35% and 65% chord length at a high angle of attack and compared to the baseline airfoil andpreviously done semi-circular geometry. The results are summarized in Table 3. It appears therectangular geometry placed at 35% chord length outperformed the competing geometriessignificantly; however, when the varying dimple geometries were placed at 65% chord length,the percent increase in L/D did not vary significantly from geometry to geometry. (a) (b) (c) Figure 15: Dimple with (a) rectangular geometry; (b) triangular geometry; (c) trapezoidal geometryTable 3: Percent increase in L/D
. Ronghui Ma, University of Maryland Baltimore County A. Professional Preparation: Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Mechanical Engineering B.E. 1991 Southeast University, Nanjing, China Mechanical Engineering M.S. 1994 Stony Brook University, Me- chanical Engineering Ph.D. 2003 Ph.D. Thesis: Modeling and Design of PVT Growth of Silicon Carbide Crystals Ph.D. Advisors: Professors Hui Zhang and Vish Prasad B. Appointments 1998-2003 Research Assistant, State University of New York at Stony Brook 2003-2004 Post-doctoral Fellow, University of Pennsylvania 2004- 2010 Assistant Professor, University of Maryland Baltimore County 2010- Associate Professor, University of Maryland Baltimore CountyDr. Deepa Madan, University of
with Technology,” 118th ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 26-29June 2011.[12] J.C. Crepeau, B. Willis, S. Quallen, S. Beyerlein, D. Cordon, T. Soule, P.K. Northcutt, T.Gaffney, J. Kimberling, A. Shears, and A. Miller, “Generation-Z Learning Approaches toImprove Performance in the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam,” 2020 ASEE VirtualConference, Paper #28606
students. By the second lecture, students are informed of their projects and project teams. The secondlecture covers engineering methods for conducting research, detailing best practices, availableresources, and an overview of the research process. As a homework assignment, a Mentor-TeamCharter (Appendix B) is completed by the teams and submitted by the third lecture. This charteris to be completed by the student team, with feedback and input from their faculty and/or graduatestudent/post-doctoral mentor. For the third lecture, student teams provide an introduction to their research project for theclass, providing relevant background information. Each team is also asked to present their researchplan for the semester, milestones
. Jorgensen, “The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 5–11, Jan. 2008.[2] J. S. Lamancusa, J. E. Jorgensen, and J. L. Zayas-Castro, “The learning factory - a new approach tointegrating design and manufacturing into the engineering curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 103–112, Apr. 1997.[3] V. Wilczynski, C. S. O’Hern, and E. R. Dufresne, “Using an engineering design center to infuse designexperience into a mechanical engineering program,” in Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,IN, 2014.[4] C. R. Forest, R. A. Moore, A. S. Jariwala, B. B. Fasse, J. Linsey, W. Newstetter, P. Ngo, and C. Quitero,“The invention studio: A
been focused on teaching junior and senior engineering design classes as well as educational and curriculum development. He is coordinator of the first new ME-Practice course in the revised Mechanical Engineering curriculum and faculty advisor of the Mining INnovation Enterprise.Dr. Nancy B. Barr, Michigan Technological University As the Communications and Senior Design Program Advisor, Barr developed a multi-faceted technical communications program in the Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics Department at MTU. She delivers communication instruction to undergraduate and graduate students, assists faculty in crafting critical thinking/communication assignments, and trains GTAs and faculty in best practices in
. Page 26.127.4BadgingBadging, or microcredentialing, is a process by which students can be evaluated on skills and knowledgeat a more granular level than a whole course. In our current educational model, when an employerreviews the transcript of a student who received a B in a class, that employer cannot distinguish whetherthat student did everything in the course pretty well, or is particularly good at some skills yet unable tocomplete other tasks12. The concept with badges, and why there is increasing interest in the potential usein education, is the ability to measure particular skills that are encompassed in a class.Moreover, badging also works to incentivize students. In Kapp’s The Gamification of Learning andInstruction[14], the argument
differentmajors were put together to increase the diversity within each group as follows: Group A: 2robotics students, 2 mechanical engineering students and 2 masters students in mechatronicsystems and control. Group B: 2 robotics students, 1 Bio-medical engineering student, 1 masterstudent in automotive engineering and 2 masters students in mechatronic systems andcontrol.The students who took the course had taken various courses in the past that were not necessarilyneeded for their final project and more importantly there were skills that were new for somestudents. For example, robotics students had completed all their control and programming coursesand were familiar with the control strategies and robotics implementation needed for the project.For this
this case a reciprocating internal combustion engine) work? What comes in? What goes out? • Air and fuel goes in, gas, heat, and work come out. b) How does air get into the engine? • Through the intake manifold, into the carburetor, then into the cylinder through the intake valve. c) How does fuel get into the engine? • From the gas tank into the carburetor where it is mixed with air. d) How does exhaust get out of the engine? • The exhaust valve opens and the piston pushes the exhaust out through the muffler
, students also learned fundamental multidisciplinary principles inorder to achieve a compact, portable, and an affordable system while taking consideration of cost,performance, and functionality.The final class grade confirmed effective learning outcomes of the project team. All five studentsof the team received class grade A or B while the course success was defined a grade C orhigher. In addition, a class survey administered to the team students showed the students' fullsatisfaction with the course on how their learning of multidisciplinary mechatronics engineeringimproved for their professional career development in the future. As a result, students learnedclear lessons on how a multidisciplinary engineering design project is implemented. In
the motion. 7 The external resultant force must be in the same direction as the acceleration. Work and Energy 8 Gravitational potential energy can be either positive, zero, or negative. 9 Elastic potential energy can be either positive, zero, or negative. 10 When a spring is stretched by 5 in, it has more elastic potential energy than when it is compressed by 5 in. Conservation of Linear Momentum 11 If two same-size balls A and B are coming from the opposite direction, mA > mB. Ball B will experience a larger change of momentum. 12 If two same-size balls A and B are coming from the opposite direction, mA >
Course," in Emerging Technologies for Education, Rome, Italy, 2016.[2] P. Doroshenko, A. Hebert, A. Khare, C. Parikh, C. Sweeney, J. M. M. Marrocco and A. Pandit, "Hillsborough high school iSTEM club's 2016 project: Quadcopter," in IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 2016.[3] C. Molina, R. Belfort, R. Pol, O. Chacon, L. Rivera, D. Ramos and E. I. O. Rivera, "The use of unmanned aerial vehicles for an interdisciplinary undergraduate education: Solving quadrotors limitations," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Madrid, Spain, 2014.[4] J. Kim, K. Chang, B. Schwarz, A. S. Lee, S. A. Gadsden and M. Al-Shabi, "Dynamic Model and Motion Control of a Robotic Manipulator," Journal of Robotics
this project, funded by the National Science Foundation(NSF), are to engage mechanical engineering students in the learning process and to make themprepared for the workforce in building-related fields. Distinctive elements that differentiate thiselective course from traditional elective courses are: (a) incorporating applied software trainingand (b) making the course experiential and project-based (c) enhancing students’ interaction withthe related industry through guest speaker and field trip.The course was implemented for the first time in Fall 2016 in a minority serving university. Thedata to evaluate the success level of the project was collected via: (a) pre- and post-implementation interviews, (b) classroom observations, (c) student
meeting arranged by the head ofthe department. Prior to the meeting, the Head of Department: a. Requests an annual report of the results and information uploaded in SAEP. b. Defines work-teams based on the student outcomes that the Faculty evaluated in SAEP. c. Defines Department Coordinators that will be responsible for observing and ensuring that all Faculty members that must evaluate student outcomes do so. d. Invites all Faculty – including those that evaluated student outcomes - to hold a meeting so that the work teams defined previously present an analysis of the semester evaluation.In the evaluation meeting, Professors suggest and propose
given by professors in the humanities. As the newFYS director in 2012, the second author inherited the challenge of a program staffed primarily bythe faculty in the college of the arts and sciences. In 2011-12 there were 74 sections of the then-equivalent of FYS 112;b only three of those sections were taught by faculty from the professionalschools (one from the college of engineering and two from the college of education and healthsciences). The second author was concerned that students perceived this lack of participation inFYS by the faculty of the professional schools as a lack of endorsement for the value of liberaleducation.c She wanted the lecture to emphasize the significance of FYS as a foundation for allareas of study at the University
the time of the demo, a syringe with a small tube was used to insert thedye. Page 26.33.8 Figure 6: Individual parts of the Stokes flow device2.1.7 Cavitation demo Like the Stokes flow demo, students attempted to create this demo, but it hasn’t beencompleted at this point. It is basically a piston/cylinder device filled with water. The piston islifted using a pneumatic cylinder, reducing the pressure and producing cavitation. Information,video, and directions can be found on the blog created by Nigel B. Kaye (see figure 7)8 If a livedemonstration of cavitation is too difficult to achieve, there are many images and
. The supervisors consisted of a diverse set of junior and senior engineering studentsthat received a B or better in dynamics. At the beginning of the meeting the supervisor wouldlook over each student’s homework to ensure they attempted all the problems. Then eachstudent was asked to present a portion of their problem set. The problems selected by thesupervisors for students to present were those that required the application of important anddifficult concepts covered in the course.Each student in the group would be asked to present a portion of their solution using awhiteboard. The portion assigned was selected so that the presentation would require about tenminutes. Students were allowed to use their notes, but expected to explain each step
advantage for various positions of the can crusher and comparingthe mechanical advantage of different models. Instructor also lets the students know it’s likelythey will not be able to finish the activity in the one class period, and there is no time pressure tocomplete all of the analysis questions.The student groups are given a handout with a series of suggested steps and a few photographs ofthe can crusher in various positions (see Appendix B). To a fellow engineering professor thismay seem overly prescriptive for an open-ended student-guided activity, but from the students’perspectives it is still far from clear. They often write of not having enough instruction and notknowing how to begin, which is necessary, for they are to decide how to
andposter presentation by a faculty in Communication Department. Outside judges gradedstudents’ presentation. A selection of images from the course will be available on a publicwebsite. (a) (b) (c) Fig. 9. Sample Final Projects: a) burning mums, b) water balloon, c) dancing drops.F. Art/Science Competition Entry (Extra 10 points)Students were encouraged to submit their work to art/science competitions for extra credits.Students were asked to submit their intention at the beginning of semester and only one studentsubmitted his work to the Gallery of Fluid Motion, which has been sponsored by the Division ofFluid Dynamics of the American Physical Society, since 1985
example of a progressreport template was shown in Appendix B. By contrast, technical reports required students todemonstrate the technical details of design and project management. For example, EngineeringProjects 1 technical report 2 (template shown in Appendix C) covered design assessment andrequired teams to detail their vehicle component research, safety research, plan for component re-use, purchase, redesign, or new design, and project management updates. Even though it seemedmore work compared to the previous progress reports, the students were gradually building theirSAE design reports along the way. In previous years, students would rush to finish these beforethe competition deadlines.Finally, for Engineering Projects 1 and 2, the
., Gillet, D., and Huguenin, P., “Introduction to Real-time Control using LabVIEW with an Application to Distance Learning,” Int. J. of Engineering Education, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2000, pp. 372–384. [9] Reck, R. M., “BYOE: Affordable and Portable Laboratory Kit for Controls Courses,” 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015 , Paper ID: 13467.[10] Schinstock, D., McGahee, K., and Smith, S., “Engaging students in control systems using a balancing robot in a mechatronics course,” 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2016, pp. 6658–6663.[11] Bay, C. J. and Rasmussen, B. P., “Exploring controls education: A re-configurable ball and plate platform kit,” 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2016, pp. 6652
in their teams. Other students talked about theheightened awareness they have that a teammate might feel like an outsider and the importanceof trying to see things from other points of view. One student even wrote, “Consciouslyconsidering the perspectives of others has caused me to not completely change, but at least toreconsider my own personal views on the Syrian refugee situation.” Based on our feedback, wefeel that this training went extremely well and that it is in a large part due to the way the materialwas presented to the students.Project B – Building Design ChangesOne of our team members, Dr. Merchan-Merchan, worked closely with an outside design firm tocreate our first display area (see Figure 1). We anticipate the installation of
Paper ID #13778A Roller Coaster Project as Part of an Undergraduate Dynamics Course inMechanical EngineeringDr. Andrew R. Sloboda, Bucknell University Andrew Sloboda is a Visiting Assistant Professor at Bucknell University where he teaches a variety of mechanics-based courses, including solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, dynamics, system dynamics, and vibration. His research interests lie primarily in the fields of nonlinear dynamics, vibration, and fluid- structure interaction. Page 26.104.1
course, it has been added tothis paper because it shows how powerful peer discussions can be. Figure 2 - Sample clicker question for a Thermodynamics course. NOTE: The original authorship of this question is unknown but was not written by the author of this paper.Table 2 - Table of responses to question in Figure 2. The color red highlights the correct answer. Section 1 Section 2 Independent Peer Independent Peer A 16% 41% 28% 98% B 10
. Multidisciplinary Engineering Courses at Texas A&M UniversityThe courses taught at Texas A&M University, implemented for the Fall 2020 and underimplementation for Spring 2021 semester, were all Junior level engineering courses that includeboth the lecture & lab components. The following are the courses under present study: a. Thermodynamics for Technologists: Fall 2020 b. Fluid Mechanics & Power: Fall 2020 c. Strength of Materials: Fall 2020 & Spring 2021 d. Product Design & Solid Modeling: Spring 2021The above-mentioned courses were delivered Face-to-Face with synchronous remote option,which defines them as hybrid courses. All of the above-mentioned engineering courses are majorengineering courses taught nationwide
Learning Cycle into this project are discussed elsewhere16, 21-22.Active Learning Module SummariesAs part of the NSF-funded grant, ALM’s have been developed and implemented into eight coursesat six different universities using five different software packages. All of the ALM’s have beendeveloped to meet various educational and instructional objectives. The educational objectives ofthe learning modules include the following: a) to provide a different insight into traditionally challenging concepts that are covered in a required undergraduate mechanical engineering course, b) to provide undergraduate engineering students with a basic understanding of FE theory as applied to thermal and structural analyses, and
enroll in agraduate school as a part-time student. Those 10 scholars identified faculty and peer mentoring,all of the research related activities sponsored by our program, internships, and social interactionwith faculty and their peers as positive factors that helped them make their decisions.Acknowledgement This research was supported by an NSF S-STEM grant (DUE–1742170).References1. Measuring Up 2008. The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, State Report Card. http://measuringup2008.highereducation.org/print/state_reports/short/MD.pdf2. Hensel, N.H. and Cejda, B. D.. Tapping the potential of all: undergraduate research at community colleges. Council on Undergraduate Research. Washington, D.C., 2014.3. Lopatto, D
Paper ID #25077Happy Hours are a GodsendDr. Krishna Pakala, Boise State University Krishna Pakala, Ph.D., is an Clinical Associate Professor at Boise State University, Idaho. His academic research interests include innovative teaching and learning strategies, use of emerging technologies, and mobile teaching and learning strategies.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Through real-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarova’s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to
for this course includes implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy to design test questionsthat cover a wider range of cognitive levels. Currently, most questions are at the “application”level. A wider range of questions will allow for more robust analysis of student learning.Additionally, a concept inventory has been implemented as an additional measure of studentlearning. The development of a measure for team performance, independent of examperformance would allow the authors to more closely examine the effect of being on a high-performing team on student learning. Finally, the authors are investigating the effect of TBLextended to individual performance in downstream courses.ReferencesAnderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A
. Abu-Ayyad, "Promoting Multidisciplinary Industry- Sponsored Capstone Projects," 2020 Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference, 2020.[3] K. C. Davis, "Enhancing Communication Skills in Senior Design Capstone Projects," 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, 2001.[4] B. Nuttall, J. Mwangi and C. Baltimore, "Capstone Projects: Integrating Industry through Student Leadership," 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2009.[5] C. Cioc, S. Cioc and R. A. Springman, "Using Capstone Projects for Community Outreach," 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[6] J. A. Mynderse, R. W. Fletcher, L. Liu, A. L. Gerhart, S. Arslan and K. E. Yee, "A Three- Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on an SAE Collegiate