?,” Bioscience, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 159–165, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2006)056[0159:ITARAN]2.0.CO;2.[7] S. E. DeChenne, K. Lesseig, S. M. Anderson, S. L. Li, N. L. Staus, and C. Barthel, “Toward a Measure of Professional Development for Graduate Student Teaching Assistants,” J. Eff. Teach., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 4–19, 2012.[8] K. A. Richards, J. D. Velasquez, and L. B. Payne, “The Influence of a College Teaching Workshop Series on Teaching Assistant Perceptions of Preparedness and Self-efficacy.” ASEE Conferences, San Antonio, Texas, doi: 10.18260/1-2--22072.[9] S. L. Young and A. M. Bippus, “Assessment of Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) Training: A Case Study of a Training Program and Its Impact on GTAs
systematic review of the literature from 2011 to 2021,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 114, pp. 1–17, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101996.[4] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study,” Sci. Educ., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 493–534, 2004, doi: 10.1002/sce.10131.[5] H. Thiry, T. J. Weston, S. L. Laursen, and A.-B. Hunter, “The Benefits of Multi-Year Research Experiences: Differences in Novice and Experienced Students’ Reported Gains from Undergraduate Research,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 260–272, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-11-0098.[6] R. Taraban, E. Prensky, and C. W
.[7] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. 2000.[8] H. Kathuria and D. W. Becker, “Leveraging Course Quality Checklist to Improve Online Courses,” J. Teach. Learn. with Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 400–407, 2021, doi: 10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.31253.[9] D. Kurnia Tari and D. Rosana, “Contextual Teaching and Learning to Develop Critical Thinking and Practical Skills,” 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012102.[10] K. D. Tanner, “Promoting student metacognition.,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 113–120, 2012, doi: 10.1187/CBE.12-03-0033.[11] B. Oakley, B. Rogowsky, and T. Sejnowski, Uncommon sense teaching
Engineering Students’ Desire to Discuss Racial Injustice in the Classroom and Faculty Anxieties,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2021.[4] K. Cokley et al., “The COVID-19/racial injustice syndemic and mental health among Black Americans: The roles of general and race-related COVID worry, cultural mistrust, and perceived discrimination,” J Community Psychol, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 2542–2561, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jcop.22747.[5] D. B. G. Tai, I. G. Sia, C. A. Doubeni, and M. L. Wieland, “Disproportionate Impact of COVID-19 on Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in the United States: a 2021 Update,” J Racial Ethn Health Disparities, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2334–2339, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40615
between Communication- Conflict Interaction and Project Success Among Construction Project Teams,” International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1466-1482, 2017.[10] A. P. C. Chan, D. C. Ho, and C. M. Tam, “Effect of Inter-Organizational Teamwork on Project Outcome,” Journal of Management in Engineering ASCE, 17(1), 34–40, 2001.[11] S. Senaratne and A. Hapuarachchi, “Construction Project Teams and Their Development: Case Studies in Sri Lanka,” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 5(4), 215- 224, 2009.[12] N. Azmy, “The Role of Team Effectiveness in Construction Project Teams and Project Performance,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Civil. Eng., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA, 2012.[13] B. W. Franz
participants were drawing traditional rigidrobots or soft or bioinspired robots. To analyze the results from a pilot study using this instrument, wecreated a code book of the features of drawings we were interested to understand: (a) task robot isperforming (chore task, health task, etc.), (b) colors used in the drawing, (c) is the robot “bioinspired”(animal type, features), (d) who is building robot (themselves, other person, characteristics of thatperson), (e) presence of curved surfaces vs. “blocky” robots. The analysis was conducted on deidentifieddrawings by three members of the research team for triangulation of the findings. Despite efforts to createan objective analysis method, subjectivity does come into play when viewing images. Due to
, (b) demonstrating the relevance of course content to their future careers, and (c)improving their professional networks by requiring them to connect with a professional. To complete the assignment, students teamed up in small groups (of two or three) andidentified a job that they could imagine pursuing directly after their studies. They investigateddetails about the job, e.g., typical work, salary, opportunities for remote work, work-life balance,and next professional steps beyond this job. They then connected with someone working in thisjob (or in a very similar position) to conduct an informational interview. Again, specificinformation was required: what they typically do, what they like most/least about their job, andwhat their
. Briefly explain how this process works in a thermodynamic sense? You might want to consider concepts such as temperature, partial pressure, specific and relative humidity, dew point, condensation, et cetera” Rubber is a polymer that consists of ● Psychrometric ● Plastic rubber band long chains of molecules that are Applications weakly crosslinked (i.e. there are weak bonds between adjacent chains). The figure below shows schematic diagrams of rubber when it is (a) relaxed (unstretched), and (b) stretched. Recall that the entropy change of closed system can be written as , where σ is the entropy production. Recall also the “increase of entropy” principle: σ = ΔSsystem + ΔSsurroundings ≥ 0. A
Journal of Engineering Education, 43(6), 927–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1462766Faber, C., & Benson, L. C. (2017). Engineering students' epistemic cognition in the context of problem- solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 677–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20183Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, 'big data' and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377417Godwin, A. (2017). Unpacking Latent Diversity. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, OH. https://peer.asee.org/29062Godwin, A., Benedict, B., Rohde
: 10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137.[15] B. A. Burt, “Toward a Theory of Engineering Professorial Intentions: The Role of Research Group Experiences,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 289–332, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.3102/0002831218791467.[16] J. Seniuk Cicek, P. Sheridan, L. Kuley, and R. Paul, “Through ‘Collaborative Autoethnography’: Researchers Explore Their Role as Participants in Characterizing the Identities of Engineering Education Graduate Students in Canada,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, Jun. 2017, p. 29029. doi: 10.18260/1-2--29029.[17] J. B. Main, L. Tan, M. F. Cox, E. O. McGee, and A. Katz, “The correlation between undergraduate student
/10.4324/9780203507711/learning-teach-higher-education-paul-ramsden-paul-ramsden. [Accessed: 05-Feb-2023].[2] A. Leite and S. A. Blanco, “Effects of Human vs. Automatic Feedback on Students’Understanding of AI Concepts and Programming Style.” [Online]. Available:https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.10653.pdf. [Accessed: 06-Feb-2023].[3] B. Hanks, S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, L. Murphy, and C. Zander, “Pair programming ineducation: A literature review.” [Online]. Available:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08993408.2011.579808. [Accessed: 05-Feb-2023].[4] R. E. Mayer, “Teaching and learning computer programming: Multiple research perspec,”30-Sep-2013. [Online]. Available:https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315044347/teaching
corporations (A, B and C) joined the grant proposal submission. Corporation A is a smallsoftware engineering corporation offering Computer Science internships. Corporation B is a smallengineering corporation specializing in wireless technologies, offering Computer Engineeringinternships. Corporation C is a large petrochemical extraction corporation offering ComputerScience and IT internships. Post award, the team pursued MOU to formalize an internship pipeline.Corporation B backed out of the partnership citing financial hardship due to the COVID-19pandemic. Corporation C did not follow up on attempts to formalize a partnership. The team spent considerable effort to find more internship hosts. One candidate was a smallstart-up, a government
collaboration, we can work towards a more inclusiveand equitable future in multiscale sustainable food system research networks, in engineeringeducation spaces, and in higher education. ReferencesAdams, M., & Bell, L. A. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203940822Cox, T. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research, and practice (1st ed). Berrett- Koehler.Deitch, E. A., Barsky, A., Butz, R. M., Chan, S., Brief, A. P., & Bradley, J. C. (2003). Subtle yet significant: The existence and impact of everyday racial discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations, 56(11), 1299–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035611002Freeman, R. B
ofthe provided glycol-water mixtures is the best engine coolant for cold weather?" Studentsanalyzed engine coolant performance between three fluids given as unknown propylene glycol-to-water ratios, simply labeled A, B, and C. They were asked to perform viscosity, specific heatcapacity, thermal conductivity, and density for each to predict the propylene glycol-to-waterratios. The students performed experimentation during the first three labs by following theprovided protocol modified from the relevant ASTM procedure. Except for the density lab, eachteam of three students was provided access to eye droppers, a precision pipette, graduatedcylinders, and a precision scale. Then they were asked to develop their own protocol to measurethe density
responses that they were willing to putlarge amounts of effort into extra credit assignments even in cases where they were only worth afew points. When asked about the factors that influence that effort, responses expanded upon thenotion of ’grade protection’ with some responses indicating that, if the time and points weresufficient, they were willing to dedicate large amounts of effort to the assignment. In particular, toprotect against falling below particular grade boundaries (e.g., B+ vs A-). Related to this, whenstudents were asked about the relationship between anxiety and the presence of extra credit,though the majority indicated through Likert responses that it had no negative impact, severalsuggested that the increase or protection in
Paper ID #38314A Case Study Investigating High School Teachers’ Implementation of anEngineering-focused Biologically Inspired Design Curriculum (FundamentalResearch)Dr. Abeera P. Rehmat, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAlexandra A. Towner, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher pro- fessional
cultural orientation: The ability to favorably evaluate cross-cultural situations. This concept is related to cosmopolitanism, reduced ethnocentrism, open-mindedness, inquisitiveness, curiosity, and respect. • Cultural self-efficacy: The ability to believe that you can achieve a goal in a cross- cultural context. b. Analyze dimensionThis dimension describes a person's capacity to take in, assess, and synthesize pertinentinformation without the prejudice of preconceived beliefs and stereotypical thinking [14]. Thesub-dimensions are self-awareness, social monitoring, perspective taking, and culturalknowledge. • Self-awareness: The ability to understand the impact of one’s own culture, values
withdrawfrom the course after the first few weeks due to the high programming requirements and difficultconcepts of data science algorithms. For example, in Fall 2021, 10 undergraduate studentsenrolled in this course in the beginning but 3 of them ended up dropping the course. ii) Thequality of the course projects of undergraduate students is much lower than that of graduatestudents in general. Based on students’ feedback, this is mostly because a) the undergraduatestudents have limited research experience and b) some of the undergraduate students need tospend lots of time and effort getting familiar with programming. What’s worse, the situation isn’tgetting better in Fall 2022 compared to Fall 2021 despite the efforts being made to designsimpler
)References 1. Connor K, Kelly J, Scott C, Chouikha M, Newman D, Gullie K, Ndoye M, Dabipi I, Graves C, Zhang L, Osareh A, Albin S, Geddis D, Andrei P, Lacy F, Majlesein H, Eldek A, Attia J, Astatke Y, Yang S, Jiang L, Oni B, Zein-Sabatto S “Experiment Centric Pedagogy – Improving the HBCU Engineering Student Learning Experience,” ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, June 2018, USA. 2. Connor K, Scott C, Korte R, Sullivan B, Velez-Reyes M “Mini-Workshop Series for Minority Serving Institutions with ECE Programs,” ASEE Virtual Conference 2021 3. Connor K, Scott C, Chouikha M, Leigh-Mack P, Sullivan B, Kelly J, Goodnick S, Smith M, Klein M, Abraham S, Oni B, Ososanya E, Eldek A, Yang S, Erives H, Joslyn C
interview participants were chosenbased on four criteria: a) participants must be undergraduate students; b) participants must beengineering students; c) participants recruited for the think-aloud have some representationacross different race and ethnic groups and d) participants need to have completed an internshipor undergraduate research experience. In total, eight engineering students were interviewed. Fourof the participants identified as men, three participants identified as women and one participantidentified as nonbinary. Two participants identified as White, four participants identified asAsian, one participant identified as Latino, one participant identified as Indigenous, and oneparticipant identified as Black. Five of the eight students
mental health problems in PhD students," Research policy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 868-879, 2017.[6] R. L. Bonner, C. B. Stone, S. Mittal, W. Phillips, and R. L. Utecht, "Preparing academics to teach: Example of a structured method of preparing doctoral students in business programs to teach," Journal of Management Education, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 435-463, 2020.[7] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, "Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education," Nature biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282- 284, 2018.[8] J. Posselt, "Normalizing struggle: Dimensions of faculty support for doctoral students and implications for persistence and well-being," The Journal of
Paper ID #38239Identifying curriculum factors that facilitate lifelong learning inalumni career trajectories: Stage 2 of a sequential mixed-methods studyNikita Dawe, University of Toronto PhD student in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto, Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education.Dr. Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching and Associate Director, ISTEP (Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice) at the University of Toronto.Amy Bilton ©American Society for
“takes into account socioeconomic realities and issensitive to cultural differences.” (www.ewb-usa.org). And finally, the ABET accreditation bodyrecently included the two following learning outcomes into their criteria: a) “produce solutionsthat meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well asglobal, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors,” and b) “create a collaborativeand inclusive environment” [3].Engineering programs have responded to these developments by designing curricula thatconsolidates these factors in their technical frameworks [4-7], using a variety of approaches,including problem-based learning [8], project-based learning [9], and service learning [10].Outcomes using these
, doi: 10.1007/s40299-018-0400-7.[17] K. E. Brinkley-Etzkorn, “Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence offaculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens,” InternetHigh Educ, vol. 38, pp. 28–35, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.004.[18] B. Bos, “Professional development for elementary teachers using TPACK,”Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 167–183,2011.[19] Y. W. Chen, B. E. Johnson, M. Pool, S. Shehab, and B. Johnson, “Engagement inPractice: Toward Building University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign’s Multi-Disciplinary Service-Learning Ecosystem,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2022.[20] G. E. Gardner and M. G. Jones, “Pedagogical
students in the United States," Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 45-55, 2002.[9] S. A. Lee, H. S. Park, and W. Kim. "Gender differences in international students’ adjustment." College Student Journal, vol. 43, no. 4, p. 1217+, 2009.[10] K. Bussey, "Gender identity development," in Handbook of identity theory and research, S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles, Ed. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011, pp. 603-628.[11] J. H. Hitchcock, S. Sarkar, B. K. Nastasi, G. Burkholder, K. Varjas, and A. Jayasena, "Validating culture and gender-specific constructs: A mixed-method approach to advance assessment procedures in cross-cultural settings," Journal of Applied School
placebo. Innovation,Science, Environmental, Special Edition: Charting Sustainable Development in Canada (2007),106-130.4. Beder, S. (1989). Educating ecologically sustainable engineers. Education Links, (37), 24-25.5. Lemkowitz, S. M., Bibo, B. H., Lameris, G. H., & Bonnet, J. A. B. A. F. (1996). From smallscale, short term to large scale, long term: integrating ‘sustainability' into engineering education.European Journal of Engineering Education, 21(4), 353-386.6.Elms, D. G. (1996). The Environmentally Educated Engineer: Findings on Fundamentals. WITTransactions on Ecology and the Environment, 17.7.Gunn, I. W. (1996). Education For Attainability Through Engineering. WIT Transactions on.Ecology and the Environment, 17.8.Vanderburg, W.H. (1999
literature,” Hisp. J. Behav. Sci., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 174–203, 2021.[3] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, The integration of the humanities and arts with sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education: Branches from the same tree. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2018. doi: 10.17226/24988.[4] C. G. Velez-Ibanez and J. B. Greenberg, “Formation and Transformation of funds of knowledge among U.S.-Mexican households,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 313– 335, 1992.[5] L. C. Moll, C. Amanti, D. Neff, and N. Gonzalez, “Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms,” Theory Pract., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 132–141, 1992.[6] A. C. Barton, E
,” American Sociological Review, April 2009.[3] Hunt, V.; Layton, D.; and Prince, S., Diversity Matters [Public Report, McKinsey & Company, Online], Feb. 2, 2015. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business functions/people and organizational performance/our insights/why diversity matters/diversity matters.pdf. [Accessed Aug. 5 2021].[4] Noland, M.; Moran, T.; and Kotschwar, B., “Is Gender Diversity Profitable? Evidence from a Global Survey,” [Peterson Institute for International Economics, Working Paper Series, WP 16-3], February, 2016. Available: https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/wp16-3.pdf. [Accessed Aug. 5, 2021.][5] Watson, W.E. ; Johnson, L.; Zgourides, G.D., “The
. Andrews and J. Playfoot, Education and Training for the Oil and Gas Industry: Building A Technically Competent Workforce. Elsevier, 2014.[4] R. A. Berkley and D. M. Kaplan, Strategic training and development. Los Angeles : London: SAGE, 2020.[5] LinkedIn Learning, “2023 Workplace Learning Report: Building the Agile Future,” LinkedIn, San Diego, CA, 2023. Accessed: Feb. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://learning.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/learning/en-us/pdfs/workplace-learning- report/LinkedIn-Learning_Workplace-Learning-Report-2023-EN.pdf[6] National Universities Commission, “Engineering and Technology,” NUC CCMAS, Dec. 27, 2022. https://nuc-ccmas.ng/engineering-and-technology/ (accessed Feb. 27, 2023).[7] B. V. Koen
Engineering Task Self-Efficacy on Engineering Students Through an Intersectional Lens.” [Online]. Available: http://epicenter.stanford.edu/[2] E. S. Adjapong, I. P. Levy, and C. Emdin, “EMPOWERING GIRLS OF COLOR THROUGH AUTHENTIC SCIENCE INTERNSHIPS,” 2016.[3] A. Patel, A. Bulger, K. Jarrett, S. Ginwright, K. B. Chandran, and J. M. Wyss, “Summer Research Internships Prepare High School Students for 21st Century Biomedical Careers,” The Journal of STEM Outreach, vol. 4, no. 1, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.15695/jstem/v4i1.13.[4] A. J. Gonsalves, A. S. Cavalcante, E. D. Sprowls, and H. Iacono, “‘Anybody can do science if they’re brave enough’: Understanding the role of science capital in science majors’ identity trajectories