artificial intelligence andits impact on their career prospects. Students found to be more confident through position-of-stress surveys administered later in the academic term were found to be more positive about theirfuture in a world more influenced by artificial intelligence. The figures below show this result. Figure 1. Boxplots for the confidence levels. Figure 2. Three groups of confidence levels and their associated ECTD scores (Y axis) and confidence levels (X axis).In short, students who lack confidence see themselves as being impacted and possibly evencontrolled by artificial intelligence. Students who are more confident see themselves controllingartificial intelligence and are
, Arizona State UniversityDr. Shawn S Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Shawn Jordan, Ph.D.is an Assistant Professor in theDepartment of Engineering atArizona State Univer- sity. He is the PI on three NSF-funded projects: CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society (EEC 1351728), Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?(EEC 1329321), and Broadening the Reach of Engineering through Community Engagement (BRECE)(DUE 1259356). He is also Co-PI on one NSF-funded project: Should Makers be the Engineers of the Fu- ture?(EEC 1232772), and is senior personnel on an NSF-funded grant entitled Workshop: I-Corps for Learning (i-Corps-L). He received his Ph.D. in Engineering
background relates totheir chosen degree programs, let alone theirfuture careers. And despite the national call toincrease the number of graduates in engineeringand other STEM disciplines7 , the inability ofincoming students to successfully advance pastthe traditional freshman calculus sequenceremains a primary cause of attrition inengineering programs across the country. Assuch, there is a drastic need for a proven modelwhich eliminates the first-year mathematicsbottleneck in the traditional engineeringcurriculum, yet can be readily adopted byengineering programs across the country. Such Figure 1. The Derivative Labis the focus of this work.The Wright State model begins with the
the resulting socialization, career capital gains, and knowledge transfer that occur in the international context. Currently, Shirley is continuing to pursue expatriate re- search in addition to working on teamwork and training research in the medical domain. In specific, Dr. Sonesh is working on investigating clinical decision making and developing training for rapid response teams in the obstetrics unit to improve team decision making, team coordination, and ultimately patient safety. Other research interests include reducing medication error in EMS contexts, the use of adaptive team tutoring, responses to organizational change, coaching, and augmented reality for medical training; this work is funded by ARL
student Page 23.1269.7comment. The comments were used as part of the feedback used to improve the modules.Impact on pre-college studentsThe VL modules were introduced to students in middle grade level during a campus visit (~age12-13). The students saw a demonstration of the modules and were able to manipulate the labs aswell. At the end of the visit, the students responded to a survey of attitudes toward the use of VLand career goals. The results indicate positive impacts of the experience. Specifically, students: gained knowledge about engineering from the VL lessons were able to understand and perform the VL lessons
typology. We feelthis research is an important contribution that can: 1) further our understanding of how studentproblem typology may (or may not) change during their undergraduate career; 2) contribute to ourevolving understanding of problem solving among novices and experts; and 3) provide afoundation for negotiating understanding of “good” problem solving among students, faculty, andpractitioners, serving as a feedback loop for engineering curricula.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1830793. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
participants before and after the training were almost constant, apaired t-test indicated that the times to take the pre and post diagnostic went down (from anaverage of 1000.41 seconds or 16.67 minutes to 678.39 seconds or 11.31 minutes) in asignificant way (p-value 0.0002203). This result may indicate that the students felt more familiarwith the type of questions and their level of difficulty during subsequent testing.Analysis of the qualitative results gathered through the ET exit surveys shows that 89% of theparticipants completed them, 50% of them reported that the training improved awareness aboutthe level of applicability of SVS to their careers, but only 21% expressed satisfaction fromimproving SVS vs. the work that was needed for this project
about family engineering is emerging. With the most recent adaptation of theFamily Math and Science modules for Engineering, we expect more literature in relevantforthcoming studies. A not -et published work on the role of parents in engineering educationprovides a detailed review of the literature of parents engagement in engineering and science andframes the literature with four common themes. The parent is viewed as24: Page 23.446.14 • Engineering career motivator • Engineering attitudes builder • Students’ achievement stimulus • Scientific/Engineering thinking guideFamily Engineering was created with the goal of “actively
the University of Washington at Seattle in 1982, 1987, and 1995, respectively. He began his academic career in 1998, and is currently the chair of the Department of Com- puter Science at Eastern Washington University in Cheney, Wash. His research interest includes numerical Page 23.224.2 methods for forward and inverse solutions to partial differential equations with biomedical applications. Prior to his academic career, he was employed as a senior principal design engineer in the electronics industry, where he enjoyed fifteen years of experience developing parallel embedded signal and image
instructor’sperspective regarding the course content, learning objective of homework assessments, andstudent learning behavior.Student Baseline Survey: The primary objective of the baseline survey was to seek informationabout various aspects of academic background, motivation, programming, and mathematicalabilities before exposure to quantum concepts and activities. For those who encounteredquantum concepts, the survey measured their familiarity with 9 key concepts of QIS. Participantswere asked about their likelihood of pursuing a quantum-related career. The baseline survey alsoexplored, research interest, a listing of three topics that they were most interested in learning inthe EEE 4423 course, inquiring about any specific areas of quantum computing
has a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Ms. Leslie Bondaryk, The Concord Consortium Leslie Bondaryk received the B.S. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the M.S. degree from the University of California, Santa Barbara, both in electrical engineering. She is currently the Chief Technology Officer with the Concord Consortium, Concord, MA, USA. Over her career, Ms. Bondaryk has introduced new technologies to
Engineer- ing, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland. Pelumi got his BSc and MSc degree in Physics from Obafemi Awolowo University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollu- tion Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at Morgan State University and Obafemi Awolowo University. With a passion to communicate research findings gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his career, Olaitan has attended several in-person and virtual conferences and workshops, and at some of them, made presentations on findings on air pollution, wastewater reuse, and heavy metal
and J. Plaut Eds. Minneapolis: Minneapolis Campus Compact, 2014.[12] M. LaForce, E. Noble, and C. Blackwell, "Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs," Education Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 92, 2017.[13] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, G. Gilot, S. Boukdad, and M. Krug, "The Community- Engaged Educational Ecosystem Model: Learning from the Bowman Creek Experience," presented at the Engaged Scholarship Consortium, Minneapolis, MN, 2018.[14] D. Wood, F. Aqlan, H. Marie, D. Lapsley, J. Brockman, and K. L. Meyers, "Building and Replicating a Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem - a STEM Learning Commons," presented at the NSF IUSE
from China. Fan received her MS in Elementary Education Science and a graduate certificate in Curriculum Instruction.Dr. Lisa Y. Flores, University of Missouri, Columbia Lisa Y. Flores, Ph.D. is a Professor of Counseling Psychology at the University of Missouri. She has expertise in the career development of Latino/as and Latino/a immigrant issues and has 80 peer reviewed journal publications, 19 book chapters, and 1 co-e ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student perceptions of confidence in learning and teaching before and after teaching improvementsAs part of an overall research program investigating the impact of changes in teachingstrategies on
difference? Diversity constructs asseparation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review 32: 1199-1228.Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. and Shanahan, M.C. (2010) Connecting High School PhysicsExperiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A GenderStudy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47(8): 978-1003.Leslei I. (2021) Conflicted: How Productive Disagreements Lead to Better Outcomes. HarperCollins.Loignon A.C., Woehr, D.J., Loughry, M.L., and Ohland, M.W. (2018) Elaborating on Team-Member Disagreement: Examining Patterned Dispersion in Team-Level Constructs. Group &Organization Management 44(1): 165-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118776750Loignon A.C. (2022) Comments made
- Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and facultyDr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Stressors for Doctoral Students Questionnaire in Engineering: Year 2 of an RFE project on understanding graduate engineering
were any changes over the course of their college academic career. In Spring 2022 wecollected 33 EERI responses from senior engineering students, a subset of which we were able topair with responses from their first year to examine changes. Overall, this subset of students didnot show statistically significant changes in their EERI scores between first year and senior year.While the sample size for this cohort is too small from which to draw a reliable conclusion, it doessuggest that the EERI and DIT-2 measurements may be extremely stable over time and that theyare potentially not well-suited to assess changes in student ethical reasoning as a result ofeducational interventions. The research team is currently re-running this study with a
' academic self-efficacy,research skills, research confidence, teamwork confidence, education, and engineering careerintentions are also presented in the paper. In addition, this study also illustrates how the student’sglobal experiences, such as cultural awareness, worldwide perspectives, and interest in globalengineering careers, have changed as a result of this project. Lastly, the lessons learned from theCOVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the project implementation and what changes are beingmade for the next cohort are also discussed.Project backgroundThree public universities in the states of Texas, Nevada, and North Dakota are working togetheron the IRES project. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCAT),University of
were any changes over the course of their college academic career. In Spring 2022 wecollected 33 EERI responses from senior engineering students, a subset of which we were able topair with responses from their first year to examine changes. Overall, this subset of students didnot show statistically significant changes in their EERI scores between first year and senior year.While the sample size for this cohort is too small from which to draw a reliable conclusion, it doessuggest that the EERI and DIT-2 measurements may be extremely stable over time and that theyare potentially not well-suited to assess changes in student ethical reasoning as a result ofeducational interventions. The research team is currently re-running this study with a
City School District Title II B Mathematics and Science Partnership grants, Building Learning Communities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District, Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University and the University at Al- bany through the Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She holds an advance degree in Educational Theory and Practice from the University of New York/SUNY Albany, with experience in teaching educa- tional methods at the master’s level as well as an introduction to education courses designed to develop new interest in teaching careers. She has worked as an elementary classroom teacher developing specific curricula for gifted and talented students as well as
Paper ID #32722It’s a Context Gap, Not a Competency Gap: Understanding the Transitionfrom Capstone Design to IndustryDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and
OverviewThe overall goal of this three year project is to increase awareness and preparedness of rural andindigenous youth to pursue engineering and engineering-related careers. To reach this goal, weare working with elementary pre and in-service teachers in rural and reservation communities touse ethnographic methods to connect local funds of knowledge with classroom curriculum. Morespecifically, the first phase (current phase) is on training participating teachers, whereas thesecond phase will be on supporting their implementation of the engineering curricula. This paperdescribes the first summer professional development, which focused on two items: (1) trainingelementary teachers and pre-service teachers in ethnographic methods and photo
as a learning tool,” while another wrote, “problem solving takes going back and retrying,refitting, over and over again to get it right, or what you want it to be. Along the way you learnregardless.” Teachers especially liked the portion of the lessons where students wereconstructing, testing, and revising their designs, as this both engaged students and helped themlearn through trial and error, like engineers do. Interactive science centers are in a uniqueposition to provide opportunities for engineering education through K-12 field trip programs.Early experiences in engineering and science have been shown to be important for developing aninterest in STEM and motivation for pursuing STEM careers. The Engineering Explorationscurriculum
been fortunate in our unit to have a highly engaged Industry Advisory Board (IAB)that we have enlisted in support of our RED project work. During our fall 2016 meeting severalIAB members expressed interest in engaging with students in support of the RED project goals.During the meeting we developed the concept of “matching” IAB members (and other interestedalumni) as mentors with student Pods. The matching would be based on mentor and Pod-members’ career directions and experiences, and more generally on their life stories, challenges,and accomplishments.The student designers have continued to interact with each other in what they refer to as a“superpod” (both because it is larger than a typical pod and because it includes representativesfrom
refer to students’epistemological framing, which Scherr & Hammer define as the “sense of what is taking placewith respect to knowledge” (p. 149) [28]. In other words, students make judgments about whatclass experiences are important and how they should engage with these experiences. Thisjudgment is based on the physical classroom space [10], [18], as well as external factors andstudent characteristics such as their underlying beliefs about learning, career goals, andeducational experiences to date [9], [29]. Based on their prior experiences, students may frame aroom with chairs and front-facing tables as an indication that the class will mostly be lecture, andtheir role will be to listen passively. On the other hand, a studio classroom or
STEM in the Rio SouthTexas (RST) Region by targeting major barriers to student success and creating opportunities forenhanced student engagement. To attain this goal, the grant is addressing problems such asdiminished college preparedness, in particular, Calculus readiness; subpar standardized examperformance and language barriers; reduced awareness of STEM pathways and careers; lack ofrole models in STEM fields; and decreased achievement in foundation courses. The grant activitieswere selected based on their potential to deal with the challenges RST students face in progressingand persisting in Engineering and Computer Science. Furthermore, the activities are linked topromote precollege pathways, improve transition from the lower to upper
spanning 6 decades from engineering programs, Geisingeret al. [8] identified five factors that contribute to poor retention rates in engineering nationwide.These factors include classroom and academic climate; grades and conceptual understanding;self-efficacy and self-confidence; interest and career goals; and race and gender. Of primaryconcern are both discipline-specific skills and knowledge (e.g., mathematics), as well as moregeneral, non-discipline-specific self-efficacy and metacognitive knowledge and skills.Metacognition, often defined as “thinking about thinking,” is primarily about knowing,understanding, monitoring, and controlling one’s cognitive processes, leading to altered andideally more productive behaviors [9] – [13]. The study of
. Epperson, and M. M. Nauta, “Women’s career development: Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors?,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 173–183, 1997.[24] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, J. Schmidt, B. Brenner, H. Lyons, and D. Treistman, “Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 458–465, 2003.[25] R. W. Lent et al., “The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 474–483, 2001.[26] Kang Seung Hee and K. S
Grant No.1741611. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Watson, M.K., K.C. Bower, and W.J. Davis. Advancing diversity initiatives in the civil engineering profession: Impacts of an NSF S-STEM grant at a regional undergraduate teaching institution, in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. 2017. Columbus, OH.2. Wenger, E., Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept, in Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice. 2010, Springer. p. 179-198.3. Li, L.C., et al., Evolution of