commitment: Differences between posters and lurkers," Information &management, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 154-165, 2017. doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.003[6] N. Sun, P.P-l. Rau and L. Ma, “Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literaturereview,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol38, pp. 110-117, 2014.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.022[7] N. Johnson, “Zoom fatigue is real, Here’s how to deal with it,” Parents. May 28, 2020.Available: https://www.parents.com/parenting/better-parenting/zoom-fatigue-is-real-here-s-how-to-deal-with-it/[8] S. Garcia-Bulle, “What is Zoom fatigue and how to avoid it in students?,” Observatory ofEducational Innovation, October 15, 2020. Available: https://observatory.tec.mx/edu-news/zoom-fatigue-students[9] L. Heinrich
, vol. 2020-June, p. 7, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34301.[19] D. D. Burkey, D. D. Anastasio, C. Bodnar, and M. Cooper, “Collaborative Research: Experiential Process Safety Training for Chemical Engineers,” STEM for All Video Showcase, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://stemforall2020.videohall.com/presentations/1691.[20] B. W. F. Velicer, B. B. Hoeppner, and M. S. Goodwin, “Time-Series Study,” in Encylopedia of Research Design, N. J. Salkind, Ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2012, pp. 1520–1528.[21] R. Sawyer, J. Rowe, R. Azevedo, and J. Lester, “Filtered time series analyses of student problem-solving behaviors in game-based learning,” Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Educ. Data Mining, EDM 2018, pp. 229
[1] Sorrell S. Reducing energy demand: A review of issues, challenges and approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;47:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.002.[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2019:1–2. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions (accessed September 10, 2021).[3] Rapier R. The Load Following Power Plant: The New Peaker. Transform GE Power 2017. https://www.ge.com/power/transform/article.transform.articles.2017.jun.load-following- power-plant (accessed January 10, 2022).[4] Welch M, Pym A. Improving the flexibility and efficiency of gas turbine-based distributed power plants. Power Eng 2015;119. https
Education, 2nd ed: New York: MacMillan Reference, USA, 2003, pp. 1370-1373.[2] G. W. Ellis and Y. Yu, "Using Knowledge Building to Support Deep Learning and the Development of 21st Century Skills," presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013.[3] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, M. K. Norman, and R. E. Mayer, How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2010.[4] P. C. Blumenfeld, T. M. Rogat, and J. S. Krajcik, "Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Learning Environments," in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences R. K. Sawyer, Ed., ed: Cambridge University Press, 2006
: ASEE Conferences, June 2008, https://peer.asee.org/3734.[2] B. H. F. M. A. Aldo A. Ferri, James I. Craig and B. Klein, “Development of team-based hands-on learning experiences,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, no. 10.18260/1-2–34461. Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, June 2020, https://peer.asee.org/34461.[3] D. W. Joe Stanley, Daryl Beetner and R. Dua, “Hands on projects and exercises to strengthen understanding of basic computer engineering concepts,” in 2005 Annual Conference, no. 10.18260/1-2–14397. Portland, Oregon: ASEE Conferences, June 2005, https://peer.asee.org/14397.[4] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, H. Walker, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1
-2013.3. York College of Pennsylvania Mechanical Engineering Program, “York College of Pennsylvania Alumni Surveys”, 2008-2013.4. J. MacEntee, owner of Digital Mettle, Personal Interview, December 28, 2013.5. S. Kiefer, “Maching Experience in a Mechancial Engineering Curriculum”, presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014.6. A. Ownes, “Engineering Beyond the Classroom”, Engineer Blogs, November 15, 2011.7. S. Kiefer, Scott, S. Kuchnicki, “Project-Based Learning: Teaching Engineering Design Not Tinkering”, presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013.
Orleans, Louisiana, June, 2016.[5] N. Barendt, N. Sridhar, K. A. Loparo, “A New Course for Teaching Internet of Things: A Practical, Hands-on,and Systems-level Approach,” in Proc. 125st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June,2018.[6] J. P. Jones, “A Hands-on Introduction to Embedded Systems & IoT,” in Proc. 127th ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Virtual Conference, June, 2020.[7] S. Abraham, A. Miguel, “Creation of an Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Innovation Lab,” in Proc. 124st ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June, 2017.[8] L. M. Laird, N. S. Bowen, “A New Software Engineering Undergraduate Program Supporting the Internet ofThings (IoT) and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS),” in Proc
helpful for expanding this work to a more complete survey of faculty thatfit this category, including Hispanic faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions.References[1] C. Carrigan, Riskin, E. A., O'Leary, K., Yen, J., Mody-Pan, P.N., O'Donnell, M., "On- Ramping to Academia: Women’s Experiences of Transitioning from Nonacademic to Academic Careers," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, 11492.[2] S. Parks, Dietz, L., "Mid-Career Change: Benefits and challenges of leaving industry for academia," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017, Conference Paper ID # 18302.[3] S. Fleishman, Braun, J., "Caution! Rough Road Ahead – the Transition from Industry Professional
has worked at the University of Wisconsin since 2010.Eric Loren Severson Eric L Severson (S'09-M'15) received the B.Sc. and PhD degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA in 2008 and 2015, respectively where he also worked as a post doctoral associate through 2016. He is currently an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Dr. Severson is an associate director of the Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium (WEMPEC) and fellow of the Grainger Institute for Engineering. His research interests include design and control of electric machines and power electronics, with focus areas in magnetic bearings, bearingless motors, flywheel energy
Paper ID #36757Work In Progress: CodeCapture: A Tool to Attain Insightinto the Programming Development ProcessNaman GulatiAngy HiggyHamid S Timorabadi (Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream) Hamid Timorabadi received his BSc, MASc, and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has worked as a project, design, and test engineer as well as a consultant to industry. His research interests include the application of digital signal processing in energy systems and computer networks. He also has deep interest in engineering education and the use of technology to advance the learning
influences people’s ethicalbeliefs and considerations. Another interesting topic in ethics is human flourishing theories. Terrell Bynum first coined the termflourishing ethics in 2006. Since then, many researchers have been applying flourishing ethics as theirparadigm for AI ethics. In Stahl (2020) ’s book, he stated, ”The central thesis of this book is thatflourishing ethics can enlighten AI ethics and guide the development of practical interventions. Anotherexample is Reiss (2021), in his paper on the use of AI education, who argued that education shouldsupport human flourishing, which will widen to non-human surroundings since it benefits humans too.There are two general categories of Flourishing Ethics (FE) –1. Human-Centered Flourishing
, another can be optimized, and the third area is necessarily unbounded. Design Triad There is a further balance between engineering, design and product. The engineering considerations are about feasibility; is it possible to make, how is it built? The design part is focused on the customer experience. The product aspect is keyed to the need/s addressed. While many engineering courses in innovation and entrepreneurship focus on business (and in some cases, human) values, students should also be given opportunities to develop deep technical expertise. There is another balance between feasibility (engineering), viability (business) However
Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2009, pp. 337-341.[3] J.-I. Choi and M. Hannafin, "Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design," Educational technology research and development, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 53-69, 1995.[4] C. F. Quigley and D. Herro, An educator's guide to steam: Engaging students using real- world problems. Teachers College Press, 2019.[5] K. Cennamo and D. Kalk, Real world instructional design: An iterative approach to designing learning experiences. Routledge, 2019.[6] B. Giddens and C. Stasz, "Context Matters: Teaching and Learning Skills for Work," Centerpoint, 1999.[7] S. Avargil, O
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02579-x. [6] Oglensky, B. (2008). The Ambivalent Dynamics of Loyalty in Mentorship. Retrieved from SAGE Open Journal: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018726708089000. [7] Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: a qualitative study. Nurse education today, 34(5), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.020. [8] Lunenburg, F. (2010) From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces. Formal Communication Channels: Upward, Downward, Horizontal, and External. Retrieved from Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools: http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg%2C%20Fre d%20C%2C
Exposition 2016: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 26-29 June 2016.[5] S. R. Burckhard and J. Kant, The PEEC experiment: Native Hawaiian and Native American Engineering Education. Brookings, SD: Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering, South Dakota State University, 2016.[6] “The Mālama Honua Worldwide Voyage,” Hōkūleʻa, 20-Aug-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.hokulea.com/worldwide-voyage/. [Accessed: 18-Feb-2022].[7] F. S. Allaire, “Navigating uncharted waters: First-generation Native Hawaiian College students in STEM,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 305–325, 2017.[8] T. T. Nguyen, O. Francis, S. Miller, D. Kuehu, K. McLean, J. L. Irvine, and N
. References [1] L.S. Vygotsky, L. Semenovich, and M. Cole, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. [2] Z. Aguirre-Muñoz and M. L. Pantoya, M. L. “Engineering Literacy and Engagement in Kindergarten Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 630-654, 2016. [3] D. Bairaktarova, D. Evangelou, A. Bagiati, and S. Brophy. “Early Engineering in Young Children’s Exploratory Play with Tangible Materials.” Youth and Environments, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 212-235, 2011. [4] J. Blank and S. Lynch. “Growing in STEM. The Design Process
Students and Implications for Persistence and Well-Being,” J. High. Educ., vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 988– 1013, 2018.[8] J. Beckmann, “Gendered career expectations in context: the relevance of normative and comparative reference groups,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 968–988, 2021.[9] D. Bonner and M. C. Dorneich, “Increasing female middle school student interest in stem: Requirements for game-based learning applications,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 133–146, 2021.[10] S. L. Eddy and S. E. Brownell, “Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2016
and Instruction. Theauthors would like to thank all of the learning assistants who participated in the research.References[1] Y. Cao, C. Smith, B. D. Lutz, and M. Koretsky, “Cultivating the next generation: Outcomes from a Learning Assistant program in engineering,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Oct. 24, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/cultivating-the-next-generation-outcomes-from-a-learning-assistant- program-in-engineering[2] V. Otero, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, “A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1218–1224, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1119
, werecommend that the projection method be considered for adoption by instructors who teach fourbarlinkage analysis to undergraduate students.References[1] A. Cayley, "On Three-bar Motion," Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. VII, pp. 136-166, 1876.[2] S. Roberts, "On Three-bar Motion in Plane Space," Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. VII, pp. 14-23, 1875.[3] C. W. Wampler, "Solving the Kinematics of Planar Mechanisms," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 387-391, 1999.[4] R. Norton, Design of Machinery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.[5] K. J. Waldron and G. L. Kinzel, Kinematics, Dynamics and Design of Machinery. Wiley, 2004.[6] G. H. Martin, Kinematics and Dynamics
with theimportance of student leadership development, many faculty in the workshop expressed barrierssurrounding their ability to actively support that development. Figure 4 shows that the workshopreduced all but one of those identified barriers. After the workshop, faculty concerns wereprimarily focused on student resistance and not having enough time as opposed to not knowinghow to support student leadership development which was the most frequently cited barrieralong with not enough time in the pre-workshop survey. When you think about fostering student leadership development, which factor(s) make engaging with this process feel uncomfortable or too challenging
., Predicting the Effects of Dimensional and Material PropertyVariations in Micro Compliant Mechanisms, M.S., Brigham Young University, 2001.[3] Subaşı, Levent. Synthesis of compliant bistable four-link mechanisms for two positions. MSthesis. 2005.[4] Howell, Larry L., Compliant Mechanisms, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2001[5] Farhadi Machekposhti, D., Tolou, N., & Herder, J. L. (2015). A review on compliant jointsand rigid-body constant velocity universal joints toward the design of compliant homokineticcouplings. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(3), 032301.[6] Pham, M. T., Teo, T. J., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of3D Printed Compliant Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference onProgress
continuous improvement efforts in the Spring 2022 semester. Surveysare deployed after each assignment and will be evaluated in a similar manner to the work inprogress presented here. We will also evaluate for statistical differences in the groups based onthe changes made to the course in Spring 2022. We will continue to identify ways to improvestudents' learning experience in the experiential CNC course. The team plans to submit a fullpaper to the Manufacturing Division in 2023.References [1] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Brideges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, M. K. Norman, How Learning Works, Jossey-Bass: Wiley, 2010, [E-book] https://firstliteracy.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/07/How-Learning-Works.pdf [2] J. D. Vermunt, “The regulation of
they: gained both greater understanding ofsmart cities and appreciation for the relevance of coding, sensing, and data analysis to Civil andEnvironmental Engineering contexts; and they improved their abilities to analyze data, integratesensing, and make data-informed decisions.Works CitedAkhter, F., Khadivizand, S., Siddiquei, H. R., Alahi, M. E. E., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019). IoT Enabled Intelligent Sensor Node for Smart City: Pedestrian Counting and Ambient Monitoring. Sensors 2019, Vol. 19, Page 3374, 19(15), 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/S19153374Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092, 22(1), 3
explain their thought process [4,5]. In utilizing the “think aloud''method, students have the opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge of the topic or concept.Their ability to answer the question(s) in a complete manner is assessed using a predeterminedrubric. Examiners may provide hints, delve deeper into a particular aspect, and dynamicallyadjust questions to facilitate further discussion. This is in stark contrast to the traditional writtenexamination in which students are given fixed questions on a written test in which they wouldread thoroughly and write their answers on paper [5]. While oral examinations have been widelyadopted as an alternative form of assessment to traditional written examinations, they are notcommonly implemented in
Director of Engineering) Dr.Timothy J. Kennedy P.E., is the Executive Director of Engineering and an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at Abilene Christian University. His professional experience has focused on water reuse, water and wastewater treatment. Additionally, he has an interest in point of use treatment technologies for developing regions and how to better prepare students to immediately contribute to the engineering industry.Jody Jones (Assistant Professor of Finance) Jody L Jones, EdD. is an assistant professor of finance at Abilene Christian University. His teaching area(s) are financial institutions and theory. His research interests are gender equity in finance and student
? Benefits, Challenges,and Impact on Students”, American University, June 25, 2020, [Online] Available:https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/technology-in-education[15] H. Wu, Y. Hsu, F. Hwang, “Teachers' Adoption of Technology in Classrooms: Does SchoolSize Matter?” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 63-85, 2007,10.1007/s10763-006-9061-8[16] Pew Research Center, Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet, 2021 [Online]. Available:https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/[17] M. Muro, S. Liu, J. Whiton, S. Kulkarni, “Digitization and the American workforce,”Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings, November 2017, [Online][18] C. Feijao, I. Flanagan, C. Van Stolk, S. Gunashekar, “The global digital skills gap
theimplementation of engineering projects, the partnership can contribute to the reciprocal,social intersection of engineering and urban gardening in an easily translational manner.References[1] R. Asomani-Boateng, “Closing the Loop: Community-Based Organic Solid Waste Recycling, Urban Gardening, and Land Use Planning in Ghana, West Africa,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 132–145, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0739456X07306392.[2] R. G. Bringle and J. A. Hatcher, “Campus–Community Partnerships: The Terms of Engagement,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 503–516, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00273.[3] K. Lambert-Pennington, K. M. Reardon, and K. S. Robinson, “Revitalizing South
, “Engineering by the numbers: ASEE retention and time-to-graduation benchmarks for undergraduate engineering schools, departments and programs,” 2016.[2] N. B. Honken and P. Ralston, “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look,” vol. 14, no. 2, 2013.[3] C. P. Veenstra, E. L. Dey, and G. D. Herrin, “A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention.,” vol. 1, no. 3, p. n3, 2009.[4] W. D. Slanger, E. A. Berg, P. S. Fisk, and M. G. Hanson, “A longitudinal cohort study of student motivational factors related to academic success and retention using the college student inventory,” vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 278–302, 2015.[5] R. D. Robnett, P. A. Nelson, E. L. Zurbriggen, F. J. Crosby, and M. M. Chemers, “Research mentoring and scientist
communication survey. The focus was on the student academicdevelopment during the last few years of teaching at a university level. The equation containsfactors to account for additional time needed by students. Moreover, it relates the effects ofvarious personal communication styles in learning.T = (0.03 (2.5 H1 + 3.5 H2 ) + 0.11 (2 M1 + 4 M2 ) + 0.17P) ∗ S (1)Where,T: assignment time estimationH1: input time by outstanding studentH2: input time by excellent studentM1: input time by good studentM2: input time by satisfactory studentP: input time by marginal studentS:1 for either direct or systematic communication styleS:1.1 for spirited communication styleS: 1.2 for considerate communication styleT = 2.5 Tinst S
Paper ID #37106An Innovation Methodology to Increase StudentsPerformance in Hybrid Classroom and Virtual EnvironmentTooran Emami (Associate Professor) Tooran Emami is a tenured associate professor of Electrical Engineering in the Electrical Engineering Program at the U. S. Coast Guard Academy. Her research interests are in control systems, particularly Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller design, robust control, time delay, compensator design for continuous-time and discrete-time systems, analog or digital filter design, and hybrid fuel cell system design. © American