manufacturing activities at Yale’s academic makerspace. His professional interests in Mechanical Engi- neering are in the areas of data acquisition/analysis and mechanical design. He is the Co-Chair of the Executive Advisory Board of the FIRST Foundation and is a Fellow of the American Society of Mechan- ical Engineering. Previously, he was the Dean of Engineering at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy and has had fellowships at the MIT Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, the Harvard School of Public Health and with the American Council on Education. He has also served as the Vice President of Public Awareness for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and was the 2001 Baccalaureate College Professor of the Year by the Carnegie
classroom sessions.The following elements of the re-designed course were consistent with previous semesters. Theinteractive response system was used during lectures. However, the questions in the re-designedcourse were largely conceptual and less calculation-based questions were incorporated. The sametextbook has been used since Fall 2013; individual homework assignments were dueapproximately semi-weekly and incorporated online exercises for concept mastery and problemsrequiring multi-step solutions with detailed calculations. The exam style (discussed previously)and difficulty was consistent with previous semesters, to the extent possible. Since Fall 2013, thecourse has incorporated laboratory demonstrations and required student lab reports with
methods improves theresults.To date, the instructional approaches described above have been used only by one instructor.Our plan for broader implementation is to incorporate these approaches into an interactivecomputer-based tutorial, so that other instructors can easily assign such work without having toheavily revise their lecture approaches. The interactive tutorial could incorporate simulated or“virtual” laboratory experiments, where students could gain “hands-on” experience related to theideas we are presenting. This tutorial will be incorporated into our existing Circuit Tutorsoftware package,13-15 which we plan to distribute through a textbook publisher at some point toensure its sustainability.6. Conclusions
Sustainability Practices, en- ergy management of Data Centers and to establish Sustainable strategies for enterprises. He is an Affiliate Researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, focusing on the energy efficiency of IT Equipment in a Data Centers. As a means of promoting student-centric learning, Prof. Radhakr- ishnan has successfully introduced games in to his sustainability classes where students demonstrate the 3s of sustainability, namely, Environment, Economics and Equity, through games. Students learn about conservation (energy, water, waste, equity, etc.) through games and quantifying the results. He has pub- lished papers on this subject and presented them in conferences. Before his teaching
Women < Men Medium Laboratory, Research, and Studio Space Women < Men Eldercare Policies Women < Men Stop the Clock Policies Women < Men Page 26.162.7RIT included an additional question: How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the quality of the long-range career map/plan that you have created? Of the 404 respondents to this particular question (thisexcludes the 18 who did not respond), 52% of men and 55% of women respondents were very satisfiedor satisfied with the quality of
that the team confronted a varietyof challenges, many of which are common to faculty and students seeking to pursue research ordesign endeavors in a small college. We now provide a more detailed explanation of thechallenges of the experience, explaining how they applied to this case in particular:-Small college facilities: Compared to large research universities, the laboratory space,equipment, and other resources were quite limited.-Limited budget: In line with the above, financial resources were modest as well.-Multidisciplinary team and project: With a professor of electrical engineering mentoring astudent with a mechanical engineering concentration, both student and instructor would need tobranch out beyond their comfort zone to tackle the
heart of our e-pedagogy is to provide opportunities for learners to think about new questions or work with newinformation. An effective way to increase the likelihood of this kind of thinking is to havelearners write about their ideas, which occurs throughout the Rio’s Brain learning adventure. Page 26.475.7Figure 3: Sample screenshots from the introductory graphic novel in the Rio’s Brainlearning adventure. They show Rio coming to Sadina’s house for help; Rio telling thebackstory of his camping trip; Rio telling about falling off a cliff; Rio in bed in theSCARE laboratory; Rio looking at his own brain in a vat; and Rio and Sadina
Elliott Tew. Becoming experts: measuring attitude development in introductory computer science. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 183–188. ACM, 2013.17 Arlene Fink and Mark S. Litwin. How to measure survey reliability and validity, volume 7. Sage, 1995.18 John Hill, Curtis A. Carver Jr., Jeffrey W. Humphries, and Udo W. Pooch. Using an isolated network laboratory to teach advanced networks and security. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, volume 33, pages 36–40. ACM, 2001.19 Robert W. Lent, Steven D. Brown, and Kevin C. Larkin. Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of counseling psychology, 33(3):265, 1986.20 Celia Paulsen, Ernest McDuffie
exhibited the least. The closest demonstration of thisattribute was during an observation of student discussions during a team meeting. During thismeeting, the team leader was discussing that a new task added to their upcoming trip to Uganda,in addition to assessing the current electrical system, was to build a safe welding laboratory forthe school EWB-U was serving. In addition to building the facility, the students, along with their Page 26.500.8industry mentor, were also going to host a workshop on safe welding for the students of theschool EWB-U was serving.The students’ reasoning for building the welding facility and hosting a safe
electrokinetics, predominantly di- electrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently co-Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributed to 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Rice UniversityDr. Jennifer Cole
., assistant, associate, full). Examples ofthe differential treatment that Black faculty face: not being given access to an ample sizelaboratory space (or no laboratory), having their office spaces downsized, being ignored inmeetings, being seen as the “Diversity” person, not being chosen to chair search committees,being denied tenure, etc. Faculty are often forced into silence due to being pre-tenure or notwanting to be perceived as an “Angry Black Woman or Man.” Program Directors state thatengineering departments are stuck in a color-blind ideology, which engenders a lack of comfortin discussing critical issues of race or ethnicity. The reality of being a change agent isexhausting, thus White allies are desperately needed to help advocate and
various disciplines, with an additional focus on basic science knowl-edge in the medical domain. The three study types consist of so-called (1) laboratory studieswith short RIs of only a few hours or days, (2) classroom studies (like ours) with RIs of a fewyears, and (3) naturalistic studies with RIs spanning tens of years. In many naturalistic studies theknowledge is measured at the end of the RI. Knowledge at the beginning of the RI can only bereconstructed by e. g. counting the cumber of courses taken on the subject and respective gradesachieved. Across all study types and disciplines, many of the results were adequately describedby the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve. 3 This curve models retention over time as a fast decay atthe beginning
2013. In general, in these evaluations we received relatively minor observationsoriented to reinforce the admission and tutoring programs so that the graduation rates wereenhanced and the failures rates on Basic Science courses were reduced. In particular, we haveweaknesses in the field of Mathematics, this a common problem in Latin American engineeringprograms12 that in our opinion does not receives enough attention. In our case, since 2005 wehave put in place a collaboration with a French University (INSA-Lyon), oriented at reinforcingteaching and learning practices on Engineering Mathematics. Another important recommendationwas to establish a program to update and renew the laboratory equipment as well as put in place amaintenance program
’ learning of basic quantum phenomena such as photon, electron, atommodels, and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle using virtual laboratories. They found thatalmost all students accurately conceptualized the quantum phenomena. Zollman and hiscolleagues2 argued that quantum mechanics learning is not as difficult as it is commonlyperceived. They suggested that non-science high school and first year college students havethe capacity to comprehend quantum mechanics without classical mechanics backgrounds.However, to accomplish this, instruction has to be carefully and internationally designed.Thus, they developed a new instructional design for quantum mechanics that included hands-on activities and a computer-based simulation. 175 teachers in 160
, perceptions of the present (perceived instrumentality), and the interconnections between future goals and present actions. The results of this work indicated three unique student profiles based on their FTPs and have been described previously.18 For the quantitative portion of this work, engineering students at a western land grant institution in fall of 2014 who were enrolled in a first year engineering course required of all engineering majors (except computer science and engineering) were invited to participate (n=682). Students completed the optional survey (n=360, 52.8% response rate) during the first week of class in laboratory sessions of the course. Instrument Motivation was assessed using the Motivations and Attitudes in Engineering that had
Page 26.951.2support research activity at an internationally competitive level for a top 100 university.Coordinating two courses for 300 or more students is normal, with support from teachingassistants for tutorials and laboratory classes. (In Australian universities, each course isnormally 25% of a full-time student’s study load for a semester.) In view of its importance,the capstone design course has a slightly higher level of teaching resources than most othercourses.The second challenge is students’ lack of practical knowledge. Practical knowledge amongstudents entering our engineering courses is usually limited to basic domestic repairs andassembling flat-packed furniture. Almost all the prior courses completed by students focuson
Paper ID #13677Interdisciplinary Medical Product Development Senior Capstone DesignDr. Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois, Chicago Miiri Kotche is a Clinical Associate Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and currently serves as Director of the Medical Accelerator for Devices Laboratory (MAD Lab) at the UIC Innovation Center. Prior to joining the faculty at UIC, she worked in new product development for med- ical devices, telecommunications and consumer products. She co-teaches both bioengineering capstone design courses, including the longstanding core senior design sequence and
perspective, Unstructured-Organizational. Cultural norms and past learningexperiences are also present in this quadrant as they are typically learned over a duration of timeas a result of being a member of a broader social interaction and therefore develop knowledgefrom the culture. When asked about some practices and how they learned about it, severalparticipants noted that they either saw them in their own educational experiences or somethingthat they had done in their own practice and did not recognize it as an EBIP until they saw it in amore organized setting such as a conference session, conference paper, or journal article. "I mean my previous institution, they were already employing active learning in hands-on laboratories. I did a
the fore- seeable future and in fact it’s probably likely to get worse. We anticipate that the market place will have a demand for engineers trained by people with practical experience in a program geared toward practicing. We knew that’s what we wanted to do. The market place is ready for students who fit that bill.Erica’s perspective was consistent with Julian’s – the needs of the marketplace were drivers ofidentifying needs of the students. For her communication project in science, Erica reformulatedthe worth of the laboratory experience: I think we often go for…these knowledge pieces. I look as those [communication] skills as much more important, in all honesty. I think those are the skills that you
. The setup needs to stay completely sealed and leak proof during testing. The fluid should not loss to the surrounding after material failure at the end of the testing. The pressure delivered needs to be variable and controllable. The pressure needs to be measured throughout the test. The bulge height needs to be measured throughout the test.The design constraints are as follows: Due to limitation of the laboratory space, the apparatus size should be limited to 4ft in length, width and height. The total cost of the prototype should not exceed $1,500. The setup should be compatible with hydraulic press available in the institution. The sensors to be selected should be compatible with National Instrument input board
engineering science and towards design-centeredactivities. The restructuring of how we educate aspiring engineers has taken place at theclassroom, departmental, and institutional levels. Laboratory and design courses have beenparticularly instrumental in this shift. Engaging learners within engineering courses has beenwidely studied and can occur through active and cooperative learning, experiences inside andoutside the classroom, interaction and support from experts, and the creation of supportivelearning environments that promotes challenge, effort, and social interaction.2 Across thesestrategies for engagement, design education is central to the engineering classroom. As design isa distinguishing activity done by engineers, design education
Engineering Research Center and previously served as Department Head of the Human Computer Interaction Institute. He has been the recipient of the AAEE Terman Award, the IEEE/ACM Eckert-Mauchly Award, and the ACM SIGMOBILE Outstanding Contributions Award. He is a Fellow of IEEE, ACM, and AAAS and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.Dr. Asim Smailagic, Carnegie Mellon University Professor Asim Smailagic is a Research Professor in the Institute for Complex Engineered Systems and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at CMU. He is also the Leader of Research Thrust on Virtual Coaches at the Quality of Life Technology Center, an NSF ERC, and Director of the Laboratory for Interactive Computer
Classroom using Pencasts and Muddiest Point Web- enabled Tools. In: American Society of Engineering Education. Indianapolis; 2014.14. Newstetter WC, Behravesh E, Nersessian NJ, Fasse BB. Design Principles for Problem-Driven Learning Laboratories in Biomedical Engineering Education. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(10):3257-3267. doi:10.1007/s10439-010-0063-x.15. Garmendia Mujika M, Garikano Osinaga X, Sierra Uria E, Perez Manso A. Developing Teamwork Efficacy Page 26.1099.19 Factors: An Experience in a Project Based Learning Context. Int J Eng Educ. 2013;29(3, SI):752-762.16. Bingham A. Student Attitudes to Real-World
isprovided on creative problem solving, the professional skill used in this study; the instrumentselection process adopted to choose the current set of instruments is discussed; and finally,completed data collection along with its results is presented.Creative Problem SolvingHow do we define, or assess a person’s creative potential? Can it be enhanced, i.e., can a personlearn to be more creative? These questions relate to a deep discussion of creativity as a process tobe taught along with pertinent tools, as well as an inherent disposition for openness to andsustained interest to be creative. Yet another dimension of creativity might be of creativeperformance captured in a short (e.g., laboratory task) or a long period of time (e.g. semesterlong
theclassroom, whether in a lecture, laboratory, or discussion-based course, it is extremely difficultfor the faculty member to instantly gauge the current state of each student and which actions totake accordingly. Faculty time outside the classroom is limited, with many factors vying forattention, from course preparation to grant-writing.The process has delays embedded throughout its various steps: whether considering the casewhen an instructor delivers an assignment or instruction and a student takes several days beforeacting on it, or the time lapse between when an assessment instrument is initially put to use andwhen the instructor either receives that information, finishes decoding it, or makes use of it, thesedelays may prove crucial in
ParticipantIdea Pitches to rally to teams, for Workshops by EdExperts wherein students could learn moreabout a specific organization’s tools, and for a lab safety training to use the shop tools.Three topic categories enticed participants: Hands-On Learning, Digital Learning, and SystemsRe-Thinking. There were four key design parameters of the event— i) Three topic categorieswere framed: Hands-On Learning, Digital Learning, and Systems Re-Thinking, ii) EducationExperts were brought in to pitch Challenge Presentations, lead workshops, and serve as ad hocmentors, iii) A laboratory equipped with prototyping materials and a spending budget for eachstudent enabled physical project developments, and iv) Award categories were not matched to thethree topic
each of the projects will be provided at this timeas data was still being processed at the time of this writing. The three entries are: Explore and develop tools for visual support of learning and training: “Google Glass” Flipped Classroom and Interactive Engagement for Improved Student Learning in Mathematics Flipped Classroom for Statics and Particle Dynamics courseThe objective of first entry was to investigate the use of Google class for preparing multimediacontent through first-person view that could be utilized for teaching, learning, training, andevaluation of laboratory activities. The pilot required the development of the visual support toolsfor “Google Glass” using Android SDKs.The second entry focused on the
Administration from Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton): Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension and Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study.Dr. Philip Michael Sadler, Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Philip Sadler holds a B.S. in Physics from MIT and an Ed.D. from Harvard. He co-authored the first integrated computer and laboratory introductory calculus course in 1975. He has taught middle school mathematics, engineering, and science and both undergraduate science and graduate teaching courses at Harvard. His research
90s, Dr. Sticklen founded and led a computer science laboratory in Page 26.1589.1 knowledge-based systems in the College of Engineering, Michigan State University that focused on task specific approaches to problem solving, better known as expert systems. Over the last fifteen years, Dr. Sticklen has pursued engineering education research focused on early engineering with an emphasis on hybrid course design and problem-based learning. Dr. Sticklen assumed the chairperson of Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
Societyof Engineering Education (the acronym “IGIP” is derived from the society’s originalGerman/Austrian name, “Internationale Gesellschaft für Ingenieurpedagogik”), accredits trainingcenters to offer this certification. Centers exist in Germany, Russia, Austria, Brazil, Switzerland,Czech Republic, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Estonia, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia,Slovenia and Ukraine. The curriculum requirements are modular and extensive, requiring 600hours total, across eight areas, including: Theoretical and Practical Engineering Pedagogy (180hours), Laboratory Methodology (60 hours), Psychology and Sociology (90 hours),Ethics/Intercultural (30 hours), Communication Skills (90 hours), Project Work (30 hours),Electronic Technologies (60