classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE AnnualConference, 2003.14 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Assessment results of multi-intelligence methods used in dynamics,” Proceedingsof the ASEE Annual Conference, 2006.15 Everett, L. J. and Villa, E. Q., “Increasing success in dynamics course through multi-intelligence methods andpeer facilitation,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.16 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R., editors. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool (Expanded Edition). National Academies Press, 2000.17 Kypuros, J. A. and Tarawneh, C., “Multimodal Modules for Non-Calculus-Based Engineering MechanicsCurriculum,” Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.18 Kypuros, J
planning another Tenure & Promotion Panel discussion and Q&A…. Do you have topics and issues you'd like to know more about? Send me your ideas that can help us plan the content and find the right panelists.The following are the inputs that were received from the member solicitation (E. Tetteh, personalcommunication, October 5, 2011):• Techniques, strategies, etc that have resulted in successful tenure and promotion• Promotion to full Professor• Faculty ~ Reappointment/ Promotion and Tenure• Shared University Governance• TECHNOLOGY Based discipline with respect to the "BOYER'S ~ model", which is Scholarship of "Teaching-Applied Research- Innovation/ Application and Integration"• How to divine [sic] out what my
, Sydney: A story of intersecting agendas. International Journal of Sustainability inHigher Education, 5(3), 267-277.7. Vandenburg, W. H. 1999. On the measurement and integration of sustainability in engineering education. Journalof Engineering Education, 88(2), 231-235.8. Meadows, D. H. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Edited by D. Wright. Chelsea Green Publishing: WhiteRiver Junction, Vermont9. Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Page 25.294.910. Mihelcic, J. R., J. C. Crittenden, M. J. Small, D. R. Shonnard, D. R. Hokanson, Q. Zhang, et al. 2003
array. The following factors are affected on the performance of a solar cell4: Sunlight and the angle that the sunrays hit the PV cell. Climate conditions such as clouds, fog, dust. The atmospheric layer's absorption and reflection. Temperature of the surroundings. Fig 2. Solar panel configurationsThe equivalent circuit of PV cells can be modeled as a current source in parallel with a diodeand series and shunt resistances4,5 as shown in Fig. 3. The output current I is obtained from: q ( V Rs I ) V Rs I I I l I 0 e nkT 1 (1) R SH
;-//-/( ,*+)*--")*+( "$%&.$'J);1#$') 9.3"K.+$"(03:) 9.3"K.+$"(03:) @M"06&'3$NG%%/) 2)!%3$(%/) 9.3.:'&'3$) /:'=(.)8)G(0:%3%&'$(1)E)>3./14+)W'%&'$(1) E!)533%7.4%3)8)!('.470$1)8)Q(0R'3)2)C(./)!%&&"30+.4%3#) E)!./+"/"#)8)"165&:)8"22#$*,&'"$(.)?*@-5&:)+0#%*-() Figure 4: The Summary-form Edifice of Undergraduate Manufacturing Engineering at North Dakota State University Firstly, over the past decade, the North Dakota manufacturing economy has been very strong,marked by increasing employment throughout most of the first decade of this century. TheFargo-Moorhead
Ftotal = k f 2We find empirically that k ranges between 6 and 9 for the College of Engineering and Science atLouisiana Tech university for each year starting in 2000. Figure 1. shows the f-index for 2007-08, here k =6. Page 25.165.3 f-index for 2007-08 14 12Number of Students 10 8 6 4 2 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
training sessions, the final presentations are made. In some cases it is necessary to havea semi-final presentation session where all teams record their presentations so that a group offinalists can be chosen. This can be a logistic necessity. If five teams present at the finals andeach team gives a 10-12 minute presentation with a 3-5 minute Q&A, then the program lasts forat least 75 minutes (5 teams X 15 minutes each). Now, add in a 15 minute introduction forleaders from the University and firm to talk and judges to be introduced. Then account for 5minutes between the presentations, at least 10 minutes for judges to select the winner(s), and 10minutes to thank the participants and award the prizes. In this format, even if nothing gets
this time.transmission Exam 1- Qs: students will scored 70% or betterImpairments, such as 3,4,5,9,10 score 70% or on this questionAttenuation, delay distortion, Exam 2 – Qs: 2, 3 better on this blockand noise. Reading assig, question Iclicker quizzes block. Final Exam – Qs:6, 13, 17, 33, 374.Become familiar with Exam 1 – Q:6 70% of 76.6% of students Y None planned at this time.noise designation such a Exam 2 – Q:2,3 students will scored 70% or bettersignal-to-noise ratio (SNR) HW 3
upward linear displacement [e.g., ya and yb in Fig. 1(b)].■ Methodology and pedagogy of the method of model formulasThe four model formulas in Eqs. (1) through (4) were derived in great detail in the paper thatpropounded the MoMF.12 For convenience of readers, let us take a brief overview of how thesemodel formulas are obtained. Basically, it starts out with the loading function q,9 written in termsof singularity functions for the beam ab in Fig. 1; as follows: q = Va < x >− 1 + M a < x >− 2 − P < x − x P >− 1 + K < x − x K >− 2 − w0 < x − x w >0 w − w0 w − w0 − 1 < x − x w >1 + w1< x − u w > 0 + 1 < x − u w >1
Basics of Technology Introduction to CADNeedless to say, it will take some time to gain enough statistical data to be able to measure thesuccess of these curricular changes, but we are hopeful that they will make a significantcontribution to the study success of our students.References: 1. E. Bratschitsch, A. Millward-Sadler: Praxis-Oriented Engineering Education in Vehicle Technology Studies - Challenges and Solutions, Proceedings of ASEE Conference & Exposition, Louisville, June 20th - 23rd 2010 2. Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention. Journal of Engineering Education, October 2009, Vol. 98
thermoelectric device (Type-T thermocouple) Heater voltage, measured using a voltage divider (analog voltage input) Load voltage, measured across variable resistor Partial load voltage, measured across the 0.488Ω fixed resistor and used to calculate load current.In order to calculate efficiency using Equation (1), the input heat, Q in, and output power Pout,must be found. The input heat is found using the heater voltage and heater resistance as shownin Equation (2) below. (2)The heater voltage was measured by the data acquisition system and the heater resistance wasmeasured as 9.00Ω prior to testing.The power output was calculated using the
specimens are cast in accordance with ASTM C31. These specimens are usedfor compressive strength tests at 1, 7, and 28 days. However, these specimens only require 68 pounds of material,leaving 148 pounds of concrete for waste. This waste, (37,740 pounds total) had been disposed of in an all-purposedumpster prior to the new zero-waste design.Other materials also became waste when fabricating these trial batches. In the mixing and testing of concrete, alltools and equipment are routinely rinsed after each batch to keep them in working condition and clean. On average,this rinsing requires 2 minutes: one minute for tools; and one minute for the mixer. At a metered flow rate (Q) of0.1426 gallons/second this represents 17.11 gallons of water per batch or
Q Q3 Before 40 30 25 Q Q4 After 24 20 11 Totaal Responses 10 6 5 Befoore n =171 After n = 168 0 ery High Ve High H Aveerage Lo ow Very
learningmodules encouraged students towards positive attitude to work more in study. The most negativeagreement (3.8%) was in Question 9, regarding to the development of the thinking and problemsolving skills by the POGIL activities in classroom. Such neutral and negative responses of Q 7and Q 9 indicate that students, who had limited experiences in active learning environment,might find some difficulty to adapt a new learning strategy to study the subjects by means ofthese POGIL activities.Consider the large number of the positive agreement responses in Q6-9 that stand out stronglyagainst the neutral/disagreement regarding the value of the POGIL based learning environment;for example, a total (11.5%) of the disagreement and neutral response in Question
benefits of using the cloud computing to extend the capacity of clusters”. ACM Publications 2009. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1551635 6. Gong, C., Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, H. & Gong, Z. (2010) “The Characteristics of Cloud Computing”, Parallel Processing Workshops (ICPPW), 2010 39th International Conference on 1316 Sept. 2010, pp. 275 – 279. 7. William Y. Chang, H. A.A. (2010). “Cloud Service Architecture and Related Standards3,2”. In Transforming Enterprise Cloud Services (pp. 87132). Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 8. NIST, National Institutes of Standards and Technology, http://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/ 9. Terry, D. (2011) “ACM Tech Pack on Cloud Computing”, ACM Tech Pack Committee on Cloud Computing
, students requested that a detailed map with directions be sentelectronically to them before the start of the program to ensure they could locate the check-in/registration area. One final recommendation was to make the program longer in order tofacilitate the peer building process (four days was too rushed). Finally, a student expressedconcern that the program overlapped with the freshman priority enrollment time. The studentcould never fully relax during the program because he/she was worried about not getting theclasses of his/her choice. Feedback from the participants about the various workshops consistently reported not havingenough question and answer (Q&A) time. Students were left with lingering thoughts andquestions about each workshop
lowest ratings were 2.20 and 2.30, for “Analysis” and Questions andAnswers”, respectively. Some of the analysis problems were related to how the input loads andrestraints were determined, rather than the use of the software itself. During the Q/A session,some groups had difficulty justifying the reasons for some of their decisions related to theiranalysis. It should also be noted that the high standard deviation for “Goals/Criteria” was due tothe lack of clarity in the purpose of the analysis (i.e. with respect to their optimization) by two ofthe groups. In summary, effectively using the material presented in this course is a challenge forour students, but while they clearly struggled on some issues, the projects provided a valuableexperience to
part of the work is supported by the Undergraduate Research Associates Programof the University of Southern California. Our data comes from a challenging university-leveloperating systems course that offers enrollment for both graduates and undergraduates. Theseforums provide an aid to students when they are away from the classroom, allowing them thebenefits of referencing solutions to similar problems and having their own addressed. Working inteams, students may come in contact with others from their group, those from outside their group,and also with the professor. Eight project forums from two semesters divide up the 418 threads(the whole containing 1841 posts) in our data. Each thread is modeled in a “Q&A” style ofdiscussion, linked up
reported an increase in interest in STEM and the 11th grade girlsreported an increased interest in pursuing engineering in college. The males in both 11thand 12th grade reported a decrease in STEM related fields yet rated STEM skills asenjoyable. Page 25.617.10Figure 9. The 10th grade chemistry classes were all males and indicated that they enjoyed STEMactivities after participating in the electrospinning activity. They also indicated in Q. 19 and Q. 20that they were considering pursuing a science or engineering major in college.Although the attitudes inventory was inconclusive, there was a notable change in thestudent’s comprehension and knowledge
2001-126). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 20, 2011, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001126.pdf24 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.25 van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Abany, NY: State University of New York Press.26 Säljö, R. (1997). Talk as data and practice – A critical look at phenomenographic inquiry and the appeal to experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 173-190.27 Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA
: University of Texas at El Paso. Retrieved from http://cahsi.cs.utep.edu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=lTsF-nmnN8k%3D&tabid=10211. Connally, E., Hughes-Hallett, D., Gleason, A. M., Cheifetz, P., Davidian, A., Flath, D. E., & et al. (2006). Functions modeling change - A preparation for Calculus (3rd ed.). Wiley.12. Freudenthal, E., Roy, M. K., Ogrey, A. N., and Gates, A. Q. (2009). A creatively engaging introductory course in Computer Science that gently motivates exploration of mathematical concepts. (AC 2009-2188). Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference.13. Freudenthal, E., Roy, M. K., Ogrey, A., Magoc, T., & Siegel, A. (2010). Media Propelled Computational Thinking. Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical
to q 2 which was also pertinent to q 3)4: Yes, I think there would be an increased emphasis on simplicity and practicality.differencesin the design I think it poses an interesting dynamic of having to build someone else’s design.process This is something that can definitely occur out in industry so it gives them someknowledge real world experience on how to fit in within an existing design team. I door design however think students entering this kind of experience in academia might feelphilosophy like they are along for the ride and not really included in any of the decision making processes. To a small degree I would expect them to be
. It is hoped that aconsideration of the kinds of complexity described in this paper with provide reasons to integratethis practice into student experiences while they are in school.i Shannon Flumerfelt, Gary Halada, and Franz-Josef Kahlen, “Complexity By Design.” Mechanical Engineering,134 (2012): 28-33.ii Louis J. Thibodeaux, Kalliat T. Valsaraj, Vijay T. John, “Marine Oil Fate: Knowledge Gaps, Basic Research, andDevelopment Needs; A Perspective Based on the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill,” Environmental EngineeringScience 28:2 (2011) 87-93.iii Oxford Dictionary on-line: http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/complex?q=complex
Education. Proceedings from FIE ‘10: 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Rapid City, SD.4. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.5. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969 - 1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 125-152.6. Locke, E. A. & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Page 25.677.8
reputation for his research in the areas of computational fluid dynamics, fluid particle systems, and fluidization. His computational work has shortened the time lag from laboratory- to commercial-scale for fluid/particle and fluidized bed systems. He currently serves on the editorial board of the Powder Technology Journal. He has received several AIChE awards includ- ing the Donald Q. Kern Award in Heat Transfer and Energy Conversion, the Fluor Daniel Lectureship in Fluidization and Fluid/Particle Systems, the Ernest W. Thiele Award, and the Fluidization Process Recognition Award. He is also a Fellow of AIChE.Mr. Mohamed Shahidehpour, Illinois Institute of TechnologyMr. Joseph Clair P.E., Illinois Institute of Technology
/computer-science- courses , Accessed on Jan 9, 2012.20. Stanford University, http://explorecourses.stanford.edu/CourseSearch/search?page=0&catalog=&q=CS&filter-coursestatus- Active=on&view=catalog&filter-catalognumber-CS=on&collapse=, Accessed on Jan 9, 2012.21. Carnegie Melon University, http://coursecatalog.web.cmu.edu/schoolofcomputerscience/ , Accessed on Jan 9, 2012.22. University of Utah, http://www.ece.utah.edu/uploads/pdf/Available%20ECE%20Courses%20Fall%202010%20Update.pdf , Accessed on Jan 9, 2012.23. Stony Brook University, http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~jgao/CSE590-fall06/, Accessed on 12/7/2011.24. Stanford Wireless Sensor Networks Lab, http://wsnl.stnford.edu/ , Accessed on 12/7/2011.25. Yale
Carolina, Charlotte Miguel Pando is Associate Professor, Civil, and Environmental Engineering Department, UNC, Charlotte.Dr. Samuel T. Lopez, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Page 25.834.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 International Service as a Means of Improving Retention of Engineering Students Brett Q. Tempest, Sandra L. Dika, Miguel A. Pando & Samuel T. Lopez University of North Carolina at CharlotteAbstract One of the most significant challenges facing engineering education is
, http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2010-profile-engineering-statistics.pdf5. Redmond, S. P. (1990). Mentoring and Cultural Diversity in Academic Settings. American Behavioral Scientist,34(2), 188-200.6. Hill, R. D., Castillo, L. G., Ngu, L. Q., & Pepion, K. (1999). Mentoring Ethnic Minority Students for Careers inAcademia: The WICHE Doctoral Scholars Program. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(6), 827-845.7. Zhu, J., Cox, M.F., Evangelou, D., Lynch, C., Fentiman, A.W., and Dunston F.S., Experiences of Scholars in theReinvigorating Engineering and Changing History Program: A Case Study of the First Graduate Student Cohort,2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition in Vancouver, BC, Canada.8.ABET (2010
interval:(msec) 170", "P wave: Normal", "QRS Complex Axis: -45", "QRS Duration:(msec) 90", "Morphology: Q waves in I, III, and aVF, and V1 to V5", "STsegment: Hyperacute ST segment elevation in V1 to V6", "T wave: Inverted in I, aVL and V2 to V6", "QT interval: 320" , "Diagnosis: Sinus rhythm with second degree SA block type I", "\tLAD, acute anterior and lateral MI, and probable old inferior MI"}; static double[] yourChoicesParameters = {71, 71, 170, -45, 90, 320}; private JList yourChoices; private JTextArea info ; private Container pane