senior design project is a capstone project course taken in the final year of the Electronics andComputer Engineering Technology (ECET) program at Sam Houston State University (SHSU).Introduction of renewable energy applications to engineering technology curriculum at SHSU hasimpacted students, faculty, and university community very positively and
model for other institutions seeking to assess students’ global and contextual competencies.Overview of the Program and Suite of AssessmentsThe program in which this suite of assessments was used provides first-year students with anopportunity to expand their global competencies through direct experience. It integrates an on-campus, Spring course meeting a general education requirement with a short-term internationalmodule immediately following semester exams in May. The 2016 program enrolled 92 studentswho participated in one of three international modules: Italy, Switzerland, and Germany; China;or the Dominican Republic. Engaging in the program provides students with opportunities toexpand their global competencies while learning about
GoldShirt Program at CU to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; findings are very encouraging, and the program is being adapted at several other engineering colleges. Dr. Sullivan led the 2004 launch of ASEE’s Pre- College Division, was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Dua Chaker, University of Colorado, Boulder Dua Chaker is a Professional Research Associate and Project Engineer and Editor for the TeachEngineer- ing Digital Library in the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program, College of Engineering and Applied
School to France, Switzerland, Italy, and Ecuador to study different higher education systems around the world. Seyam is also a Fellow of the Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence, and he earned the Graduate Certificate of Preparing Future Professo- riate in 2016.Ms. Chelsea R. Corkins, Virginia Tech Chelsea is currently an Agriculture Extension Specialist at Virginia Tech. She works closely with two extension programs - one adult and one high school level - through program development, curriculum design, and outcome assessment. Chelsea holds a BS and MS degree from Kansas State University both in Biological and Agricultural Engineering and will be rejoining the graduate student world by begin- ning a second