Conference Session

WIED: Medley

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Beth A. Powell, Tennessee Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.”6. Works Cited1. McIlwee, J.S. and J.G. Robinson, Women in engineering; Gender, Power, and Workplace culture1992, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.2. Wolfe, J. and E. Powell, Biases in interpersonal communication: How engineering students perceive gender typical speech acts in teamwork. Journal of Engineering Education, 2009. 98(1): p. 5-16.3. Bowles, H.R., L. Babcock, and L. Lai, Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations:sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007. 103: p. 84-103.4. Phelan, J.E., C.A

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sangarappillai Sivaloganathan, United Arab Emirates University; Ali H. Al-Marzouqi, United Arab Emirates University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Knowledge as Defined by Coursework, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference 2007.4. Cherbaka N. and Lavelle J., Proposing an Engineering Management Program at North Carolina State University, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference 2009.5. Collins T.R. and Youngblood A.D., Engineering Management Program Re- Evaluation, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference 2002.6. http://www.asem.org/ASEM_Docs/EM_Masters_Program_Certification_- _Academic_Standards.pdf Visited on 29th November 2013.7. Sivaloganathan S. Influencing Factors from the Literature for Engineering Education, The journal of the Institution of Engineers Sri-Lanka. December 2003.8. Grayson L.P. The Design of Engineering Curricula, UNESCO Studies in Engineering Education

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Capstone Design

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmed Cherif Megri, North Carolina A&T State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Education AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, UT.Stiggins, R.J. (1997). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment, Second Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.Olds, B., Moskal, B., and Miller, R. (2005). Assessment in engineering education: evolution, approachesand future collaborators, Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1), pp. 27-40.Todd, R., Magleby, S., Sorensen, C., Swan, B., and Anthony, D. (1995). A survey of capstoneengineering courses in North America, Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), pp. 165-174.Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision andCurriculum Development, Alexandria, VA

Conference Session

Integration of Engineering and Other Disciplines (Including Liberal Arts)

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine Hennessey Wikoff, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Cynthia Wise Barnicki, Milwaukee School of Engineering; James R. Kieselburg II, Grohmann Museum at Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Multidisciplinary Engineering

and/or safety aspects of the manufacturing process(s) illustrated in the work ofart, the production methods used to produce a particular product, or how a particular work of artwas produced. If the work of art illustrates a process from the past, a perspective on how theprocess (or environmental/safety considerations) have changed to the present is expected withmore weight on the present.Timeline:Initial choice for topic/work of art: due Monday, March 18th. If multiple students/groups havethe same choice, an alternative selection may be needed.Preliminary topics (short description of the focus of the paper with the title/artist of the work ofart and a minimum of 2 references outside the textbook) are due on Monday April 15th.Final papers are

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andres L. Carrano, Auburn University; Wendy A. Dannels, Rochester Institute of Technology (NTID); Matthew M. Marshall, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 151, 385-397.14. Sobek, D.K.. and Smalley, A. (2008). Understanding A3 thinking: A critical component of Toyota’s PDCA management system. New York: Taylor and Francis.15. Ammar, S. and Wright, R. (1999). Experiential learning activities in operations management, International Transactions in Operational Research, 6, 183–197. Page 24.786.13

Conference Session

Thermodynamics, Fluids and Heat Transfer II

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica W. Clark, University of Maine; John R. Thompson, University of Maine; Donald B. Mountcastle, University of Maine

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

(2):137 – 148, 2002. 4 Christian H. Kautz, Paula R. L. Heron, Michael E. Loverude, Lillian C. McDermott, and Peter S. Shaffer. Student Understanding of the Ideal Gas Law, Part I: A Macroscopic Perspective. American Journal of Physics, 73(11):1055, 2005. 5 Ronald L. Miller. Misconceptions About Rate Processes: Preliminary Evidence for the Importance of Emergent Conceptual Schemas in Thermal and Transport Sciences. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2006. 6 Christian H. Kautz and G Schmitz. Interactive Lecture Questions as a Research and Teaching Tool in Introductory Thermodynamics. In Proceedings of the 2006 SEFI Conference, number June, pages 1–9, 2006. 7 Evan B. Pollock

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sabeen A. Altaf, Institute of International Education; Eck Doerry, Northern Arizona University; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Edward Randolph Collins Jr. P.E., Clemson University

Tagged Divisions

International

above, the seven members are located in Berlin, Bremen, Cologne, Hamburg, Munich,Münster, and Osnabrück. Collectively, the UAS7 alliance members collaborate with more than1400 university partners worldwide.The UAS7 offers a wide variety of exchange opportunities for international students, includingsummer, semester, and year-long exchange opportunities. In addition, UAS7 offers graduateprograms in English for students who are seeking a degree beyond the Bachelor’s and Master’slevel.The universities of applied sciences (UAS) are relatively new. They were established in theearly 1970’s with the objective to help German industries maintain their internationalcompetitiveness. This new approach to higher education was intended to satisfy a

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven J Henderson, U.S. Military Academy; Kenneth McDonald P.E., Dept of Systems Engineering, United States Military Academy, West Point

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

assessment of their own learning. The application functions as part of a largerarchitecture we designed to allow a teacher to monitor learning during class and gain evendeeper insights during subsequent offline analysis. A pilot study revealed our architecture wasable to successfully record and support analysis of our students’ self-reported learningassessments. Notably, the architecture serves as a useful tool for spotting trends in studentlearning that, when combined with video of a class, can be a powerful critique.References1 Bloom, Benjamin S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, Edward J., Hill, Walker H. and Krathwohl, David R. (1956) ‘Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain’. New York: David McKay, 19, p. 56.2

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Mehmet Ayar, TUBITAK; Dennie L. Smith, Texas A&M University; Christine Ehlig-Economides, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

sustainability. Proceedings of the International Page 23.24.13 Symposium on Engineering Education and Educational Technologies (EEET). Orlando, FL.[5] Yalvac, B., Brooks, L. A., & Ehlig-Economides, C., (2008, June). Research on the evolution of college instructors’ perspectives of teaching and learning. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition. Pittsburgh, PA.[6] Barab, S. A., Barnett, M. G., & Squire, K. (2002). Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 489–542.[7

Conference Session

INT. Engineering Education: Developments, Innovations, Partnerships, and Implementations

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette; James L. Barnes, James Madison University; Susan Kubic Barnes, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

International

the rapid expansion of homeland security, national security and ...Corporate Centers• Accenture Innovation Center for Open Source www.accenture.com/.../service-technology-innovation- center-open-s... Accenture's Innovation Center for Open Source shows how OSS can work in simulated environments.• AT&T Foundry Innovation Centers to Accelerate Technology, AT&T www.att.com/gen/press- room?pid=2949 AT&T Foundry innovation centers are the home to technology collaboration, innovative ideas, new apps, and more. Learn more about AT&T Foundry and ...• AT&T innovation center, The AT&T Innovation Center highlights AT&T's leadership role in developing innovative applications and integrated solutions for businesses and

Conference Session

Distance Education and Engineering Workforce Professional Development

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Noah Miller, Northrop Grumman, Electronic Systems; Timothy Boyd, Northrop Grumman Corporation; Eric Paul Pearson, Northrop Grumman

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

likewooden dowels, plastic wheels, rubber bands and LEGOs.Participants are expected to maintain full engagement, share personal experiences with others Page 23.1403.15and work through common goals during challenges, case studies, community service, design-to-build competitions and feedback sessions. These activities occur between 6:00 P.M. onThursday and 11:00 A.M. on Sunday morning. Few hours are wasted on sleep and relaxation asthe participants become fully integrated into their team responsibilities and cherish theopportunities to network and practice leadership sessions. Offsite Weekend Leadership Summit Participants (Sample #s

Conference Session

Innovation for ChE Student Learning

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

William Willette; Larry White; Garry White

Circuits & Devices Magazine.[11] Consortium for the Study of Engineering Communication, Rice University,http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~engicomm/, (Date accessed: 12/28/03).[12] Cribb, G.,1998, Information Skills Training for Engineers, Session 1441,ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.[13] Dillon, S., Building a Better Sentence in Corporate America, The New York Times, December 7, 2004.[14] Driskill, L., June, 2000, Linking Industry Best Practices and EC3(g)Assessment in Engineering Communication, Session 2261, ASEE Conferenceand Exposition.[15] Dynamoo’s Email Etiquette, http://www.dyamoo.com/technical/etiquette.htm. (Date accessed: 12/28/03)[16] Engineering Communication Center, University of Toronto, http://www.ecf.utoronto,ca/~writing

Conference Session

K-12 Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

William Jordan; Rosalind Hale; Renee Akbar; Ramona Travis; John Fulwiler

various sets of state standards, benchmarksand the National Educational Technology Standards at ISTE http://cnets.iste.org/. To finalizethis component, participants were provided with the Louisiana State Department of Educationtechnology-infused lesson plan template that was used in the group *WebQuest. More on*WebQuest can be checked out at the official website: http://WebQuest.sdsu.edu/.The participants were broken into groups and were instructed to select *WebQuest topics basedon their teacher education program major. Through collaborative planning and research, theteams built *WebQuests where they combined various graphics from their math and/or scienceclasses, lesson plan(s) that included state and technology standards and teacher pages

Conference Session

Teaching Strategies in Graphics

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Nicholas Bertozzi

.) Patterns of Persistence in, and Switching from, Declared or Intended Majors by 1991 for 810,794Undergraduates Entering a National Sample of Four-Year Institutions in 1987. Cooperative Institutional ResearchProgram, Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, April 1993.2.) Seymour, E., Hewitt, N.M. (2000). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. ISBN: 0-8133-6642-9, Westview Press.3.) CDIO Initiative Homepage, www.cdio.org, 2005, accessed on February 23, 2005.4.) Malmqvist, J., Young, P. W., Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., Svensson, T. (2004). Lessons Learned fromDesign-Build-Test-Based Project Courses. INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE – DESIGN 2004,Dubrovnik, May 18-21, 2004.5.) Barr, R. E

Conference Session

Nanomaterials for Learners of All Ages!

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Jacqueline Isaacs

body (which includes socialscience and public health students as well as chemists, physicists, and engineers). The meeting dates areJanuary 27, February 10, February 24, March 10, March 24, and April 7. Each meeting includes three 45-minute lectures with an additional 15 minutes for questions and a break. The course schedule is presentedin Table 2 and selected topics are described in Table 3. Table 2. Introduction to High-rate, Template-based Nanomanufacturing (Spring, 2005) Date Speaker Topic January 27 A. Busnaina Overview of nanomanufacturing (NEU) D. Papageorgiou Basics of semiconductor/MEMS fabrication S. Somu / L

Conference Session

Problem-Solving & Project-Based Learning

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Taryn Bayles

Ranking k Figure 2: Introduction to Engineering Course at Eastern T ech HS Survey Poor Fair Good 10 Very Good Excellent 8 6 Numbe r of Re sponse s 4

Conference Session

ABET Issues and Capstone Design

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Milton Bryant; Paul Biney

assist in meeting both program objectives and program outcomes. The suggestions Page 10.68.14from the IAC need to be implemented as soon as practical.8. Secondary Annual Assessment of Program OutcomesThe Educational Benchmark Inc.’s (EBI) survey instrument is used to obtain opinions form allgraduating seniors at the end of each semester. The surveys for the year are submitted to EBI foranalysis and comparison with other selected institutions. A similar EBI Alumni survey is alsoconducted once a year. The College ABET Committee performs analyses of the EBI Surveyresults by mapping applicable EBI questions into program outcomes. The percentage

Conference Session

Unique Laboratory Experiments & Programs Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Daniel Walsh; David Gibbs

, “Centerline Cracking in Deep Penetration Electron Beam Welds in Type 304L Stainless Steel,” Welding Journal, 64, 5, 127s, (1985)26) K. Prassad Rao, S. Prasnnakumar, “Assessment Criterion for Variability of Delta Ferrite in Austenitic Weld and Clad Materials,” Welding Journal, 67 , 2, 35s, (1988)27) C.D. Lundin, C.H. Lee, R. Menon, V. Osorio “Weldability Evaluations of Modified 316 and 347 Austenitic Stainless Steels,” Welding Journal, 71, 5, 171s, (1992)28) J.C. Lippold, W.F. Savage, “Solidification of Austenitic Stainless Steel Weldments: Part 1,” Welding Journal, 58, 12, 362s, (1979)29) J.C. Lippold, W.F. Savage, “Solidification of Austenitic Stainless Steel Weldments: Part 2,” Welding Journal, 59, 2, 48s, (1980)30) J.C. Lippold, W.F

Conference Session

Assessment & Quality; Accreditation in Engineering Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Youssef Shatilla; Adnan Zahed

, 3. Textbook and reference book (s), 4. Assignments; home work, quizzes, exams, projects, computer applications, design contents, laboratory work, and 5. Three examples of students’ work for each of the above assignments, • Senior projects design reports showing the accomplishment of capstone design content, • Safety manuals for laboratories, and • Student advising system and student co-curricular and extra-curricular activities substantiated by various student clubs and societies.Along with the documentation process a “Preliminary Program Assessment Questionnaire”was sent to the ABET International Activity Committee (INTAC), which is responsible forforeign program evaluation. In response to our

Conference Session

New Program/Course Success Stories

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Wade Shaw; Muzaffar Shaikh; Carmo D'Cruz

Page 10.544.12 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education3. www.markencom.com/docs: Engineer to CEO: The Development of Balance - Mar 19974. John Whittaker: “Engineers, Entrepreneurs and the Commercialization of Technology” –PICMET 2001 Conference Portland OR. July 2001.5. Allan A. Gibb, “Entrepreneurship, Enterprise and Small Business: State of the Art ?” ed.Bohman and Pousette, Smaforetagsforskning 1 Tiden, 4th Nordic SME Research Conference,Umea Universitet, June 19866. S. Staub-French: “Entrepreneurship and Engineering Management” – Engineers in Law andBusiness Development – February, 20047. John J

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching/Learning Strategies

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Robert Simoneau; Mary deManbey; Karen Wosczyna-Birch

; T.L. Wentling (Eds.), Beyond tradition:Preparing the teachers of tomorrow’s workforce. Columbia, MO: UniversityCouncil for Vocational Education.Boesel, D. (1994). Integration of academic and vocational curricula. In D. Boesel, M.Rahn, & S. Deich (Eds.), National Assessment of Vocational Education, FinalReport to Congress, Vol. III, Program Improvement: Education Reform.Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Page 10.760.15Department of Education.“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 15Copyright ÆÉ 2005, American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Assessment Issues in 1st-Yr Engineering

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Edward Evans; Sandra Spickard Prettyman; Helen Qammar

: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press. 3. Beyerlein, M, 2001. ‘The parallel growth of team practices and the Center for the Study of Work Teams’, Team Performance Management, 7, 93-98. 4. McAnear, T. P. and Seat, E., 2001. “Perceptions of Team Performance: A Comparison of Male and Female Engineering Students”, paper No S3A, 31 ASEE.IEEE Frontiers in Education, Oct 10-13, Reno, NV and references therein. 5. Seat, E. and S. Lord, 1999. “Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Effective Interaction Skills”, Jour. Eng. Ed., 88, 385. 6. Yokomoto, C. F., M. Rizkalla, C. O’Laughlin, M. El-Sharkawy, and N. Lamm, 1999. “Developing a

Conference Session

Teaching Outside the Box in Civil Engineering

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Zhiyong Zhao; Joe Hagerty; J. P. Mohsen

Page 10.255.9 2005 ASEE National Conference 9 PRESENTER EVALUATIONSPresenters were also asked to evaluate the course. They were told that their answers could help make the coursebetter the next time it was offered, if it was offered again. Presenter opinions were considered very important in theoverall assessment of course success. A form similar to the form used for student evaluations was given to thepresenters. Again, answers were given on a scale of 0 to 5 (where "0" means "Not Applicable" and "5" means"Exceptionally Well"). If a presenter felt that s/he could not answer a question

Conference Session

Measuring Perceptions of Engineering

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

John Ochs

ASEE Conference Session 1410 V. Lessons Learned, Conclusion and Next StepsIt has been a challenge to help some students to value this real-life application. Studentshave been immersed in a traditional educational system focused more on ‘grades’ andless on ‘learning.’ Because this course utilizes authentic project(s) and hands-onapplication rather than lower level thinking skills, some students have a hard timeadjusting. During the first semester, we learned that college bound students wanted tospend more time in the career/postsecondary comparison section of the course, whileothers found less value in this area. Consequently, we differentiated instruction

Conference Session

First-Year Design Experiences

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Teodora Shuman; Greg Mason

TEAM 1 TEAM 2 20 TEAM 3 TEAM 4 TEAM 5 15 Power [mW] 10 5 0 2 3 4 5 6 Velocity [m/s] Figure 4. Example plot of power produced by the generator coupled to the wind turbine shaft versus the speed of air in the wind tunnel.Door handle projectIn this

Conference Session

Innovative Graduate Programs & Methods

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Kevin Brewer; Johannes Boehme; Glenda Scales; Cheryl Peed

and Wilmington.9Both Virginia Tech and Wake Forest have access to Internet2’s Abliene network. Themotivation for selecting IP for delivering SBES courses was driven by several factors: cost andthe ability to move towards future technology. The initial courses for the SBES were deliveredin fall 2002 using ISDN. The technical team carefully reviewed the protocol options fordelivering future SBES classes. Because of the increasing cost of delivering classes using ISDNand the trend of service providers focusing more on supporting IP, the SBES directors supportedthe technical team’s decision to move to IP. Table 2. Summary of Project Goals Summary of Project Goals General Strategy Networking infrastructure

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Design

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Meredith Aronson; Reid Bailey

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship, Design, and PBL

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Ken Ports

Ventures in the School ofManagement at Florida Tech. She is also the Co-Director of Florida TechStart, the Florida Institute of Technology’sbusiness accelerator. Prior to joining the university, she was a practicing CPA for 25 years and founder of CarolynJ. Fausnaugh Associates, CPA’s. In the early 1990’s she was a member of the founding team of InternetU, the firstInternet

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education & Industry

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Duane Dunlap

Session 1455Framework for Integrating Project-Based Learning, Experience and Practice in Professional Graduate Education for Engineers in Industry Leading to the Professional Master of Engineering D. D. Dunlap, 1 D. A. Keating, 2 T. G. Stanford, 2 A. L. McHenry, 3 E. M. DeLoatch, 4 P. Y. Lee, 5 D. R. Depew, 6 G. R. Bertoline, 6 M. J. Dyrenfurth, 6 S. J. Tricamo, 7 H. J. Palmer 8 I.T. Davis, 9 R.E. Morrison, 10 J. P. Tidwell, 11 K. Gonzalez-Landis, 12 J. O’Brien 13 J. M. Snellenberger,14 D. H. Quick,14 R. N. Olson,14 L. M. Coulson14 Western Carolina University 1 / University of South Carolina 2

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Civil ET

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Carmine Balascio

displayed in Figure 3, an incorrect form for thecubic feet per second units was used. LON-CAPA would have recognized units expressed as“ft^3/s”. No penalty is assessed for responses that are in an incorrect form. Notice that the triescounter still registers zero of a maximum of 2 tries for this problem. (The instructor can setmaximum tries as high as 100.) For an incorrect answer, LON-CAPA responds with an“incorrect” message followed by the counter displaying the number of tries used and themaximum allowed.It is advantageous to write some problems in the forms shown in Figures 2 and 3 rather than as inFigure 1 so that multiple answers are submitted all at once with a single push of the submitanswer button because a computer response of “incorrect