significantimprovement in students’ writing skills [21].The primary stage for the effort of improving engineering students’ writing skills can beincorporating writing instruction into laboratory courses which require lab reports. Requiringformal lab reports is an effective tool to integrate substantive learning into a written structure aswell as integrating communication skills into curriculum. It has been suggested that increasingthe number of collaborative writing assignments in the form of lab reports will result insignificant levels of improvement [18].This paper describes a series of teaching strategies to enhance students’ technical writing in thecontext of group-based lab assignments. A description of the methodologies employed, andoutcomes of assessment
Engineering 4 cr. instructor (myself in this case) ensures that students are actively EE531: Power System Modeling and Computational Methods. participating in the class, rather that passively listening.B. Online lectures and assignments. instruments, the laboratory has six LabVolt test benches which can be configured using motor-generator sets as generating Successful teaching of interactive classroom and online- sources or loads. Each bench is tied to its substation andspecific classes means that the teacher not only needs interconnected via transmission lines as a complete powercurriculum and
Paper ID #30040Impact of pre-lab videos on improving students’ learning outcomesMs. Resmi KrishnankuttyRema, Bowling Green State University • Assistant teaching professor , Mechatronics Engineering Technology, at Bowling Green State Univer- sity, Ohio. • Master’s Degree in Bio Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. • Bachelor’s degree in Electronics and medical Instrumentation from Cochin University of Science and Technology, India. • Ten years of teaching experience working as an Electronics / Mechatronics in- structor of which four years in the Department of Engineering Technologies
Paper ID #31746Importance of Active Learning in an Undergraduate Course in ConstructionSchedulingDr. Yewande S Abraham, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET) Yewande Abraham Ph.D., LEED AP O+M, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engi- neering Technology Environmental Management and Safety at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT). She received her Bachelor’s and Master’s in Civil Engineering from Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom and completed her Ph.D. in Architectural Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. She teaches courses in construction management at RIT
engineering pedagogical content knowledge and engineering engagement, whichled to an overall increase in teaching engineering self-efficacy [19]. Other studies have alsofound that the integration of robotics projects into various disciplines increased the involvedteachers’ self-efficacy around the use of robotics into middle school curriculum [20]. Immersingteachers in laboratory settings and research experiences has also been effective at increasing highschool teachers’ self-efficacy in content areas such as nanotechnology [21], as well as shiftingtheir perceptions of engineering as a field [22]. These examples of professional developmentactivities embody the five principles of professional development and ultimately demonstratedthe effectiveness of
demonstration that the derivative operatoris more than a symbolic mathematical operator and much more than just anotheracademic exercise.We have successfully used winDSK, winDSK6, and the latest version, winDSK8, toprovide demonstrations of any number of concepts during outreach (K-12 events), atfreshman motivational events, and in junior, senior, and even graduate ECE courses.IntroductionFor years, students have struggled with learning the significance of the impulse response.This is especially true given that there is no piece of test and measurement equipment(T&ME) in our teaching laboratories that is capable of producing a true impulse. Manyeducators have written about the benefits of demonstrations to aid student learning,especially for some
real vibration systems. Glean et.al. [5] developed some laboratory experiments, which not only to foster a better understanding ofthe principles of the system dynamics course, but also expose students to the various tools usedin making engineering measurements. Sridhara and White [6] developed five different labs withdonated equipment to measure the frequency of the vibration system, as well as to teach studentshow to use accelerometer. Ruhala [7], [8] developed four free vibration and five forced vibrationexperiments with commercially available translational system and one rotational lumped masssystem.Electromechanical system I course is a required undergraduate course for 5th year students inElectromechanical program at Wentworth Institute
ahierarchy used for the classification of learning tasks (see Table 1). At the lowest level of thehierarchy is ”remembering”, i.e., where only memorizing facts is required, while at the highestlevel is ”creating”, i.e., where a great deal of critical thinking is necessary. In addition, actionverbs depicting the learning tasks can be grouped under a specific level in the hierarchy (seeTable 1). When expressing the learning outcomes for an entire course (e.g., in the courseoutline), for a course module, for homework or laboratory assignments, or for lesson planning ingeneral, it is recommended to use such action verbs. If possible and/or applicable the alignedcourse components (i.e., the learning outcomes, the learning and teaching exercises in
-vibrationexperiments developed for an engineering vibration laboratory course. These experiments arebuilt for measuring the transient or steady-state response of a lumped mass system with eithersingle or multiple degrees of freedom. It is concluded that the laboratory experiments areeffective in helping students understand the vibration theory and provide an increased level ofintellectual excitement for the course. McDaniel and Archer [3] develop a full-scaleexperimental laboratory for teaching a mechanical vibration course. Forced vibration testing isemployed to excite a one-story building constructed by students. The testing is designed toexperimentally determine the building’s natural frequencies, mode shapes, and damping.Excitations along the vertical and
Paper ID #29070”It’s been a while”: Faculty reflect on their experiences implementingwhat they learned during an intensive summer programDr. Ariana C Vasquez, Colorado School of Mines Ariana Vasquez is the DeVries Post-Doctoral Fellow at Colorado School of Mines. She earned her doc- torate in Educational Psychology from The University of Texas at Austin. Ariana’s research focuses on motivation, learning, and achievement. Her research is driven by a desire to find solutions to educational problems in the classrooms. Her work experience while at UT Austin, included time at the Charles A. Dana Center, the Center for Teaching
Delivery to Support the Industrial Role of a Mechanical Engineering TechnologistAbstractThe COVID-19 Pandemic has created widespread disruption in higher education. This has beenespecially felt in the engineering field, which has traditionally relied on applied laboratories todeliver course material effectively and efficiently. In particular, courses in the Mechatronicdomain that integrate mechanical components, electrical systems, and programing rely heavilyon applied labs to instruct students on this interdisciplinary topic through hands-on activities. AtNew Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), these applied labs have been facilitated in theMechanical Engineering Technology (MET) program by using a
in the Chemistry Division, Chemical Diagnostics andEngineering Group at Los Alamos National Laboratory. His research interests span polymers in materials science,including accelerated aging and developing composites for additive manufacturing and radiation shielding.ELIZABETH ARMISTEADMURALI DUGGINAMurali Manohar Duggina is a Graduate student at The University of New Mexico majoring in Nanoscience &Microsystems Engineering. His research interests are in the Materials Science of semiconductor manufacturingprocesses and investigating novel polymer piezoelectric materials. Murali also serves as a Graduate Teaching Assistantand helps ongoing development of curriculum in a manner supporting a research-led and scholarly approach to
affiliated with high schools and colleges including vocational schools. The followinglist provides the accomplishments made by this coalition: • Multi-institutional AM collaboration in teaching, laboratory practices and research [3], • Framework developed to measure the attainment of ABET Student Outcomes through AM curricular practices. [4], • Smart phone accessible AM laboratory platform for multi-institutional collaboration [5], • Up to date skills required of AM technicians [6], • TTS: studio-based AM training [7], • Using AM as an innovation tool to enhance the student learning and success [8-9], • Up to date MOOC AM
design –an inexpensive Stirling engine that can be implemented at their schools. The project serves as an integrating exercise that combines the necessary hard skills in manufacturing (i.e., technical drawing, material selection, manufacturing process, and metrology) and soft skills (i.e., design methodology, teamwork, schedule planning, documentation, and communication). c) Clicker assessment. Daily clicker assessment summarizes and highlights key points in lectures and laboratory practices. It also helps to retain new knowledge while providing teaching materials for the participants at their respective schools. Much improvement has been observed among participants after the successful
ledto each university implementing a varying approach, these factors include: the software systemsutilized, computing/laboratory resources available, current and expected student profiles, as wellas the overall expected competencies.The software used at each university was based on instructor experience as well as industrysupport. Even though each university uses varying software, the interesting similarity is thenumber of software systems being used. Each course emphasizes process-oriented teaching,focusing on the process rather than the product [6]. The instructors all value the use of multiplesoftware tools rather than a singular platform to teach the different processes. Each instructorstrives to mirror the AEC industry trends and software
testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters program. Also, she introduced the first experiential
. Hale, S. Freyne, Teaching Aids and Laboratory Experiments toEnhance Materials Learning, Proceedings of the 2007 Midwest Section Conference of theAmerican Society for Engineering Education, Wichita, KS, Sep. 19-21, 2007.[9] A. M. Barry, D. Berry, S. Cunningham, J. Newton, M. Schweppe, A. Spalter, W. Whiteley,R. Williams, Visual Learning for Science and Engineering. A visual Learning Campfire,Snowbird, Utah, June 1-4, 2002.[10] G.R. Chalageri, G.U, Raju, Teaching Reform through Model building in Theory of MachineCourse, Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in EngineeringEducation, ICTIEE, 2014.[11] S. Rasul, Q. Bukhsh, S. Batool, “A study to analyze the effectiveness of audio visual aids inteaching learning process at a
UW-Milwaukee Teaching Assistant and Lab Manager Milwaukee, WI 01/2012 – 05/2013 •Maintained lab equipments and developed methods of lab experimentation for mechanical experimentation class •Taught experimental methods for engineering problem solving and computerized programming envi- ronment based on LabVIEW UW-Milwaukee Research Assistant Milwaukee, WI 08/2009 – 12/2011 •Nanomaterials synthesis and analysis using Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction •Developed nanomaterials for anode electrodes in lithium ion batteries and performed the electrochemical character- istics using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and battery test equipments Advanced Test Concepts (ATC), Inc
, gaining significant traction in the K-12 system is standards-based grading. With standards-based grading, grading is based upon “measuring students’proficiency on well-defined course objectives.” [1] Instead of arbitrary grading scales, studentsare assessed multiple times regarding their performance on course outcomes. By doing this,there is an increase in student engagement and a more thorough comprehension of coursematerials. [2] Standards Based grading focuses on the specific, relevant skills a student shouldlearn and helps instructors to assess how well students are learning and tailor their teaching tomeet areas of concern. [3] By measuring these goals, students continue to learn. By usingrubrics to articulate these goals, students can use
grading implementations: laboratory and research courses The specifications grading approach was implemented in two semesters of a largeundergraduate research course and a co-instructed chemical engineering senior laboratory courseat the University of Connecticut both had a variety of individual and group assessments. Thegrading scheme was explained to the students on the first day of both courses along with a duedate matrix for assessments. The student evaluations of teaching after the first semester indicatedmixed feelings regarding the grading scheme. Based on this feedback, the instructors made themotivation for using specifications grading more transparent and provided handouts withchecklists to the students during the second semester
, power supply, benchtop multimeter, andlaboratory PC. The room has a closet that can store several lab kits to serve different classes. Thelarge open space in this laboratory enables students to collaborate and communicate well witheach other as well as with the laboratory instructors. Figure 1. Lecture room and Laboratory room for embedded system educationIII. Course Curriculum using MSP432 MCUsA. Digital Electronics CourseThis ESET 219 digital electronics course is designed to teach students about digital electronicsand their applications. The focus is primarily on the design of combinational and sequential logic © American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 2020 ASEE Annual
, engineering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers inacademe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant timedeveloping and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduatecourses to train engineers who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and able to understand thesocietal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand challenges of the 21st century.SANG M. HANDr. Han is a Regents Professor in the Departments of Chemical & Biological Engineering andElectrical & Computer Engineering at the University of New Mexico. He earned his Ph.D. inchemical engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara and his B.S. in chemicalengineering with
idea of doing research on one’s ownteaching [18] are both relevant. This idea has also been taken up (independently) in the US byAngelo and Cross [22], and Cross and Steadman [23]. The former concerning ClassroomAssessment Techniques (CATS), and the latter, classroom research. We are strongly influencedhere by the position of Patricia Cross, who claimed that teaching in higher education would notacquire status until teachers treated their classrooms as laboratories for research. The “new”discipline of engineering education research, the question of who should be doing it, and how itcan be accomplished with rigor has been discussed at FIE and ASEE since 2000 [24]. Takentogether, these essays argue that there is such a thing as a “scholarship of
state that “theneed for hands-on experience is presented as overcoming the emphasis on knowing ‘that’[theory] versus knowing ‘how’ [practice].” [3] Additionally, hands-on learning goes beyondenhancing technical knowledge and skills and provides invaluable opportunities to developprofessional and interpersonal skills [4].Laboratory work has long been recognized as a crucial component of a complete undergraduateengineering experience. Laboratory work teaches students how technical knowledge is applied inpractice. Many traditional labs have been successful in this regard [5]-[7]. Yet in light of therapidly changing professional landscape, disrupted by the unprecedented accessibility ofinformation and global connectivity via the Internet, and
]. Applicants were required to submit a CV,letter of recommendation, a sample curriculum, and statement of interest with theirapplication. In addition, interested teachers selected their preference for research laboratories asthey aligned with their interests. Teachers were chosen on the strength of their application withconsideration given to type (neighborhood, magnet, selective enrollment), geographic diversity,and student demographic of the school in which they teach. BEST Teacher Fellows each receive$7,500 stipend and $1,000 allotment for classroom materials to implement their bioengineeringcurriculum at the end of this full-time six-week program. In addition, Fellows receive anadditional $500 following the completion of a post-curriculum
Paper ID #29146WIP: Exploring Pedagogical Alternatives for Incorporating Simulations inan Introductory Power Electronics CourseMr. Mohamed Khaled Elshazly, University of Toronto Mohamed Elshazly is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Toronto Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). He is currently engaged in developing support simulations for teaching introductory power electronics to undergraduate ECE students, as well as providing techni- cal support. Mohamed’s main research interests are numerical simulations and computational materials science, focusing on quantum mechanical
Paper ID #29871Adding a Simulation Module to a Primarily Experimental MechanicalEngineering CourseDr. Reihaneh Jamshidi, University of Hartford Reihaneh Jamshidi is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Hartford. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Iowa State University. Her teaching focuses on ma- terials science, mechanics of materials, and mechanical engineering design. Reihaneh’s primary research interests are design, manufacturing, characterization, and mechanics of soft materials and structures.Dr. Ivana Milanovic, University of Hartford Dr. Milanovic is a professor of
Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation.Prof. Jason Wiese, Jason Wiese is an Assistant Professor in the School of Computing at the University of Utah. His research takes a user-centric perspective of personal data, focusing on how that data is collected, interpreted, and used in applications. His work crosses the domains of
Paper ID #28855Workshops for Building the Mechatronics and Robotics EngineeringEducation CommunityProf. Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Michael A. Gennert is Professor of Robotics Engineering, CS, and ECE at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he leads the WPI Humanoid Robotics Laboratory and was Founding Director of the Robotics Engineering Program. He has worked at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, the University of California Riverside, PAR Technology Corporation, and General Electric. He received the S.B. in CS, S.B. in EE, and S.M. in EECS in 1980 and the Sc.D. in EECS in 1987
Paper ID #29540Making the connection: Encouraging technology-specific reading skillsthrough structured readings of textsDr. Vigyan Jackson Chandra, Eastern Kentucky University Vigyan (Vigs) J. Chandra, Ph.D., serves as professor and coordinator of the Cyber Systems Technology related programs offered within the Department of Applied Engineering and Technology (AET) at Eastern Kentucky University. He received his master’s and doctoral degrees from the University of Kentucky in Electrical Engineering, and holds certifications in several computer/networking areas. He teaches courses on computer systems and applications