its 2 years of operation, none of which have the same operational procedures. Changes in key personnel or personnel’s working hours resulting in no clear key 1 point of contact as many of the initial negotiations took place at a very senior level and these are not the members of staff delivering the outputs for the partnership. Each partner has different modes of operation for term times, teaching loads and 1,5 other duties of staff external to the UNITWIN. This means it is difficult to get a time that all partners are able to dedicate time to the project. Some partners have no financial targets in their Institutional Research Targets and 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 have active strands that specify deliverables in Multi
used to develop theseglobal citizenship constructs. Factor analyses on this dataset produced 9 distinct measures ofsuch values. Of 62 initial items (42 drawn from the original scale and 20 newly written items),39 items remained after factor analysis while 23 items were discarded through rigorousassessment. Newly written items that referenced engineering-oriented global citizenship valuesand used similar language to the original scale were added in order to validate this scale’sappropriateness for use among engineering undergraduate students and add value for applicationto engineering education. Adding to previous research that used these survey items to study amore narrow population of students, this study provides measures of perspective
potential participants, their intentions, needs,motivations and goals, among others. All these features play an important role in the neweducational trends, belong or not to formal education, and have the support of the Europeaninstitutions3.MOOC participants' perspective, and specifically the set of their profiles, has littleprominence in research on MOOC format. MOOCKnowledge project, an initiative of theEuropean Commission’s Institute of Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), aims toestablish large-scale cross-provider data collection on European MOOCs to cover partially theparticipants' underrepresentation from their perspective, where the diversity of the participantsand the variety of their profiles represent a relevant issue5.Clustering
. Flexibility, uniqueness, and personalization of theservices offered are inherent in the model.These changes in the information environment have pushed librarians at the Arthur LakesLibrary at the Colorado School of Mines (Mines) to re-think the current model of reference,especially for faculty and graduate researchers. The library plans to build upon the successfulaspects of current initiatives and better integrate them with reference services to create acohesive program. This new model aims to provide specialized in-depth support for researchteams, departments, and research centers across campus through consultations, small groupinstruction sessions, and curated resources. Leveraging staff strengths and current successes willhelp reallocate
empathy with/for users.Thus, we focused our second co-creation workshop around designer-user empathy. This enabledus to focus the discussion more narrowly and expand the initial empathy instrument morepurposefully. Yet, given myriad interests and challenges identified in the first co-creationworkshop (and some interests that again manifested in the second), we have begun developingalternative pathways to explore emergent interests. We describe one such example next.Developing CommunityWe hoped this project would grow the community of scholars and instructors who are studyingempathy and engineering design in engineering education. To this end, we have observed andencouraged novel lines of research growing from our co-creation workshops and
perceived needs (enrollment pressures, finances, etc.), and constraints that preventactions such as value of disciplinary research, lack of time, financial resources, etc. Initialthemes (discussed below) are beginning to emerge from the partially complete data set that arefurther informing code development.Preliminary ResultsThe results reported here are part of the initial code development which focused on a largeresearch-intensive university, a national private liberal arts university, and a regional minorityserving institution. In terms of the first research question—how administrators and policymakers draw on insights from EER—the data coded so far indicates that change efforts inengineering education are mostly local and involve navigating a
Centers/UARCS Technology Alliance University Academia Research Initiatives U.S. U.K. Gov. Gov
Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Research Infrastructure Challenges for Graduate Programs in STEM Disciplines at Minority InstitutionsAbstractIt is much more challenging to perform experimental research functions at many minorityinstitutions, because of lack of adequate research infrastructure. This is especially true if onewishes to initiate and implement masters and doctoral degree programs in physics. In the presentpaper, an attempt is made to discuss the various hurdles encountered by the authors in theestablishment of Master’s and Doctoral degree programs in physics at Alabama A&MUniversity, one of the HBCUs (Historically Black Colleges and Universities). The departmentgot no special or necessary
] own practice with a view to purposefully [advance] our understanding...based on evidenceand concrete experience”15 (p.6). This type of inquiry is typically comprised of cycles of reflectionand action, whose form and timing are dependent on the purpose of the inquiry and the constraintsof the group11,12.Typically, the first step in collaborative inquiry is to form the group. The selection of researchersand cases for this study was purposeful and opportunistic. We specifically wanted to highlight arange of research foci within engineering education as well as uses of SOI.The cycles began with initial reflections on our personal experiences using SOI. For each case,described in detail in the subsequent section, we developed written accounts of
AC 2011-1667: INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH EXPERIENCE FOR EN-GINEERING STUDENTS IN CHINA IN THE AREA OF FUEL CELLSXia Wang, Oakland University XIA WANG (wang@oakland.edu) is an assistant professor in the department of MechanicalEngineering at Oakland University. Her research and teaching interests lie in the areas of fluidmechanics and heat transfer, with an emphasis on fuel cell technology. She is program director of the NSF IRES program at Oakland University.Laila Guessous, Oakland University Laila Guessous, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the department of mechanical engineering at Oakland University (OU) in Rochester, MI. Her research and teaching interests lie in the areas of fluid mechanics and heat transfer
thosewhere “researchers from different disciplines work in a more integrated way to solve a problemtogether. Rather than each contributing separate pieces to the solution, the collaborators workclosely together, combining their knowledge from their own disciplines to work toward asolution …At the end of a truly interdisciplinary collaboration, each collaborator is changed bythe experience” (p. 124). Using these definitions, our collaboration began as a multidisciplinaryone and progressed towards interdisciplinary collaboration but for the purpose of this paper weuse the generic term “multidisciplinary”.We had no road map to guide our multidisciplinary research when we began. In hindsight wenow realize that we were initially inclined to underestimate
, frameworks and iterative and non-linear processes were outlinedas key to designing a productive and more efficiency curriculum. In the interview, the three expertsreported common elements that are important in curriculum design, and they all agreed that the fivediscourses of designing thinking are essential. In the two comparative case studies, commonelements were used in the development and evaluation of curriculum.SummaryThe initial objective of the research was to investigate the five discourses of design within theliterature by identifying artifacts, processes, experiences, systems, and cultures in two case studies[34; 35]. Accordingly, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with expert faculty membersin curriculum design to compare
achieved and the breadth of the project has expanded.In order to implement the program as designed, significant funding will be required. In themeantime, collaborations will continue between the universities as well as between the academicresearchers and the industry end-user. Near-term goals include: further develop a major proposalfor the complete summer transitional program, obtain sufficient financial support for this year’sindustry visit, meet with faculty at a potential partner university to develop a program module onmanufacturing training relevant to the project, meet with potential local high school contacts todevelop a pre-college component to the summer program and initiate faculty research based onstudent results to increase the depth
the Faculty had never offered a co-curricularexperience. This study also explores students (i) motivation to participate in the program, and (ii) students initialexperiences being part of Icarus. More specifically, we address the following questions: RQ1: Why do students decide to join a voluntary research program? RQ2: What are students’ initial perceptions of belonging and self-directed learning after participating in the Icarus program? In order to answer the research questions, we took a quantitative approach. We asked the studentsenrolled in the Icarus program, about their attitudes towards the program and towards engineering in general. Inaddition, we requested during the application process for students
collectionmethods were IRB and participants were given pseudonyms.Initial CodingThe interview data was collected from a one-hour entrance interview at the beginning of theprogram, five-minute pre- and post- interviews at each of the presentations, and another one-hourexit interview at the end of the experience. All interviews were semi-structured. The reflectivesurveys were administered approximately one week after each presentation and included onlyopen-ended items for the pilot cohort. Interviews were transcribed, and the research team codedeach interview and the reflective surveys in Dedoose using an initial coding approach asdescribed by Saldaña [11]. While using this approach, the research team kept the researchquestion in mind and particularly noted
Session 3268 The Spinning Rocket Simulator: An Experimental Design Project for Teaching and Research D.M. Halsmer, W.E. Bair, P. Ng Oral Roberts University Abstract An experimental apparatus is being developed to simulate the dynamics and control of spinning, thrustingbodies with internal mass motion. An interdisciplinary team of undergraduate engineering students is executingthe first phase of development as a senior design project at Oral
, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Ann Sitomer, Oregon State University Ann earned a PhD in mathematics education from Portland State University in 2014. Her dissertation examined the informal ways of reasoning about ratio, rate and proportion that adult returning students bring to an arithmetic review class and how these ways of thinking interacted with the curriculum. Other research interests include teachers’ professional noticing of learners’ mathematical thinking and orga- nizational change. Ann works on both the implementation and research sides of the ESTEME@OSU project.Dr
AC 2004-778: A COMPARISON OF BIOENGINEERING FACULTY MEMBERS'TEACHING PATTERNS AT ONE RESEARCH UNIVERSITYAlene Harris,Monica Cox, Purdue University Page 9.17.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2004 Session 3530 A COMPARISON OF BIOENGINEERING FACULTY MEMBERS’ TEACHING PATTERNS AT ONE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY Monica Farmer Cox, Alene H. Harris, Ph.D. Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Peabody College at Vanderbilt University/ Department of Teaching and Learning
]. The STEM Center integrates and expands the use of research-based practices across several STEM disciplines, providing 4-year comprehensive institutionssimilar to … with a strategy for long-term intervention to be adopted at early stages of theiruniversity experience. The STEM Center at SHSU is one of several initiatives to promote systemicchange [14] in higher education as it has significantly fostered a vibrant conversation on activelearning methods on campus, and refocused energy on thinking about the challenge of improvingstudent success in the STEM disciplines [15].Project GoalsThe goals of the STEM Center are consistent with the goals stated in the PCAST report: contribute to theeffort to increase the number and quality of STEM graduates
to help shape the design of the energyharvesting device. Outcome 2 of ABET Criterion 3 states that students should be able “to applyengineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of publichealth, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors” [5]. The use of outside opinions to narrow and revise the initial designs allowed thestudent to take specific concerns into consideration. Many of the opinions focused on a concernfor public safety, economic factors, and environmental factors.Experiential, hands-on research opportunities relate important concepts which are delivered inthe classroom to real-world applications. While the classroom setting is effective at
MSU. This includes increasing both the amount of externally funded research in EER and the number of scholarly articles published on EER. • Initiate large-scale research studies at MSU to generate empirical findings to address the challenges facing engineering education. The center will initially target efforts on o Improve student learning of complex engineering concepts. o Improve efficiency of engineering education to reduce time-to-graduation. o Broaden participation of underrepresented groups within engineering, specifically women and Native Americans. o Increase motivation toward persisting to graduation and entering the engineering workforce. • Implement large-scale
andretention, particularly if they occur in the first two years of the college experience. It should be Page 14.81.2noted here that addressing community college transfer students, a source of almost 50% of thegraduating BS degrees in some engineering majors at WSU, is also a possible target group forthis improvement in retention and engagement. It is important to identify the locally perceived challenges to including freshmen,sophomore, and initial transfer students in research activities. Anecdotal evidence from facultymembers noted that the lack of skills and experiences are some of the barriers to includingundergraduates in their research
Session 2286 A Collaborative Effort to Develop a Research Center in Engineering and Technology in Uganda Frank T. Duda, Jr., Douglas K. Lauffer Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Grove City College, Grove City, PA 16127 / Dept. of Computer Information Systems and Telecommunications, Community College Beaver County, Monaca, PAAbstractIn order for Uganda Christian University (UCU) Mukono, Uganda to realize its vision of trainingEast African students to be at the forefront of the impact of technology in both a cultural and asocietal sense, a committee
community. Through theprofessional development umbrella, GEECS has hosted webinars related to career development,graduate student life, and peer mentoring to help connect students in the field.In this paper, we discuss the initial peer mentoring plan and the evolution of two peer mentoringgroups. We then present autoethnographies4 about our experiences participating in the GEECSpeer mentoring groups. In concluding, we offer implications for future research, as well asprofessional development endeavors, such as expanding and connecting peer mentoring torelated types of activities.GEECS Peer MentoringTo fulfill the GEECS mission, there existed an opportunity for graduate students to personallyand professionally support one another through such things
-making in undergraduate engineering students. Dr. Finelli leads a national initiative to create a taxonomy/keyword outline for the field of en- gineering education research, she is past Chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of the American Society of Engineering Education, and she is an ASEE Fellow.Dr. Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech Maura Borrego is Associate Dean and Director of Interdisciplinary Programs in the Graduate School and also Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. From 2011-2013, she served as a Program Director in the Division of Undergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and
course materials in the area of pollution prevention and environment management using NCATSU’s library resource and faculty collaboration. As a part of collaborative research projects, BUET initiated two research projects: (i) Tannery waste treatment and (ii) Medical waste treatment.• Dr. A.K.M.A. Quader, Professor of Chemical Engineering & International Coordinator from BUET visited NCATSU during the period of October 11- December 10, 2001. Dr. Quader, during his visit, worked on the preparation of a course on ‘Environment Protection and Pollution Prevention’ for the undergraduate students belonging to different engineering and science disciplines studying in Bangladesh. The main objective of this course is to provide
and assessment coordinator for the Nanotechnology Center and the Transformational Initiative for Graduate Education and Research at UPRM.Prof. Jaquelina Ester Alvarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Prof. Jaquelina Alvarez is the Graduate Research and Innovation Center (GRIC) Coordinator and Co- Director of the Transformational Initiative for Graduate Education and Research (TIGER) at UPR-Mayaguez. As part of the General Library team, she is the College of Engineering Liaison Librarian and serves as the Data Manager of the Center for Research and Excellence in Science and Technology (UPRM-CREST). Additionally, she co-leads the Center of Professional Enrichment (CEP) and member of the Research Academy for
defined the direction and scope ofsubsequent education policy and research in terms of gender equity. In 1964, Congress passedthe Civil Rights Act, which, among other things, prohibited racial discrimination in education.As a part of this Act, Congress also commissioned a national study to determine the extent ofracial inequality in terms of access to educational opportunity. With the passage of Title IX, in1972, discrimination on the basis of sex in educational institutions and programs was alsoprohibited, but, unlike the 1964 Civil Rights Act, no research to examine sex discrimination wasincluded in the legislation. In the early 1980’s, national concern about the growing shortage ofscientists and engineers gave rise to policy initiatives
computationalthinking skills needed to excel in the digital economy. One program that was created as part ofthe President’s initiative was the Research-Practitioner Partnership (RPP) grants issued by theNational Science Foundation. The program has four objectives: 1) develop a connectedcommunity of practice; 2) develop and manage a participant-driven and multi-site researchagenda; 3) convene a researcher evaluator working group to develop a process for advancing theshared-research agenda; and 4) collect qualitative and quantitative data about RPP’simplementation and common impact data. However, there has been no detailed reports or studiesof these funded RPP projects thus making their impacts difficult to observe. Thus, this researchentailed a systematic
Paper ID #14546More Comprehensive and Inclusive Approaches to Demographic Data Col-lectionMr. Todd Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd is a PhD Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on en- trepreneurship education and entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering educa- tion efforts.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through