food insecurity[1]. The rate of food insecurity in Texas is higher than in most other states. According to the USDepartment of Agriculture (USDA), Texas is among the nine highest states of food insecuritywith a prevalence rate of 13.3 percent. The situation is more severe in some of Texas’s ruralcommunities. Due to a lack of money and other resources, households with low and very lowfood security have difficulty in providing enough food for their family members at some timeduring the year. Food insecurity is closely related to poor health among children, adults, and theelderly [2]. Multiple studies have shown that limited access to adequate food leads to impairedcognition and behavioral and mental health problems among children [3-5]. Food
there are non-cognitive and affective factors that are relevant for studentsuccess and have a direct affect on degree choice and subsequent drop out rate. These factorsbear relevance on curricular field, institutional sensitivity among others. For these reasons, itis necessary to rethink training institutions so they may become a welcoming, respectfulspace that favors full inclusion and development for women. The present work seeks toidentify factors that enginering students themselves consider relevant and necessary toinclude in a School of Engineering, to allow promoting a safe and inclusive gender equalenvironment. Data was collected using a validated quantitative instrument, using theSensitive Assessment for Gender Equality SAGE [1
) determined a need for an additional one million STEMgraduates over the next decade [1]. In order to help accomplish this worthy but formidable goal,the council recommends a strategy to increase recruitment and retention of STEM students in thefirst two years of their undergraduate education. In fact, the PCAST report states that increasingthe national retention rate of STEM majors from 40% to 50% would produce 750,000 more STEMgraduates, effectively accomplishing three-fourths of the council’s goal.Significant initiatives have been ongoing that aim to improve the quality of undergraduate STEMeducation and learning experiences. The initiatives vary on the levels of national, multi-institutioncollaborations, corporate, and individual campuses [2-6]. A
to the teaching of K-12 integrated STEM education continues to be impededby the lack of observational tools available to education researchers. The work presented here usesa new observation protocol – the STEM Observation Protocol (STEM-OP) – designed formeasuring the degree of integrated STEM teaching in K-12 science and engineering classrooms.The STEM-OP includes 10 items with four descriptive levels for each item (scored 0-3): 1)Relating content to students’ lives, 2) Contextualizing student learning, 3) Developing multiplesolutions, 3) Cognitive engagement in STEM, 5) Integrating STEM content, 6) Student agency, 7)Student collaboration, 8) Evidence-based reasoning, 9) Technology practices in STEM, and 10)STEM career awareness. In this
aspects 1- technical aspects ofchange (technological advancements and computerization) and 2- the people-related aspects(educating and growing the workforce skills). Limited availability of research on both aspects,specifically educating aspects such as the skills/ capabilities of the workforce and the available jobtraining curriculum, in the industrial distribution industry and especially warehousing has drawnour attention for doing this research.Regarding Small and Mid-size Enterprises (SME), Koshal et al., 2019 outlines some of the resultsobtained from a survey comprising sixteen Likert-type questions, gathered from 56 potentialrespondents from industries such as manufacturing, retail, distribution and third-partyorganizations. Results show a
our new engineering students is that engineers do not have towrite. The truth is that communication skills are widely acknowledged within the profession asan essential skill for engineers. ABET has consistently listed “an ability to communicateeffectively” as a foundational student outcome [1] , and surveys indicate that engineering facultyrecognize the importance of students being able to communicate solutions and designssuccessfully [2]. However, writing education is often only addressed within courses like seniorcapstone and general education English courses because engineering faculty run up againstroadblocks such as the time commitment required to set up a new writing assignment, the timeneeded to provide valuable feedback, and students
. Thus,for Andre, identification with engineering, race, and social justice were all related. The findingsof this study may have implications for how institutions leverage students’ social justiceresources that they bring into engineering, integrate issues of social justice into engineeringeducation, and broaden perspectives of engineering such that the field might appeal to a widervariety of students. Results highlight the value and utility of integrating issues of socialinequality into engineering education for potentially increasing interest, persistence, andrepresentation in the field of engineering.Introduction A significant amount of research has focused on engineering identity [1], demonstratinghow engineering identity contributes
initiatives, including professional development, teacher training, special education, curriculum improvement, Local Control Funding Formula, Local Control Accountability Plan, Western Association of Schools and Colleges, Title 1, and other State and Federal programs to improve students’ educational development and academic success. Dr. Meyerott believes all students can learn with innovatively designed programs, curriculum, and instructional strategies implemented to accommodate the diversity of learners today. This successful learning environment can be achieved through high expectations, clear goals, and collaboration with students, educators, and community stakeholders. In Theresa’s extra time she is a scuba diving
select their teaching modality without significant impacton performance.Intro: The effects COVID-19 had on education since March 2020 have been varied. Over 50%of in-person learning around the world was put on hold for at least some period of time. [1] [2]Over 24 months after the start of lockdowns across the world, many institutions are still adaptingto a new normal. Engineering courses had to become flexible adapting course material, in-classdemos, fieldwork, labs, and industrial field trips to the online environment. Intro toenvironmental engineering courses often include all of these aforementioned experiences. In theearly days of the pandemic, March 2020, faculty had to adapt curriculum quickly to continuestudents’ education in
investments in designingand developing gamified educational strategies in the last two decades, little is known aboutsystematic approaches to direct future research and development efforts in this field for theconstruction sector. The overarching objective of this study is to address this gap in knowledgeby conducting a scoping review to systematically analyze and map the research done in thisdomain. Particularly, this study addresses two questions: (1) what is known from the literatureabout gamified solutions for education and training in the construction industry? (2) what are thepotential future research directions in gamification for education and training in the constructionindustry?In this study, we address these questions using a scoping
other factors, such as gender,exercise, and working hours, did not show significant associations with well-being and perceivedstress, further studies are required to investigate: how a specific gender group appears to have adifferent well-being state than others; what types of work might impact students' well-being; andwhat support systems provided by the university are most effective in supporting student well-being.Introduction A recent study showed that graduate students are six times more likely to suffer from mentalillness as compared to the general population [1]. The study surveyed 2,279 graduate students from26 countries and 234 institutions and discovered that a staggering 41% of the participants hadmoderate to severe anxiety
facilitate the learning of theirnear-peers in STEM courses [1-7], including first-year engineering courses [8-11]. The LearningAssistant (LA) model formalized the process of training UTA students to serve in a variety ofclassroom settings, frequently for core STEM courses that many students find particularlychallenging. The LA model started at the University of Colorado Boulder and has sinceexpanded to 200 institutions [12, 13]. LA Programs are intended to blend four goals:undergraduate course transformation using LAs, discipline-based education research, teachingrecruitment and preparation, and transformation of departmental cultures [12]. The three mainexperience elements of model LA programs include: (1) practice where the LAs lead weeklylearning
competences in data analysis. Theintuition driving this research is that the approach currently used to teach data science in civilengineering is failing to gain the interest of students. This study has two objectives: (1) toexplore the attitudes and beliefs of civil engineering students towards data science and (2) topropose pedagogical activities aimed at integrating data science into undergraduate civilengineering courses. Toward the first objective, an instrument was developed using itemsadapted from the Computing Attitudes Survey (CAS) and the Engineering ProfessionalResponsibility Assessment (EPRA). The survey was administered to civil engineering students,with responses received primarily from senior-level students. An exploratory factor
future computer engineering curricula. Such curricula should meet the standards oftoday yet look forward to adapting to the guidelines of tomorrow, which are embodied by theIEEE/ACM Computing Curricula 2020 Paradigms for Global Computing Education.IntroductionAt our institution, like many others worldwide, it has been over a decade since we havereimagined and redesigned our engineering curricula. Since then, we have ensured andconfirmed compliance with accreditation agencies [1], perfected the delivery of courses, andassessed learning outcomes to ensure that our graduates can be successful in all the differentstages of their careers. The problem is that in the last ten years, the careers that await ourgraduates have changed fundamentally such
between what instructors want students to know (course goals orobjectives) and their understanding. As a result, an alternative method of assessing student work,standards-based grading (SBG), is becoming more popular in the engineering education field toprovide students with rich feedback on how well they are meeting course standards [1] . ThoughSBG more explicitly links student proficiency and course goals, its effectiveness still relies onstudent initiative to read and internalize the SBG feedback. This is a not a trivial task. Bothanecdotal educational wisdom and a handful of studies suggest that students do not incorporatefeedback [2] , especially when paired with a grade [3]. Additionally, there can be studenthesitance in accepting SBG
supporting evidence-based outreach in science, engineering, arts, and design. She translated a decade of interdisciplinary initiatives into VT’s Innovations Pathway Minor, and has directed 11 PhD dissertations, served on 17 PhD committees, and funded and mentored 6 post-graduate scholars (5 PhD, 1 MFA). Her funded NSF projects include revolutionizing the culture of the VT ECE department, identifying practices in intentionally inclusive Maker spaces, and researching effective modes of co-creation between housing experts and remote Alaska Native communities.Annie Yong Patrick (Ms.) .© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comWork-in-Progress: Sense of Belonging Among Underrepresented
, including ASCE, ACI, ASEE, ASC, ATMAE, and TRB. His research output has been well disseminated as he has published thirty journal papers and thirty-nine conference papers. His research interests are 1) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition held in Minneapolis, MN, June 26-29, 2022 Does the Active Learning Help Students Learn and Improve their Performance? A Case
of diverse stakeholders, including those who aremarginalized, mainstreamed, and vulnerable. We adapted the Interpersonal Reactivity Index todevelop a measure to capture expansive empathy and performed an exploratory factor analysis.We examined factor structure using data collected at the beginning of a senior design class.Initial results suggest that students have not developed expansive empathy in their previousengineering courses.Introduction and research purposeWhile empathy is critical in ethical and effective design, teaching it is challenging. Researchsuggests empathy can be developed through human-centered design [1], as students engage withsociotechnical issues and focus on actual stakeholder needs, and especially, by focusing
Tine3, PhD, Samuel Next Generation Science Standards:funded by the Science Education Streeter1, David Clemens-Sewall1, Sara • MS-LS1-5. Construct a scientific explanationPartnership Award of the National Institute based on evidence for how environmentalof General Medical Sciences, a team of Vannah4, and Genevieve Goebel4 factors influence the growth of organisms.faculty, staff, and graduate students fromDartmouth as well as educators from a Thayer School of Engineering, 2Biological 1
its use extended into university-level engineering curricula. In 2016 several earlyadopters hosted a SBG workshop at the ASEE Annual Conference [1]. Some engineeringinstructors have documented the use of SBG in fundamental engineering courses, such as fluidmechanics [2], thermodynamics [3], signals and systems [4, 5], and software verification [6].This paper extends from the author’s efforts to implement SBG in introductory electric circuitscourses for biomedical, computer, and electrical engineering students.There have been many interventions to improve students’ performance and concept retention inelectric circuits courses. Narrowing the focus to papers that are concerned with strategiesinvolving grading: using team-based learning [7] to
industrysoftware, e.g., SAP2000 and Revit, to develop structural models and expand their potential throughVR development using toolkits such as Unity. The VR exercises currently under development aregenerating structural systems to expose students to seismic technology, including seismicisolation. Through the implementation of these VR exercises, we aim to increase students’engagement and material comprehension in upper division structural engineering courses.1. Motivation for WorkHands on learning is an excellent means of reinforcing material and engaging students. However,in fields such as structural engineering (SE), exploring theory can be difficult due to the scale ofreal-life projects and connections to real-life applications. This further
offers students an opportunity to synthesize and demonstrate their knowledgein the field of their discipline as well as hone the skills necessary in the workplace. They are animportant part of engineering education and also a requirement by ABET. A study led byGewirtz in 2017 [1] shows engineering students benefit from a capstone design course in theirtransitions into the professional world. Many engineering programs have a capstone courserequirement so that students get exposure to open-ended problem-solving, and often aculminating engineering design project is a major part of the course. Several years ago, theMathematics Department and the Engineering Department at Methodist University developedtheir own capstone courses independently, and
amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Monique S. Ross (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender
climate initiative. Separate surveys were administered for faculty,staff, postdoctoral fellows, and graduate students. Each survey included ~100 questions. Response rateswere high with over 80% of faculty and staff responding.Climate survey responses were distributed to departments through four separate profiles to facilitate morefocused discussions. Climate Profile 1 focused on Broad Experiences in the Department includingsatisfaction with resources, positive aspects of the climate, and concerns. Climate Profile 2 focused onmore Specific Experiences in the Department including transparency, influence, and voice. ClimateProfile 3 focused on the Overall Quality, Conditions, and Concerns related to climate in the department.Climate Profile 4
associated changes that occur in their brain can lay the groundwork for novel advances inengineering education that support new tools and pedagogy development for design.IntroductionConcept mapping is a technique to represent complex systems [1], [2]. It provides a visual tool toillustrate the relationships between conceptual information. The use of concept maps isincreasingly prevalent in both education and engineering practice. For example, conceptmapping is a core principle in the Adaptable Futures guide [3]. When deciding whether abuilding is suitable for adaptive reuse, and how to go about designing it, the guide suggestsstarting with drawing a concept map including all of the possible stakeholders and making linksbetween the reasons for
concepts such as vectors, matrices, and linear spaces from the very beginning. Inthis paper, we describe the design choices and implementation guidelines adopted during threeyears of major innovation and overhaul of an existing linear algebra course (called the Traditionalcourse in the following) offered to engineering students at the University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign.The Traditional linear algebra course was listed as an upper-level course, following the calculussequence targeted to freshmen and sophomores. This resulted in a significant portion ofengineering students only taking linear algebra later in the curriculum, despite the fact that mostof its content requires only Calculus 1 as a prerequisite. Consequently, instructors
Impacts (CENI) at ICAT. Her work focuses on building networks between the university and multiple community sectors and supporting evidence-based outreach in science, engineering, arts, and design. She translated a decade of interdisciplinary initiatives into VT’s Innovations Pathway Minor, and has directed 11 PhD dissertations, served on 17 PhD committees, and funded and mentored 6 post-graduate scholars (5 PhD, 1 MFA). Her funded NSF projects include revolutionizing the culture of the VT ECE department, identifying practices in intentionally inclusive Maker spaces, and researching effective modes of co-creation between housing experts and remote Alaska Native communities.Justin Kleiber Justin received his B.S. in
experiences. Specifically we focus on three popular teaching andlearning variables that closely align with ERT. As shown in Table 1, these include studentengagement, technology use and access, and student assessment.Hence, in this study, we focus on investigating the following research questions that drive ourresearch: • RQ 1: What are the implications of emergency remote teaching on students’ learning experience • RQ 2: What is the impact of emergency remote teaching faculty or instructors’ teaching experience?The rest of the paper is organized as: Section discusses the literature review, Section explains themethodology that we use for this study, Section discusses the results obtained from the data,finally Section outlines and