Conference Session

Government Policy, Manufacturing Education, and Certification

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald J. Bennett F.ASEE, F.ABET P.E., Univeristy of Saint Thomas; Elaine R. Millam

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, wedecided to step up to the challenge of shaping courses and key experiences that would develophighly competent technical leaders.We created and delivered a series of leadership courses for graduate students in our School ofEngineering with excellent results, and have reported on these in several previous articles(Millam and Bennett 2004, 2011c,d), (Bennett and Millam 2011a,b) and a book (Bennett andMillam 2012). In the course of this work, we felt a strong need to find out what otherengineering schools and universities were doing to ensure their graduates were fluent in theirunderstanding and practice of leadership. Our research, utilizing a simple survey of deans ofengineering schools, was designed to determine how widespread the interest was in

Conference Session

Green and Susainable Manufacturing Practices

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Tech.); Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El Paso; Shraman Kadapa, Drexel University (Mechanical Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Smarth H Chadha, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.)

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

graduate levels. His tremendous re- search experience in manufacturing includes environmentally conscious manufacturing, Internet based robotics, and Web based quality. In the past years, he has been involved in sustainable manufacturing for maximizing energy and material recovery while minimizing environmental impact.Dr. Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Tech.) Dr. Ertekin received his BS degree in mechanical engineering from Istanbul Technical University. He received MS degree in Production Management from Istanbul University. After working for Chrysler Truck Manufacturing Company in Turkey as a project engineer, he received dual MS degrees in engi- neering management and mechanical engineering from Missouri

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary and Capstone Experiences in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd Myers, Ohio University; Peter Klein, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

AC 2008-100: MANUFACTURING CENTRIC UNDERGRADUATE CAPSTONEEXPERIENCETodd Myers, Ohio University Todd D. Myers Ph.D, M.B.A. is a researcher in Center for Automatic Identification and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial Technology at Ohio University. Dr. Myers has ten years of manufacturing experience in the supply side of the automotive industry. His responsibilities have included multi-plant materials management, ERP implementation, project management, and engineering management. His funded research has included RFID OEM capability studies, Barcode robustness studies, and Manufacturing Operations Studies. Dr. Myers is a certified GlobeRanger trainer and three-time recipient of the

Conference Session

Development of Manufacturing Engineering Laboratories I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

learning experience is taking place,including the past offering when 100% of the students received at least B- (80%) letter grade.Course evaluations also indicated ratings mainly in the range of 4 - 5 in 5 scale.In summary, students gain 15 weeks of hands-on practical experience on industrial grade robots.They learn about trajectory planning, program planning and logic with flow-charts and state-flowdiagrams. The students also study the wiring process of inputs and outputs to the robotcontroller. But, most importantly they get exposed to scenarios replicating real-life cases such ashand-exchange and setting of a TOOLFRAME, palletizing and depalletizing, and mostimportantly wiring and programming of an actual work-cell, possibly twice – one with an

Conference Session

Green and Sustainable Manufacturing Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaby Mohammed, The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi; Saed Talib Amer, The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the attributes associated with each of thesecompetences present a challenge for engineering educators in both the context in which theyshould be introduced, as well as “determining what can be accomplished within the constraintsof a university education” [4]. From an educational stance, the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) [5], states engineering students’ minimum learningoutcomes (a) through (k) as shown in Table 1: Table 1: ABET learning outcomes a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c) an ability to design a system, component, or

Conference Session

Innovations in Curriculum and Course Development

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Paper ID #17429Integrating Engineering Design into Graphics CoursesDr. Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University Arif Sirinterlikci is a University Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and the Depart- ment Head of Engineering at Robert Morris University. He holds BS and MS degrees, both in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Technical University in Turkey and his Ph.D. is in Industrial and Systems En- gineering from the Ohio State University. He has been actively involved in ASEE and SME organizations and conducted research in Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering, Biomedical Device Design and

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research and Industry

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Faisal Aqlan, Pennsylvania State University; Qi Dunsworth, Pennsylvania State University; Jessica Resig

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. manufacturing: 2015 and beyond,” 2015.2. Spak, G.T., “US advanced manufacturing skills gap: Innovation education solutions,” 4th International Conference on New Horizons in Education, Elsevier, 2013.3. Kimmel, H., Carpinelli, J., Burr-Alexander, L., and Rockland, R., “Bringing Engineering into K-12 Schools: A Problem Looking for Solutions,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006.4. Sharma, S., Siwach, B., Ghoshal, S.K. and Mohan, D., “Dye sensitized solar cells: From genesis to recent drifts,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 70, 2007, pp. 529- 537.5. Gonçalves, L.M., de Zea Bermudez, V., Ribeiro, H.A. and Mendes, A.M., “Dye-sensitized solar cells: A safe bet for the future

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the main focus of MANE 201. The covered topics and schedule is asbelow Table 2. A final prototype is illustrated in Figure 1 (b). Table 2 Topics and Schedule in MANE 201 Week Topic HW ASSIGNMENT 1 Introduction and safety training 2 Digital design of pump HW1 3 Generate bill of materials (BOM) and process planning HW2 4 3D print of impellers 5 Fabricate pump body using saw and mill Lab assignment 1 6 Fabricate face plate using saw and mill

Conference Session

Practices for Student Learning Engagement

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ana Djuric P.E., Wayne State University; Jeremy Lewis Rickli, Wayne State University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Daniel Foster, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

and theoretical requirements in engineering program.Future WorkThe CoBot learning environment modules will be used for development of a new undergraduatecourse: Introduction to Collaborative Robotics and Applications.AcknowledgmentsThe presented work is supported by NSF grant (#1601454) [Learning Program for Cobots inAdvanced Manufacturing Systems].ReferencesAkella, P., Peshkin, M., Colgate, E.D., Wannasuphorasit, W., Nagesh, N., Wells, J., Holland, S., Pearson, T. and Peacock, B., (1999). Cobots for the automobile assembly line, In Robotics and Automation, Proceedings, 1999 IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 1, pp: 728-733.Anandan T. M., The Realm of Collaborative Robots – Empowering Us in Many Forms, Robotic

Conference Session

Progress in Manufacturing Education III

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hugh Jack P.Eng., Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

AC 2012-3826: THE 2012 STATE OF MANUFACTURING EDUCATIONDr. Hugh Jack P.Eng., Grand Valley State University Hugh Jack is a professor of product design and manufacturing engineering at Grand Valley State Univer- sity in Grand Rapids, Mich. His specialties include automation, design projects, and internet application development. Page 25.1276.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The 2012 State of Manufacturing EducationAbstractThe paper describes the 2012 results of a third annual survey on the state of manufacturingeducation. The survey respondents

Conference Session

Strategies for Effective Education in Manufacturing

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuqiu You, Ohio University; Neil Littell, Ohio University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

learned in previous courses into a realsystem integration project. This interaction would provide a deeper level of assessment of thestudent competencies related to control systems, material handling, industrial robots, andsystems integration within the modern manufacturing environment.References [1] Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why Problem-Based Learning Works: Theoretical Foundations. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 221–238. [2] Schwering, R. E. (2015). Optimizing Learning in Project-Based Capstone Courses. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19(1), 90–104. [3] Stevenson, W. J. (2015). Operations Management, (12th). New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill. [4

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary and Capstone Experiences in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Creese, West Virginia University; Deepak Gupta, Southeast Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, 40 cm) P = design load (400 lb., 182 kg)) E = Young’s Modulus σ = Yield Strength b = rung width h = rung height thickness The total cost is the sum of the material cost, processing cost, and the cost penalty. Theprocessing can be approximated by the expression:Cp = (P/Ac) x (Tmp / 1800) x CWf x HTf x Rpc x L x Ac x NIWhere:P = total Perimeter of Cross-section (in)Ac = cross-sectional area (in2)Tmp = melting point of alloy (degrees K)CWf = cold work factor = 1.25 if material is cold worked, otherwise use 1.0HTf = heat treating factor = 1.35 if material is heat treated, otherwise use 1.0NI = hollow internal section factor = 0.70 if material has a hollow internal section, otherwiseuse 1.0L

Conference Session

Manufacturing Materials and Processes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ergin Erdem, Robert Morris University; Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

voxels (indicated in pink) and Figure 2(b) provides the sections thathave wall thickness more than five voxels. (a) (b)Figure 2. Thin Section analysis indicating fill regions more than (a) four voxels (b) five voxelsHands-on Physical Laboratory ExperimentsIn order to augment and enhance the learning process, a hands-on experiment is conducted forsand casting of a specific pattern. The laboratory experiment is conducted in the Metal Shop.Students have the chance to observe the actual sand casting process, participate in the moldmaking. The laboratory set-up is provided in Figures 3 and 4. Figure 3 depicts the bottom board,pattern board, cope and drag part of the flask while Figure 4

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jahangir Ansari, Virginia State University; Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University; Lipika Ghosh, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

PlatesSeveral samples were cut off from the Al-Cu region and prepared for metallographicobservations. Two prepared samples and some magnified microscopic images are shown inFigure 9. Figure 9- Selected Samples (a-b) and Microscopic Images (c-h)The initial investigation demonstrates the joining of aluminum and copper by FSW is feasible.Results indicate a quality weld is achievable by appropriate geometric setup and optimization oftransverse speed, tool rotational speed, and axial load.Case Study III- Butt Joints of Aluminum and Copper by FSWThis study focuses on the application of FSW technology to weld aluminum and copper bars toproduce a durable quality joint. For this purpose, several experiments were carried out to weld0.125-0.25in

Conference Session

Manufacturing Laboratory Innovation

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

R. Radharamanan, Mercer University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the laboratory modules developed and taught inthe design and manufacturing courses that are expected to meet the following ABET’s EC-2000“a” through “k” requirements such as: b) ability to design and conduct experiments as well as toanalyze and interpret data; c) ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds; d) ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; and g) ability to communicateeffectively, as well as the Mercer University’s learning objectives such as: critical thinking,application of technology, knowledge integration, knowledge application, and written and oralcommunication. Selected results from student team projects are also presented, analyzed, anddiscussed

Conference Session

Manufacturing Materials and Processes

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert L. Mott, University of Dayton; Ronald J. Bennett F.ASEE, F.ABET P.E., University of St. Thomas; Mark J. Stratton, SME; Mel Cossette, Edmonds Community College; Thomas G. Stoebe, University of Washington; Frank Zeh Cox, National Resource Center for Materials Tecnology Education

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

] Page 24.789.14 Figure 1 The Four Pillars of FigureManufacturing 1 Graphic Representation Knowledge (SME 2011) of the Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge [Used with permission from the Society of Manufacturing Engineers] A B C D E F G H IFigure 2 Aspects of the Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge that are directly relatedto Materials Science. The letters refer to elaborations about materials/manufacturingrelationships in the subheadings within Section 5 of this paper. See also the overalldiscussion in Section 5 on the Materials section of the Four Pillars model

Conference Session

Manufacturing Curricula for the Year 2015 and Beyond

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Venkitaswamy Raju, State University of New York-Farmingdale

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. The objectives of GEMwere: a) to define the needs of the global manufacturing industry for training andeducation in manufacturing strategy, b) to develop curriculum to comply with the conceptof digital business and extended products, and c) to develop detailed specifications for amanufacturing strategy curriculum focusing on manufacturing engineering and businessadministration topics. In developing such a program, the following were used as guidingprinciples:- seek strong involvement of industry- seek wider coverage in each region- seek the involvement of leading universities all over the world- focus on meeting the future needs of industry- recognize and acknowledge the cultural differences in global operations- assure that the program

Conference Session

Automation and Robotics Subjects in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Devine, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

the quality and complexityof student projects using both virtual and physical robots, clearly demonstrated that the use ofoff-line programming and simulation software had a positive impact on student learning.Bibliography1. Schneider, R. (2005). Robotic Automation Can Cut Costs. Manufacturing Engineering. Vol. 135 No. 6. Page 14.768.92. Jones, T. (2006). Trends and Motivations for Robot Purchases. www.robotics.org, posted 11/06/2006.3. Morey, B. (2007). Robotics Seeks Its Role in Aerospace. Manufacturing Engineering. Vol. 139 No. 4.4. Nieves, E. (2005). Robots: More Capable, Still Flexible. Manufacturing Engineering. Vol. 134 No

Conference Session

Supply Chain and Logistics in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Taratukhin, Stanford University; Yulia Yadgarova P.E., Bauman Moscow State Technical University; Anastasia Stelvaga, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Hybrid cloud environment for manufacturing control system Julia Yadgarovaa, Anastasia Stelvagab and Victor Taratukhinc a Bauman Moscow State Technical University, b Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, c Stanford University AbstractToday the concepts of Smart factory, Internet of Things and Industrial Internet play asignificant role in innovation process and new engineering design architectures. Using designthinking approach, university team of MSc and PhD students under the guidance of global ITcompany

Conference Session

State of Manufacturing

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

Paper ID #73332013 State of Manufacturing EducationDr. Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University Hugh Jack is a Professor of Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering at Grand Valley State Uni- versity in Grand Rapids, Michigan. His interests include manufacturing education, design, project man- agement, automation, and control systems. Page 23.19.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The 2013 State of Manufacturing EducationAbstractThis paper presents

Conference Session

Incorporating Innovative Technologies into the Curriculum

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Chen, Iowa State University; Ye Li, Bradley University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

, NY. T2G 17-21 3. Chen, J.C. and Huang, B., 2007, “Customers Voice based Manufacturing Curriculum Development using Quality Function Deployment (QFD)”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology Education, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 5-14. 4. David L Hallowell, “QFD: When and How Does It Fit in Software Development?” Available on iSixSigma LLC’s website (URL: http://software.isixsigma.com/library/content/c040707b.asp) 5. Glenn H. Mazur, 1996, “The Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) To Design A Course In a Total Quality Management (TQM) at the University of Michigan College of Engineering”, International Conference on ICQ 1996, Yokohama 6. Kenneth Crow, 2002, “Customer focused

Conference Session

Green and Sustainable Manufacturing Practices

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University (Tech.); Carlos Michael Ruiz, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Benjamin G Cohen, Drexel Department of Engineering Technology; Sarah Renee Andrieux

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

varying air and water flowrates as well as air pressureand their interdependence.The STAR student developed a research project involving building an educational learningmodule. The main learning outcomes were related directly to the ABET [10] criteria a and b, asshe demonstrated abilities in the areas of mathematics, science and engineering . Also the studentdemonstrated comprehensive skills related to criteria c and d, specifically designing a system andits components for “a broadly defined engineering problem”. She also conducted tests andmeasurements; she analyzed and interpreted experimental data and she applied her results toresults to improve the developed module. She gained new knowledge in the area of mechanicaldesign, being able to

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University; Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University; M. Eric Carr, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

systems including design and development of pilot testing facility, mechanical instrumentation, and industrial applications of aircraft engines. Also, in the past 10 years she gained experience in teaching ME and ET courses in both quality control and quality assurance areas as well as in thermal-fluid, energy conversion and mechanical areas from various levels of instruction and addressed to a broad spectrum of students, from freshmen to seniors, from high school graduates to adult learners. She also has extended experience in curriculum development. Dr Husanu developed laboratory activities for Measurement and Instrumentation course as well as for quality control undergraduate and graduate courses in ET Masters

Conference Session

Green and Sustainable Manufacturing Practices

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu Husanu, Drexel University (Tech.)

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

device was developed earlier by another student as independent studyresearch. A comparison between mathematical modeling and experimental data will enablestudents to explore deviation of theoretical models from the physical system as also how well anassumption may describe a real system behavior.ConclusionsThe SLOs related to the course implementation of the learning modules are related to the twomain areas: (1) introductory notions for thermodynamics and fluid mechanics and (2) energyconversion and energy efficiency, from estimation to direct quantification. Therefore ABETcriteria and b will guide our SLO assessment as main criteria [7]. Also, criterion c will beimportant to assess, due to experimental nature of the activities developed. The

Conference Session

Manufacturing Education Innovation and Assessment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianmei Zhang, Kansas State University; Z.J. Pei, Kansas State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

answers from the students for three consecutive semesters are shown in Fig. 1.From these results, it is found that more and more students prefer to do TTYP and enjoy TTYPduring class. (a) Results from fall 2001; (b) Results from spring 2002; Page 11.613.4 (c) Results from fall 2002; Fig. 1. Survey results on TTYP from three consecutive semesters.Short QuestionsShort questions are prompted once or twice during each class. Normally before introducingimportant concepts, the instructors ask some short questions to catch students’ attention and thestudents are forced to think about the questions and answer the questions. Their responses arealways encouraged and

Conference Session

Our Future in Manufacturing

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Danielson, Arizona State University; Trian Georgeou, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

technology surveys were sent to the head/director/chair ofmanufacturing programs accredited by ABET as Manufacturing Engineering Technologyprograms. These ABET-accredited programs were determined using the list of accreditedprograms published on the ABET website. Appendix B contains a list of all 41 programssurveyed during this effort. The MET programs providing a response to the 2005 surveys arelisted first, along with the location of the program, followed by programs responding to the 2007survey. 2005 Survey Respondents Arizona State University, Mesa, AZ Ball State University, Muncie, IN Brigham Young University, Rexburg ID California State University, Long Beach, CA Marshall Community & Technical College

Conference Session

Innovative Project-based Learning Practices in Manufacturing

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tumkor Serdar, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

taken during the junioryear of their study by students in Mechanical Engineering Technology.An overview of a variety of manufacturing processes is introduced that are available to processmaterials into finished products. Special emphasis is placed on the “traditional” processes fromthe standpoint of production methods, sequence of operations, and economic decision analysis.The objectives of MET1161 include: (a) Provide each student with an opportunity to gain anunderstanding and appreciation of the breadth and depth of the field of manufacturing; (b)Emphasize and recognize the strong interrelationships between material properties andmanufacturing processes; (c) Provide each student with an opportunity to become familiar withsome of the basic

Conference Session

Design Education I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Creese, West Virginia University; Deepak Gupta, Southeast Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

total surveys completed were approximately 30. Theresults were similar to the results in previous years. The second survey came approximately 60 percent through the project time. The secondsurvey was completed by the teams and all nine teams completed the survey. This survey is inTable 2 and was a combination of the second and third surveys when four reports were submittedinstead of the current three reports. The last five questions were reminders of what should beincluded in the report and the low values are expected as students tend to focus only on runningthe program and printing the results. Some of the results are interesting as the response toQuestion A was 4.8 and the response to Question B was 5.0. It would be unusual for the

Conference Session

Pedagogical Issues in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jitendra Tate, Texas State University-San Marcos; Vedraman Sriraman, Texas State University-San Marcos

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

presentation was 66%.Table 4 displays actual average and standard deviations.Table 5. Basis for research paper evaluationReport1. Creativity2. Completeness and depth3. Knowledge of engineering science4. Use of appropriate engineering terminology5. ConclusionsEach item 20 points, Total out of 100 Presentation(a) Presentation Skills1. Speech volume, projection and pronunciation2. Quality/clarity/quantity of visual aids3. Use of time(b) Questions and Answers4. Directness and clarity of answers5. Displays knowledge / competenceEach item 10 points; Total out of 50ConclusionsIn the beginning students had many doubts about the research paper activity. But after lab visit andplant tours they were convinced about the purpose of the research paper. Students

Conference Session

Emerging Technologies in Manufacturing Education - I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zbigniew Czajkiewicz, Robert Morris University; Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University; Ozden Uslu, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

20069. Rapid Prototyping. Chua C. K., Leong K. E. and Lim C. S. World Scientific Co. Pte. Ltd. Second Edition 200410. Rapids Castings Delivers Parts to the Navy with Speed. Modern Casting, October 2006. American Foundry Society, Inc. Schaumburg, IL11. Rapid Planning for CNC Milling-A New Approach for Rapid Prototyping. Frank, Matthew C, Wysk, Richard A, Joshi, Sanjay B. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2004.12. Is CNC Machining Really Better Than RP? Terry Wohlers and Todd Grimm. Time- Compression Technologies. January 2003. http://www.tagrimm.com/information/articles.html13. Truth Be Told. Todd Grimm. Time-Compression Technologies. August – September, 2004. http://www.tagrimm.com/information/articles.html14. The Ex One Company