undergraduate management and industrial engineering curricula. Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall.4. Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., Light, D., Heinze, C., & Rivas, L. (2005). Creating an evaluation framework for data-driven decision-making. EDC Center for Children and Technology, USA.5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. B. & Cocking R.R. (Eds). (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press.6. Anderson W. A., Krathwohl D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, R. E., Mayer, P. P., Raths, J. R. & Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley
planes. In contrast Figure 8 shows a student sketched part with chamfered corners,where the vertical edge of chamfer and the horizontal edge of the mating top surface are collinearin the drawing. When asked to describe the collinear lines, the student replied that, “Thechamfer line doesn’t look up and down, but looks like it is at an angle because of how the rest ofthe part is.” This remarkable comment indicates that the student was understanding the part in aholistic way and that the features on the isometric sketch represent edges of it in a coherentfashion.Figure 7: Coincident lines (Line A and Line B) on different planes in an isometric view.Figure 8: Student sketched chamfered corner where collinear vertical line represents two edgeson
professionalpresentation, but also an appreciation for the needs of communication when displaying theirmodels. Page 12.1194.10 Table 2: Speech Evaluation Engineering Graphics and Design Speech EvaluationObjectives: · Interesting, persuasive, creative – logical + emotional appeal · Speak for 15 minutesRating Scale: 4 = Excellent (A) – Outstanding work 3 = Very good (B) – Exceeds standard, but not outstanding work 2 = Satisfactory (C) – Meets standard, but some improvement isnecessary
Paper ID #7019Assessment Process Using the First Year Computer Graphics Course at Uni-versity of Arkansas at Little RockDr. Srikanth B Pidugu, University of Arkansas, Little Rock Dr. Pidugu is an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology program at University of Arkansas at Little Rock. He obtained Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Old Dominion University in 2001.Prof. Mamdouh M. Bakr, University of Arkansas, Little RockDr. Swaminadham Midturi, University of Arkansas, Little Rock Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. he has been a member of ABET
. Again, these laboratory practicals were graded on a 20point scale. Students were told that they had to model the taper of the marker body, the capindentions and overall shape, as well as the necessary rounds and chamfers. Students were alsorequired to relate the size of the cap to the size of the octagon at the end of the marker body(similar to the relation required in the original laboratory practical). a. b. Figure 3. Photo (a.) and CAD Model (b.) of Marker Used for Lab Practical in Semester 2.CAM Course Laboratory Exercises a
administered to first-year students who were enrolled in the College ofTechnology at Purdue University. It did not capture information from students who wereaccepted and chose not to attend. Capturing data from that population could be helpful indetermining how to increase the yield of students who are accepted and choose not to attend.Bibliography 1) Kaplan A., Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 2) Sadowski, M. A., Birchman, J. A., Karcher, B. X. (2012). A study to examine the role of print, web, and social media for recruiting students. Global Graphics: An educational perspective, 66th Mid-Year
/23796529.2011.11674687. [Accessed Jan. 10, 2018].[7] J. M. Brill and R. Maribe Branch, “Visual literacy defined – The results of a Delphi study: Can IVLA (operationally) define visual literacy?,” Journal of Visual Literacy, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 47-60, 2007. [Online] Available: Taylor & Francis Online, http://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2007.11674645. [Accessed Jan. 10, 2018].[8] B. R. Harris, “Blurring borders, visualizing connections: Aligning information and visual literacy learning outcomes,” Reference Services Review, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 523-535, 2010. Available: Emerald, https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321011090700. [Accessed Jan. 30, 2018].[9] T. Bowen, “Assessing visual literacy: A case study of developing a rubric for identifying and
to follow the instructor. Inclassrooms specially set up for lecture capture at The Citadel, cameras in the room are eitherfixed or must be controlled manually by the instructor. The SWIVL takes away this manualcontrol element. The audio using this setup is also an improvement upon an iPad alone or awebcam setup. The microphone on the marker and USB speaker greatly improve the ability tocommunicate with students who attend remotely. The biggest drawback using this method is thatthe video quality is limited to the capability of the iPad’s front-facing camera. Depending on theplacement of the SWIVL, this can make it difficult for remote students to see the board. (a) (b) Figure 1: A
description of the anticipated size and configuration. A minimum of eight individual parts were required. 2. Presentation of detailed dimensions for each individual part. Hand sketches of the configuration including final sizing of each part with particular emphasis on mating dimensions. 3. Complete 3D CAD models of parts and assembly. 4. Final set of dimensioned drawings. Specifically: a. Isometric of assembly b. Orthographic of assembly c. Exploded view of assembly d. Parts list e. Dimensioned views of each parWhile the course content was the same, it should be mentioned that the semester length andprofile of the students is slightly different than during the fall or spring
expected toacquire from the program to prepare them to achieve the program education objectives. [See, forexample, the Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Technology Standards effective for the 2005-2006 Accreditation Cycle]. The current Criteria for Engineering Technology are often referredto as the “a-k” criteria. An engineering technology program must demonstrate that graduateshave: a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines, b. an ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering and technology
planning, monitoring, and evaluation of thinking Formative assessment for Promote both knowledge more learning opportunities and regulation of cognition. Post-activity reflection Students perception on Collect diagnostic clues to intervention meet Individual needs A B Figure 1: (A) Process-oriented activities for improved student engagement and performance and (B) Process-oriented intervention for creative and critical thinkingThere is a lack of knowledge of
multiaxis tasks including visual cue quality,” J. Aircr., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 607–614, 2001.[2] J. j. Vogel-Walcutt, J. b. Gebrim, C. Bowers, T. m. Carper, and D. Nicholson, “Cognitive load theory vs. constructivist approaches: which best leads to efficient, deep learning?,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 133–145, Apr. 2011.[3] J. X. Chen, N. D. V. Lobo, C. E. Hughes, and J. M. Moshell, “Real-time fluid simulation in a dynamic virtual environment,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 52–61, 1997.[4] D. M. Fraser, R. Pillay, L. Tjatindi, and J. M. Case, “Enhancing the learning of fluid mechanics using computer simulations,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 381–388, 2007.[5] S. Roweis et al., “A
making their drawings. The students that did not finish their Page 23.233.5drawings within the class time were asked to finish the drawings on their own time beforethe next class. a) b)Figure 1. Module One a) in-class assignment drawing and b) homework drawing.In addition, to further practice and strengthen the skills and methods covered during thefirst class, students were asked to complete a homework assignment (shown in Figure 1b)before class the following week. This gave the students an opportunity to practice makingdrawings and receive individual feedback at the beginning of the second class.From the
SD Assessments n (hr:min:sec) (hr:min:sec) (hr:min:sec) Assignment 7. Widgets 1-6 1. Instructor A 25 0:30:07 0:24:48 0:07:32 2. Instructor B 13 0:19:28 Assignment 8. Widgets 7-15 1. Instructor A 25 0:37:50 0:33:44 0:05:49 2. Instructor B 14 0:29:37 Assignment 9. Widgets 16-18 1. Instructor A 24 0:58:25
visualization skills.Training and testing were the focal point of numerous studies [12] – [16] and they cover multiplemethods to challenge students to visualize objects and patterns in various settings. All have beenproven to help the students improve their spatial skills but without one being universallyaccepted to be 100% effective. They all demonstrated various degrees of success depending onstudents’ background, gender, resources, socio-economic status, time spent on practicing, and, ofcourse, their level of interest. As a result, the more variety of methods is available, the morechoices the faculty and students will have to select the most appropriate method for theirparticular situation.BackgroundAbout a year after the publication of the “A, B
) (b) (c) Figure 1. Illustration of (a) sketch dimensions, (b) sketch constraints, and (c) engineering drawing dimensions and notes. Sketch and drawing created in CREO Parametric TM version 6. • geometric constraints to create relationships between the curves (e.g., make two line segments equal in size and parallel); • and, associative constraints to create relationships between dimensional constraints.Figure 1a shows an example of a sketch with dimensions and Figure 1b shows the geometricconstraints. The way in which curves are used and how dimensions and geometric constraintsare established between them gives purpose to the sketch. This
State University. Her research focuses on (a) new literacies of online reading comprehension, particularly in complex and ill-structured learning domains, (b) teaching and learning in synchronous hy- brid learning environments, where physically present and remote participants interact in real time through such technologies as video conferencing tools and robots, and (c) the use of augmented reality in STEM education.Dr. Hannah Klautke, Michigan State University Hannah Klautke is a User Experience Research Associate with Usability/Accessibility Research and Con- sulting (Michigan State University Outreach and Engagement). She is involved in usability evaluations, focus groups, and information architecture projects for
, Conceptualisation in Visuospatial Reasoning Tasks: A Case for Exploring, in Engineering Design Graphics Division 68th Mid-Year Conference. 2013: Worcester, MA.5. Sweller, J., J.J.G. vanMerrienboer, and F.G.W.C. Paas, Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 1998. 10(3): p. 251-296.6. McGilchrist, I., The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Page 24.314.6 Western World. 2009, England: Yale University Press.7. Tversky, B., Functional Significance of Visuospatial Representations, in The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, P. Shah and A. Miyake
features that would promote more meaningful engagement in the app, show the importance of high quality design and implementation of technology tools for learning and research. References [1] S. Sorby, N. Veurink, and S. Streiner, “Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is ‘yes,’” Learning and Individual Differences , vol. 67, pp. 209–222, 2018. [2] M. Berkowitz and E. Stern, “Which cognitive abilities make the difference? Predicting academic achievements in advanced STEM studies,” Journal of Intelligence , vol. 6, no. 4, p. 48, 2018. [3] S. Sorby, B. Casey, N. Veurink, and A. Dulaney, “The role of
, "A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer- based instruction," Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 13, pp. 111-127, 1995.[19] R. L. Bangert-Drowns, C.-L. C. Kulik, J. A. Kulik, and M. Morgan, "The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events," Review of educational research, vol. 61, pp. 213- 238, 1991.[20] A. Corbett and J. R. Anderson, "Feedback timing and student control in the LISP Intelligent Tutoring System," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Education, 1989, pp. 64-72.[21] M. L. Epstein, A. D. Lazarus, T. B. Calvano, K. A. Matthews, R. A. Hendel, B. B. Epstein, et al., "Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes
to reference them and find what you needed and not be stuck searching through the program for hours…Having the class time to ask questions about assignments and any problems that arose while completing assignments was very helpful to me…”Fig. 2. Use of flipped classroom resources: watching video demos or reading text instructions. Inthe end of course anonymous online survey, students (n=149) were asked A) whether theypreferred to watch the video demos or read the text instructions, and B) how many times theywatched the video demos.Fig. 3. Preference for flipped classroom or traditional lecture format courses. In the end of courseanonymous online survey, students (n=149) were asked A) whether they preferred this CADcourse to
acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation for thisproject through collaborative grants DUE-1432280 and DUE-1432288.References[1] Marbach-Ad G., McAdams K. C., Benson S., Briken V., Cathcart L., Chase M., El-Sayed N.M., Frauwirth K., Fredericksen B., Joseph S. W., Lee V., McIver K. S., Mosser D., Quimby B.B., Shields P., Song W., Stein D. C., Stewart R., Thompson K. V., Smith A. C. (2010) A Modelfor Using a Concept Inventory as a Tool for Students' Assessment and Faculty ProfessionalDevelopment, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.[2] Sadowski, M., & Sorby, S. (2013). Update on a Delphi Study for Developing a ConceptInventory for Engineering Design Graphics. Engineering Design Graphics Division 68thMidYear Meeting Proceedings
information will beeffectively communicated using a 2D drawing. The second step is the definition of datums.Though datums can be continually added throughout the annotation process, students areencouraged to develop a datum scheme that will fully cover specifications at this stage. Thoughchanges can be made to these after they are referenced by other elements, novices typically havedifficulty or lack the patience to do this, and resort to deletion and reinsertion (similar to makingmodifications to geometric features that “break” the CAD model). The third step is combiningindividual datums into datum reference frames (DRFs). The most common of these being theA|B|C orthogonal planar structure, though all feasible combinations based on the
, 12 (4), 363-374.2. Harnisch, D. L., Polzin, J. R., Brunsting, J., Camasta, S., Pfister, H., Mueller, B., Frees, K., Gabric, K., Shope, R. J. (2002). Using visualization to make connections between math and science in high school classrooms. A Page 13.1233.6 paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education international conference, Nashville, TN.3. Fritz, J. P., Way, T. P., Barner, K. E. (1996). Haptic representation of scientific data for visually impaired or blind persons. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference
theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.5. Gredler, M. (2009). Learning and instruction; Theory into practice (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.6. Hartman, N. W., & Branoff, T. J. (2005). Learning theories: Applications for instruction in constraint-based solid modeling and other engineering graphics topics. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 69 (2), 6-15.7. Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural-historical theory and mathematics education. In: Kozulin A, Gindis B, Ageyev V, Miller S (ed), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.8. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes
Design GraphicsDivision of the American Society for Engineering Education.In the 1993 a Special Edition of the Engineering Design Graphics Journal was published. Thisspecial edition was in celebration of the 100th anniversary of ASEE and the 65th year of the Page 15.24.2Graphics Division. The title of this special edition was “The Evolution of the Engineering DesignGraphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, 1928-1993.” It wasrecounted and recorded by William B. Rogers. While discussing the name changes of theDivision over the years, Rogers says this, The graphics smoke screen camouflaged our course content for barely one
screen of the HMD (as shown in Figure 4).Analysis of Objective Data In an initial analysis, all known effects, including student, system, and the interaction betweenstudent and system, were considered. Analysis results for the effects of each factor are shown inFigure 6. Figure 3. Anaglyphic glasses in use Figure 4. HMD in use Page 11.127.8 Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2006, American Society for Engineering Education (a). Problem 1 (b). Problem 2
Chair and Director of Training as the operating platform of choice.Equipment decisionsA list of media arts equipment and software was collected (See APPENDIX B: SME LabWorkstation Original Wish List). Based on the studio specifications, a series of quotes weresolicited from multimedia equipment vendors located in New Mexico, California and Arizona.Each quote contained a procurement requirement that all equipment required to construct thestudio be supplied by a single vendor. Additionally each vendor was required to provide ademonstration of a like-kind studio and a two-day training seminar would be contain in the quote Page 11.1152.7and final bid
erase all lines. Zoom and Pan=> pinch two fingers to zoom in or out. Move both fingers to pan.Sketch Grading and Assignment Navigation • When done with a sketch press “Submit.” If your solution is correct you will move on to the nextA)assignment, otherwise you will be asked Correct Sketch to try again. B) Incorrect Copies Sketch with of your Peek at submitted Solution assignments are sent to the Spatial
Paper ID #29041Using the Results of Certification Exam Data: A More Deliberate Approachto Improving Student LearningDr. Robert A. Chin, East Carolina University Robert A. ”Bob” Chin is a faculty member, Department of Technology Systems, College of Engineering and Technology, East Carolina University. He is a past chair of the Engineering Design Graphics Division and as of the 2020 annual conference, he will be serving as the outgoing past chair of the Division. In 2015, he completed his second term as the director of publications for the Engineering Design Graphics Division and as the Engineering Design Graphics Journal