to the completion of IE/ME degree; 6. Have declared Industrial Engineering or Mechanical Engineering as their major; 7. Demonstrate financial need as defined by the US Department of Education rules for need-based federal financial aid - Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA).Based on this requirement, the scholars are selected from current students, not freshmen. SCOPEScholars are expected to receive enhanced mentoring and participate extracurricularactivities. They must participate in activities including: 1. Career mentoring – Scholars must meet with a professor to discuss resumes, internships and career planning. 2. Outreach and advisement – Scholars must meet with a professor to discuss academic performance and
thinking. Theexhibit has three stations of unplugged (non-technology based) and plugged (technology-based)activities: (1) Play Structure (Figure 17), (2) Plan It!/Test It! (Figure 18) and (3) Computer-basedcoding game (Figure 19). In all of the activities, children have to help a robot find the quickestroute to deliver medicine to three animals. At one station, children pretend to be the robot anddeliver medicine themselves, whereas at the other stations, they provide instructions (i.e., code)to the robot to deliver medicine. The exhibit is designed to mainly promote CT as a problem-solving process, and emphasizes three CT competencies: Problem Decomposition, Algorithmsand Procedures and Debugging/Troubleshooting. However, our research findings
, learning from failures, sales pitches, systemscaling, and taking action versus over-planning. Typically, one active learning exercise wasincorporated into each course meeting throughout the semester. Students anecdotally respondedwith positive enthusiasm to the activities with interest in pursuing entrepreneurship in addition toengineering. Overall, the integration of the EM activities equipped the course instructors withuseful tools to engage the students in the course content, generate excitement for a future inengineering, and develop EM skills beneficial for a successful career.IntroductionThe University of Mount Union utilizes a two-semester first-year engineering sequence. One ofthe four pillars of the Mount Union Engineering programs is the
. They said they planned to use morehands-on activities to increase student engagement and foster resiliency and persistence.Teachers suggested multiple ways they would use their learning from the project to createpositive change. They said that they would use knowledge from the project to inspire students toattend college and consider degree programs related to mathematics and science. They also saidthe program would allow them to appreciate their own capacity for making lasting change instudents’ lives, increase student engagement and creativity in their classrooms, enable students tobecome more independent learners, and facilitate students becoming better citizens as theyrecognized their capacity to help solve problems.The Making Inspired by
scaled test.This study required the students to utilize engineering knowledge and practices to design andconstruct the tower using easily accessible materials and tools. The tower was constructed perthe 2018 Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) Seismic Design Competition rulesand guidelines defining the design details and the two ground motions applied. As the studentsdid not plan to enter into the EERI SDC, they designed beyond the guideline restrictions to testthe use of seismic isolators. The tower was experimentally tested using the Shake Table II byQuanser available at SFSU with and without isolators. This project built upon the students’background in structural analysis, design, and mechanical vibrations. However, their
who may not be tracking a lesson with theirpeers.Figure 4 All but one of the students in the Mursion classroom have an answer to a math problemFigure 5 A student becomes visibly frustrated because he does not understand how to solve a problemICSAs in Science Methods CourseIn the science methods course, each student has the chance to lead the course through three talks.In the first talk, they discuss planning and carrying out investigations in which they walk theirpeers or the Mursion students through a probe prompting them to think about how they woulddesign an experiment to test a hypothesis. In the second talk, they will walk the class throughinterpreting and analyzing data from an experiment. In the third talk, they will lead the
program; Section 3 describes the first-year implementation, including recruitment andmentor development, as well as findings through focus group meetings. Section 4 presents theaction plans for the future based on what we learned through the first-semester assessment data.2. Overview of CAPS ProgramFunded by NSF, CAPS is a 5-year project that emphasizes broadening the participation ofunderrepresented minority students including female students, by helping ECST scholarsgraduate faster and with better academic records. The program aims to 1) ensure that 50% ofscholars graduate in 5 years which is 4 times higher than our college’s current graduation rate;and 2) ensure that 90% of scholars retain their scholarships year to year. In addition
model with remedial coursework needed,students may enter ahead of schedule when high schools and two-year community colleges worktogether to provide the skills that students need. Providing a more focused mathematicalfoundation for students who need help at both levels will create an environment that is moreconducive to finish university coursework at the expected or even an accelerated pace (with dualcredit and AP courses). Future recommendations include studying math programs at the highschool and two-year college levels that provide the ability to close achievement gaps, especiallythose experienced by minority students.Our Math Department plans to continue to offer math refresher courses and increase availabletutoring. In the mean time we
informationgathered about each participant to create a backdrop and contextual setting to complement theinterview data, 2) performing a narrative analysis method of the interview data and open codingthe emergent themes, and 3) constructing narrative stories that present themes and results. Anoverview of the study’s data analysis and management plan and the results of each step aresummarized in Table 3. The following paragraphs detail the steps in the data analysis process.Table 3. Summary of Data Analysis and Management Plan Data Analysis Step Action Result 1. Create a contextual Write backdrop summaries for each One backdrop summary backdrop summary
typical communities of practice, one approachhas been to enable the community to engage using the internet, or virtually. Aside from thecrucial aspect of online communities meeting in a virtual setting to develop their practice throughcollaboration without the limitations of travel cost (time and money),10 they have other keyfeatures not indicative of face-to-face or co-located communities. They are typically designedtop-down, members do not typically know each other, leadership is chosen or recruited,communication is generally through the use of computers, development of the community takestime, and they require technological support for effective community.14 These communities,therefore, require a fair amount of planning and organizing. Finding
order to prevent academic dishonesty. Our system currently supports C programs and we plan to extend it to other languages in the near future. The execution engine is a Docker container. The system automatically generates Makefileto compile and link the source code. When a program is tested, the system invokes a set of analysis programs, for example, Valgrindto detect invalid memory access. If a program terminates abnormally, the system invokes gdband reports the call stack information. The system also allows modular testing. An instructor provides the correct answers for the functions needed for a programming assignment. After a student
, teachers completed an evaluation survey for that day’s workshopsessions. Those results are aggregated in Figure 2. The teachers had a positive workshopexperience and rated all aspects of the workshop positively. The participants’ ratings were mostpositive for sessions on writing research plans, overviews of the rules of S&E fairs, and datacollection. Teachers were also very positive about the hands on activities, including a teambuilding exercise that kicked off the week (the Marshmallow Challenge10) and producing theirown S&E fair projects. One thing teachers were less enthusiastic about was presenting theirposters to the other workshop participants. When the teachers were asked what topics theyneeded more help with, many mentioned
opportunities for VP outside of class.” “The VP system was effective at encouraging class discussion. In my opinion, the system can be improved by adding a counter that shows the points needed to advance to the next level.”4.3 Quests and GamerCardStudents were generally positive regarding the use of quests as assignments and how they weredisplayed on GamerCard. Students reported that having all assignments for the semesteravailable in one list on GamerCard was a good resource and allowed them to plan out theirefforts during the semester.4.4 Achievements/Titles/ClassesIn comparing GamerCard to other gamification systems (such as Fitocracy [8] or even karmarating systems for online discussion cites such as Reddit), the almost unified opinion that
component as an integral part of the system; 3- Real-time evaluation of resources (i.e., time, money, human, etc.) as the system develops; 4- Assurance that when the system is realized, it meets Specific, Meaningful and Measurable goals (referred to in industry as SMM); and 5- Quantification of risk and mitigation plans (e.g., multiple options for an interface).Thus, the System Level Diagram approach is not only integrated within the synthesis andanalysis phases, but it also serves as a team integration tool that compels students to discuss andcommunicate together on regular basis. Additionally, it can be used during procurement andmanufacturing by setting ordering and fabrication plans since it shows dependency relationshipsbetween
paper presents results to date from a dissertation study on undergraduate student cross-disciplinary teamwork. The study focuses on a team of undergraduate students from technicaland non-technical disciplines such as, engineering, management, economics, architecture, andpsychology, working together on a cross-disciplinary project. The project was primarily student-led, and was facilitated by two faculty mentors in mechanical engineering and management. Theteam spent the semester working together to develop a business plan for a makerspace oncampus that would allow students access to prototyping equipment, such as 3D printers, at littleto no cost.This study utilized a qualitative research approach, borrowing from ethnographic, narrative, andcase
students feedback, thedesigners were able to troubleshoot few software related issues and clean up few “bugs”.The learning system is hosted by Michigan Tech and made freely available for anybody aroundthe world to use over the Internet. At Michigan Tech, we plan to integrate the materials into highschool outreach programs and into PLC courses. College and other interested instructors orstudents will be able to use the material independently or in conjunction with a class. When thesystem is used in conjunction with a class, instructors will be able to connect with their studentsand monitor their progress. Given the remote location of Michigan Tech, this online PLCeducation system will allow us to reach a much larger audience. We will solicit
inunderstanding how engineering helps people address real world issues. Figure 2 provides asummary of responses to the questions related to student affect.Class impact on your attitudes 3. As a result of your work in this class, what GAINS DID no gains a little gain moderate gain good gain great gain not applicable YOU MAKE in the following? 3.1 Enthusiasm for the subject 3.2 Interest in discussing the subject area with friends or family 3.3 Interest in taking or planning to take additional classes in this subject 3.4 Confidence that you understand the material 3.5 Willingness to seek help from others (teacher, peers, TA) when working on academic problems 3.6 Possess an aesthetic and technical appreciation for bridges, towers, shells, and other
has ME and PhD in Civil Engineering from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Dr. Shettar has over 30 years’ experience in engineering education and administration. His expertise lies in strategic planning and institutional development, Engineering Education Research and Industry -Institute Society interaction in regional development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Developing a First-Year Engineering Course at a University in India: International Engineering Education Collaboration Walter M. McDonald, Daniel S. Brogan, Vinod K. Lohani, Gopalkrishna H. Joshi, Ashok S. ShettarAbstract: This paper presents the results of collaborative efforts between
computational intelligence, monitoring, communication technology,infrastructure, and decision support systems. The automation and components needed to ensurethat the SG guarantees adaptability and capabilities are discussed in depth, the interoperability ofrenewable energy sources and components are presented and discussed, ensuring minimumchanges in the existing power system legacy. Standards needed for designing new SG devicesand products are also included. This paper presents the thought process behind the establishmentand implementation of a stacked upper division undergraduate and graduate level courses onsmart grid fundamentals planned to be offered at the authors’ institutions. The course is alsointended for professionals already working in
energy and energy efficiencyat Drexel University. The goal of the new course is to develop advanced knowledge to meetevolving workforce demands, expanding opportunities for professional advancement, or pursuinga managerial position in green energy manufacturing3. To support this goal, the new course isintended to enable students to make green decisions when selecting and implementing asustainable design plan for a particular industrial application through an in-depth understanding ofnewly emerging green energy manufacturing. One of the key challenges in developing thelaboratory course is an emphasis on hands-on experience for enhancing student learning on greenenergy manufacturing. To provide life cycle experience, simulations with an industry
software and being implementedinto the mechanics of material project for the first time this semester. Therefore, we areexpecting to receive many suggestions and feedbacks at the end of the semester to furtherimprove the software as well as teaching paradigm. Furthermore, we are already planning to addthe following features to VML software. 1) Real-time tracking and deformation evaluation function: Current version of VML does not have the function to conduct real-time image capture and analysis. With a low-cost, high-quality web camera available today, VML can be turned into a real- time 2D strain measurement software. A real-time strain measurement and data visualization can lead a better
face 17.Challenges include an increased workload for faculty, at least initially, cultural and technicalbarriers, working in dual environments, and the need for student self-discipline 16.Further StudyThis is a study in progress. There are several avenues of further study planned. First, we intendto dig still deeper to find causes for the differences we have found. One way to do this is to lookat results by course and delivery type to see if any courses are contributing disproportionally tothe differences we see. We also plan to look at end of course student evaluations. One problemthat we have encountered here is that a different instrument was used for online evaluations. Wewill create a cross walk and match questions in the survey where we
. Surveys of the student attendees as well as some of the presenters wereperformed to assess various measures of self-efficacy. Surveys indicated that the event wassuccessful in promoting self-efficacy.IntroductionThis paper discusses the Robotics Competition and Family Science Fair for grades 4-8 sponsoredby the Latino STEM Alliance, which was held at the end of the school year in an inner cityneighborhood in Boston.. In it, we will discuss the motivation for this event, its planning, itsexecution, its assessment, and next steps in the partnership between Latino STEM Alliance andSuffolk University.BackgroundEvidence has shown that robotics programs can encourage interest among underrepresentedgroups and others in studying STEM 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Prelim + Mulligan Candidacy Exam/process ProposalFormulating research Research writing +plan Proposal Rewriting or Real World Conference + "TheData Collection
: jose.fontan1@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.eduDr. Omar I. Molina-Bas, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez Campus Omar I. Molina Bas, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Unit Coordinator Construction Engineering and Man- agement Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus email: omar.molina1@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.edu/molina.htmlProf. Tim L. Mrozowski, Michigan State University Tim Mrozowski A.I.A., LEED R AP BDC, is the Program Leader and a Professor of Construction Man- agement, in the School of Planning, Design and Construction at Michigan State University. He conducts research on construction management, sustainability and energy. Recent research and outreach projects include
skill.16Questioning students is critical for guiding their reasoning as well. Questions can be inserted atmultiple points in the learning process, such as during self-directed instruction with web-based,flipped-classroom materials; progress reviews; or team-based problem solving efforts in theclassroom.11 Prodding students to articulate answers drives them towards completion of a task.15Prompting them with questions that require explanation and justification of their solutions atdifferent phases of the project, as during frequent progress reviews, can assist them in planning,monitoring, and evaluating.19 Therefore, requiring students to develop coherent argumentsscaffolds them in solving ill-structured problems and also provides one of the best
director of Engineering Leadership and as an instructor in Engineering Science at Penn State. Erdman has chaired the local Jaycees, Department of Social Services Advisory Council, GE Share Board, and Curling Club; and served on the Human Services Planning Council, United Way, Chamber of Commerce, and Capital Fund Drive Boards of Directors. Erdman has also lectured on leadership topics at Penn State and RPI. He has served on the Penn State College of Engineering Advisory Council, helped establish an Alumni Advisory Board, and currently serves as the President of the College of Engineering Alumni Society. Affiliations include the Penn State Alumni Association, Centre County Chapter Board of Directors, President’s Club
sure to reach out to theEngineering DepartmentIn an academic setting, reaching out to faculty to determine the information needs of boththem and their students is one of many aspects of a librarian’s duties. An engineeringlibrarian in a college/university setting is no different, whether the librarian works as part of amain library or in a separate engineering library. Nelson has developed an extensivemarketing plan of the engineering library at Purdue University where outreach to faculty isone of many facets6. At Dalhousie University, Dooley recognizes that working with facultycan build “mutually beneficial outcomes” for both librarian and faculty that may lead to bothparties seeing each other as equals in the university setting 7.Subclaim
are generally in support of real-world university research programs or otherfunding agencies, providing much needed external motivation (monetary and pride) to spur success.In such a system, these three entities are very much dependent upon the ability of the other two formission success. Similar to that of a circus performer spinning three plates on sticks, it takes a tightlycoordinated planning effort and execution to ensure success – timing is everything. A similar case canbe made for the need for an inexpensive technology to accomplish the UAS/sensor integration. If anyof these requirements (time, money, personnel) in any category cannot be met, the project will likelynever commence and a valuable opportunity may be lost. Rapid
innovative teaching and learning practices derive directly from the outcomes assessment plan that he helped devise and implement as ABET Coordinator. Address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad del Turabo, PO Box 3030, Gurabo, Puerto Rico, 00778. Tel. 787-743-7979 x 4182 E-mail: jcmorales@suagm.eduDr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student misconceptions and how to increase the adoption of research- based instructional strategies by college instructors