needs with consideration of public health, safety, andwelfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors, and (SO 6) todemonstrate an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpretdata, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions.Introduction The design and construction sectors deliver services based on a profit model. Despite this,economic analysis in architectural design instruction is severely lacking. The standards thatgovern economic analysis in architectural design, professional, and instructional activities areambiguous at best. This is reflected by the accreditation standards for professional programsoverseen by the National Architectural Accreditation Board (NAAB
transform STEM education can be implementation of an inquiry-basedcollaborative approach. The inquiry-based collaborative approach can impact and prepare STEMgraduates for the future workforce following the required high level of critical thinking, problem-solving, and decision-making skills. This innovative approach also can help STEM graduatesdevelop required collaborative and communicative skills while working as part of any team.The inquiry-based collaborative approach has recently received recognition when themetacognitive approach has been implemented into the design of online, hybrid and face-to-facelearning to support the dynamics of reflective thinking and a collaborative inquiry process [2].Metacognition is a required cognitive ability to
pressabout Tesla. These are not just technical issues, but ethical violations have been reported as well.A simple Google search can help one find these news items. Students were asked to researchsome of these articles and analyze Tesla’s vehicle electrification effort through the Design Justicelens using answers to the following questions as guides: Who do you think created the originaldesign? Who benefitted/benefits from it? Who were/would be harmed from it? What designjustice principles are being violated, if any?Upon completion of the above tasks, all students were asked to reflect on what they learned byanswering the questions: a. What are some things you learned about Design Justice? b. Name at least three new things you
simplify the model as they see fit, and then apply the canonical mathematical models theywere taught in their engineering science courses to guide their design decisions in a group settingand reflect on their answers. Previous research has focused on engineering students workingtogether within designated design courses, but little is known about how students work togetherin a group to solve a problem in an engineering science course.This full research paper serves as our first attempt to answer the questions: 1) How do undergraduate engineering student teams solve an open-ended statics problem? 2) How does solving these problems contribute to building professional engineering skills?BackgroundOne of the main activities of
increase diversity in the department [25]. They employed a variety of approaches, includingcurricular change designed to incorporate sociotechnical context. The University of San Diego’sefforts at “Developing Changemaking Engineers” cross engineering disciplinary boundaries andhave inspired curricular change that “requires an enhanced curriculum with a focus on studentteamwork, a greater consideration of social context, improved communication with diverseconstituents, and reflection on an ethical understanding of their decisions and solutions” [28].Some of the efforts at both of these institutions have been supported by large National ScienceFoundation grants, which can remove barriers such as financial resourcing and incentives forfaculty
engineeringdesign process. As such, when provided with support (e.g., professional development), teachersare able to plan engineering lessons that frame the problem development phase – identification ofgoals, clients, criteria and constraints, and background knowledge - and encourage thedevelopment of multiple solutions [7]. During these two stages (i.e., problem scoping andexploration), children have been observed exploring different perspectives of the problem,engaging in reflective decision making, developing an optimal solution [13], [17], [18]. Theseresearchers argued for acknowledging children’s abilities to engage in heuristic practicescommon to expert designers and engineers.We contend, as do others, that parents serve as an additional resource of
to the real-world problem they were solving in groups. 4. Teamwork – these problems encouraged students to read Harvard Business Review articles on teamwork and apply the concepts to their group project. 5. New Knowledge – these problems encouraged students to increase their depth of understanding of soil mechanics and foundation engineering. 6. Technical communication – these problems asked the students to read a page of the department’s technical communications guide and reflect on how they could incorporate the concepts into their group report and presentation. 7. Wisdom – these questions presented a quotation from Dr. Ralph Peck and asked the students to interpret and explain the quotation.Each homework
an NSF CAREER grant investigating how marginalized students navigateengineering and the subsequent characteristics of the engineering learning environment. For thisproject, the grant was submitted more than a year before we started working on this paper. Thetiming of this proposal was such that the Covid-19 pandemic provided the opportunity to reflecton the decisions made in the original proposal before beginning data collection. The researchteam facilitated this reflection process through a comprehensive literature review during the firstyear of this project. The literature review helped synthesize existing relevant conceptualframeworks and led to the development of propositions and a conceptual model. 3. An Approach to Research Quality
impact of equity, diversity, and inclusion interventions on students'likelihood for "enacting inclusive behaviors on teams," Rambo-Hernandez et al. (2019) detailfive activities focused on equity in first-year engineering classes (across the span of a semester).These interventions focused on providing students with information about concepts like implicitbias or diversity in the engineering workforce and then subsequently having them complete someform of self-reflection assignment or group activity. Students were then measured four timesacross the semester using the ‘Valuing Diversity and Enacting Inclusion in Engineering Scale’(Rambo-Hernandez 2017). Their study found that the interventions were influential in students'likelihood to promote a
members.AccreditationAccreditation in the United States dates back to 1932 when the Engineers’ Council forProfessional Development (ECPD), the predecessor to ABET, was founded [2]. Since thebeginning, accreditation and professional societies have been tightly coupled as membersocieties help set standards and provide expert volunteers as Program Evaluators. ABETunderwent significant transformation at the turn of the millennium in adopting EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC2000). The shift to outcomes-based assessment was intended to increaseflexibility and innovation. The change also included a focus on professional skills, reflecting adecades-long growing recognition in the importance of equipping engineering graduates with abroader skill set for the evolving workforce [4
present study is a part of a project funded by a National Science Foundation (NSF)IUSE/PFE RED grant through the Division of Engineering and Education Centers. One goal ofthe project is to radically transform the way courses are taught in the Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering Department at the University of Connecticut. The program aims to create a moreinclusive learning environment that not only enhances the learning outcomes for all students, butalso provides flexibility and choices to allow all types of learners to personalize their educationalexperience. These changes are reflected in redesigned courses, designated in the department as I-Courses. It is anticipated that incorporating flexibility within engineering courses while alsoadopting a
of CAD and CAD design occurred during informal learningsettings with self-directed usage of tutorial videos provided by Autodesk and the courseinstructor. Student projects are developed through a series of subsequently scheduled formalproject meetings throughout the design-thinking process involving the instructor and otherstudents to discuss design iteration, design challenges, and user feedbackRecruitmentAt NCCU, the mission is to educate and train African Americans for global careers in the 21stCentury [12]. Our current coursedemographics (81% black, 6% white and4% Latin-X) reflect that we areparticipating in this mission to date. Thestudents participating in the “Making”-infused CURE (DaBuGs) and CURE-like(Genetics) courses are
quoted text on aslide, we played audio clips for audience members, which enabled them to engage moremeaningfully in students’ narratives. Because audience members could hear a human voicespeaking the words, the audio narratives provided a powerful tool that prompted reflection anddiscussion in ways different from text-based formats.4. ImplicationsIn a society that heavily consumes information through video and audio media (e.g., YouTube,podcasts, etc.), the audio dissemination approach described in this paper provides a uniqueopportunity to make our work more readily available and accessible to promote change.Specifically, it provides a strategy for leveraging contemporary tools to translate researchfindings into broad impact. Audio
reflection, are better able to perceive virtue in everyday life. By increasing theirvirtue awareness, the researcher hypothesizes they would increase their overall understandingof virtue. If their understanding is improved, they will be better able to internalize virtue andby default, improve their character and enable them to make better ethical decisions.Pilot Study DesignA quasi-experimental approach was adopted with control and experimental groups using apre-test survey as a baseline and a post-test survey to measure differences in statementresponses. The survey consisted of fifteen statements about virtue and character (see below)and was given before any virtue instruction. The statements were on a five-point Likert scaleto allow cadets to
signal that the space is occupied primarily by men), as well as behaviors - the things peoplesay and do - that express their stereotypes. Such expressions of stereotyping can be quite blatant,as when, for example, women are explicitly told that they are unlikely to succeed in STEM andare steered away from STEM careers. However, in today’s society stereotyping is more likely tobe expressed indirectly, reflected in subtle as opposed to blatant expressions, which are thereforeambiguous. We focus on these subtle stereotypic behaviors in this study, and refer to them assubtle bias events.Subtle BiasGiven the subtle nature of modern sexism [15], [16], it is likely that gender bias in STEMsettings is often subtle, and thus ambiguous as to whether it
engineering designneurocognition studies [36], [35]. For example, the mean oxy-Hb was observed to differ betweenfirst-year and fourth-year engineering students when design ideating [37]. First-year studentsrecruited more oxy-Hb in the regions of the brain generally associated with cognitive flexibilityand divergent and convergent thinking. Senior engineering students recruited more oxy-Hb in thebrain region generally associated with uncertainty processing and self-reflection [37]. Thisapplication of neuroimaging provides an objective measure to understand student cognition whendesigning. Here it was used to test the use of concept maps to expand the design problem spaceand measure differences in engineering students’ brain.Research QuestionsBoth
inclusion that did not engage topics such as racism, sexism, heterosexism, classism, etc. For example, we would exclude a paper that mentions the word diversity once, in the context of serving a diverse student population, and does not mention or engage with that topic further. ● Does the paper contain reflection and/or critical engagement that we could use to inform our practice?We set out to gather papers that were published in two journals, one open access and onesubscription-based, on DEI topics over a period of 10 years, and evaluate them based on ourcriteria. We also were curious if some of the authors we consider foundational to ourunderstanding of DEI in librarianship were being cited by authors in these journals
maximizethe impact. How are the changes affecting the library’s services and resources? What are thelibrary’s vision and plans for the future? This case study will address these questions and talk indetail about the changes that have been implemented, how they have been accomplished, theobstacles that were faced, and how the library is moving forward.IntroductionThis paper is a case study on transformational changes underway at the University of Michigan'sArt, Architecture and Engineering Library (AAEL). These changes reflect forces impacting thebroader institutional and higher education landscape. Libraries are a unique entity in academia,encompassing four core areas: space, collections, services, and expertise. Engineering librarieshave been
fromdecisions, one can also imagine oneself in the position of other stakeholders in the process, notmerely attributing cost-benefit to their position, but actually imagining oneself being affected bythe decision. The process of moral deliberation is also about reconstructing selves, our thoughts,and habits [3]. The ability to imagine oneself in a different role is important in realisticevaluations of scenarios that may include envisioning a future self, such as a student seeingthemselves in an entry level engineering position, or that engineer seeing themselves in amanagement position. When reflecting on a scenario one has been in and the relations to ascenario that has not been experienced, the discussion can be much richer and include
students think they are good. The metacognitive awareness of learningstrategies in college students was discussed in a paper by McCabe [20]. Students are not aware of whatthey know and don’t know, thus the clinging to the rereading and mass practice. Students claim to knowthe material and are confounded when the test results don’t reflect that. In fact, Callender andMcDaniel [21] found in four separate experiments that rereading does not improve recall or testinggrades: one group reading once vs one group reading twice. Groups read three texts once or twice witha set of unrelated problem solving between the reading and the testing, and the last group read thematerial once or twice with the first text material tested immediately and the second text
. The research group has expanded access to systems research to a broader group of students, many of whom have continued in the field. The assessment revealed that students are benefitting from the knowledge acquired and exchanged within the research group. This report is designed to share approaches we have implemented thus far, outcomes, and a reflection on areas for future improvement. KeywordsUndergraduate research, diversity, inclusion, computer systems, practical skills, high impactpractices. 1 IntroductionThe field of computer systems has a woefully low representation of women and people ofcolor. Our research team is designed to broaden participation in computer systems byproviding a positive undergraduate research experience. Early
where teachers cannot easily visit the host site, andprogram directors are challenged to visit participants’ home classrooms.The ITS-RET program utilized a variety of “in-program” evaluation instruments, to include preand (immediately) post participation surveys, research mentor surveys, assessment of lessonplans, observation of classroom implementation during the summer camp, and open-endednarrative reflections provided by participants at the end of the program. Participant responses toprogram evaluation instruments during the summer was analyzed for the purpose ofcharacterizing teachers’ primary motivations for participating in the RET program, changes intheir confidence levels in engaging with Science and Engineering Practices from the
organization of their report (WA in Table 1, Appendix B). Thisassignment also directs students to a language unit from the CE Writing Project, Sequence ofInformation [27], which provides more information and specific strategies they can use to addresswriting organization. Grading is based on their reverse outline and their reflections about theirreport, and the assignment leads into submission of their revised lab report the following week. Inother writing assignments, we draw on other units from the CE Writing Project that encouragestudents to think about the discourse conventions within the field of civil engineering [24]. Forexample, students are asked to identify places in their own writing that show the desired property,such as conciseness, and
of the COVID-19 pandemic, to the current year’s team concentrating onimplementing sensors in the hand and refining the ergonomics of the existing design. The paperwill also include student & faculty reflection and discussion of the faculty facilitation needed forsuch a service-based project and how engineering educators can consider implementing suchprojects into their programs.IntroductionInterdisciplinary team-based projects in engineering education are an approach to experientiallearning which can provide students with a diverse learning opportunity to work closely withindividuals from different disciplines [1, 2, 3]. Some of the benefits of participating on aninterdisciplinary team include unique solutions to solving complex problems
. According to the NationalResearch Council [3] and Savey [4], inquiry-based learning (IBL) is a pedagogical approach inwhich students begin with a question followed by investigating the solutions, reflecting, andcommunicating findings, and creating new knowledge based on the collected evidence. IBL hasbeen widely adopted in science education because of its great potential to facilitate more positivestudent attitudes and a deeper understanding of scientific concepts [5], [6]. Additionally, accordingto Specht et al [7], inquiry-based learning has been increasingly suggested as an efficient approachfor fostering students’ curiosity and motivation by linking science teaching in schools withinformal learning and phenomena in everyday life. To ensure the
university setting. The success of an advanced digital design course deliveredusing a remote Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) lab inspired the creation of anintroductory digital logic curriculum for 2-year community college and high school students. TheBEADLE curriculum is designed to prepare students for a junior-level course in computerengineering at a 4-year university, where digital logic is typically taken during the first twoyears. To evaluate the curriculum, we offered it to a sophomore class on digital logic design at a4-year public university and collected pre- and post-assignment surveys to gauge understandingof the material. Reflection pieces were also used to evaluate the students' approach and level ofcomprehension. In this paper
essentially more of a coaching ratherthan correcting[2], and collaboration with communication experts for training is one approach todevelop more efficient and purposeful grading rubrics. The goal of rubrics is to reflect the skillstargeted in the assignment in order to effectively evaluate technical communication[2].In previous work, the lead instructors for a two-part series of senior-level chemical engineeringunit operations laboratory courses worked with the Writing Center on campus to developassignments and activities targeted at specific technical communication skills[9]. Through thiscollaboration, preliminary rubrics were developed to assess communication skills tied to learningoutcomes. These rubrics were constructed based on reflecting what
can help.’”The article referenced is a collection of excerpts from the book “Peer-to-Peer Leadership:Transforming Student Culture” by Aaron Thompson, Greg Metz, and Joseph B. Cuseo. Contentsections summarized include Why Peer Leadership Matters in the 21st Century, The Importanceof Social Capital, The Power of Peer Leadership, and Positive Outcomes Associated with PeerLeadership. In the content referenced as the most impactful reading of the practicum, leadershipis undeniably linked to peer mentorship, yet the connection was missed in PL reflection. As thePeer Leader Practicum further develops, activities and discussions should reinforce theimportance of leadership development within the practice of peer mentorship.Peer Leaders Self-Identify
group, selected to better ensure that content on diversity andinclusivity is well-integrated into the course in a meaningful and effective manner. This contentincludes interviews with industry professionals who themselves can effectively represent diverseperspectives; readings selected from texts on engineering failures resulting from a lack ofinclusivity (“missing voices”) in design, and case studies on the impact of locating high risktechnologies and facilities in socio-economically disadvantaged areas (often correlated with largeminority populations). Students are asked to reflect on factors which impact their own values aswell as those of engineers who design, site and implement technologies. DIV learning outcomesto be achieved via the
know”. Some codes appear both in theFacilitators and the Barriers data, with different interpretation: for example, prep coded a response to thebarriers question when a student said they didn’t feel adequately prepared to succeed in their next class,and it coded a response to the confidence question when the student reflect on the extent to which thepreparation that they do have equips them for success.A. Most frequent categories for facilitators and barriersWhen coding responses of CSE majors in the eight participating classes to the question: What makes youfeel good about your plans to take the next course in this sequence?, the most frequently seen category wasKnowledge, which includes the codes prep and cs-skills. Students feel confident