courses for almost nine years. His previous research involved thermal management systems for military vehicles.Dr. Paul Davidson, The University of Texas at Arlington American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 1 Session XXXXCreating a First-Year Course to Prepare Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Students for the Path Ahead David J. Ewing, Paul Davidson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department University of Texas at
Technology Management. He is also the point of contact of ECU National Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber Defense Education (CAE-CDE). Dr. Chou teaches IT related courses, which include cyber security, intrusion detection and incident response, wireless communications, and network manage- ment. His research interests include machine learning, wireless communications, technology education, and cyber security, especially in the field of intrusion detection systems.Dr. Biwu Yang, East Carolina University Dr. Biwu Yang is a professor in the Department of Technology Systems, College of Engineering and Technology, East Carolina University. He teaches in the field of data networking, information technology, and information
learningapproaches.Bibliography1. Parsons, J. Roger, Engage Program: Implementing and assessing a new first year experience at the University of Tennessee, Journal of Engineering Education, Oct 2002.2. Fortenberry, Norman L, Jacquelyn F Sullivan, Peter N. Jordan, Daniel W. Knight. Engineering Education Research Aids Instruction, Science Vol 317, August 2007. Download from www.sciencemag.org on October 29, 2007.3. Bass, Hyman, Mathematicians as Educators, American Mathematics Society, Vol 44, No 1. January 1997.4. Prince, Michael J., and Richard M. Felder, Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases, Journal of Engineering Education, April 2006.5. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds., How People Learn
“Engineering is Re-engineered into a Team Sport”, Wall Street Journal, 2 May 1995.4 Nancy Fitzgerald, “Mastering Engineering”, ASEE Prism, pp. 24-28, January 1996.5 Robert H. Todd, Carl D. Sorenson, and Spencer P. Magleby, “Designing a Senior Capstone - Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers”, J. Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 92-100, 1993.Benoit Cushman-Roisin is professor of engineering and associate dean of the Thayer School ofEngineering at Dartmouth College. He teaches and conducts research in the area of environmentalengineering.Elsa Garmire is professor of engineering and dean of the Thayer School of Engineering at DartmouthCollege. Her
received his Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from MIT in 1995 in the field of MEMS. He worked in industry at Texas Instruments, GTE, and Digital Equipment Corporation in the field of microelectronics. His research interests are microelectronics, MEMS, and nanoelectronics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Annual Documentation of Assessment and Evaluation of Student Outcomes Simplifies Self-Study PreparationAbstractElectrical Engineering (EE) programs seeking accreditation fromthe EAC of ABET must demonstrate that they satisfy eight generalAccreditation Criteria, plus any program specific criteria. Two ofthe most challenging and debated criteria are
integrated teaching and learning program,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20–31, 1999. 9. D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan, “Improving engineering student retention through hands- on, team based, first-year design projects,” in ASEE 31st Conference on Research in Engineering Education, June 2007. 10. “Makerspaces,” ELI, 2013. 11. R. S. Kurti, D. Kurti, and L. Fleming, “Practical implementation of an educational makerspace: Part 3 of making an educational makerspace,” Teacher Librarian, 2014. 12. R. S. Kurti, D. Kurti, and L. Fleming, “The environment and tools of great educational makerspaces part 2 of making an educational makerspace
AC 2012-4969: IMPROVING CONFIDENCE LEVEL AND PERFORMANCEOF FIRST GENERATION AND FEMALE STUDENTS USING METACOG-NITION STRATEGIESDr. Quamrul H. Mazumder, University of Michigan, Flint Quamrul Mazumder is a professor of mechanical engineering at University of Michigan, Flint. His re- search interests includes computational fluid dynamics, metacognition approaches of learning, active and experiential learning, renewable energy, and global engineering education. His teaching areas are fluid mechanics, renewable energy, introduction to engineering, and senior design. Page 25.743.1 c American
AC 2012-3386: ONLINE AND IN-SEAT ETHICS INSTRUCTION: THEVIEW FROM BOTH SIDESDr. Kenneth R. Leitch P.E., West Texas A&M University Kenneth R. Leitch holds a Ph.D. is civil engineering from New Mexico State University and a M.B.A. from Colorado Christian University. He is an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at West Texas A&M University in Canyon, Texas. He is a registered P.E. in Texas and Indiana.Ms. Rhonda B. Dittfurth, West Texas A&M University Page 25.1000.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Online and In-Seat Engineering Ethics
AC 2010-1584: A BODY OF KNOWLEDGE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING ANDMANAGEMENT DISCIPLINEJohn Hildreth, University of North Carolina, CharlotteBruce Gehrig, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Page 15.8.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Body of Knowledge for the Construction Engineering and Management DisciplineAbstractMany engineering professional associations and societies have defined the body of knowledge(BOK) related to their specific engineering disciplines to define the knowledge, skills, andattitudes necessary to become licensed and/or certified to practice professionally. Educators canuse such BOKs
., www.mathworks.com.16. Wolfram Research, www.wolfram.com.17. EXCEL is part of the “Microsoft Office” suite; www.microsoft.com.18. Bloch, S. C., “EXCEL for Engineers and Scientists,” 2/e, Wiley, 2003.Greg Mowry received his B.S. and M.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from Iowa State University in 1976 and1978 respectively. He attended Stanford University from 1979 to 1981 for a non-thesis M.S.E.E. program. He Page 9.114.9received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota in 1995. He joined the engineering Proceedings of the 2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
.[8] D. E. Graff, et al. (ed.), Research and Practice of Active Learning in Engineering Education, Pallas Publication in Leiden University Press, Amsterdam, Nederland, 2005.[9] D. Paulson and J. Faust, “Active Learning for the College Classroom,” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 3-24, 1998.[10] P. Pheeney, “Hands on, minds on: Activities to engage our students,” Science Scope, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 30-33, 1997. Page 23.264.14[11] S. Burd, et al. (ed.), “Virtual Computing Laboratories: A Case Study with Comparisons to Physical Computing Laboratories,” Journal of Information Technology
Session 2315 A Methodology to Define the Body of Knowledge in Civil Engineering Wilfrid A. Nixon and M. Asghar Bhatti Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242AbstractPolicy 465 of ASCE proposes radical changes in the process and implementation of civilengineering education. A necessary step in that implementation is defining the Body ofKnowledge (BOK) required in various topics within civil engineering, both at the time ofgraduation and at the time of licensure. This paper will explore, for a particular
suggests an increase in thenumber of owners who are likely to go for Design-Build delivery for the first time. Continuedsuccess of the Design-Build projects requires documentation and dissemination of fundamentalDesign-Build knowledge to the new entrants. Better understanding of Design-Build deliverymechanism is critical for owners who plan to undertake new projects. Selection factors based onexperience of owners from previous projects, delivered through Design-Build, could providenecessary understanding to the new owners. Page 8.1003.1Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
. Page 7.149.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThis paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the objectives of the modifiedcourse and its general organization; Section 3 details the analog material that is added tothe course, in both the lecture and the laboratory; Section 4 describes our experienceteaching the modified course during the Fall 2001 semester; Section 5 providesconclusions and suggestions for future work.2. Course OverviewVLSI Design courses became popular in the early 1980s, following the publication ofMead and Conway’s pioneering book, Introduction to VLSI Systems1. This
simulation using the latest microprocessor technology. The laboratory exercises includedfeedback and control systems, computer control in process and real time simulation. Researchactivities outside the classroom included computer-based activities and power engineeringlibrary research. The gender mix of students was about 50/50. This teaching experience posed anumber of questions in terms of the use of existing resources (electronics hardware and software)to direct transfer of previously developed technologies at a new university, or to develop theprograms that followed the increase of faculty skills.I. IntroductionThe Midwest Universities Consortium for International Activities, Inc. (MUCIA) was selectedby the Ministry of Education-Malaysia to
ofMathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3829–3846.[3] Brijlall, D., & Maharaj, A. (2014). Exploring support strategies for high schoolmathematics teachers from underachieving schools. International Journal ofEducational Sciences, 7(1), 99–107.[4] Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.[5] Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A.,Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers‟ 16mathematical knowledge, Cognitive activation in the classroom, and studentprogress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.[6] Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices
well adapted to business and management training? Thestudents would tell you no, it is because engineering is perceived as difficult and they are lookingfor something easier.In reality, engineering is one of the best backgrounds for developing management skills.Engineers tend to be quick learners and are trained in analytical practices. A CarnegieFoundation report, using over 30 years of surveys, showed that 60% of persons with anengineering degree became managers or businessmen within 15 years. {2} Cleland and Kogaolufound that 40% of industrial executives and 34% of all top corporate managers in the US haveengineering education {3} Think about that. Considering all the various degrees, that is aphenomenal statistic.Unfortunately, many
sometimes believe thatwelding is a simple process that does not change the material properties. If they have a chance totry welding in a laboratory setting it may reinforce this belief when inexpensive materials areused that do not change properties very much due to the welding process.Particularly on heat treated parts, heating during the welding process can cause grain growth in Page 10.33.1the volume of material adjacent to the weld. This grain growth and any other tempering effects Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American
://www.pathways.cu.edu.eg/subpages/training_courses/C10-Analytical-EN.pdf[5] P. C. Abrami, R. M. Bernard, E. Borokhovski, D. I. Waddington, C. A. Wade, and T. Persson, “Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 275–314, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.3102/0034654314551063.[6] D. T. Tiruneh, A. Verburgh, and J. Elen, “Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies,” HES, vol. 4, no. 1, p. p1, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.5539/hes.v4n1p1.[7] R. De La Espriella, “Critical Thinking: A Modern Practitioner’s Journey of Discovery.” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://bluedragon1-ips.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/2020-07
AC 2010-425: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING OF COMPLEX ENGINEEREDSYSTEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKSPaul Flikkema, Northern Arizona UniversityJeff Frolik, University of VermontCarol Haden, Magnolia ConsultingTom Weller, University of South Florida Page 15.557.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Experiential Learning of Complex Engineered Systems in the Context of Wireless Sensor NetworksAbstractThere is a strong need for the reform of engineering education in order to prepare students forone of the great challenges of this century: to understand highly complex problems ranging fromhealth care to geoengineering and to synthesize
. Page 23.1160.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Technological and Engineering Literacy: Assessment and Measurement of Learning GainsAmerica’s standard of living and way of life depend upon technology. It is vital for bothempowerment of the individual and national economic growth. Informed citizens should have anunderstanding of what technology is, how it works, how it is created, how it shapes society, andhow society influences technological development. Despite the centrality of technology to ourwell-being, there is little research measuring the degree to which undergraduate students, out-of-school adults, and other adults outside of the K-12 setting possess a broad
research interests address a broad spectrum of educational topics, but her specialty is in how people learn problem solving skills.Mr. Paul Alan Clingan, Ohio State University Page 23.1220.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The Inverted Classroom in a First-Year Engineering CourseIntroductionSeveral authors have explored the value of implementing an inverted, or flipped, classroommodel.1,2 The inverted classroom “flips” the in-class and out-of-class activities, often by movingthe lecture content before class and working on homework and hands-on activities during classtime
knowledge about titration, filtration of wasteoil, extraction of oil, washing and conversion into biodiesel during the experimental studies.Some of the students joined our group used these research activities as their own Engineer of2020 requirements in the College of Engineering. One of the students (Mr. Israel Belachew) isalso a co-author of the present study and made a lot of contributions during the experiments(Figures 7 and 8). We believe that these studies and new experiments will enhance theknowledge of many BS engineering students to perform more detail studies in these fields fortheir higher level educations.4. ConclusionsBecause of the shortages in economically producible fossil fuels, global economic crises, andenvironmental and health
is an active member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin. His research interests include fiber reinforced polymer materials, accelerated bridge construction, and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Let’s Break Stuff! A refit of the mechanics sequence of courses to inspire student inquiryABSTRACTThere is a growing consensus that our students need to build a different set of skills during theircollege experience than was necessary in decades past. In addition to technical knowledge,graduates of engineering programs must enter the workforce inspired and able to engage indesign activities, creatively
laboratory equipment and demonstrations; and software development to support self-study. Peter has been at Imperial College since 2018, before which he worked in the Oil and Gas industry as a Research Scientist and as a Field Engineer at Schlumberger. Prior to that he was Assistant Professor at Nazarbayev University. Peter has a Ph.D. in Fluid Dynamics from University College, London (UCL); a Master’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from UCL and Columbia University, New York; and a Master’s Degree in Education from Imperial College London.Christian Klettner, University College London ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Desktop flow visualisation experiments
Paper ID #38663Board 35: Assessing Students’ Perspectives and Attitudes Toward SocialJustice and Compassion in Civil Engineering (Work in Progress) ˜ Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)Mr. Cristi´an Eduardo Vargas-Ord´onez, Cristian Vargas-Ord´on˜ ez is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include arts and engineering integration for epistemic justice and multicultural engineering edu- cation. He has experience in teaching and designing curricula for various educational programs, including first-year engineering and underrepresented pre
Engi- neers. In 2013, she was invited as a visiting researcher to collaborate with the EVOVision Group at the computer department of CICESE in Baja California. In 2014, B. Lorena Villarreal earned a nomination on MIT Technology Review’s ”Innovators under 35 Mexico” (TR35) list for her work on the development of an artificial olfactory system for odor-source tracking and localization using rescue robots. In 2015, she was awarded through a program between INFOTEC, CONACYT, the Newton Fund, and the Mexican Secretariat of Economy, with the opportunity to participate in a training course on technology commer- cialization as part of the Leaders in Innovation Fellowship program offered by the Royal Academy of
, Atlanta, GA, in 2005. She is currently an Associate Professor in the Electronics Systems Engi- neering Technology program at Texas A&M University, in College Station, TX. Her research interests include protocols for real-time voice and video communications and their performance, IP-based emer- gency communications, last-mile communication links for the SmartGrid, rural telecommunications, and behavior-driven development.Mr. Mondray Matus, AutoAgMaKayla Griffith American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 1 Session XXXX
Paper ID #37241Board 14: Work in Progress: Co-creation of Teaching Team Competenciesand ValuesDr. Jennifer L. Leight, The Ohio State UniversityLarry HurtubiseDr. Tanya M. Nocera, The Ohio State University Tanya M. Nocera, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Practice and Director of Undergraduate Education in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is focused on developing, teaching, and assessing upper-level Biomedical Engineering laboratory ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Co-creation of biomedical engineering teaching team
educational tool to introduce robotics."In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering(TALE), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1-8.[7] Girhe, Puja, Shubham Yenkar, and Arpita Chirde. "Arduino based cost effective CNC plottermachine." International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research(IJETER) 6, no. 2, 2018, pp. 6-9.[8] Balasubramanian, Karthik, "Efficient Mechanisms using ARDUINO to Control Robots."International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Electronics, Instrumentation andControl Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2014, pp 562-568.[9] Hochgraf, C., “MAKER: Spirograph-Style Drawing Machine Controlled by Arduino” InProceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New