AC 2012-4352: INCORPORATING NAHB PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATIONSINTO A UNIVERSITY RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTSPECIALIZATIONProf. Eric A. Holt, Purdue University Eric A. Holt is a Graduate Instructor at Purdue University in the Building Construction Management Department. Holt earned a B.S. in building construction technology and spent 19 years in the residential construction industry. His career includes construction material sales and marketing, building inspector, customer home project management, and architectural design for homes and remodel projects. He earned a M.S. in technology from Purdue University, in construction management. He is currently working on his Ph.D. in construction management, focusing on
AC 2012-4460: JUNIOR CYBER DISCOVERY: CREATING A VERTICALLYINTEGRATED MIDDLE SCHOOL CYBER CAMPDr. Heath Tims, Louisiana Tech UniversityProf. Galen E. Turner III, Louisiana Tech UniversityMr. G.B. Cazes, Cyber Innovation Center G.B. Cazes currently serves as the Cyber Innovation Center’s (CIC) Vice President, responsible for its daily operations. In addition, Cazes has devoted countless hours to the development and implementation of a dynamic Academic Outreach and Workforce Development program. This program will assist the CIC in developing a knowledge-based workforce for the future. Cazes has spent his entire career in the information management and information technology sectors. His experience includes working in the
inthese subjects by the conclusion of their formal education. Students’ attitudes with respect tomathematics and science are known to be developed at a young age and become entrenched bymiddle school. In an effort to encourage young students to eventually pursue careers in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics, the Colorado School of Mines has developed theBechtel K-5 Educational Excellence Initiative. This engineering outreach program is beingimplemented in five minority elementary schools located throughout the Denver area, eachschool including grades kindergarten through fifth. One measure of impact of this program is anattitudes survey in mathematics and science. This article presents a study that seeks tostatistically examine
. Page 25.964.3In addition to preparing students for careers where a basic knowledge of nanotechnology isrequired, it is also essential to educate the general public regarding nanotechnology. Society isalready being affected by new developments in nanotechnology and will continue to be affectedin the future. In deciding the future of nanotechnology, both the technical experts and the publicwill participate in the decision making. Therefore it is essential to educate the general public sothat they can make informed decisions2. Although designed with science and engineering majorsin mind, this introductory course is open to and is accommodating to all majors increasing aninformed citizenry.ObjectivesThe objectives for the NanoExposed! course are
students who were not participating. This early comparison provided ahelpful basis for future comparisons and helped clarify assertions about the selection and application process and thedegree to which it might influence the make-up of the participant group. If, for example, the selection processrecruited—by design or by accident—students who were disproportionally interested in STEM careers beforeparticipation, conclusions about the ability of the program to encourage students to pursue such opportunities mightbe reasonably questioned. Independent-samples t tests found no statistically significant differences between thegroups’ mean responses, indicating that even where differences between the Digispired participant group and thecomparison group
Anderson’s career began as a middle school science teacher and an instructor at the post-secondary level, which then led to program administration. She has extensive experience developing precollege academic programs and diversity, retention, and student support programs. Her current role involves es- tablishing and maintaining partnerships with secondary schools, community colleges, corporations, and state and national organizations that help strengthen the University’s outreach, recruitment, retention, and graduation of underrepresented student populations, as well as the recruitment and retention of diverse faculty and staff. Michigan Tech’s ongoing climate study is directed by Anderson. She advises and re- views unit
new solution is that student learning experience must be enhanced to meetstudent’s future educational and professional needs. Previous research finds that certainknowledge can soon become outdated or even obsolete while other knowledge can be crucial andbeneficial to student’s professional career for a long run.8,10 Students can obtain those crucialknowledge in critical thinking and problem solving from college study and sustain theknowledge for their professional career through newly developed enhancement. In order tosustain student knowledge in critical thinking and problem solving, one of suggested changes is Page 25.275.3for students to
AC 2012-4369: CAPSTONE DESIGN HUB: BUILDING THE CAPSTONEDESIGN COMMUNITYDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communi- cation in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is Co-PI on several NSF grants to explore design education. Her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication in capstone courses, the effects of
Rapids, Michigan.”(p. v) “The study showed that there was no set of variables that was able to accurately predictacademic success or retention.” (p. 94) This research could suggest the exploration of non-intellective data collection for future evaluation.The research from Kokkelenberg and Sinha7 also suggested the importance of non-intellectivefactors. “There are several issues that remain untested, issues that may be important. Theseinclude the early life experiences of a student, the effect of peers, and the career outlook.” (p.944) Kokkelenberg and Sinha concentrated on students that are successful in STEMundergraduate studies. They “postulate that success in a STEM field, success here defined asdeclaring STEM as a major and graduating from a
requirements [1]. The engineering graduationrate is even lower for Texas Higher Education institutions. It has also been noted that manystudents made their decision to leave an engineering major within the first two years, the periodduring which they are taking engineering prerequisites and before taking any (or many)engineering courses [2]. One of the potential reasons for this situation is that students in theirfirst two years are given little exposure to the many possibilities that an engineering career canoffer, while they are taking math and science courses taught outside of engineering departments.It suggests that few students-even those who have had some prior exposure to engineering-knowwhat engineers do, and this affects their commitment to
AC 2012-5050: EDUCATING GLOBALLY COMPETENT ENGINEERS INLONDON, UNITED KINGDOMMr. Brian D. Koehler, North Carolina State University Brian D. Koehler is Director of International Engagement in the College of Engineering at NC State University. He leads NC State’s Engineering Career Fair, which has become one of the largest and high- est quality opportunities in the nation, mentors the NC State Engineering Ambassadors, and advises the Engineers’ Council. Teaching and research areas include engineering education, career development, in- ternational engineering, leadership, corporate recruiting, and supply chain management. Koehler received degrees from the University of Wisconsin, Platteville (B.S.), and NC State
in embedded systems. She held other positions related to project management.Dr. Arthur Pyster, Stevens Institute of Technology Art Pyster is a distinguished Research Professor at Stevens Institute of Technology and the Deputy Ex- ecutive Director of the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) sponsored by the Department of Defense. During Pyster’s 35-year career, he held several senior positions, including being the Senior Vice President and Director of Systems Engineering and Integration for SAIC and the Deputy Chief Informa- tion Officer for the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration. He is an INCOSE Fellow and a member of their Board of Directors. He currently runs BKCASE, a project that is establishing the
of the opportunities available through an engineering education.”As a result, the NAE has instituted an initiative, called Changing the Conversation, toassist in addressing the obvious media blind spot, as well as the relative ignorance of thegeneral public, to the importance of engineering in solving the problems confrontingsociety. This effort is also designed to address the shortage of K-12 students who preparethemselves to study engineering in colleges and universities.The NAE cites three important reasons for improving the public understanding ofengineering: (1) Sustaining the U.S. capacity for technological innovation; (2) attractingyoung people to careers in engineering; and (3) improving technological literacy.While the NAE was
undergraduate tuition/stipend scholarships to be spent over a three-year period. In thewinter of 2010, the EMT program received approval from JSU’s curriculum committee. TheEMT curriculum has been designed to satisfy the general criteria of the Association ofTechnology, Management, and Applied Engineering (ATMAE). The Technology Departmentwill continue to track metrics to evaluate program benefits.In September 2011, JSU’s Technology Department received another grant from DHS, through itsScience, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Career Development Grants program. Thisgrant will enable JSU to award scholarships to more undergraduate students who demonstratecareer interest in Homeland Security. The mission of this Career Development program is
Missouri.Dr. Daniel K. Marble, Tarleton State University Daniel Marble earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Houston, with an M.S. and Ph.D. in accelerator-based nuclear physics from the University of North Texas. Marble began his academic career as an Assistant Professor of physics at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point in 1994. In 1998, he was hired to develop the first engineering program at Tarleton State University (engineering physics), where he presently serves as Head of the Department of Engineering and Physics. In addition to interests in ion solid interaction, physics of sports, accelerator technology, and materials characterization, Marble is actively involved in K-16 science and
, Watson worked in two different middle school classrooms as a NSF GK-12/Pi Fellow. While at the University of Tennessee, she participated in the co-op (industrial internship) program and was appointed a co-op ambassador to mentor undergraduate students pursuing industrial internships. She also has mentored undergraduate research assistants during her master’s and Ph.D. programs. Her primary research interests include preparing doctoral students for industry and academic careers and the rheology of ionic liquids and cellulose solutions.Dr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Jed Lyons is a professor of mechanical engineering and the Faculty Director of the Center for Teaching Excellence at the University of South
Institute of Technology Mike Eastman is Department Chair and professor of electrical, computer, and telecommunications engi- neering technology at Rochester Institute of Technology. His research interests include embedded systems design and development focusing on hardware algorithm implementation and sensing and control. Most recently, Eastman has been involved with curriculum redesign and academic calendar conversion at RIT. Prior to embarking on a career in academia, Eastman spent six years at Intel Corporation, where he was a Senior Systems Engineer. His work at Intel focused on custom embedded systems hardware design. He holds a B.S. in electrical engineering technology and a M.S. in computer science from RIT.Dr
University inpartnership with NECC. The SBP was meant to encourage new STEM students to embraceSTEM careers as well as to improve retention at NECC. The hands- on activities allowedparticipants to apply mathematics to technical problems and to experience how engineering andmathematical skills are used within STEM majors. "Hands-on and learning by experience arepowerful ideas, and we know that engaging students actively and thoughtfully in their studiespays off in better learning.”1 Participants explored alternative energy systems with hands-on Page 25.1210.2activities that concentrated on wind and solar power design projects.Instructional TeamThe Program
studentsuccess.” Shuman, et al, (1999) studied the issue of engineering attrition at the University ofPittsburgh by focusing on student characteristics and educational initiatives. They found,as did Budney, et al (1998), that the first semester is critical to student success. Surveysof engineering leavers indicated the principal two reasons for leaving engineering as“came to dislike engineering/studying engineering” and “lost interest/developed newinterests”. They also found that although a high percentage of the students talked tosomeone before leaving engineering, very few sought career counseling services.Following their studies, the COE implemented a number of actions to improve student
Page 25.886.2discovery based approach and a hands-on robotics program will improve students‟ STEMattitudes, math performance, and intentions to pursue STEM education and careers. The theoryof planned behavior5 was used to guide the measurement of students‟ STEM educationoutcomes.A Guided Discovery Approach to STEM EducationTraditional approaches to STEM education can result in disinterested students who may notpursue college-level STEM education and a competitive and hostile educational environment.6We propose that a guided discovery approach is more effective in engaging diverse students inlearning STEM concepts. This engagement will result in increased STEM knowledge andacademic self-efficacy among diverse elementary students.Bruner‟s7
curriculum, an increased responsibility for self-directed learning is highly desirable. Students about to embark on a career must independently beable to meet professional development demands in a rapidly changing engineering environment.Students who arrive in class with assigned reading completed, notes reviewed, and prepared forclassroom activities are developing the ability to be self-directed learners. Limited classroomcontact time can be much more effectively utilized by focusing on concepts and applicationsidentified by students as needing further review and explanation. This paper describes changesimplemented to a Civil Engineering “Structural Design of Foundations” course at a Penn StateUniversity’s College of Engineering. These included
, someresearchers have begun to address this issue. A research brief by the Southern RegionalEducation Board (SREB) matched PLTW participants with career and technical educationstudents with similar demographics and fields of study. SREB found that PLTW students whoenrolled in two or more PLTW courses did significantly better in mathematics and science on theHigh Schools that Work (HSTW) assessment than career/technical students in comparable fields(Bottoms & Anthony, 2005). Differences between PLTW students and similar career/technicalstudents were also found for subsequent course-taking behavior, with PLTW students morelikely to complete the four years of mathematics and science (Bottoms & Uhn, 2007). However,this may not have been an appropriate
students atfive different sites each summer. The program has five primary goals: 1. Increase students’ enthusiasm for research that turns into a desire to pursue postgraduate education. 2. Develop a high level perspective of the issues and opportunities of earthquake engineering in a global society. 3. Attract exceptional undergraduates, particularly underrepresented students (women, minorities, and persons with disabilities) into STEM careers, primarily the field of Page 25.1493.2 earthquake engineering. 4. Cultivate students’ professional selves, including networking skills, presentation skills
and 10% in common between Civil :Environmental. Further, the skills and knowledge desired for these engineers also have much incommon. To explore the similarities and differences in these disciplines as perceived bystudents, a Body of Knowledge (BOK2) survey was distributed to senior students as part of thelifelong learning module in the three separate capstone design courses. Students were asked torank the American Society of Civil Engineers’ (ASCE) 24 BOK2 outcomes from most to leastimportant to their future careers. Among students in all three majors, design and problemsolving were by far the top ranked outcomes; communication and teamwork were rankedbetween 3 to 6 by all majors; and there was also consensus among the bottom rated items
Leadership program, providing a lead role in MacEwan’s strengths-based leadership initiative. In 2009, she was named one of Alberta’s ”50 Most Influential” by Venture Mag- azine. In her role as Dean, she works with a dedicated team to lead MacEwan as an institution that offers a variety of degrees, diplomas, and certificates. Prior to her career in education, Elford prac- ticed law for 10 years, and holds both a B.A. and an L.L.B. from the University of Alberta. She stays connected to the profession through membership in the Law Society of Alberta and the Canadian Bar Association. Elford sits on the Board of Directors of Junior Achievement (JA) of Northern Alberta and Northwest Territories and is the Vice Chair of the
include the role of motivation in learning engineering, construction of engineering identities, and faculty development.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is Co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Dr. Brett D. Jones, Virginia Tech
: To develop a sensor technologies curriculum for the high school classroom. To use environmental sensors to teach technology, engineering, mathematics, science, and critical workforce skills. To encourage learners to look at a local problem and local data with a global perspective. To promote awareness of sensor network-related careers and opportunities among high school teachers, students and guidance counselors.The following sections will first address the question of why sensors are an excellent vehicle forsuch a curriculum, describe the curriculum and its participants in some detail, and then examineits impact on the students in terms of some of the specific skills and concepts that wereembedded in the
pursuing careers in STEM fields, CañadaCollege developed a program titled Student On-ramp Leading to Engineering and Sciences(SOLES). Funded by the US Department of Education through the Minority Science andEngineering Improvement Program (MSEIP), SOLES addresses some of the barriers to thesuccessful transfer of community college engineering students to a four-year institution includinglow success rates in foundational math courses, lack of practical context in the traditionalengineering curriculum, and inadequate relevant internship opportunities for lower-divisionengineering students. The program employs strategies that have been proven effective inincreasing the retention and success of minority students such as mentoring programs,3,4
the team member’s experiences.The data considered here show interesting aspects of current and former team member’sperspective. The students generally wanted a formal collegiate competition experience; felt thatthe Formula Hybrid competition would be helpful in their career ambitions, but they alsoindicated that they had little to no knowledge of hybrid vehicle technology before joining theteam. Page 25.408.12Written responses are overwhelmingly positive. The students directly saw the benefit from thehands-on experience and definitely felt that participating on the team and attending thecompetition was extremely valuable.Here are averaged data
company and how thattransition occurs. The students provided a second form of data: After each interview, theyparticipated in an individual “think-aloud” problem-solving session, in which they worked on anassigned problem set from the target course and verbalized their thinking and problem-solvingstrategies.As the participants in this study represented different stages in an engineering career, it wasinappropriate to combine the data for general coding. Instead, I approached all data with thequestion, How does this participant perceive the role of mathematics in engineering? For eachparticipant, I extracted data relevant to this question from the interview and “think-aloud”transcripts. From these extracted data, I created a narrative summary for