participants typically spend between 15 and 25 hours to completethe project. More information may be found in Reference 1.ParticipantsStudent participants were from the same cohort in the first term of the senior capstone laboratorysequence at Oregon State University. This class included 27 students majoring in bioengineering,45 students majoring in chemical engineering, and 9 students majoring in environmentalengineering. These students were assembled into 27 three-student teams who all participated inthe virtual laboratory project which was administered between two physical laboratory projects.They had a choice between the three virtual laboratory projects; 15 teams worked on the VirtualCVD Laboratory Project (45 students) and the remainder worked
, microprocessors, assembly language, and higher-level programming. For programs having capstone experiences, this system could also be used in senior projects. This type of device can be used in traditional classes but will be most useful for distance-learning classes because of its ability to direct the student and collect data. Introduction Before attempting any design, it is important to specify what the design will accomplish, not how it will be implemented. This is typically done with a document called a functional specification. Once it is completed (and approved by shareholders, if necessary), work can begin on the actual components that make up the design. Many
undergraduate engineering course.AbstractThis evidence-based Work in Progress research paper will explore how collaborative technologyimpacts student engagement with teams and programming activities in an introductory first-yearengineering course. Introduction to engineering has been a historically difficult course forundergraduates as they are introduced to algorithmic thinking, design processes, and problem-solvingmethodologies. To assist students, a variety of approaches can be employed in the classroom; team-based capstone projects with end of course demonstrations, synchronous collaborative technology thatsupports teamwork and communication in and out of class, pair-programming, and visual-basedprogramming languages. Each of these provides
, since they will learn to look at the problem from differentangles before choosing a suitable path forward.2. Encourage internships.Internships are a great way to prepare students for careers on multi-disciplinary teams. Onebenefit is to allow students to learn if they like and think they can thrive in that environment. Thesecond is to already start acquiring the necessary skills to succeed in these positions early on.Internships which have a component around rotation across teams, also allow students to gainwider appreciation of how different positions interact, before having to dive deep into one role.On completion of junior-year internships, students can then bring back acquired skills to theirfinal year classes, capstone projects, and
requirements into the mechanical engineering capstone projects, introducing non-profit partnerships related to designs for persons with disabilities, and founding the Social/Environmental Design Impact Award. He manages several outreach and diversity efforts including the large-scale Get Out And Learn (GOAL) engineering kit program that reaches thousands of local K-12 students. He has received the Volunteers for Medical Engineering (VME) 2020 Faculty of the Year award, Engineering for US All (e4usa) 2021 Most Outstanding University Partner Award, and the VME 2021 Volunteer of the Year award. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
engage joint PWI-MSI teams in the US education and research enterprise. The IECis a novel collaboration among nearly 20 MSIs, most of whom participated in an NSF fundedmulti-year, engineering education project. This new organization was built on the idea that thiscollaboration can be leveraged and moved to the next level to provide higher capacity building ateach of the consortium members. The hypothesis is that there are windows of opportunity openthrough establishment of research and educational collaborations between its MSI members withPWI research-intensive institutions. This is especially true since its member institutions serve aunique population of minority students. The IEC is developing the infrastructure and programs tofacilitate
think are the critical environmental problems of today (list a maximum of 5)?c) Identify practices that will enable us to mitigate these concerns (list a maximum of 5).Students enrolled in multidisciplinary capstone engineering courses were provided the samesurvey based on sustainability. The survey results were then collected and analyzed for directcomparison. The obtained data facilitates identification of key areas of sustainability thatstudents have been exposed to and retained during their undergraduate engineering education. Italso highlights areas that educational interventions need to target to efficiently disseminatefundamental knowledge in the area of sustainability. To fill this gap, the next research stagefocused on examining
physical or kinesthetic demonstrations. Theories that expound upon and methodological frameworks for analyzing kinestheticactivities and experimental lab work have existed in the domain of engineering education forquite some time [6, 7], and certainly are well documented within the mechanical engineeringdiscipline [8-13], ranging from the study of manufacturing, any number of forays and iterationsof the teaching of statics, interdisciplinary work heavily involving mechanical engineeringdesign and mechanical engineering students, senior capstone projects, and a barrage of industry-collegiate partnership research projects. One common theme among these works is that studentsare more engaged with where their interests lie, and if the community
relatedcourses are in the filed of robotics, construction management, and nanotechnology. Most of thesecourses require students to complete a project. While undergraduate research is emphasized toreplace or complement capstone project course such as EGT-417, course projects serve well inexposing students to innovative, developmental work that can benefit them in future practicalapplications. The outreach programs that target young high school students as well as adultlearners can also benefit from hands-on projects that combine innovation, creativity andanalytical skills. It is desirable to incorporate new ideas, innovative schemes and application-based learning into manageable projects that can be carried out by students on different levels
and helpbring them to the classroom. Within the SME there is the North American ManufacturingResearch Institute (NAMRI) that holds annual research events. Over time increasing theeducational ties to this group should help identify prime areas for education that can beintroduced to the undergraduate curriculum ahead of industry demand. Page 14.393.6Places where research topics are expected to have a direct input include, ≠ Senior level capstone courses and undergraduate course projects ≠ Upper level electives and advanced topics courses ≠ Exposure through co-ops and internshipsInnovation in EducationEducation is a process, much like any process in manufacturing. Universities bring in studentsand
: are they related?,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2009.[20] T. A. Ward, “Common elements of capstone projects in the world’s top-ranked engineering universities,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 2013.[21] B. J. Zimmerman, “Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. . Zeidner, Eds. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, pp. 13–39.[22] P. Rivera-Reyes, O. Lawanto, and M. L. Pate, “Students’ Task Interpretation and Conceptual Understanding in an Electronics Laboratory,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 265–272, Nov. 2017.[23] P. Rivera-Reyes, “Students’ Task Interpretation and
Paper ID #26269Developing Reliable Lab Rubrics Using Only Two ColumnsProf. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment and professional development
example of evolvable SDRbased laboratories for three existing undergraduate courses. In this project, we are developingnew lab components that can be adopted by multiple courses ranging from freshman yearintroductory course to senior year capstone design projects. Specifically, we have developed aSDR based general modulation/demodulation platform with a graphical user interface (GUI).This user-friendly GUI will allow students to adjust RF parameters such as carrier frequency andsymbol rate. More importantly, this general modulation/demodulation platform is capable oftransmitting many popular modulation schemes such as BPSK, QPSK, 8PSK, 16PSK, 16QAM,64QAM. Additionally, students are able to observe the transmitted signal in both time andfrequency
completionof the course, students will be able to: 1. Complete a flowchart of how to solve a problem; 2. Use a computer program to solve an engineering problem; 3. Correctly and clearly plot the results of calculations; 4. Program a microprocessor; and 5. Use software to accurately represent a 3-dimensional object.Prior to this curriculum change, mechanical engineers were not all exposed to microprocessorprogramming. A number of students employed them in club, competition, or capstone projects,but this was generally a minority. Department faculty decided to seize the opportunity in thisnew course to introduce microcontrollers to all mechanical engineering students. Not only is itan engaging way of exercising and reinforcing recently
Paper ID #13903The ”Minty Boost R ” as an Exciting Laboratory Experience in Learning PowerElectronics and InstrumentationDr. Herbert L. Hess, University of Idaho, Moscow Herb Hess is Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Idaho, where he teaches subjects in He received the PhD Degree from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1993. His research and teaching interests are in power electronics, electric machines and drives, electrical power systems, and analog/mixed signal electronics. He has taught senior capstone design since 1985 at several universities
NanoJapan: International Research Experiences for Undergraduates(NanoJapan IREU) and the RQI Research Experiences for Undergraduates (RQI REU)programs for comparison because both programs are funded by the NSF, headquartered at RiceUniversity, recruit participants from universities nationwide via a competitive selection process,enable students to participate in cutting-edge research in fields related to nanoscale and atomic-scale systems, phenomena, and devices, and require participants to present topical researchposters on their summer projects at a summer research colloquium as a capstone experience.The NanoJapan: IREU Program, the key educational initiative of the NSF PIRE grant awardedto Rice University in 2006, is a twelve-week summer program
. Students were asked about their motivation to learn course content for eachmodeling platform as well as their confidence in their ability to utilize each software package tosimulate real-world mechanical systems. Survey data was analyzed via SAS 94 English (SASInstitute, Cary, NC, USA) for statistical significance. Modeling Dynamics terminates each semester with a significant group term project. Open-ended instructions encourage teams to develop a research question about a real-world dynamicalsystem that can be investigated using the simulation tools taught in the course. Students oftenselect to use their simulation term project to supplement Capstone Design or graduate researchtopics, which typically requires students to learn and implement
, industrial training opportunities and Page 13.355.7course/program curriculum development. Benefits for the student side are far greater in numberwith opportunity to have industrial adjunct faculty to present real life scenarios in certainmanagement based courses. The Advisory Board is generating endowment money to supportscholarships to IET students and they support equipment donation in areas of need. The mostimportant is cooperative education placement. This usually results in greater possibility of futurefull-time employment and helps develop topic areas for their Senior Project capstone course. TheAdvisory Board now supports the teaching, research
Paper ID #6799Ethics in Engineering Education Using Virtual WorldsDr. Jodi Reeves, National University Dr. Jodi Reeves is an associate professor in the Department of Applied Engineering at National University in San Diego, CA. She teaches courses in design engineering, engineering management, electric circuits, and other applied engineering courses. She is also the lead faculty for the Data Analytics program in the School of Engineering, Technology, and Media at National University. Prior to academia, she worked for almost ten years as a quality control manager, engineering project manager, and senior scientist responsi
task.Current assessment approaches rely on idea generation tasks, surveys, or project deliverableseach of which have limitations. In this paper, we present an alternative novel approach forassessing individual understanding of innovation process that we argue should be a learningoutcome of any innovation education program or curricula. Our method, called the InnovationProcess Mapping Protocol provides individualized assessment of knowledge and skills and takesabout 30 minutes to complete. The data collected in the form of Innovation Process Maps areevaluated in two ways: using the innovation process mapping rubric and in the form of a Markovchain. We present results from two students and discuss how this instrument can be used inresearch studies and
expected to build a working model of their design in the workshop. Each team willsubmit a proposal and a project schedule identifying all work items needed to complete the designexperience by the end of the quarter. Weekly written and oral progress reports are also requiredfrom each team. Students are also required to maintain a design folder in which all relevantcorrespondence, team meetings and design calculations are kept. The design is normally constrained by size and cost and other considerations that may beapplicable depending on the problem. This design experience allows students the opportunity towork in teams during their first year of enrollment. It also emphasizes the importance of graphical,written and oral communications in the
military. Next, an assessment is offered onthe current state of electric power programs within the academic community for meeting theseneeds. In recognition of projected technology-driven military platforms, an enhanced powerengineering concentration within the electrical engineering curricula at the Naval Academy hasbeen proposed. The paper will conclude with an overview of the selection process forcurriculum topics, course sequencing, and laboratory content.Power Engineering and the U.S. EconomyWith the innovative advancements in power electronic semiconductor materials over the past fewdecades, the field of power engineering has expanded from the traditional focus on utility-levelgeneration and transmission of energy to include the widespread
process. Because of this, it isnot just likely that university education will change during the coming years; it is a certitude.The school facility of the future, therefore, must go far beyond grudgingly accommodatingchange. They must be built for the changes that will definitely occur. Moreover, flexibility isnot just something that will be needed in the future. A high degree of flexibility is required rightnow, to accommodate all the non-standardized aspects of university education that are already inplace, including:• Exploratory, project-based learning where students “learn to learn” by engaging in a wide range of activities• Outcome assessment, capstone programs and portfolios• Teaming and group decision-making, with teachers acting as
. Because of this, it isnot just likely that university education will change during the coming years; it is a certitude.The school facility of the future, therefore, must go far beyond grudgingly accommodatingchange. They must be built for the changes that will definitely occur. Moreover, flexibility isnot just something that will be needed in the future. A high degree of flexibility is required rightnow, to accommodate all the non-standardized aspects of university education that are already inplace, including:• Exploratory, project-based learning where students “learn to learn” by engaging in a wide range of activities• Outcome assessment, capstone programs and portfolios• Teaming and group decision-making, with teachers acting as
andmanipulation of biological molecules 6,7,8,9. The imaging capability of AFM combined withmanipulation allows precise control of nanoscale components over which nanostrucures aremoved and characterized at each step of manipulation or assembly.Scanning probe microscopes have been expensive and were used mainly by the researchuniversities and high tech industry. However due to the increasing use of AFM for teachingpurposes, the leading providers of AFMs have developed low cost, high-value scanningprobe microscopes. The goal of our project is to set up an instructional lab using low costAFM and develop instructional material for visualization and manipulation of nanoscalecomponents for two and four year engineering technology programs. The paper will
needs. Our DA and IDA methods assess student (learning) outcomes satisfying the Page 23.230.3MET specific criteria are in coincidence with ETAC Criteria. It’s also to be noted however, thatthere is a considerable overlap between ETAC and MET specific criteria. Two methods –Direct and Indirect Assessment methods are used to assess the studentoutcomes of METs. The DA method uses semester exams, quizzes, projects, lab reports,independent study papers, and capstone design projects, and the IDA method uses end of thesemester self-assessment by students. As pointed out earlier, we need only the raw scores and thetest papers for this model but not
based on both test performance in the class as well as interest in pursuing aresearch project. These two issues are key elements since one wants motivated students as wellas those intellectually prepared for open-ended projects. During this same time period, thestudents were also exploring topics for their senior capstone design project and theundergraduate research project provided added synergism.The undergraduate research phase of the project began in earnest late in the spring semester andcarried through the summer and fall terms. The students were presented the foundationalmaterial using a variety of methods including in-person tutorials on the subject by the facultymentor, on-line tutorials on the foundational material, and readings of
thequality of our students’ software. We took a three-prong approach to adapting the certificationconcepts into the software engineering courses required of our Wireless Engineering majors:standards, tools, and certification. We chose to call our certification process AU OK, where AUstands for Auburn University and OK is a tribute to Nokia’s Nokia OK program, which inspiredthe project.4.1 StandardsWe adapted application standards for classroom use as examples of what is expected of industry-quality software. In particular, we drew heavily on the Java Verified test criteria12 andpredecessor documents from Nokia’s NOKIA OK process. References to procedures that were
Page 8.495.6hands-on activities excited the majority of the students, resulting in significant interest in Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationthe Lost in the Amazon curricular unit. Students commented that they had “never donefancy experiments” and were wondering how “engineering can be fun?” This excitementtowards the hands-on projects was maintained throughout implementation, and createdinitial student interest in the required worksheets. By having fun with Lost in the Amazon,students seemingly changed from their conception that engineering “can’t be exciting,” asexemplified when students
mechanism, andadditional criteria to be met by faculty, facilities, and institutions. Only Criteria 3 and 4 relatedirectly to the content of the EP curriculum; Criterion 8, which refers to program criteria, is notrelevant here because none exist for Engineering Physics (i.e. criteria that would be developedthrough the American Physical Society or the American Institute of Physics).Criterion 4, “Professional Engineering Component,” places no explicit requirements on coursecontent other than requiring a major design experience, which is of the type usually contained ina capstone “senior design” course. It additionally requires “one year of a combination of collegelevel mathematics and basic sciences… appropriate to the discipline,” “one and one-half