Paper ID #17892A Multidisciplinary Pilot Course on the Internet of Things: Curriculum De-velopment Using Lean Startup PrinciplesDr. Valerie Galluzzi, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Valerie Galluzzi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Software Engi- neering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in Terre Haute, Indiana. Her research interests include wearable technology, machine learning, sensor networks, and the Internet of Things.Dr. Carlotta A Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Carlotta A. Berry is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer
of a distorted picture ofengineering education. The retention of engineering students is a very difficult problem [1].Demanding engineering curricula and ill-prepared students are often cited for poor retention andgraduation among engineering students. The problem is even more significant amongstunderrepresented minority groups. Lack of proper academic mindset and attitude for success andvery limited computer skills were cited as main challenges for incoming engineering students[2]. Also, lack of experience in bringing an engineering design concept to a working prototypeand poor written oral communication skills significantly contribute to the retention problem [2].The Electrical Engineering (EE) Department of the University of Texas at
AC 2008-17: UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERS FOR CURRICULUM ANDLABORATORY EQUIPMENT DEVELOPMENT: A FREESCALE S12MICROCONTROLLER LABORATORY TRAINERSteven Barrett, University of Wyoming Steven F. Barrett received the BS Electronic Engineering Technology from the University of Nebraska at Omaha in 1979, the M.E.E.E. from the University of Idaho at Moscow in 1986, and the Ph.D. from The University of Texas at Austin in 1993. He was formally an active duty faculty member with the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado and is now an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wyoming. He is a member of IEEE (senior) and Tau Beta Pi (chief faculty advisor). His research
AC 2011-2628: EE STUDENTS COMPLETE PHOTOVOLTAIC R&D FORINDUSTRY IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMChris C Delia Jr., Rowan UniversityCarlos Daniel Barreiro,Dr Peter Mark Jansson PE, Rowan UniversityDr. John L. Schmalzel P.E., Rowan UniversityKevin Anthony Whitten, Rowan University Kevin Anthony Bellomo-Whitten was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on August 22, 1988. He moved to Cape May, New Jersey in 1989, where he attended all of his schooling. Upon completion of high school, Kevin was accepted to Rowan University’s College of Engineering, Electrical and Computer En- gineering department. He had the pleasure of traveling to England in 2009 for a course in Sustainable Design in Engineering, where his interest
that the CubeSatpedagogy will have a significant and lasting benefit on student outcomes as it is incorporatedinto more core EE classes and laboratories at Vanderbilt University.Bibliography[1] Feisel, Lyle D., and Albert J. Rosa. "The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education." Journal of Engineering Education 94, no. 1 (2005): 121-130.[2] Roppel, Thaddeus A., John Y. Hung, Stuart W. Wentworth, and A. Scott Edward Hodel. "An interdisciplinary Page 24.1245.11 laboratory sequence in electrical and computer engineering: Curriculum design and assessment results." Education, IEEE Transactions on 43, no. 2
Paper ID #9842Science Learning with Design, Engineering and Robotics (Curriculum Ex-change)Mike Ryan, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Marion Usselman is a Principal Research Scientist and Associate Director for Federal Outreach and Re- search at the Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). She earned her Ph.D. in Biophysics from the Johns Hopkins University and has been with CEISMC since 1996 developing and managing university-K-12 educational partnership programs. She currently leads up a team of
issues and may result in several benefits, includingmeaningful face-to-face engagements between faculty, students, and employers, as well as reducedtime for curriculum development2,3,4. As a process improvement initiative, Agile developmentbegan in 2001 as a set of principles used in the development of software. It was then codified andpresented as the Agile Manifesto5. The first applications of Agile in higher education logically werefrom computer science and engineering. These first applications in higher education resulted in theAgile-Teaching/Learning Methodology6 and focused on instructors quickly adapting to students’ Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference
. Reinforcement learning models are applied in computer games [2]-[4], industrialautomation and robotics [5]-[7], traffic control systems [8]-[10], resources management systems[11]-[13], advertising [14]-[15]. Section 2 overviews the hardware and software requirements of the project. Section 3summarizes the project activities suitable for course and curriculum development. Section 4outlines the student and faculty-directed research possible with this project. Conclusions appear inSection 5.Section 2: Project Requirements Machine learning platforms for gaming applications typically require processor speeds inthe range of teraflops which can access memory in gigabits per second on buses with large bitwidth to deliver thousands of gigabits per
productsof design drive innovation which is valued in our current neoliberal economic system to whichengineering education is coupled, and a subset of faculty simply like to teach design courses.This paper reports on early stage results of a second year course design course within anelectrical and computer engineering curriculum. The course is part of a significant curriculumreform which has been in place for two years in the ECE Department at Bucknell University.The curriculum implemented a “design thread” to ensure design taught at least once in each yearas shown in Figure 1. In part the curricular change was due to the importance engineeringstudents reported design play in their own development in a decade of responses to surveys doneas part of
typical coursesin EET curriculums (such as a communications or microcontroller course) as well as a networkingcourse within CMPET curriculums.The device used for the laboratory applications is the MaxStream XBee wireless module, since it iscompatible with the IEEE 802.15.4 standard. It uses a radio transceiver operating in the Industrial,Scientific, and Medical (ISM) RF band at frequencies from 2.400GHz to 2.484GHz. The standarddevice has a maximum outdoor line-of-sight range of 300 feet and a maximum data throughput of250kbps with a UART interface. The device is intended to be used in conjunction with the internalRS-232 port found in most microcontrollers and computers for applications in wireless sensornetworks and remote data
improvement process. As many of these issues affectall IT and networking programs, it is hoped that this discussion is helpful to all programs.BackgroundThe Network Engineering Technology (NET) program in the Department of Computer andInformation Technology (CIT) at Purdue University focuses on building infrastructure to supportbusiness application deployment. The general philosophy of the program is that business needsdrive application and data needs, which require network and underlying system infrastructure.Students must understand business at a high level, application and data management at a mediumlevel, and infrastructure in detail.The core curriculum consists of two main areas: network engineering (NET) andsystems/network administration and
. Http://www.uc.edu/gened/OnePage.html. 9. TAC-ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Programs.” http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/T001%2004-05%20TAC%20Criteria%201-19-04.pdf. November 1, 2003. Page 7. 10. ACM Special Interest Group for Information Technology Education. “Computing Curricula: Information Technology Volume.” Http://sigite.acm.org/activities/curriculum/downloads/IT%20Volume- Sept%202004%201.pdf?sigite=2c434445277bba7e902ffb54c8581684. July 2004. Page 33. 11. Request detailed materials including PowerPoint presentations from Dr. Geonetta at sam.geonetta@uc.edu. The course materials are all posted on a Blackboard site so learners have ready access to them
“Traumatic Brain Injury: A Neural Network Journey” (Grades 6-12)—This teacher-authored curriculum is a product of the Research Experience for Teachers (RET) program, asummer research experience for secondary teachers at the Center for Sensorimotor NeuralEngineering at the University of Washington. This engineering research center is focused onimproving lives by connecting brains and technology. Research focuses on the design of aclosed-loop co-adaptive bi-directional brain-computer interface which could improve the qualityof life for people with specific types of spinal cord injury, Parkinson’s disease, stroke, and otherneurological disorders. In this seven-week program, teachers become apprentice researchers inlabs conducting cutting-edge neural
R. Forin, Rowan University Tiago Forin is a PhD candidate in Engineering Education and researcher at Purdue University affiliated with XRoads Research Group, the Global Engineering Program and the Office of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Effectiveness. He received a Bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Florida State University and a Master’s degree in environmental engineering from Purdue University.Theresa F.S. Bruckerhoff, Curriculum Research & Evaluation, Inc. Theresa Bruckerhoff is the Principal Research Associate and Operations Manager at CRE., with nearly twenty-five years of evaluation experience, ten years as the principal evaluator. She studies and evaluates training, professional
Paper ID #32548Choose Ohio First—IMProving REtention and Student Success in Comput-ing(COF-IMPRESS-C): First-year Progress ReportDr. Nasser Alaraje, University of Toledo Dr. Alaraje is currently a Professor and Chair of the Engineering Technology Department at The Uni- versity of Toledo. Previously, Dr. Alaraje was a Professor and Program Chair of Electrical Engineering Technology in the School of Technology at Michigan Tech. Prior to his faculty appointment, he was em- ployed by Lucent Technologies as a hardware design engineer, from 1997- 2002, and by vLogix as chief hardware design engineer, from 2002-2004. Dr
research. Possible research questions might include:RQ1. What are core computational thinking skills in the context of engineering?RQ2. How to integrate computing in engineering curriculum so as to help engineeringstudents learn computational thinking skills?RQ3. How do engineering students learn computational thinking skills through theeffective engagement in instructional activities?RQ4. What should we endeavor to promote computational thinking for non-CSengineering majors?II. Computational Thinking in Engineering1. Computational Thinking (CT)Computing is an innate capacity of human beings. The term Computational Thinking(CT) has been used in the educational context for quite a long time (Dijkstra, 1976).But the concept has become popular in
assessment of computer science education in a chemical engineering curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.10. Collura, M.A., Aliane, B. and Daniels, S. and Nocito-Gobel J., 2004, “Learning the methods of engineering analysis using case studies, Excel and VBA - course design,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.11. Rosca, R., 2006, “Learning Matlab – just-in-time or freshman year?” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.12. Hodge, B.K. and Steele, W.G., 2001, “Computational paradigms in undergraduate mechanical engineering education,” Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.13. Said, H., Khna, F. 2004, “Towards using
Paper ID #14853Proposal-Based Learning for Freshman Introduction to EngineeringDr. Mary Carpenter Ed.D., CCD - Custom Curriculum Design With more than thirty years’ experience in the education profession, Dr. Carpenter has a track record of managing the development of high quality, revenue impacting, blended curriculum. A seasoned professor and corporate trainer, she has delivered valuable learning experiences to students who range in age and ability from Head Start preschoolers to doctoral candidates at one of America’s oldest universities. As a certified Instructional Designer, she has held leadership and instructional
AC 2007-1488: REVIEW OF CURRENT EMBEDDED SYSTEM HARDWARE, OS,DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATION DOMAINS FORINSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNC. Richard Helps, Brigham Young University Richard Helps is the Program Chair of the Information Technology program at BYU and has been a faculty member in the School of Technology since 1986. His primary scholarly interests are in embedded and real-time computing and in technology education. He also has interests in human-computer interfacing. He has been involved in ABET accreditation for about 8 years and is a Commissioner of CAC-ABET and a CAC accreditation team chair. He is a SIGITE executive committee member and an ASEE Section Chair. He spent ten years in
nonsystematic generating matrix, genmat, and the parity matrix, parmat, is: >> genpoly=[1 1 0 1]; >> [parmat,genmat]=cyclgen(7,genpoly,'nonsys') parmat = 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 genmat = 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1As one would suspect, the computer generated generating matrix (genmat) is equal to thecalculated generating matrix (G). 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 G= 0 0 1 1 0 1 0
andcomplexity that are far beyond the capacity of an academic group to acquire or (even ifdonated) to support adequately. Simulation is an obvious but underused way to provide abroad and realistic environment to demonstrate how the tools work. This paper describessimulation of an ion implanter and simulations for other tools are being developed usingthe same principles. The control computer emulates all the typical features of a realmachine (physical set-up, calibration and operation). In addition, typical faults in the toolcan also be introduced. The tool simulator can also be linked to conventional processsimulators for virtual lab activities at several course levels.1. Tools for technology teachingAny mature commercial technology is intrinsically a
developmentcommittee meetings and have been displayed at major industry conferences on advancedinstrumentation and computer-based control. This paper documents the work to date andthe presents a plan for expansion of the internal competition to include other engineeringand technology programs within the ASEE membership. A complete list of parts andmaterials together with a pictorial fabrication log can be downloaded from our web site toallow other undergraduate student teams to construct their own MPIII. The EET/TETPrograms at Texas A&M University is prepared to host the first open MPIII Grand Prixrace competition during the Spring 2004 semester in College Station, Texas.BackgroundMotivation The mobile platform concept was originally developed as a
Session Number 2548 Robots and Microprocessors: Increasing Student Interest in Introductory Programming Gregory M. Dick University of Pittsburgh at JohnstownBackgroundInstruction in computer programming has been a required component of the EngineeringTechnology curriculum at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (UPJ) since itsinception in the early 1970s. In the 1970’s the programming language was FORTRANand the primary goals of the course were to give the students a firm grounding in thebasics of: problem solving algorithm development program design
of theInstitute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers and the Association for Computing Machinery,describes six different strategies for teaching introductory computer science. The two mostwidely used are the traditional Imperative-first paradigm and Objects-first, the rapidly growingapproach that emphasizes objects and object-oriented design. Both place programming first andstart the student with a mainstream general-purpose language.For each strategy, Curricula 2001 provides a guideline for a two-course sequence, but stronglysuggests their three-course curriculum because “the two-course sequence is no longer sufficientto cover the fundamental concepts”. Two or three courses may be the recommendation, but thereality is, as Hankley [2
2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Bibliography 1. Committee on Information Technology Literacy, “Being Fluent with Information Technology,” National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, Book and Web Site NSF Contract No. CDA- 9616681, 1999. 2. ACM Curriculum Committee on Computer Science, “Curriculum 78: Recommendations for the Undergraduate Program in Computer Science,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 22, pages 147-166, 1979. 3. Technology Accreditation Commission for Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), ”CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
Engineering EducationThe present curriculum provides students with an overview of assembly language in the first partof the course. Students study a portion of the instruction set and then modify existing programs.We focus on the "simple" tasks that relate to the microcontroller hardware, such as input/outputfrom Port registers and time delays using the internal timer/counter. The term Special FunctionRegisters (SFRs) refers to the specific hardware registers in the 8051 microcontroller. We leavethe higher-level tasks, such as the setting of a time delay based on input data, which take greateffort in assembly language to the high-level language.In the second part of the course, students examine the same three hardware-oriented tasks of datainput
necessary. Forrealistic, real-world experiences, an efficient rapid design method must be developed to enhancequality and scale of classroom projects.What do we usually do in the classroom?We usually offer a series of courses such as Digital Logic Circuits and Computer Architecturescoupled with laboratory exercises that include HDL-based implementations. Since technologiesand tools are continuously evolving, digital design education must catch up with the pace of thetechnology evolution in industry. Furthermore, engineering education should predict and lead thedirection of the future technology paradigm shift. We should offer a few intensive courses ratherthan do a series of many courses taught in the current curricula!Is a commercial FPGA
approach described here allows the student to develop and executerealtime signal-processing software using C++ and a standard PC. The PC soundcard is used forsignal input and signal output, allowing students to hear the results of their DSP software.Hardware limitations imposed by the PC, while not overly restrictive, do require a bit ofdiscipline and ingenuity on the part of the student. The low-cost of this approach makes it easyfor students to equip their own home or laptop computers for DSP development, so they are nottethered to a laboratory on campus.IntroductionThe laboratory portion of a DSP course in an ECET curriculum is of particular importance due tothe more hands-on, less theoretical nature of the technology curriculum compared
Session 2548 VHDL and Small Format Color Displays ”Video Images Make Learning Fun” Jeffrey S. LillieAbstractRochester Institute of Technology requires a course in Principals of Design Automation for ElectricalEngineering Technology and Computer Engineering Technology students. At the completion of thecourse, students are expected to know the basics of coding for synthesis, test bench techniques,modelsim simulator, and the Xilinx tool flow for targeting complex programmable logic devices(CPLD’s) and field programmable gate arrays (FPGA’s).A quick