) and CENG 2353 Measurements (MatLAB andprogramming) (Fig 2). CENG 2353 was increased by an additional credit hour (wasCENG 2253, Fig 1) to accomplish the additional computer application requirements. Anadditional credit hour was already being quietly consumed since most students weretaking Technology’s three credit hour course TECH 1300 AutoCAD as a replacement forthe CENG 1201 two credit hour course that had not been offered due to limited CEdepartmental resources (Fig 1). This change now became permanent leaving oneadditional credit hour for CENG 3434 (Fig 2).The updated curriculum requires a student to take one course in each of the seventraditional sub-disciplines of CE and allows them to take a second course in five sub-disciplines
AC 2012-3077: ONE OR MANY? ASSESSING DIFFERENT DELIVERYTIMING FOR INFORMATION RESOURCES RELEVANT TO ASSIGN-MENTS DURING THE SEMESTER. A WORK-IN-PROGRESSProf. Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amy Van Epps, M.S.L.S., M.Eng., is an Associate Professor of library science and Engineering Librarian and Coordinator of Instruction at the Siegesmund Engineering Library, Purdue University. Her research interests include information literacy, effective teaching, and integration methods for information literacy into the curriculum and ethical writing skills of engineering students.Ms. Megan R. Sapp Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan Sapp Nelson is Associate Professor of library sciences at Purdue
MechanicalEngineering Program at this university houses a 1500 sq. ft. active and immersive virtual reality(VR) lab. The VR lab consists of three rear projection walls providing an interactionenvironment of 14ft by 14ft area. The VR environment provides optical tracking integrated withthree-dimensional digital stereoscopic projection to facilitate immersive VR experience.IntroductionThe use of virtual reality (VR) in engineering education is expanding due to the widespreadutilization of VR in industry. There is evidence that constituents of engineering programs acrossthe globe are demanding VR literacy in engineering curriculum. VR has been extensively usedin product development visualization as a fast substitute to rapid prototyping [1]. More emphasishas been
students might react to an engineering experience—what will be new for students and where might students need scaffolding or support? (p. 204)The professional learning activities created for our institute may be used as a model to empowerteachers to develop and adapt standards-aligned curriculum to incorporate engineering design.This is especially important in the era of STEM integration, where instructional models varywidely. Ostensibly, the four foundational fields of STEM – science, technology, engineering andmathematics – interact and overlap
continued to be provided for three successive summers. A total of 39 girls participated in thetwo-week half day virtual program in the summer of 2021; 25 girls completed the one-week full day in-person program in the summer of 2022; and 23 girls engaged in the two-week half day in-person programin the summer of 2023. Total contact hours for all three iterations of the camp were the same. Bailey et al.(2023) provides a complete description of the 2021 and 2022 implementations.CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE TEACHING ENHANCES LEARNING CYBERSECURITY 2 The FACS program curriculum focused on six cybersecurity concepts: Confidentiality, Integrity,Availability, Defense in Depth, Think Like an Adversary, and Keep it Simple. Topics concerning onlinesafety
to demonstrate the professional HE teaching competencies and values expressed and required by ILTHE and SEDA. ‚ Be able to describe, interpret, evaluate, and reflect on their teaching practice in a theoretically coherent manner.2.1.3 Structure of the programThe program moves through three stages of professional development for university teaching:foundations, scholarship and reflection, respectively, in three compulsory modules althoughthese themes are also integrated within each module. An overview is given in Table 1. Furtherdetails on individual module aims, learning outcomes, structures and content can be found in(Schaefer, 2007)19. Module: Foundations of Learning & The Scholarship of Learning
collaboration betweenteaching faculty and librarians, and critical evaluation of the students’ informationcompetencies.” 10 In an environment where library instruction is sporadic and random,most assignments and bibliographic instruction are by necessity basic in nature. Librariansusing the curriculum-integrated instruction model, however, can add patent searchingassignments to junior and senior level courses, so that students can build on thecompetencies gained in freshman and sophomore assignments.VIII. Role as TrainerAs the patent and trademark librarian serves multiple roles within an organization, greateropportunities exist for all reference staff to encounter patent and trademark referencequestions. This means that patent librarians must place a
chatbots and virtual assistants can streamline communication and administrative tasks [21]. This integration could automate routine tasks as well as lead to more efficient resource management, real-time decision-making, and enhanced project outcomes. [22] 1.3 Project Management Curriculum Teaching project management in engineering higher education is crucial for preparing students for real-world challenges [23]. It equips future professionals with the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively lead projects, fostering critical thinking, problem-solving, and leadership abilities [24]. The current project management curriculum in many educational institutions often focuses on traditional methodologies, with limited exposure to the latest
real-world problems are integrated and leveraged as a vehicle to tap into students’ priorknowledge that enhances scholarship aptitudes and elucidates the usefulness of engineeringprinciples in design applications. Such pedagogical technique has been extensively implementedfor professional training in medicine and related health professions, but given its educationalversatility, various engineering educators have embraced it as an alternative solution towardsalleviating instructional quandaries [1]. Despite its potential to positively impact student learningand transform the learning environment, its utilization is not frequent amongst most engineeringeducators. The literature reports only a small number of engineering programs such as
beenmanufactured using a Haas CNC machine and aluminum stock while the mold plates are stand-ard steel plates (Figure 16). These molds have been manufactured on an industrial grade three-axis CNC machine. The milling time for the overall project is well in excess of 24 hours.Figure 16: (left) The industrial grade Haas VF 4 SS CNC machine that was used to mill theCNC block molds. (right) The CNC block mold after the CNC milling process was complete.The modular block has recently been injection molded and was deployed as an optional compo-nent of the Introduction to Mechanical Engineering course in the Spring 2016 semester. In theFall 2016 course offering, the modular block will be integrated fully into the curriculum. Table 1lists the approximate bill of
curricula which so heavily stresses rigor and technical content whilesometimes ignoring the integration of leadership competencies. However, the role of out-of-classactivities seemed to serve as an acceptable complement for this technical curriculum in theclassroom once students gained awareness of this phenomenon.Involvement in OOCAs was found to be essential to these students' leadership development, andstudents were attributing very little classroom content to leadership development. As one student,Lilly put it, “You become a leader if you’re like put in a position where you have to lead otherpeople. I wouldn’t say I went to class and like learned them [leadership skills]” . Therefore, inorder to better prepare students for their future careers
, allnecessary data was available in geospatial repositories, such as PASDA2 (Pennsylvania SpatialData Access), which did not provide a practice of planning and collecting data for suchapplications. Due to the fact that orbital imagery and aerial missions are labor and expensive foreducational purposes, the authors proposed the development and usage of an CS-TMMS forapplications related to parcels.Figure 1 provides an explanation of the steps carried out during the process of implementing thisteaching/learning strategy.1 https://naip-usdaonline.hub.arcgis.com/2 https://www.pasda.psu.edu/ Step 1: The development of the system (sensor integration and software development
with their instructor, highlighting their knowledge of the material and their experienceworking in the field.RecommendationsCollaborative programs between academia and industry such as this can produce many benefitsand opportunities for those involved and society. There are some items to consider when firstdeveloping these joint programs to meet the required expectations of all parties.When first selecting the curriculum material for these programs, it must cover a broad field of viewto make the program accessible to the most significant number of enthusiasts. The goal of thisprogram was to provide an introductory overview of the onshore wind turbine industry to itsparticipants. If the program included climb training practices, then the
lessonslearned concerning the SMI are presented.Software Engineering Technology and MathematicsThe SET program requires 28 credits of mathematics including differential, integral, and vectorcalculus, discrete mathematics and mathematical statistics. The SET program includes thepossibility of one additional elective math course in applied differential equations, linear algebra,or numerical methods for an additional 3 or 4 credits. Outside of formal math instruction,students are required to apply mathematical knowledge and skills in fundamentals courses suchas digital logic and physics, and computer science-related courses such as compiler methods.However, the JP sequence does not have an explicit math demonstration requirement. Therefore,it is uncommon
activities in undergraduate and graduate courses.Summary and ImpactThere are no existing systems that meet the requirements of delivering an engaging learningexperience with Industry 4.0 technologies in the process industry at a scope to match PurdueUniversity’s new Smart Manufacturing curriculum. It is not practical for the industry to developan educational system, nor feasible for faculty to create a genuinely representative industrialsolution. Resource and knowledge requirements are too large. A collaborative effort betweenindustry and academia provides the best opportunity to meet the challenges of producing alearning environment capable of supporting the development of a technically skilled workforcecapable of efficiently implementing the
as a group, and allowing for a post-critique of the teaching to allowthe teacher to get feedback on their teaching approach. We have created a protocol for thisapproach that we are happy to share.One key aspect to note about an FLC is the goal is not to provide a specified curriculum thatimproves teachers by prescribing skills and knowledge. Instead, the goal is for a learningcommunity to have a focused discussion with respect to a formalized theme (as prescribed by Cox[22]), with the participants helping guide the experiences.Proposed Evaluation of InterventionOur FLC organization is the mechanism by which we use board games to enable and guideteachers’ experiences of learning again in compartmentalized 2-hour meetings. Our overallresearch
and curriculums (Vossoughi & Bevan,2014).The emergence of the maker movement has led to an explosion of Makerspaces across the globe(Sheridan et al., 2014). Makerspaces are informal sites for creative production in art, science,technology and engineering, where people of all ages and experience meld digital and physicaltechnologies to explore ideas, learn technical skills and create new products (Sheridan et al.,2014; Dougherty, 2013; Lisa Brahms & Werner, 2013). In the past decade makerspaces havebeen opening in museums and science centers (Lisa Brahms & Werner, 2013), universities(Forest et al., 2014; Wilczynski, 2015; Wong & Partridge, 2016), libraries (Noh, 2015; Cao, Wu,& Stvilia, 2020), and independent non for
college of engineering to develop and lead the program. Faculty from mechanicalengineering, electrical and computer engineering and computer science departments, however,each extensively contributed to development of the program curriculum. Faculty from thesedepartments now also teach required specific courses from within their own respectivedepartments as well as the new integrated core-courses required for this engineering degree. TheBS in Robotics Engineering at Lawrence Tech is one of three known such degrees in the UnitedStates, the other two being Worchester Polytechnic Institute, the first to offer a BS in RoboticsEngineering, and University of California Santa Cruse, that also initiated a BS in RoboticsEngineering degree in the fall of
AC 2007-866: FINDING A "PLACE" FOR READING AND DISCUSSIONCOURSES: DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF "SOCIAL AND ETHICAL IMPACTSOF TECHNOLOGY"Kyle Oliver, University of Wisconsin-Madison Kyle Oliver is a graduate student in the Department of Engineering Physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.Traci Kelly, University of Wisconsin-Madison Dr. Traci Kelly is an Assistant Faculty Associate in the Department of Engineering Professional Development at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.Sandra Courter, University of Wisconsin-Madison Dr. Sandra Courter is the Director of the Engineering Learning Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.Laura Grossenbacher, University of Wisconsin-Madison Dr
that face society will likely require new ways ofthinking that can emerge by applying different disciplinary lens/viewpoints to problems. But, thedisciplinary structures in higher education, while not all bad, do not readily provide a place for studentsand faculty within these disciplines to converge. For example, assigning multiple instructors fromdifferent colleges to teach in the same room at the same time do not coincide with universitysystems/structures/values. Also, gaining curriculum approvals within a larger institution across academicunits, each with their own curriculum oversight committees, is a difficult and time-consuming process.That said, the following sections will provide an overview of this model and lessons learned from
). Page 4.316.155. Walker, J., “The Amature Scientist: Looking into the ways of water striders, the insects that walk (andrun) on water”, Sci. Amer., 349, pp897-899, (1983).6. Tucker, V. A., “Wave-making by whirligig beetles (Gyrindae), Science, 166, pp897-899, (1969).7. Sheppard, S.D., Mechanical Dissection: An Experience in How Things Work. ProceedingsEngineering Education Curriculum Innovation and Integration, Jan 6-10,1992, Santa Barbara, CA (1992).8. Petrosky H: Invention by Design: How Engineers get from Thought to Thing. Harvard UniversityPress, 242 pp, (1996)ALFRED J. BEDARD JR.Al Bedard is an adjunct associate professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He is also asupervisory physicist with the Environmental Technology Laboratory
using longitudinal data from the FE exam,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013, doi: 10.18260/1-2--22398.[4] J. K. Estell and S. M. Williams, “Program Educational Objectives: What Constitutes Sufficient Assessment?,” in 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2011, pp. 22.1182.1-22.1182.17, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18523.[5] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: 2012-2013 accreditation cycle,” Baltimore, 2012. [Online]. Available: www.abet.org.[6] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2013-2014 accreditation cycle,” Baltimore, 2013. [Online]. Available: www.abet.org.[7] E. W. Nault and M. S. Leonard, “An Integrated
Personal learning devices and remote labs: Applying what we learned in the pandemic to post pandemic education Jay A. Weitzen and Dohn Bowden University of Massachusetts Lowell Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Lowell Ma, 01824 Abstract — Prior to Covid, we were experimenting with a hybrid curriculum in which students learned to use both standardlaboratory format for our ECE labs combining classic benchtop bench equipment and the personal learning device to one totallylabs and personal learning devices utilizing the same experiments. based on the personal learning device and Zoom
Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-represented students in STEM, K-12 outreach, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, service learning, and curriculum innovation for introductory computing courses.Prof. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and instructional laboratory manager in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, engineering education, engineering leadership, and
implementing acceptablesolutions; (2) to make connections from many information resources to intersect ideas,particularly by using structured methods for generating concept designs for their ideas onsustainable products and services; and (3) to develop product designs that create environmental,economic, and social value. Student teams completed a design project incorporating these newlearning materials. This paper provides an outline of the various lecture modules in the coursewith a brief description of the module contents. The paper also illustrates the integration of lifecycle analyses, entrepreneurial-minded learning principles [3], and structured product designmethods with an example student-generated project in the course.A brief overview of
engineering education as a “system for lifelong learning”.2.0 How does Professional Engineering Differ from Research Engineering?To meet the challenges for enhanced educational engagement with industry and for purposefulreform that develops postgraduate professional education as an integrated system for lifelonglearning, the GSD-National Collaborative in Engineering and Technology Graduate Educationbelieves that a clear distinction must be made between traditional graduate education foracademic scientific research and that of innovative professionally oriented postgraduateeducation for advanced engineering practice and leadership of creative technology developmentand innovation in industry. We believe that the characteristics that differentiate these
integration of best practices. These faculty continued tobring up elements from these visits into the discussions of the curriculum design. During thatworkshop, a detailed list of learning objectives for beginning, intermediate, and advancedlearners across a variety of EML constructs was created. In the third phase, the workshopdeliverables were expanded into actual course activities and assessment complete with detailedrubrics. Again, a faculty member who was a researcher in the first phase of work was included inthe course activity development and assessment team. This allowed continuity between thephases of the projects. Currently, the revised curriculum is being piloted and assessed at ouruniversity and is considered the first of many EML
University - Altoona Leigh Ann Haefner is an associate professor of science education at Penn State Altoona and co-director of the Childhood and Early Education program at Penn State University. She is a former junior and senior high school science teacher and her current research includes a focus on inservice teacher’s integration of the practices of science and engineering in STEM education.Jonathan Bell Jonathan Bell is a graduate research assistant at Penn State pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on science and engineering education. After receiving his undergraduate degree from Hamp- shire college, Jonathan spent 13 years in California designing science exhibitions, teaching middle school
learning. Section 3 discusses how thesystem integrates with the existing cornerstone design course curriculum, including activities,lesson plans, and support via hands-on demonstration pieces. Finally, Section 4 offers concludingthoughts for future research and evaluation.2. DESIGN AND CREATION OF THE MAKING SOLUTION In order to address the need for a complete, fully interactive, yet easy-to-use printing systemin a cornerstone engineering design course, a final solution was developed over the course ofseveral semesters. This development process included initial iterations created by two separatecapstone design teams, with undergraduate research volunteers providing the final touches fordesign and construction. The result is a system dubbed the
leadershipin the process of developing technological innovations. However, during a typicalundergraduate engineering program the students are not taught about effective decision-making or leadership, as these are considered to be management modules and outside thecore engineering curriculum. This research paper, based on a case study from PlakshaUniversity, a new engineering university in India presents a pedagogical innovation thatcenters research design as an effective pedagogical tool to teach decision-making andleadership skills to engineering students. To test this, we collected data on three majorquestions: student perception of the importance of decision-making and leadership, actualstudent performance in the course, and student perception of