creativity throughout the semester and apply it in ageneral sense to civil engineering design. This lab session is a good fit for this class, and afterhaving had the students “practice” their creative skills the entire semester, it seems prudent tobegin to bridge the general idea of creativity with the reality of implementation in engineeringdesign. The students really enjoy this final preliminary design project. For this lab assignment,students are tasked with putting together a preliminary civil engineering design of a newhospital. Students are given a fictitious piece of property (see figure 4) and told that the hospitalcan be located anywhere on the property map, with the exception of displacing the neighborhoodfarm house. The only other general
needed to be successful in the upcoming year[4]. The National Association of Campus Activities defines effective leadership transition as:“the process by which past and future student leaders in an organization work together to reviewand learn from previous events and programs and prepare for the upcoming year.” [4]. Thispaper investigates leadership transitions in six different Student Sections of the Society ofWomen Engineers (SWE) to determine best practices for different size sections.The SWE student sections aim to "stimulate women to achieve full potential in careers asengineers and leaders, expand the image of the engineering profession as a positive force inimproving the quality of life, demonstrate the value of diversity." Student
researches structures that contribute to underrepresentation in STEM majors and is currently a Graduate Assistant for the UBelong Collaborative.Dr. Allison Godwin, Cornell University Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and
looking for”: An intersectional collaborative autoethnography exploring pathways to engineering design doctoral programsAbstractThis research paper used a collaborative autoethnographic approach to explore the two authors’respective pathways to engineering design doctoral programs. Prior work has highlighted variousways that access to engineering graduate school is inequitable. Through our collaborativeautoethnography, we investigated how existing inequities harm and impede access for studentswith multiple marginalized identities, such as the first author (KC), while simultaneouslyproviding advantages to students with more privileged identities, such as the second author (RL).As part of our collaborative autoethnography
Award for Excellence in Teaching (2017), COE Excellence in Teaching Award (2008, 2014), UIC Teaching Recognitions Award (2011), and the COE Best Advisor Award (2009, 2010, 2013). Dr. Darabi has been the Technical Chair for the UIC Annual Engineering Expo for the past 7 years. The Annual Engineering Expo is a COE’s flagship event where all senior students showcase their Design projects and products. More than 700 participants from public, industry and academia attend this event annually. Dr. Darabi is an ABET IDEAL Scholar and has led the MIE Department ABET team in two successful accreditations (2008 and 2014) of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Engineering programs. Dr. Darabi has been the lead
need help deciding their educational andoccupational plans2.B. PurposeThe purpose of this pilot study was to determine what types of support school counselors need.It also involves the exploration of school counselors’ perceptions of engineering. Specifically,this study is guided by the following research questions: ≠ “What are school counselors’ perceptions of engineering?” ≠ “What is the self-reported need for and support desired by professional school counselors to aid their work with academic and career development related to students and engineering?”II. MethodThis study followed a cross-sectional survey design with quantitative and qualitativequestions15. This method allowed us to reach our intended audience in an
the School of Engineering & Applied Science (SEAS) and administered by theSEAS humanities and social science faculty (Technology, Culture, and Communication/TCC). Asmentioned earlier, both experiences emphasize the integrated, comprehensive approach favored byABET as reflected in EC 2000. The similarities suggest opportunities for maximizing studentlearning and overall efficiency by using written products of undergraduate research to achieve anddocument the achievement of multiple educational objectives. Moreover, the two groups of facultyhave a history of successful collaboration at the graduate level2 and had worked together from thebeginning to design the capstone project to be compatible with the undergraduate thesis project.There
makerspaces “DesignCubes.”The project provided opportunities to explore both individual and joint research questions.Makerere has been able to observe the impact of a first-of-its-kind DesignCube on its students’prototyping abilities. Duke’s DesignCube purposefully limits access to certain technologies tomimic the environment of a LMIC. This allowed the Duke team to examine changes inprototyping processes when students use the container makerspace. Jointly, the teams haveexplored the possibilities of shipping container makerspaces to identify best practices. Eachmakerspace has its own design unique to its environment, and comparing the differences willenable optimized designs for future makerspaces. Since the DesignCubes were completed,students from
company. Some are university-wide and some are discipline (i.e., engineering) only. Most charge a fee to participate to cover overhead and some discretionary support for student programs. Industrial Partnerships Not Usually CultivatedResearch Teaching-focused schools have gifted faculty who can impact local industry through consulting that is research, analysis, or design support.Career Center Primary mission is career fairs, resume development, and search engines for internships and fulltime positions. These centers need to be a data
criteria of expertise, behavior, and ethical standardsevidenced by a code of conduct it is worth asking whether engineering educators should seekprofessional status in the larger sense of the word. The difficulties inherent in answering thisquestion have already been alluded to earlier in the paper and relate to the way engineeringeducators are socialized into the university and how “engineering” is defined within academia.Schools of engineering seek the best graduates from their or other schools for doctoral programs.Typically the most successful graduates are recruited directly into the university in a position thathas defined duties in both teaching and research. Since they have no ‘world’ experience ofengineering they bring a view of the
practices andscience content to be learned simultaneously by K-12 students (Cunningham, Knight, Carlsen, &Kelly, 2007; National Research Council (U.S.), 2012; NGSS Lead States, 2013). Engineeringdesign can then be a vehicle for learning engineering design and scientific content, emphasizinginterdisciplinary, real-world applications and contexts of science (Douglas, Iversen, &Kalyandurg, 2004). But only 9% high school science teachers feel comfortable teachingengineering (Banilower et al., 2013) so combining engineering with the traditional and reformcontent demands in the NGSS may be difficult for high school science teachers.The NGSS isn’t instructive of curriculum or pedagogy; it doesn’t provide daily objectives, lessonplans, or concrete
developing innovative ways of merging engineering fundamentals and engineering in practice and research. Dr. Peuker’s educational research also focuses on increasing student retention and success in engineering through a student success focused introduction to engineering course. He is an active member of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers. Page 23.1099.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Student Industry Cooperation for the Development of Thermal System Design Teaching Laboratory EquipmentIntroductionIn higher
journals are worried about the rising occurrences of plagiarism in articlessubmitted for publication.3The Internet has changed way students plagiarize to some extent because it has changed the way Page 13.1367.2they research. A wealth of information is now at the researcher’s fingertips. A library ofinformation is brought straight to their desks. The phrase “cut and paste plagiarism” expressesthe ease of copying a sentence, paragraph, or more from an article into a term paper.Additionally, many in the upcoming generation view materials retrieved online differently thanthose obtained from other sources. Clifton Poole stated “there is a tendency to
, which can be considered professional faculty) (~55%). Within the “blend of excellence”,senior faculty are charged with providing military and academic leadership and mentorship to thejunior faculty. Meanwhile, rotating junior faculty provide fresh perspectives and valuableinsights from recent military experiences.To better understand the “Blend of Excellence” model in practice, we initiated a survey in spring2019 to all West Point faculty (n=720) asking for thoughts and perspectives on junior civilian(i.e., instructors or assistant professors) and junior rotating military faculty development. Areasqueried included developmental approaches and best practices, developmental areas (e.g.,research, teaching), and defined developmental outcomes. The
. In 2011, began as an Assistant Teaching Professor in First-year Engineering Program where she redesigned the curriculum and developed courses with sustainability and clean water themes. In 2017, she moved to ChE Department where she has taught core courses and redesigned the Capstone design course with inclusion pedagogy practices. She has also developed and ran 9 faculty-led, international programs to Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy. She has won several teaching awards including ChE Sioui Award for Excellence in Teaching, COE Essigmann Outstanding Teaching Award, and AIChE Innovation in ChE Education Award. She also won best paper at the Annual ASEE conference in both Design in Engineering Education
(2010).4. Stec, E. Using best practices: librarians, graduate students and instruction - ProQuest. Reference Services Review 34, 97-116 (2006).5. Jacobs, H.L.M. & Jacobs, D. Transforming the One-Shot Library Session into Pedagogical Collaboration: Information Literacy and the English Composition Class. Reference & User Services Quarterly 49, 72-82 (2009).6. Badke, W. Ramping up the One-Shot. Online 33, 47-49 (2009).7. Martin, J. The Information Seeking Behavior of Undergraduate Education Majors: Does Library Instruction Play a Role? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 3, 4-17 (2008).8. Riggs, D.E. What’s in Store for Academic Libraries? Leadership and Management Issues. Journal of
. 2017, p. 7.[65] T. A. Wood, D. D. Nale, and K. T. Brown, “Student Response System Best Practices for Engineering as Implemented in Plickers,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/student-response-system-best-practices-for-engineering-as- implemented-in-plickers[66] M. T. H. Chi and R. Wylie, “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 219–243, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.[67] J. A. Mirth, “A Specifications-Based Approach for the Design and Delivery of a Statics/Dynamics Course,” presented at the 2019
AC 2011-67: RESOURCES FOR ROBOT COMPETITION SUCCESS: AS-SESSING MATH USE IN GRADE-SCHOOL-LEVEL ENGINEERING DE-SIGNEli M Silk, University of Pittsburgh Eli M. Silk is a PhD candidate in the Cognitive Studies in Education program and a Graduate Student Researcher at the Learning Research and Development Center at the University of Pittsburgh. He received his BA in Computer Science at Swarthmore College in 2001. His current research focuses on the role of mathematics in helping K-12 students better understand and design physical systems.Ross Higashi, Carnegie Mellon University Ross Higashi is a Robotics Education Specialist at Carnegie Mellon University’s National Robotics En- gineering Center. He graduated in 2007
Question #4 Begin to observe how a scene is changed by light at different times of day. Select a location and a composition then photograph it at different times of the day. Do your best to set up the camera and tripod in exactly the same location for each time period. Choose three of these images and print them on 8.5 x 11" paper for presentation on September 12. Grading Key+ Meets assignment extremely well, great job, just as expected O You’ve done an acceptable job but there is room for improvement ∆ There are significant problems that negatively impact the success of the project Answers the question posed +/O The changes in light are rather subtle and the in the project description subject matter according to the evaporation
similar sites does retrievetop-quality IEEE content, dependable results have to be gleaned from millions of other lessreliable (or fully unreliable) ones.As suggested, basic and advanced search strategies and research best-practices are the bread andbutter of a CSMs work, and to assure consistency and comprehensiveness, include a specific“scripting” of key, end-user, mission critical (sometimes termed “WOW-factor”) concepts andelements: e.g. which documents a user has permission to download based on one’s institutionalsubscription preferences (the “What Can I Access” tab), using Boolean operators (AND, ORNOT, NEAR, etc.) for greater precision or recall, “stop words” (unsearchable words with no realmeaning such as "the", "a", "an"), the use of an
considerable amount of research conducted on the topic ofprofessional development in the last 20-30 years. From these primary research studies andrelated meta-analyses, many effective methods for conducting professional development havebeen identified. The incorporation of these “best practices” is imperative in developing effectiveprofessional development and in realizing the goal of the center to infuse engineering design,problem solving, and analytical skills into the K-12 schools.When considering participants for professional development, Wade, in a meta-analysis of 91research studies found that professional development activities are most successful whenparticipants are chosen by their leaders or colleagues to attend or that they are selected on
upper-levelundergraduate and graduate students at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The datasetcontains a mix of 100 correct and 400 incorrect submissions and underwent an extensivefine-tuning process with OpenAI’s advanced GPT-3.5-turbo-1106 model [15]. Therefore, ourresearch questions include: • RQ1: How can a proof of concept be designed and implemented to assess the feasibility of utilizing a generative AI model for providing semantic error feedback in educational settings, ensuring that the system avoids disclosing correct answers while enhancing the learning experience? • RQ2: How does the feedback from the fine-tuned GPT model differ in specificity and relevance compared to standard GPT models in the
Paper ID #14939The Bucknell Poetry Path App Experiment: A Collaboration Across CampusProf. Michael S Thompson, Bucknell University Prof. Thompson is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Bucknell University, in Lewisburg, PA. While his teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer engineering electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. His research interests
biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Control, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award and a UCI Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Mentorship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Investigation of Psychological Safety in Student-Led Undergraduate Engineering Design Projects through Student InterviewsAbstractTo supplement classroom learning and prepare students to transition from school to industry,many undergraduate engineering students participate in team-based design projects, both indesign-focused courses and as extracurricular activities. These projects can be largely organizedand
end-to-endproject where they start with simulation and work their way up to a populated hardware productthey can hold in their hand … especially one with surface mount parts. Local undergraduatestudents may be in this situation simply because of their choice of option area, and graduatestudents (particularly international) may have come from curricula that did not emphasis hands-on work, including practical issues associated with board layout, population, and testing. Thesehands-on opportunities are imperative for university educators that seek to graduate employablestudents.IV. ConclusionThis paper presented initial experiences and lessons learned with regard to the integration of awearable, wireless electrocardiograph design project into a
and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 Best Paper Award for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China.Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle Madsen Camacho is Professor in the Department of Sociology & Faculty Administrator at the University of San Diego and is a former Fellow of the American Council on Education. Her research c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21760 focuses on
expose the students to the tech-nical topics in AI. We teach technical topics in deep learning using applied research projects toreal-world healthcare datasets (such as tumor growth, cancer, and more). Other than teachingtechnical skills, the program was also aimed to enable students to produce novel contributions tothe domain of diagnostic artificial intelligence. The program required students to present their re-search projects in a capstone seminar and submit a research report similar to a conference paper.To accomplish these goals, discussions on research practices and academic communication wereincluded in the course design, facilitated by a dedicated communication TA for these aspects.The 5E approach used in course: The 5Es approach [24
approachof the course did not translate well because it was more difficult to effectively use hands-ondemonstrations. While researching other pedagogical approaches1,2,13,14 to circuits for non-majors courses, two common themes emerged. First, incorporating hands-on experimentallearning opportunities is a best practice for this type of course. Second, it is desirable to makethe courses with electrical subject matter as practical and relevant as possible. Since theinfrastructure for a lab-based course was not available, a method to bring a hands-on elementinto the large lecture hall was desired. After discussing the situation with another professor whoimplemented a robotics project into a freshman orientation course5 and seeing
ElectricityChapter 5.1 Hydro EnergyChapter 5.2 Geothermal EnergyChapter 5.3 Solar Thermal EnergyChapter 5.4 Solar Photovoltaic EnergyChapter 5.5 Wind EnergyChapter 5.6 Transmission, Distribution, and Storage for Renewable Energy SourcesSection 6. Future Energy ChoicesChapter 6.1 Natural Gas as a BridgeChapter 6.2 HydrogenAppendicesAppendix A: Mathematical NotationAppendix B: Abbreviations and AcronymsResearch DesignTo assess the pedagogical impact of the newly developed online and dynamic textbook onstudent learning outcomes, we designed an iterative educational research study. Informed by theprevious grant work,5,6,7 we have planned to explore the following student learning outcomes: (a)content understanding, (b) attitudes towards engineering, (c) life
. Page 22.1544.7Research was done to identify patterns related to the organization’s stage of quality systemimplementation. Some interesting results related to stages were: Stage 6 - Very High use of Benchmarking and Cause and Effect Diagrams Top two levels - Very High use of Mistake Proofing, Flow charts, and Gage R&R studies Factor Analysis for top two stages combined: Factor 1 - Data driven design and robust design (35.6%) Factor 2 - Process control (21.7%) Factor 3 - Variation reduction and prevention (20.1%) Factor 4 - Problem diagnosis and process improvement (19.8%)Research Question 4 - Is there a relationship between executive awareness and corporate use ofstatistical methodologies and customer satisfaction