AC 2010-250: PREPARING FOR ENGINEERING 2020: A NEW COURSE INELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING FOR ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTERENGINEERING MAJORS.Maher Rizkalla, Indiana University-Purdue University, IndianapolisMIchael Knieser, ILSIMohamed El-Sharkawy, Purdue University Page 15.974.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Preparing for Engineering 2020: A New Course in Electronic Manufacturing for Electrical and Computer Engineering Majors. Maher E. Rizkalla, Michael Knieser, and Mohamed El-Sharkawy, and Nilashis Dey Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering 723 West Michigan Street (Rm. SL160
aspects, methodologies, and knowledge bases inNetworking, Communication, RF, Microwave, VLSI, Electromagnetic, Optics, and OpticalCommunication/Networking into a series of classes to be added to a regular/traditional EEprogram. We will introduce our plans and current implementations of HSSE at the department ofelectrical and computer engineering at Iowa state University. Our recent work is presented thatshows very promising trends in utilizing High Speed Systems Engineering as integratingpedagogical and research platforms to train modern engineers and future researchers. The newlydeveloped classes and changes in the curriculum will be introduced and discussed. We will showhow the new HSSE laboratory (with an electronically controlled optical
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering Project Platform for Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum IntegrationIntroductionThis paper discusses how engineering projects developed on a centralized engineering projectplatform can integrate the undergraduate Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) coursesacross four-year ABET-accredited programs. This integration is viewed as an essential step toproduce engineering graduates with skills that make them competitive in the global workforce.Typically, the courses in the ECE curriculum are taught as discrete units in relative isolation ofeach other. This approach does not effectively deliver the critical-thinking competencies
department is available for use by departmental committees toassess students’ competency levels and program outcomes. The Agricultural Engineering (AE)program at ISU is using this data, along with cooperative education student focus groupfeedback, to assess our curriculum. This process is ongoing and is very valuable in meetingABET expectations for continuous improvement based on constituent feedback. This paper willdescribe the competency-based assessment program in the COE at ISU, present the data providedby the ECS office and the AE student focus groups, and show how this feedback is being used inour continuous improvement initiative.BackgroundThe College of Engineering (COE) at Iowa State University (ISU) has undertaken a new initiativeto help
/engineering earned in the United Statesduring the last twenty years shows that less than 20 percent of graduates account forunderrepresented minorities which place this population in great disadvantage with other ethnicgroups. Given that New Mexico is a state with high percentage of underrepresented minorities,the Department of Engineering at Northern New Mexico College through the support of GoogleInc. and the National Science Foundation has organized and developed Computational Thinking(CT) workshops and activities for K-12 teachers and pre-service teachers during the last twoyears as an approach to increase the awareness of Computer Science among K-12 students inNew Mexico. The curriculum developed in the workshops have provided teachers andpre
as well as various courses in Mechanical Engineering, primarily in the mechanics area. His pedagogical research areas include standards-based assessment and curriculum design, the later currently focused on incorporating entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum.Mr. Matthew Walker, Ohio Northern University Matthew Walker is a sophomore Computer Engineering student at Ohio Northern University. He is also minoring in Applied Mathematics. He is the President of the student chapter of the American Society for Engineering Education and has a passion for teaching. His previous classroom experiences include a year of being in the education college and working in the field with high school math classes that
includes more than 30 years of teaching, designing curriculum and implementation of education programs for students of all ages including new teachers. Page 25.782.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Innovative Curriculum for Engineering in High School (ICE-HS)—Status UpdateAbstractThe ICE-HS was developed to address the need to define an engineering curriculum in a charterhigh school. The research team reviewed several vendor prescribed curricula such as project leadthe way and infinity, and digital libraries funded by NSF and ASEE such
Session 1417 A Multidisciplinary Dynamic Systems Curriculum Timothy M. Cameron, Rosalyn S. Hobson, Gary S. Huvard Virginia Commonwealth UniversityAbstractFaculty in Chemical, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering collaborated in developing a newcourse, “Process and System Dynamics,” and new dynamic systems laboratory exercises that canbe used in a variety of courses and disciplines. The objective was to educate students in thefundamentals of dynamic systems and expose them to a broad diversity of applications indifferent disciplines. The labs are largely complete and are being used by
of monies intended for the projects on which they work. 2. Engineers shall adopt a zero-tolerance approach to bribery, fraud, deception, and corruption in any design or construction work in which they are engaged. 3. Engineers should be especially vigilant in countries in which the payment of gratuities and/or bribery are institutionalized practices. 4. Engineers must include certifications in all contract documents specifying zero“Proceedings of the 2006 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education” 5 tolerance of bribery, extortion, or other fraud during the
researchers drawn from around the world, and which have had a substantial impact on the direction of air quality policies in Texas. He has developed environmental educational materials for engineering curricula and for the University’s core curriculum, as well as engineering education materials for high school students. The quality of his work has been recognized by the National Science Foundation (through the Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award), the AT&T Foundation (through an Industrial Ecology Fellowship), the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (through the Cecil Award for contributions to environmental engineering and through the Research Excellence Award of the Sustainable Engineering Forum), the
utbildningar till civilingenjör vid svenska universitet och högskolor.Rapport 2006:8 R15 Knight, P., and Yorke, M. (2004). Learning, Curriculum and Employability in Higher Education,RoutledgeFalmer, London and New York.16 Hills, J.M., Robertson, G., Walker, R., Adey, M. A., and Nixon, I. (2003). Bridging the Gap Between DegreeProgramme Curricula and Employability Through Implementation of Work-related Learning, Teaching inHigher Education, 8, 211-231.17 Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., and Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education. TheCDIO Approach, Springer, New York.18 Edstrom, K., Soderholm, D., & Knutson Wedel, M. (2007). Teaching and Learning, in Crawley, E.,Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., and Brodeur, D., Rethinking
Session 2615 Performance-Based Curriculum Design by W.W. Massie, MSc, P.E. Associate Professor and Curriculum Leader Interfaculty Offshore Engineering Delft University of Technology Delft, The NetherlandsAbstractToo many faculty members approach curriculum revision or design from the standpoint oftheir own course. The question:“Where does my course fit in the new curriculum?” is heardtoo often. One of the primary difficulties when revising a curriculum is to focus first on
Paper ID #35010Multidisciplinary Approach to the First Year Engineering Design ProjectMs. Monica A. Mellini P.E., Montgomery College Monica Mellini is a registered professional engineer and has been a full-time faculty member Montgomery College since 2012, where her current title is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Physics. She serves as a Level 5 student advisor and member of the Germantown counseling cadre. In her professional life, Monica has had several life changing experiences which have shaped her academic and professional direc- tions. Monica is a doctoral student at Virginia Tech in the interdisciplinary
Session 3657 Curriculum Innovation and Renewal Donald E. Beasley, D. Jack Elzinga, Michael S. Leonard Clemson University / University of Florida / Clemson University Engineering as a discipline has been taught for centuries. Over the years, a standard engineeringcurriculum (with many variations) has evolved. However, engineering curriculum development has notfollowed a structured approach. While accreditation agencies have provided general guidelines, courses wereoften created and taught by the instructor most interested in the subject area. The result
as self-learning abilities, leadership, team work, communication,project management, and interpersonal competence. However, how and which are the bestapproaches to better educate the next generation of power and energy engineers, remain openquestions. In addition of teaching courses in electrical machines and power systems, highereducation institutes must include new courses and topics into curriculum, such as renewableenergy systems, power electronics, smart grids, energy economics and management, to mention afew of them while still ensuring a four-year graduation timeframe [2-9].The modern power systems have been significantly changed from the very modest beginnings toone of the most complex and large system, perhaps the largest machine or
of Philosophy) in Electrical Engineering at the University of New South Wales, Australia, in 2019. He is cur- rently a Ph.D. student in the Energy Systems, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, UNSW. His research interests include power engineering education, curriculum design and development, and condition monitoring of power system equipment.Dr. Jayashri Ravishankar, University of New South Wales A/Prof Jayashri Ravishankar is a Scientia Education Fellow and Associate Dean (Education) in the Fac- ulty of Engineering at the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney. Her teaching and research interests include power system modelling, analysis and control, renewable energy integration, smart
Paper ID #16594Experimental Centered Pedagogy Approach to Learning in Engineering: AnHBCU’s ExperienceDr. Mohamed F. Chouikha, Howard University Dr. Mohamed Chouikha is a professor and chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing at Howard University. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Colorado–Boulder. Dr. Chouikha’s research interests include machine learning, intelligent control, and multimedia signal processing communications for secure networks, among other areas. He also focuses on enhancing recruitment and retention of underrepresented minorities in the
globalization, new organizationalconfigurations, and new technologies of communication, design, and production. More researchis needed to document images that are often discounted by students and even faculty, i.e.,portrayals of engineering practice that emphasize its non-technical and non-calculative sides,including work processes and dynamics that involve social and cultural dimensions [3-4].The aim of this work-in-progress paper is to introduce an exploratory project that will testinnovative approaches to data collection and analysis for rapidly generating new knowledgeabout engineering practice. Traditionally, engineering practices have been studied usingindividual interviews or in-depth ethnographic field research, the latter requiring researchers
An Integrated Approach to Information Literacy Instruction in Civil Engineering Andrea L. Welker1, Alfred Fry2, Leslie McCarthy1, and John Komlos1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2 Falvey Library Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085It is critical to graduate students that are information literate. Possessing the suite of skillsassociated with information literacy will enable our students to embark upon the path of life-longlearning. To ensure that information literacy skills were adequately imparted to students in theCivil and Environmental
this strategy was extremely relevant a few years ago with emergent computinghardware, current freshmen are typically computer literate, with increasing knowledge onapplicable tools such as Excel and programming. Thus, to accommodate the needs of today'sundergraduate and to enhance the freshmen experience in engineering, this introductoryengineering course is undergoing a paradigm shift towards challenge-based learning and problem-solving approaches. This new paradigm is currently being implemented in four sections of thiscourse, with the remaining six sections serving as control.The focus of the new paradigm is the approach to and process of engineering problem solvingwith and without the aid of computing tools. Students are presented with
AC 2009-509: A HANDS-ON APPROACH TO COMPUTATIONAL METHODS INENGINEERINGMichael Gustafson, Duke University MICHAEL R. GUSTAFSON II is an Assistant Professor of the Practice in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University. His research interests include linear and non-linear control systems as well as curriculum development. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Duke University.Rebecca Simmons, Duke University REBECCA SIMMONS is an Adjunct Assistant Professor with the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University. Her research interests include computational modeling and experimental analysis of dynamic bubble systems. She received her Ph.D
students inMay 2009. A core group of engineering faculty from several disciplines moved from the Tempecampus to the Polytechnic campus to develop curriculum for the new program in 2004, after ayear of research into innovative undergraduate engineering programs. The curriculum that thesefaculty put together is very hands-on, with a project every semester. Below is a description ofthe B.S.E. program at the Polytechnic campus from their web site. Arizona State University has created one of the most innovative new engineering programs in the country at the Polytechnic campus in the College of Technology and Innovation. This new program combines a focus on interdisciplinary project-based, studio-based learning with exceptional
Session 2148 Community College/University Articulation A Programmatic Approach in Engineering and Technology By Cliff Mirman, Chair Department of Technology, Northern Illinois University (NIU), DeKalb, Ill. And Gordon Skattum, Director Technology Division, Rock Valley College (RVC), Rockford Ill.Abstract The educational missions of the typical Community College and University are
(Atwater, Dionne, Avolio, Camobreco, & Lau,1999; Schell, 2010). Additionally, apprenticeships into mastery often begin with structuredlearning approaches designed to achieve basic proficiency in the profession, similar to formalleadership development training (Avolio & Bass, 1994; Van Velsor, McCauley, & Ruderman,2010). While some aspects of developing an engineering identity necessitate the cultivation ofleadership skills, there is little in the typical engineering identity, and even less in the typicalengineering curriculum, that includes seeing oneself as an engineering leader. This is animportant gap, since if novices are to eventually replace master practitioners within engineeringcommunities of practice, then these novices will
thisanalysis of a microcosm of the experiences with transdisciplinary approaches of engineeringeducators in Canada, we conceptualize this process and these topics as “loose concepts” anddiscuss their power for future research and practice.IntroductionAcademic conferences provide an important venue to connect with the disciplinary community,to share research, and to build new knowledge. These sites of scholarly exchange are often wherewe explore concepts that are fuzzy or “loose” and through these conversations, generate newunderstandings or new directions.The Canadian Engineering Education Association / Association Canadienne de l’éducation engénie (CEEA-ACÉG) is a national organization that brings together engineering educators andresearchers at an
collaborative instructors with like-minded teaching goals. Well organized EML online-modules such as elevator pitch makes deployment easy to implement in the engineering classroom [15]. Inthis semester-long project, students were introduced to new engineering topics in lecture, they practicedtechniques in mini labs, and then applied the knowledge to their project while considering theentrepreneurial mindset at every step. In this paper, we hypothesized that an EML module that utilized aproject-based approach would improve student engagement, improve technical laboratory and writing skillsand foster student’s curiosity to learn about human body motion. This project led to a mastery in kinematics,kinetics and human body motion technology with a stronger
mathematical modeling course and suggesting standards for secondary modeling education.3. Infusion Working Group: We propose a working group of active participants be charged with formalizing strategic approaches to address challenges teachers face in infusing modeling in their daily practice.4. Repository: We recommend a small group develop a proposal for a curated repository of modeling resources, preferably peer-reviewed. (This is likely a huge, ongoing project, needing foundation support for any chance of being successfully and popularly used by teachers and the public.)The first of these is nearing completion, while the other three are all supported by a new NCTM-SIAMJoint Committee on Modeling across the Curriculum, which will likely
, where traditional teachingmethods and curricula are revaluated and updated. Faculty members play a crucial role in thistransition, as they need to embrace new teaching approaches and often step outside theircomfort zones. Despite these challenges, the push towards entrepreneurial education inengineering is gaining momentum. It is being driven by the recognition that the engineers oftomorrow need to be adaptable, innovative, and ready to face the challenges of a rapidlychanging world. This evolution in engineering education is not just a response to marketdemands, it is a necessary step in preparing students to be leaders and innovators in a worldwhere engineering and entrepreneurship are increasingly intertwined.In conclusion, the integration
graduate level Engineering Leadership courses at two Canadian Universities. The specificobjectives are to explore the impact of structured reflection on engineering leadershipdevelopment by: 1) examining the effectiveness of structured reflection for developingengineering leadership skills, and 2) identifying how the insights gained through reflectivepractice will be applied in students’ careers.2.0 Reflection Model – Describe-Analyze-Evaluate (DAE)Engineering leadership is increasingly offered as an explicit and intentional area of study in theengineering curriculum. As a result, a number of studies have worked to catalogue and classifythe number and nature of engineering programs [7] [8] [9]. Engineering leadership developmentis often approached
technologyprogram for their future careers in modern manufacturing companies, a new curriculum inRobotics Application Engineering has been developed and applied in the semester of spring 2008.This paper describes the course and laboratory of Robotics Application Engineering for studentsof manufacturing technology program (ITMT) in the Department of Industrial and EngineeringTechnology (IET).There are four Robotics courses offered in the IET Department spanning from 100 level to 400level to teach concepts, operation, programming, maintenance, interfacing, and applicationdevelopments of industrial robots. Robotics Application Engineering is taught as a 400 levelcourse for senior undergraduate students in the ITMT program. This course teaches