engineering researchers at U of T and Waterloo are engaged in a diversearray of research activities involving multidisciplinary, multi-researcher teams. While bothlibraries offer a number of services that researchers expressed an interest in, promotion of theseservices is evidently lacking. This study highlights a need to improve communications andenhance services, especially in the training of graduate students. It also highlights areas wherethe library should continue to focus efforts, such as with research data management, open accesscompliance, and articulating research impact beyond traditional bibliometric measures. Some ofthese challenges are complicated, especially those related to research data management, andrequire a multi-layered
in strong impact onthe students’ STEM identities [12]. Figure 1 Outline of overlapping REU, CCLSRM, and HSLSRM programs. Research experiences (blue) were held during the summer and LSRM mentoring sessions (orange) occurred during the academic year. Programs were overlapped when possible to support the developing community. The program focused on providing an introductory research experience that was accessibleto the first-generation, returning, and URM students participating. Students from thesedemographics have an expectation the program will be inclusive and supportive [5]. For thisreason, the program placed great emphasis on providing the students with a positive introductoryexperience to encourage them to pursue further STEM
thinking, identifying effective professional development approaches, and uncovering pedagogical techniques to enhance students’ engineering curiosity, engagement, and learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 High School Students’ Perspectives on Pre-college Engineering Education Course (Fundamental)AbstractSince the introduction of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in 2013, pre-collegeengineering education has been on the rise. However, the impact of pre-college engineeringeducation courses on high school students’ perceptions of future careers remains unclear.Engineering for US All (e4usa) aims to establish an accessible engineering
to traditional forms of prejudice, in that the discriminatorybehavior is clear, but the target is left unable to defend themselves, such as derogatory graffitipainted on a wall. Sue later created a taxonomy which further categorized microinvalidations andmicroinsults into themes (see [13]).Critical Race Theory CRT draws from several domains to explain racial disparities in the United States, as wellas what measures must be taken to eradicate these disparities. When discussing the use of racialmicroaggressions targeting Latinx students in an engineering education setting, it can be arguedthat the most relevant aspects of CRT are the positions that racism is the U.S. has beennormalized and is ubiquitous. CRT also points to the impact of
published in refereed journals and conferences. He has been the principal investigator on several major research projects on industrial applications of sensing and Control with focus on Energy Efficiency. He is a senior member of IEEE, ISA, and a member of ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 REU student engagement during and after REU program: a case study comparing individual project with group project1. IntroductionThis National Science Foundation funded research experiences for undergraduates (REU) site atTexas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK) seeks to provide an impactful summer researchexperience in the emerging field of sustainable energy and expand research
students, can have a positive impact on student motivation, engagement, and learning inpost-secondary engineering classrooms. Further, a meta-analysis of the active learning literature is clearthat RBIS improves engagement and achievement and prevents dropping out in STEM contexts(Freeman, et al., 2014). However, it remains unclear is if there are patterned differences betweendominant and non-dominant groups in engagement that can be targeted to improve instructional supportfor UREM’s.Supportive Classroom Environments and Student Knowledge BuildingIn recent years, motivation researchers have focused much time and effort to the study of supportiveclassroom environments (e.g. Jang, et al., 2010; Soenens & Vansteekiste, 2005). Experimental
written communication 93% (7%)Build / implement a design 95% (7%)* Sample is randomly assigned subset of the class, graded by a single instructor. For consistency, onlyassessments from this instructor are shown.Another window into Gizmo function is provided by the team- and individual- studentreflections that were completed after the Gizmo was built, demonstrated at the expo, andgiven away. As mentioned above, over 90% of students reflections capture insights onpossible improvements and design successes. This is a qualitative reflection, studentswill engage in quantitative assessment of projects later on in their curricula.ENGR 100 student evaluation of the experience is assessed both
is a second year doctoral student at the University of Michigan in Higher Education. His research interests focus on organizational communication and curriculum planning in post-secondary education. Page 24.745.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Influences on Engineering Instructors’ Emphasis on Interdisciplinarity in Undergraduate CoursesIntroductionSolving many of today’s technological and social challenges will require interdisciplinarythought and action1-5, and the growth of interdisciplinary engineering programs6 suggests that
focused on the design and implementation of a course using a student-led laboratory method which supports the development of authentic and courageous leaders. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 How Do Human Interaction Labs Contribute to Engineering Leadership Development?AbstractThis paper outlines the impact of a small group experiential learning course (Human InteractionLab) that cultivates authentic engagement between participants. Unlike many experientiallearning environments, this course is fundamentally learner-centered, where students designateboth the content of discussion and the norms that dictate
new ways to support first-year students and enhance retention. According tothe Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), High-Impact Practices (HIPs)offer significant educational benefits, especially for historically underserved groups, bycultivating substantive relationships, promoting engagement across diverse perspectives,facilitating the application of acquired knowledge, and fostering reflective processes aimed atpersonal development [1]. Students involved in HIPs are more likely to experience positiveoutcomes like academic achievement, persistence, and attainment of goals that prepare a studentto live a rewarding life [2]. It is recommended to integrate HIPs into curriculum in alignmentwith course objectives and
graduate education, and a future career inmechanical engineering and design. Sharing these findings highlights the potential forearly-stage research to contribute meaningfully to space exploration and innovation whileeffectively advancing STEM education and experiences at the college level.IntroductionExperiential learning opportunities that bridge the gap between classroom theory and real-worldapplication are essential for fostering effective education for a student of any discipline. In astudy by Alfaro [1], real-world experiences provide students with invaluable experiences throughhands-on projects that are not associated with a letter grade. This can foster skills in creativeproblem-solving, communication, efficient design processes, and an
of disciplines, subfields, and sectors in which engineers practice,including as workplace roles and job demands continue to change and evolve over time [6], [7].In sum, more work is needed to understand how students and professionals understand andnavigate ethical issues, how such perceptions and abilities change over time, and how variouskinds of interventions and experiences (e.g., coursework, training, service or volunteer activities,workplace situations, etc.) impact individual engineers. Such objectives seem well aligned withempirical research methods and approaches employed by scholars in engineering education andother social science research fields. Yet conversations around the challenges of conductingrigorous research on engineering
to participate, choosing mandatoryactivities to hold them accountable, our SETS program has to overcome several institutional andcollege level hurdles due to institutional-wide digital transformation and college and departmentallevel leadership change. In the paper, we will details the impact of the project has on students,faculty, programs, ET department, and College of Technology. In addition, we share ourcategorization of the decisions and choices we have to make while implementing the project,including promoting it among students, faculty, and administrators, as well as seeking outopportunities for our students to take the lead and reach out to their local communities. We hope thefindings will provide evidence based disciplinary
an additional group of undergraduate STEM majors werealso involved in the design and pilot of all activities. Four goals frame this project and research.These are to learn how (1) high school students’ knowledge of STEM careers and STEMdomains change across their participation; (2) the high school students improve their interest inSTEM career attainment and their self-efficacy for career relevant skills; (3) the undergraduateSTEM majors’ views about Communities of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers developacross their participation; and (4) teachers’ knowledge of current STEM domains, skills, andcareers change. To examine the impact of the programming on each stakeholder group, PEAR’sCIS-S and CIS-E surveys, interviews, activity
contributes to the ethical climate of the team is asimportant a skill as that engineer’s ability to make ethical decisions individually. As educators,then, we must have tools to measure both of these skill sets in pre-professional engineers. Propermeasurement allows educators to design appropriate educational interventions and to track thegrowth of students as they learn. Measurement data also would allow for further research intowhat effects, if any, individual ethical reasoning skills might have on a team’s ethical climate, or Page 22.1436.3vice versa. Past research has suggested a direct impact of team ethical climate on individualethical reason
-appropriate, five-step engineering design process; and scaffolds their engagement in andreflection about an open-ended design challenge that permits many possible solutions. (Seeeie.org for more details about the curricular materials.) As we developed the curricular materials,we worked closely with educators, soliciting their ideas and feedback, observing and testing intheir classrooms, and analyzing data from their students.During our interactions with teachers, they shared the impacts that engineering was having ontheir students. English learners were one population they highlighted. Fueled by their anecdotesand testimonials, we began to think more deeply about the possibilities. A review of the literaturesurfaced no extant research about K-12
key factor of the proposed new and updated courses will be to update the curriculum to meetthe expectations of industry by supplying qualified technicians and technologists who haveextensive hands-on experience with current design tools. By developing a re-configurablecomputing lab, we will be able to provide students at universities and community colleges withstate-of-the-art training tools that match the expectations of industry. Likewise, by strengtheningpartnerships with diverse community colleges through this curriculum development project, weaim to increase the transition of students from two-year to four-year programs through alignedcurriculum planning. Our aim is not to take away from students attending or planning to attendcommunity
craft communication strategies toeffectively engage a range of audiences is a fundamental principle of technical communication.Guidelines for effective communication will be taught throughout the course. As individuals andin teams, students will submit multiple written assignments and give oral presentation to theclass. Students are assessed by multiple assignments, some of which include peer review.(5) An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situationsand make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions inglobal, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.Assessment: Apply principles of technical communication ethics through proper citationpractices. Identify and
Paper ID #21513Situated Information Seeking for Learning: A Case Study of EngineeringWorkplace Cognition among Cybersecurity ProfessionalsHieu-Trung LeDr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri is Associate Professor in the department of Information Sciences & Technology. Dr. Johri studies the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) for learning and knowledge shar- ing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in supporting distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging economies. He received the
redesign the curriculum through the NSF funded Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED) grant. She is a member of the ASEE Leadership Virtual Community of Practice that organizes and facilitates Safe Zone Training work- shops. Dr. Cross has conducted multiple workshops on managing personal bias in STEM, both online and in-person. Dr. Cross’ scholarship investigated student teams in engineering, faculty communities of practice, and the intersectionality of multiple identity dimensions. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion in STEM, intersectionality, teamwork and communication skills, assessment, and identity construction. Her teaching philosophy focuses on student centered approaches such as
students who went on to careers in academia. Theresults were presented in Philip et al. 2 The response of these former students wasoverwhelmingly positive. They indicated that the ASEE student chapter had been instrumentalin helping them learn what life would be like as a professor, what issues were currentlyimportant in engineering education, and how to prepare for their job searches. Page 7.1046.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Despite the potential of ASEE student chapters, there
, surpassing traditional methods,demonstrate a positive impact on academic achievement (Ghosh et al., 2020).Practices aimed at preparing students for real-world applications, emphasizing collaboration andadaptability, have shown a beneficial effect (Fawns and O'Shea, 2018). Moreover, thenoteworthy acceptance of gamified assessment methods carries significant implications(Georgiou and Nikolaou, 2020).In the realm of online education systems, the importance of monitoring students' emotionsand behaviors is underscored, with effective strategies proposed, such as hidden tracking andtailored feedback (Jayasinghe et al., 2015). A notable shift from traditional exams to PaperReviews has resulted in heightened student engagement and relevance, aligning
imposed by the community of E/C professionals. However, stripped ofother connections, obligation provides a weak impact on forming students with a desire to do andbe good. [13]–[15]Here is where virtue provides a richer, more human side to the goodness equation, for whatcounts as a virtue can depend upon characteristics or circumstances which are not universal [16];Consequently the list of virtues will not be the same for all, leaving open the legitimate questionas to which virtues are most important/needed for E/C professionals and those students whoapproach E/C education with that goal. Exploring and understanding the criteria for goodness is1 See G.H. von Wright, The Varieties of Goodness, as quoted in [14].essential to this exercise. One
Indiana. Her focus includes innovative course development and the impact of built environments on human well-being with positive outcomes. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Applying a Flipped Learning Approach to Construction Cost Estimating: Fostering Increased Student Engagement in Guided Active Learning ExperiencesIntroduction:Learning the art of construction estimating is invaluable to a student’s overall understanding ofthe construction process and in promoting workforce readiness. With limited contact hours eachweek, the traditional face-to-face lecture and tutorial-based format can impede engagement andlearning, not allowing time for quality
Education, 2025 Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students’ Reflections on Combating Systemic RacismAbstractBackground: Systemic racism is deeply embedded in various institutions and societal structures,perpetuating inequalities and shaping interpersonal interactions. Engineers play a crucial role inaddressing and dismantling these systemic issues as they influence shaping the built environmentand technological systems that impact diverse communities. Therefore, integrating social justiceprinciples and awareness of systemic inequities into the engineering curriculum is crucial forpreparing future engineers to create inclusive and equitable solutions. By examining howengineering students reflect on their roles in
live observance of changes in thephysical system such as the shift in heights of manometer fluid with flow.Conclusions & Future DirectionsAlthough there were many factors to consider that may have affected the results, the LC-DLMimplementation showed similar statistics with improved student outcomes, at least for someconcepts, at a university other than where the technology was developed, which suggeststransferability of the LC-DLM pedagogy. The on-site mentoring and discussions along with onlineinstructions, phone discussions were helpful for engaging the faculty in using the DLMs in theirclasses.Previous studies at the founding university have shown significant improvements with the moduleswhen compared to a control group. To further
after submitting an assessment. Everyone likely hastheir own story they can recall of strong feelings – good or bad – being attached to receivinggrades, and it has also been established in literature that grades elicit a wide range of emotionsand feelings amongst students (e.g., [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]). While the body of research on gradesand grading practices is growing as education researchers continue to explore assessmentstrategies and outcomes, not much is known about the impact of grades on students beyond theirlearning outcomes and learning achievements.Grades & Grading PracticesGrades are well-established as a global tool in the high school and higher education communitiesto summarize and communicate a student's achievement of
need tohave the technical knowledge and skills to address a wide variety of problems, as well as theability to communicate and work closely with both clinical staff, such as nurses and respiratorytherapists, as well as IT professionals and a range of other key players in in hospitalenvironment.The program itself consists of two stackable certificates leading to an associate’s degree.The level-1 certificate is intended to provide students with sufficient background to be hired asentry level BMETs. Students gain knowledge and hands-on skills to enable them to carry outbasic inspection and preventive maintenance of a range of commonly used medical devices, aswell as knowledge of typical safety and documentation procedures. Students also
been completed. These surveys aimed toaddress a range of inquiries, including participant learning experiences, program alignment withprofessional goals, and perceived impact on student learning. The surveys also exploredparticipant experiences with Network Improvement Communities, Capstone Projects,satisfaction ratings, and suggestions for improvement. Findings from surveys administeredacross three cohorts were presented, with some noted discrepancies in respondent numbers dueto survey instrument inconsistencies. Analysis consisted of summary statistics and T-tests wereused to assess the significance of difference between pre-, post-, and follow-up responses.The external evaluation consisted of a mixed-methods approach for data collection and
along with his Master’s of Science and Bachelor of Science from Purdue’s School of Civil Engineering. Justin is currently a Postdoctoral Researcher in the STEM Education Research Institute at IUPUI. Justin’s research interests include developing pedagogical strategies to improve STEM students’ ethical reasoning skills; exploring the role of empathy within design, innovation and sustainability; synthesizing the influence of societal and individual worldviews on decision-making; assessing STEM students’ learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability; and exploring the impact of pre-engineering curriculum on students’ abilities and career trajectories. c American Society for