methods.Procedure At Miami University, The author did not provide the students with a questionnaire to fillout. The rationale being that ‘students are exhausted in filling out forms.’ Some researchersare of the opinion: ‘questionnaire-fatigue’ will result in skewed data that may lead to faultyconclusions. Therefore the assessment data was collected in an indirect manner. The author delivered four content materials in four different modes.Topic 1 was delivered in the traditional Lecture Format. (Aural)Topic 2 utilized Power Point Slides and other Visual Aids. (Visual)Topic 3 was left for the students to read, write and submit their findings. (Reading & Writing)Topic 4 was handled like a laboratory, demonstration, group discussion, etc
sayback, non-evaluative pointing andnon- evaluative questioning. The questions on the peer review sheet were: 1. Write what youhear is the topic of the project as fairly and faithfully as possible. 2. What parts of this piece ofwriting stand out to you? How and why do they get your attention? 3. What parts of this pieceof writing raise questions for you and why? These questions kept students from focusingevaluation but allowed them to think about improvement of the executive summaries not justtheir individual summary but in general. Analysis Procedures Analysis began with an initial read of all the summaries for the semesters in thestudy.There was a goal to identify any common structural features of the documents. Thisinitial review
-buildproject: 1) Design-Build-Test pedagogy; 2) the engineering design process; 3) comprehensivetechnical coverage of rocket systems; 4) the seven axes of engineering practice; and 5) enablingcomputer simulations and micro-sensor technology for engineering design and analysis. Thisnovel curriculum is evaluated using an indirect post-activity survey that probes students’attitudes about STEM fields and self-perceived skills and abilities.For the project, all students were given identical Estes LoadStar II model kits, commerciallyavailable in Educator Bulk Packs. The students’ challenge, framed as a class competition, was tomodify the rocket’s design to maximize flight altitude with an Estes C6-5 motor. The instructorfirst guided students through
Academy of Engineering (NAE) for ”For innovations in nanomanufacturing with impact in multiple industry sectors”; Society of Manufactur- ing (SME)’s David Dornfeld Blue Sky Manufacturing Idea Award for ”Factories-In-Space”; SME-S.M. Wu Research Implementation Award; three Edison Awards for Innovation; Tibbett Award by the US Small Business Association sponsored by EPA for successful technology transfer; R&D 100 Award, (the ”Os- car” of innovation); Fellowships to the International 1. Academy of Production Engineering (CIRP), 2. the American Society of Materials (ASM), 3. the American Society of Mechanical Engineering (ASME), and 4. the Institute of Physics (IoP), London, England; multiple best paper awards
expectations. While these themes were commonacross the studies included in the analysis, the way the themes manifested across data sets raisesinteresting questions about the formation of engineers and the socialization experiences thatcontribute to that formation. As research on engineering practice continues to develop, it isimportant that researchers consider where engineers are within their career trajectory and howthat influences their perceptions about the work they do and the agency they have withinorganizations.Introduction and BackgroundWhat constitutes engineering practice is constantly changing and revised as engineeringproblems become more complex and multidisciplinary, and the scale on which engineeringproblems are solved increases [1
). Some of de Paula’s academic and professional accomplishments include being the recipient of a Fulbright FLTA scholarship (2008-2009) and a Cambridge University Best Practice in State Education Scholarship (2011). In addition, he has attended and presented in conferences and teacher training seminars in Argentina, England and the USA c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 "Ingeniero como vos": An analysis of the Mbyá-Guaraní Practices Associated with Engineering DesignAbstractThe Mbyá-Guaraní are a group of nomadic people that have inhabited impenetrable territories inSouth America for centuries [1]. They are one of the groups that had the least amount of
E R, P U RD U E U NI V E RS I T Y | RU S H 7 @P U RD U E . E D U K AY L A MA XE Y , P U RD U E U NI V E RS I T Y | C AR T E 2 3 1@P U RD U E . E D U D R . M ON I C A C ARD E L L A, P U RD UE U NI V E RS I T Y | C ARD E L L A @P URD U E . E D U D R . M OR GA N H Y N E S , P U RD U E U N I V E RS I T Y | H Y N E S M@P U RD U E. E D UA myriad of factors contributes to the disproportionately low representation of racially and ethnically diverse students participating inengineering. Informal learning environments are locations where racially and ethnically diverse students can experience STEMactivities in culturally-relevant and culturally-responsive ways. Identity portraits are a tool
databreaches due to their value on the Dark Web [5]. It is not surprising then that IT professionalsrated information security as the top concern for three years in a row [7]. Additionally, it is also aconcern for parents who are worried about their children losing their identity [19].On the other hand, students spend a lot of time online; 95% of teens aged 13-17 havesmartphones, and 45% of teens report being online almost constantly [1]. The vast majority ofAmericans in the 18-24 year age range report using social media, particularly Youtube (91%),Facebook (80%), Instagram (71%), and Snapchat (78%) [1]. However, according to an online pollconducted by the Pew Research Center [17], people 18-29 years old on average only answered 6out of 10
ofengineering practices, the characteristics of engineers, and how students’ interests intersect withengineering careers.IntroductionEngineering education has become a part of science instruction as early as elementary school inthe United States. Engineering educators and the Next Generation Science Standards hold goalsof engaging children in engineering practices, informing children about the nature of engineeringwork, and ensuring that youth have the option to select future engineering study and careers [1].Research studies indicate that children are increasingly well-informed about the nature ofengineering work as a result of a growing number of K-12 engineering curricula [2]–[4] and thatelementary students in the United States are increasingly
?!"), and fail to grasp the topic. By providing a live captionhistory on student devices, students can refocus, reconnect, and thus have an opportunity to learnthe current lecture topic being presented.The design of the ClassTranscribe platform is extensible and scalable. We demonstratecaptioning of content by integrating with two websites used to host lecture videos, youtube.comand echo360.com.IntroductionToday, undergraduate and graduate engineering students enroll in courses that employ livelectures, which may or may not include exposition, active learning and student-centeredtechniques (e.g., POGIL [1]), online video content, and a blend of multiple presentation formats.However, student and technology issues such as non-disclosed hearing
growth and long-term viability? Instead, the focus seem to be meeting earningsforecasts.Henry Petroski, in To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design [1], relatesan encounter in chapter 1 with a neighbor who, after the Kansas City Hyatt Regency skywalkscollapse, wondered why engineering did not know enough to build so simple a structure as anelevated walkway. The neighbor went on to cite the Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse, theAmerican Airlines DC-10 crash in Chicago, some other famous failures, and a few things that hehad heard about hypothetical nuclear power plant accidents that he was sure would exceed ThreeMile Island in radiation release. The neighbor’s point was that engineering did not quite havethe world of their
to identify experiences and environments that encourageinnovation and entrepreneurship amongst engineering students over time. EMS is a longitudinaldataset of nationally representative engineering students2 who are surveyed at three time points:(1) as undergraduate students, (2) upon graduation, and (3) early years in the workforce. Thisanalysis is based on the first time point; juniors, seniors, and 5th year undergraduate engineeringstudents. The survey includes measures of ETSE, participation in experiences such asundergraduate research and engineering internships, and demographic information includingrace/ethnicity and gender.Using Bandura’s Social Cognitive & Self Efficacy Theory and conceptions of feministintersectionality theory as
times for two-hour sessions. All course materialsand homework were retained as data. This study chronicles the learning of the student andhighlights abilities the student mastered as well as difficulties that were encountered. By the endof the course, the student able to read and sketch both orthographic and isometric views of parts.There was also evidence that the student created and used spatial imagery of parts that included3D aspects.Literature reviewGraphical communication is a fundamental part of engineering. Correspondingly, spatialreasoning ability is a predictor of success in engineering school. The ability to mentally rotate3D objects seems especially important [1]. Students’ abilities in these areas can be increasedthrough
, Gül3, and Lee, Kristen4 1 Penn State Brandywine 2 Penn State Berks 3 Iowa State University 4 University of San FranciscoAbstractThis work presents the results of an assessment instrument designed to assess the progressivelearning of ethics in the engineering curriculum at different stages known as acclimation,competency, and proficiency, and to determine the relation of the development stages with threecomponents that contribute to learning: interest, knowledge and strategic processing. Thequestions in the instrument were defined following the Model of Domain Learning (MDL) tocapture the
traditionalteaching methods. The proposed VR teaching modules allow students 1) to experience the senseof being present in a virtual queuing system environment that is representative of a real-worldengineering situation, 2) to expand their natural perceptive abilities and authentic experience, and3) to eliminate the need to deal with any expensive equipment or risky environments to understandthe application of queuing theory. The purpose of the research is to investigate how well studentsgained conceptual knowledge of queuing theory using the developed VR teaching module.Queueing theory is defined as the mathematical study of waiting lines. In this study students wereprovided a conceptual queuing theory quiz after the VR teaching module, and then they
the Challenger launchdecision, the Alaska Airlines flight 261 crash, and the Piper Alpha oilrig fire. We received 47responses in the Fall 2016 semester and 101 responses in the Spring 2017 semester fromundergraduate and graduate students enrolled in Purdue’s Aeronautics and Astronauticsdepartment. Our initial statistical analysis indicates that there may be a correlation between astudent’s performance in and exposure to systems engineering-related classes and the student’sperformance on our survey.1 IntroductionAs the complexity of the systems we build increases, so does the demand for systems engineers[Hutchison et al., 2016; SERC, 2013; Chaput & Mark, 2013]. 23% of all engineers in the U.S. areover the age of 55, which means there
interview data from educators who did not perceiveany significant challenges also sheds light on the circumstances and strategies that facilitateeffective ESI instruction.IntroductionEthics has been recognized as an important part of engineering education and professionalresponsibility. The inclusion in accreditation criteria [1] and professional codes [2] providesan impetus for fostering ethical awareness and judgment. In a systematic literature reviewof engineering ethics education articles, Hess and Fore found that 65% of the interventionswere justified or motivated by ABET accreditation [3]. Despite its importance, there are anumber of “systemic barriers to effective ethics education” [4, p. 346]. One challenge is alack of student engagement
-oriented teaching strategies [1], [2]. After a review ofcurrent literature, Prince concluded that engineering faculty should consider new instructionalmethods, including active learning strategies, in their classrooms, as he found compellingevidence regarding the efficacy of student-centered teaching practices [3].In a meta-analysis of 225 studies, Freeman et al. evaluated instructional practices inundergraduate STEM classes to better understand the impact of active learning on students [4].The authors found that student performance on examinations or concept inventories was higher,approximately 6%, with active learning instruction. Further, their analysis demonstrated thatstudents were 1.5 times more likely to fail a course if they were enrolled
graphically by frequency of response. TheInternal Review Board at our institution waived full board review and granted approval forcampus dissemination of the survey instrument. Prior to taking the survey, respondents wereasked to electronically indicate their acceptance to a consent statement or to opt out.Results and DiscussionOne hundred ninety five students and twenty faculty responded to the survey, Table 1. Sixfaculty and five students were interviewed. Four of the six interviewed faculty had tenure. Anoversight on the survey instrument was that we did not ask the faculty if they had tenure so wecould not make downstream comparisons on this basis. Table 1: Students and faculty members that responded to questions by survey and interview
engineering courses for over five years. His previous research involved thermal management systems for military vehicles. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Using the SCALE-UP Method to Create an Engaging First Year Engineering Course (Extended Abstract) 1 David J. Ewing – The University of Texas at ArlingtonAbstractTo meet the growing demands for professional engineers, much emphasis has been placed onrecruiting and retaining increasing numbers of engineering students. In response, the Universityof Texas at Arlington (UTA) performed a
. The paperalso presents the results of the implementation of the curriculum, as well as a comparison of theoutcomes of the online course with those from a regular, face-to-face course. Student performanceon labs and tests in the two parallel sections of the course are compared. Additionally studentsurveys conducted in both the online and face-to-face courses are used to document and comparestudents’ perceptions of their learning experience, the effectiveness of the course resources, theiruse of these resources, and their overall satisfaction with the course.1. IntroductionOne of the main recommendations of the 2012 President’s Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology (PCAST) report, “Engage to Excel,” is to address the retention problem in
changing the pitch of the blades to keep thesurfaces above the “overhang” threshold of 45 degrees. Metal 3D printing, unlike FDM printing,requires higher consideration for detrimental design features and potential failure-modes. Mostof the design features of concern are described in detail in the following section.III. Design feature issues in Metal 3D printingIn designing for metal AM (specifically in the SLM process), a number of design features mustbe eliminated before starting a build job [3]. Due to incompatibility with the powder melting © American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Figure 1. Highlighted overhanging regions and
education suffers from a lack of student interest and learningchallenges due to extensive mathematical concepts, operations with geometry and the abstractionof concepts [1, 2]. Different approaches have been proposed to address the challenges, such ashands-on-experimentation [2], the inclusion of computer aided design tools [3] and, morerecently, augmented reality (AR) techniques [4]. Recent rise in popularity of 3D-enabled screensand highly improved capabilities of graphical processing units (GPUs), it is now possible togenerate complex and real-time 3D visualizations that facilitate teaching of broad scientifictopics [5]. Literature survey shows that 3D visualization assisted teaching has been proposed forvarious fields such as anatomy [6
questions were designed togage how much impact the sessions have had regarding knowledge of and attitudes toward theengineering profession. Both objective and subjective question forms were utilized.MotivationWriting on Dartmouth College’s achievement of awarding more than half of its undergraduateengineering degrees in Spring 2016 to women, Dean of Engineering Joseph Helble stated “Weneed to educate increasing numbers of talented and creative engineers, drawn from all corners ofsociety” [1]. That is absolutely true. To reach those far corners, recruitment of diverseengineering candidates cannot happen just during freshman year of college, or even during highschool. Many researchers have demonstrated that perceptions of technical careers in general
learners access toeducational experiences that typically have been limited by the need to be present in a physicalclassroom. However, MOOC virtual environments presents unique challenges for bothinstructors and learners. One of these challenges is the lack of face-to-face interaction, whichaffects how learners engage with one another and with the instruction team. From aconstructivist perspective, this is problematic because social interaction and communication arevital to meaningful learning [1]. Communication is also necessary for instructors to answerquestions, clarify concepts, and guide learners through their knowledge construction.In order to facilitate social interaction and communication, MOOCs often use discussion forumswhere learners can
theamount of diversity that can be displayed within the context of a single assignment. It isimportant to note that we are not analyzing the assignment solutions for correctness but onlylooking at the thinking and organizational strategies used at this time.2. Theoretical Foundations based in Writing to LearnLearning to program is a complex process that could benefit from Writing to Learn (WTL)strategies. The struggles of novice programmers is well documented [1]. A commonly citedfactor is “fragile knowledge,” which is knowledge that is incomplete and superficial [2].Students who effectively employ metacognitive strategies, such as reflection and self-assessment, are more likely to master the problem solving skills that are essential toprogramming
learning activities and real-life scenarios applied in her courses, students experience the application of technical concepts being taught and non-technical skills for big picture problem solvingDr. Michael Robinson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Michael Robinson is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Collaborative Process Leading to Adoption of ASCE BOK3 Consistent with ABETAbstractThe Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringidentified the coming release of ASCE BOK3 and the new ABET 1-7
the College of Education at NC State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Comparative Analysis on the Engineer of 2020 – A Holistic REU ProgramIntroductionSince the beginning of the millennium, the conceptual Engineer of 2020 established themotivation for early 21st Century engineering curricula [1]. While it has created someimprovement in educational programs, its impact is far more reaching in areas beyond itsoriginal objective, such as Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs). This REU programimproves the traditional REU procedures by incorporating methods that produce the desiredtraits of the Engineer of 2020.The Future Renewable
these exercises, while still retaining the benefits of modular implementation. The benefit ofthese individual modules is that they are self-contained and can be easily implemented into anexisting course. In contrast to larger programmatic implementations, these small-scale modulesare lower in cost and complexity, but also tend to focus on fewer aspects of entrepreneurship andare not necessarily reinforced by the surrounding course content.This paper discusses the implementation of a number of engineering entrepreneurship exercisesand activities into a mechanical engineering senior capstone course sequence. These modulestake the form of 1) an e-learning module, 2) a series of guest lectures, and 3) a businesscompetition. These modules were
requires connecting with individuals regularly. Thiswas more readily accomplished by a large team working a few hours rather than a small teamworking a large number of hours. The philosophy behind the course design stemmed from SethGodin’s apt words on experiential education: “The process involves selling the student on themission, providing access to resources, and then holding her responsible for an outcome thatworks. And repeat. And repeat.”[1]Course ContentTo emphasize the difference between language-specific syntax and general concepts involved inproblem-solving with code, the students learned three different languages. The 10 key conceptswere taught first in JavaScript and then repeated in Python. By repeating the same challenges intwo