. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[2] J. E. S. Swenson, “Developing Knowledge in Engineering Science Courses: Sense-Making and Epistemologies in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Homework Sessions,” Ph.D., Tufts University, United States -- Massachusetts, 2018. Accessed: Nov. 02, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2055441211/abstract/6ACDF8D09D6B4668PQ/1[3] J. Gainsburg, “The Mathematical Disposition of Structural Engineers,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 477–506, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.2307/30034962.[4] S. G. Vick, Degrees of Belief: Subjective Probability and Engineering Judgment. ASCE Publications, 2002.[5] A. F. McKenna, “Adaptive
. Categorizing the outcomevariables (and the relationships among them) provides for well-structured guidance topractitioners and researchers in designing TPD programs. In this respect, this frameworkappeared more relevant to our context of understanding academic leaders’ opinion of TPDevaluations. The Kirkpatrick framework comparatively is broader and more generalized in itsevaluation model of PD programs. For its specificity and structure, Reeves et al.’s frameworkwas chosen as the underlying theoretical model for this study.Figure 1: Conceptual Framework for GTA TPD by Reeves et al. [24]Framework for the relationships among GTA TPD outcome variables (blue), GTA TPD contextual variables (yellow),and GTA TPD moderating variables (green). The framework
Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(8), 769- 783.Broderick, A., & Lalvani, P. (2017). Dysconscious ableism: Toward a liberatory praxis in teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 894-905.Bullock, E. C. (2017). Only STEM can save us? Examining race, place, and STEM education as property. Educational Studies, 53(6), 628-641.Carlone, H. B., Mercier, A. K., & Metzger, S. R. (2021). The production of epistemic culture and agency during a first-grade engineering design unit in an urban emergent school. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 11(1), 172-191. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1295Carter, D. F., Dueñas, J. E. R., Mendoza, R. (2019
: A research-based guide to break down popular stereotypes about science and scientists, 2017, pp. 1–18.[2] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid, and K. W. Bauer, “Impact of Undergraduate Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 91(2), no. April, pp. 151–157, 2002.[3] D. F. Carter, H. K. Ro, B. Alcott, and L. R. Lattuca, Co-Curricular Connections: The Role of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills, vol. 57, no. 3. Springer Netherlands, 2016.[4] M. K. Eagan, S. Hurtado, M. J. Chang, G. A. Garcia, F. A. Herrera, and J. C. Garibay, Making a Difference in Science Education: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs, vol. 50, no. 4
Paper ID #36648Improving Capstone Outcomes: Changes to Deliverables andAccommodating Remote LearningAlexander James Mackay Alexander Mackay received a B.Eng degree in electrical engineering from Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador in 2017. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering at the University of Toronto, where he received a M.A.Sc. degree in 2020. His research interests include engineering design projects and their implementation, phased array feed structures, leaky-wave antennas and radar imaging systems.Hamid S Timorabadi (Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream) Hamid
decisions. Since the instructors used a range of projects with varying levels ofstructure and autonomy, future research will explore whether these differences resulted insignificant differences in student motivation. Also, in future we will explore the motivationalaspect informed by the Self-determination theory.Reference[1] M. J. Prince and R. M. Felder, “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, Apr. 2006.[2] H. S. Barrows, “Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., vol. 1996, no. 68, pp. 3–12, Dec. 1996.[3] W. T. Wang and Y. L. Lin, “Evaluating Factors Influencing Knowledge-Sharing
percent). Also, Sustainable Design and ConstructionManagement are defined as knowledge areas in CEBOK3 and in accreditation, but those areasare considered specialty areas in practice with separate consulting firms providing these services. Coursework Importance Comparison Very Important: Graduates should complete a full course in thi s subject Important: Subject should be covered in the curricul um Structural Analy sis I - Practitioner Structural Analy sis I - Educator Structural Analy sis II - Practitioner Structural Analy sis II - Educator Structural Analy sis III
Economics, 2020. 226: p. 107617.2. Das, S., Kleinke, D.K., and Pistrui, D. Reimagining engineering education: Does Industry 4.0 need Education 4.0? in Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference 2020.3. Illanes, P., et al., Retraining and reskilling workers in the age of automation. McKinsey Global Institute, 2018.4. Manyika, J., et al., What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages. McKinsey Global Institute, 2017.5. Gehrke, L., et al., A discussion of qualifications and skills in the factory of the future: A German and American perspective. VDI/ASME Industry, 2015. 4: p. 1-28.6. Huda, M., et al., Understanding modern learning environment (MLE) in big data era. International Journal of
. Turns, “Engineering with Engineers:Fostering Engineering Identity through Industry Immersion,” 2020 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition, Montreal, Québec, Canada: ASEE 2020.[4] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and J. Turns, Engineering with Engineers:Fostering Engineering Identity,” 2021 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual: ASEE2020.[5] K. Deaux, “Reconstructing social identity,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol.19, pp. 4-12, 1993.[6] S. Stryker, and P. J. Burke, “The past, present, and future of an identity theory,” SocialPsychological Quarterly, vol. 63(4), pp. 284-297, 2000.[7] E. H. Erikson, Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press, 1959.[8] M. B. Brewer, “The social self
, they maybegin to behave differently which might influence their response. Another difficulty was that thedistribution of sample sizes, which were often enormous, did not match up equally across allpopulations, such as 179 men and 41 women. In addition, there is attrition in the sample/attritionbias - participants drop out of the study and those who remain may differ from the original samplesize. Paper ID:33References:[1] A. Kossiakoff, W. N. Sweet, S. J. Seymour, and S. M. Biemer, Systems engineeringprinciples and practice, vol. 83. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.[2] Childs, P. (2012). Management skills for professionals - are they required? A case study on
thecapstone, students work on an interdisciplinary team based on their research interests. Teams areformed with students from at least two disciplines. In spring 2021, we had three teams, and eachteam was comprised of five or six M.S. and/or Ph.D. students.The course format, team teaching strategies, and grading structures encouraged an interdisciplinaryapproach to investigating their research question(s). Students attended faculty-guided lecturesdesigned to provide training in communication, team collaboration, research, and final researchproduct preparation. Course grades were project-based and included individual assignments andteam assignments. Student teams were charged with writing an interdisciplinary conference orjournal article. Teams
proposing a student survey or interview aspart of a comparative case study and will build on the framework established in this paper. Thediscursive response and comments from students will provide some insight into the post-pandemic teaching and learning approaches. There have been several studies investigating thecapability of connecting hardware to a cloud environment to offer an alternative for universitiesrequiring remote access to the hardware. The author hopes to study those platforms to provideadditional support to offer remote laboratories.References[1] Yanik, P. M., & Yan, Y., & Kaul, S., & Ferguson, C. W. (2016, June), Sources of Anxietyamong Engineering Students: Assessment and Mitigation Paper presented at 2016 ASEE
engineering (Order No. 3513078). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1024564252). Retrieved from http://ezproxy2.library.drexel.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest- com.ezproxy2.library.drexel.edu/docview/1024564252?accountid=10559[14] Geisinger, B. N., & Raman, D. R. (2013). Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications, 607. Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/607[15] Atwood, S. A., & Pretz, J. E. (2016). Creativity as a factor in persistence and academic achievement of engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 540-559. doi:10.1002/jee.20130[16] Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M
deliverymode and made suggestions to enable the expansion of remote ETW’s in the future.References[1] Estes, A.C, Welch, R.W., Ressler, S.J., Dennis, N., Considine, C.L., Nilsson, T., O’Neill, R.J., Lenox,T.A. (2010), Ten Years of ExCEEd: making a difference in the profession, The International Journal ofEngineering Education, 26(1), 141-154.[2] Estes, A. C., Ressler, S. J., Saviz, C. M., Barry, B. E., Considine, C. L., Coward, D. Dennis, N. D.,Hamilton, S. R., Hurwitz, D. S., Kunberger, T., Lenox, T. A., Nilsson, T. L., Nolen, L., O'Brien, J. J.,O'Neill, R. J., Saftner, D. A., Salyards, K.,Welch, R. W. (2018, June), Celebrating 20 Years of theExCEEd Teaching Workshop Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt LakeCity
different categories we are interested in. Figure 2 Venn diagram of the number of programs found with the key words "first-gen", "parents', and "engineering" and their intersection.Table 2 below lists all the programs we reviewed and shows the key word/s for which the programappears. As it can be seen from both the Venn diagram and the table, we didn’t find a program in theintersection of all three; first-gen, parent, and engineering.Table 2 Programs reviewed from the Excelencia in Education's Database Key Words Program Name First-Gen Engineering Parent
, M. Raber, and L. K. Fiss, “GPA as a Product, Not a Measure,of Success,” in The Demonstrable Value of Honors Education: New Research Evidence, ed.Andrew Cognard-Black, National Collegiate Honors Council Monograph Series, pp. 115-149,2019.[8] L. A. Meadows, M. Raber, and L. K. Fiss, “Innovation and Inclusion—Applying designthinking and lean startup in the honors context,” Excellence, Innovation and Ingenuity in HonorsEducation, ed. Graeme Harper, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 79-97, 2019.[9] L. K. Fiss, J. Irwin, and Y. (S.) Tan, “S-STEM Student Reflections and IDP Process,” 2021ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, https://peer.asee.org/37693, 2021.[10] R. Kegan, In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Harvard
-The Creative and Critical "Art" of Making Meaning, 2nd ed., vol. 12, Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland: Springer International , 2009, pp. 213–232. [4] J. Walston, “Improving Kindergartener ’s Initiative to Problem Solve Through Integrated STEM,” Thesis, Theses, Student Research, and Creative Activity: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 2019. [5] J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003. [6] M. Collain, “’You Don't Have to be a White Male Who Was Learning How to Program Since He Was Five’ Computer Use and Interest from Childhood to a Computing Degree,” Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 2018. [7] D
Powered by www.slayte.com TEACHING EARTH SYSTEMS BEYOND THE CLASSROOM: DEVELOPING A MIXED REALITY (XR) SANDBOX D. Tennakoon1 , A. U. Usmani1 , M. Usman2 , A. Vasileiou1 , S. Latchaev1 , M. Baljko1 , U.T. Khan1 ,M. A. Perras1 , M. Jadidi 1, ∗ 1 Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Toronto, Canada damitht6@my.yorku.ca, usmani@yorku.ca, m.usmannn@gmail.com, toli95@my.yorku.ca, sasha.latchaev@gmail.com, baljko@yorku.ca, usman.khan@lassonde.yorku.ca, mperras@yorku.ca, mjadidi@yorku.ca 2 Department of Information and Computer Science, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi
the midtermgrades and final grades. Self-reported data from the survey proved insignificant. Data collectionwill continue in the coming semesters to verify midterm 1’s ability to accurately predict studentperformance and will be used as a tool to help instructors identify struggling students. Studentswho score below 70% on the midterm will be considered “at-risk” for the remainder of the studyand their performance will be compared with and without the recitation course to determine theeffectiveness of the intervention. In later semesters, supplementary data will be tracked toidentify additional student performance indicators. A similar study found that college GPA,Calculus, and Chemistry grades were found to be most significant predictors for
aim to understand the interdisciplinary design process to understand theeffectiveness of student´s contribution as interdisciplinary work.Allowing professionals and students to cross traditional boundaries to create new solutions canleave variables unexamined due to the amount of information exchanged [12]. Nevertheless, abarrier to interdisciplinarity in education fields and workspaces is lack of communication [9],leading to difficulty of exchanging ideas to develop efficient and useful solutions. Without propercommunication, the proposed traits to create new architectural spaces and engineering solutionscan be lost. Thus, developing communication between professionals and students can prevent thissituation and improve the solutions
Affairs, Veterans Benefits Administration Annual Benefit Report:The fiscal year of 2019. Department of Veteran Affairs, 2019. [Online]. Available:https://benefits.va.gov/REPORTS/abr/docs/2019-abr-v2.pdf[4] A. Barroso, A. “The changing profile of the U.S. military: Smaller in size, more diverse,more women in leadership,” Pew Research Center, 10-Sep-2019. [Online]. Available:https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/09/10/the-changing-profile-of-the-u-s-military/.[Accessed: 11-Apr-2022].[5] K. Schaeffer, K. “The changing face of America’s veteran population,” Pew Research Center,05-Apr-2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/05/the-changing-face-of-americas-veteran-population/. [Accessed: 11-Apr-2022].[6] J. H. Lim
to 2 would be lower overall want to use different application (at least some) material costs for the system" types of [A or B]? 3. Both (Correct connection(s) 2 [see above] between activity and application) "If you have to fix every single In what situations 1. Correct observation from 2 joint...complicate[s] the actual would [A. pinned activity (at least some
long term interest in pursuing coding careers, we hypothesize that longercamps spread over one or more academic years to be ideal.Acknowledgement:The authors would like to thank Texas Workforce Commision for funding the camp and the staffof Good Samaritan Community Center, San Antonio, Texas for providing space to hose thesummer campReferences[1] National girls collaborative alliance https://ngcproject.org/statistics Retrieved Dec 3, 2019.[2] Best time to build a love of STEM? It’s after the school day ends, research sayshttps://hechingerreport.org/school-programs-can-boost-interest-stem-research-shows/ Retrieved Dec 22, 2019[3] Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2016, February). Factors influencing computer science learning in
responsibility and expertise of each member of the team, and the fact that Paulhad been mentoring Deepthi for years, the initial model of the tripartite mentoring relationshipwas conceived in line with Figure 1. Figure 1. Initial model of tripartite mentoring relationshipOur study is unique in that it includes a mentoring triad and the perspective of both the mentorand mentee(s). Most often, mentoring is studied from the perspective of the mentee. Researchincluding the perspective of the mentor as well the mentee is much rarer in the engineeringeducation literature (e.g., Mondisa, 2020). In offering the perspective of all three members of therelationship, we seek to contribute knowledge that could help mentors and mentees in
. Asgari, S., Trajkovic, J., Rahmani, M., Zhang, W., Lo, R. C., and A. Sciortino, (2021). An Observational Study of Engineering Online Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. PLOS ONE. 16(4): e0250041. 5. Xu J., Tao Y., and H. Lin, (2016). Semantic word cloud generation based on word embeddings. In: 2016 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis): 239–243. 6. Felix C., Franconeri S., and E. Bertini, (2018). Taking word clouds apart: an empirical investigation of the design space for keyword summaries. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph, 24(1): 657–666. 7. Savage, N., Birch, R. and E. Noussi, (2011). Motivation of engineering students in higher education. Eng. Educ., 6:39-46. 8. Sadikin, A.N., Mohd-Yusof, K
involves that the student integrates a suite of previousknowledge, to a greater or less extent depending on the problem(s) at hand. This of courseinvolves a considerable amount of thinking, which really is the nucleus of invention, and is insharp contrast to traditional end-of-the-chapter problems for which the student expects to find theanswer normally in the chapter!Materials science and engineering is typically a major undergraduate course for manyengineering majors (e.g. mechanical, civil, chemical, nuclear, aerospace, manufacturing, etc.).Such a course, at many universities, typically involves a lecture component and a companion labcomponent (although sometimes the lab portion of the class can be taken by the studentindependently, but
-To-Face,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1-16, Dec. 2014.[7] J.K. Morgan, R. Solhmirzaei, and H. Salehi, “Improving Team Performance in First-YearEngineering Students” 126th ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Tampa, Florida, June 15-192019.[8] J.K. Morgan, “Examination of the Development of Grit in First-Year Engineering Students”10th FYEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Glassboro, New Jersey, July 24-26 2018.[9] A. L. Duckworth, C. Peterson, M. D. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly, “Grit: Perseverance andPassion for Long-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp.1087-1101, 2007.[10] E. S. Elliott and C. S. Dweck, “Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol
://doi.org/10.18260/p.26122.[4] L. N. Fleming, K. C. Smith, D. G. Williams, and L. B. Bliss, “Engineering Identity of Black and Hispanic Undergraduates: The Impact of Minority Serving Institutions,” Atlanta, Georgia, Jun. 2013, p. 18. doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--19524.[5] A. Godwin and W. C. Lee, “A Cross-sectional Study of Engineering Identity During Undergraduate Education,” Columbus, Ohio, Jun. 2017, p. 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--27460.[6] H. M. Matusovich, B. E. Barry, K. Meyers, and R. Louis, “A Multi-Institution Comparison of Students’ Development of an Identity as an Engineer,” Vancouver, BC, Jun. 2011, p. 18. doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--17351.[7] S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and
theirchoice in at at-home, hybrid, or in-class setting to better achieve the learning goals ofbiomechanical courses without necessitating the use of a sophisticated motion tracking system.References 1- Todd Schweisinger, Rahul S. Renu, and John R. Wagner, “Student and Faculty Perceptions of COVID-19’s Impact on Engineering Preparedness”, ASEE Southeastern Section Conference, 2021. 2- Peter M. McGinnis, “Biomechanics of Sport and Exercise”, Third Edition, Human Kinetics, 2013. 3- Duane Knudson, “Fundamentals of Biomechanics”, Second Edition, Springer Science, 2007. 4- Alexandria Michelini, Arezoo Eshraghi, and Jan Andrysek, “Two-dimensional video gait analysis: A systematic review of reliability
burden for the student, the student should have the option to decline if they are fine with an 85 the first time and want to focus on their next test” (Craugh, 2017, p. 8).There were other negative evaluations reported. Specifically, Kelley (1999) reported that studentslack the motivation to work until they achieve a high grade on assignments and the lack of feelingcomfortable with a new grading system. Some of the negative comments may be attributed tooverly complicated mastery learning implementations. For example, Bekki et al. (2012) reportednegative comments on student evaluations describing confusion and dissatisfaction with theassessment process. These comments may be connected with Bekki et al.’s (2012) complicatedmastery learning