quality of life; and the need fortechnological literacy for all of our citizens.In spite of soaring U.S. college enrollments in the last 25 years, the number of undergraduatescompleting degrees in engineering has declined dramatically after peaking in 1988,1 and is stillbelow the number of new B.S.-level engineering graduates in 1988.2 An engineering educationcreates access to a successful and rewarding career and personal future, and people from allbackgrounds should have ample opportunity to share in that future.The participation of women in engineering and technology programs has stagnated, with femalesaccounting for fewer than 21% of B.S. engineering graduates. Sadly, as society has become moretechnology driven, the representation of women
for the U.S. engineering profession or academiawithout massive growth in demand for aerospace products.Much recent attention has been devoted to this gloomy scenario.5,6,7,8,9 Mercer5 notes that the jobsbeing advertised by Administration officials as signs of economic recovery are far from beinggood replacements of engineering / technology careers. She warns of the disastrous effects ofdiscouraging American youngsters with aptitude in the mathematical sciences by telling themthat the “hot’ occupations of the future do not require such aptitudes. Economist Paul CraigRoberts is quoted as saying that “only labor involved in non-traded goods and services is safefrom foreign substitution." This is a replay of what happened to engineers and factory
leader of character who can understand, implement, and manage technology;and to inspire cadets to a career in the United States Army and a lifetime of personal growthand service.The Department mission statement includes educating and inspiring, which align along a set ofcommonly accepted educational taxonomies; that is, Bloom’s Taxonomy, which is based on theseminal work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom. The committeeestablished a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning: cognitive, affective andpsychomotor. The cognitive domain taxonomy is widely accepted in many fields and has beenidentified as, “arguably one of the most influential education monographs of the past halfcentury.”3 The taxonomies are a language
powerful computing technology and team-centered, interactive learning, Rensselaer pioneered the use of studio classroom environmentsthat are collaborative, learner-focused, supported with sophisticated technology, and directlyanalogous to career work and learning. In the NSF-sponsored and award-winning (2001 ASMECurriculum Innovation Award, 2000 NEEDS Premier Award for Excellence in EngineeringEducation) Project Links - Mathematics and its Applications in Engineering and Science,modules were created that integrated mathematics, science, and engineering. We are building onboth previous successes and on-going work in undergraduate engineering education atRensselaer. Rensselaer is determined to maintain its leadership role in undergraduateengineering
. (Biomedical Engineering) from the University of Michigan. His research focus is on the mechanical properties of dynein, a molecular motor protein. He has also been involved in teaching and course development through the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, the College of Engineering, and the M-STEM Academy.Cinda-Sue Davis, University of Michigan Cinda-Sue Davis, Ph.D., has directed the University of Michigan Women in Science and Engineering (WISE) Program since 1984. Using intervention programming, advocacy, and research, the program encourages girls and women, from elementary school through graduate school, to consider careers in science, engineering and mathematics through. Dr. Davis has
9.1214.4 for a new Core course that would fit in the technology quadrant. We set up several challenges so that when students had completed the course they would have gained some of the knowledge and Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationexperience to help them in making smart choices about technology – for their career and forthemselves. We wanted students to know what questions to ask about such things as costs,power, safety, reliability, ethics, usefulness and consequences of the technology theyrecommended or purchased. The course had to be seen as clearly useful to each student. In sum,we
were composed of both ME and IE students. In 1991 after retiring from Shell (anda career as a drilling engineer and with many years experience working in Shell’s internaltraining programs), Ross Kastor was hired as a lecturer to teach the class. Five years agothe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) added the course as adegree requirement for all students entering in the fall 1998 and thereafter. Since thensome ECE students have taken the course as an elective. That number has grown over the Page 9.805.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition
reasoning.Teaching social and political responsibilities increases awareness of the complex waystechnology impacts society, both positively and negatively. It increases the professional’s senseof empowerment with respect to the choice of engineering as a potential career. Students becomeaware that, as engineers, they have the potential to do both great social benefit, but also to dograve social harm.The first quarter of the ethics component in the sophomore year introduces the students to theconcepts of professionalism, engineering codes of ethics, code-based reasoning, and case-based Page 9.552.3reasoning strategies. Many micro-case studies are referenced
by 20181has made almost a priority to prepare the population of the USA to work as computerprofessionals. The report has stated that there will be about three job opportunities per jobapplicant in computer-related careers. Not meeting such demand can make USA to be instrategic disadvantage with other economic powers of the world.In addition, statistics about the percentage of bachelor’s degrees in computer science2 earned inthe USA during the last twenty years shows that less than 20 percent of graduates account forunderrepresented minorities which put this population in great disadvantage with other ethnicgroups of the USA.Given that New Mexico is a state with high percentage of underrepresented minorities, theDepartment of Engineering at
purposelyremaining neutral on their personal stance with these issues.3.1 Issue #1: Unmanned Systems for Military ApplicationsThe development and utilization of unmanned systems for military applications is currently ahighly contested and debated issue. For professional engineers and engineering faculty, themajor concern is performing research sponsored by defense organizations such as the U.S.Department of Defense or a defense subcontractor.Robotics researcher, Ronald Arkin, has written a number of papers1,2 and a book3 in support ofdeveloping ethical principles into war-fighting unmanned systems. His career has supportedprojects from ordinance disposal to the lethal Defense Advanced Research Project Agency(DARPA) Unmanned Ground Combat Program, which can
effectively and prepare them for working onteams in their future careers.” The following is a sample of the comments which were receivedfrom students which validate this claim. This was a great experience. Personally, I want to use this idea when I am a head of a group ... It really helped our team head for success. I thought that providing feedback was helpful in allowing my group to work better together. We were able to understand what everyone was doing and wanting and it was helpful to know where I could improve based on the thoughts Page 24.543.12 of my group members. It was hard for me to give non
students in developing models of real world problems and their so- lutions. Her research also involves working with educators to shift their expectations and instructional practice to facilitate effective STEM integration. Tamara is the recipient of a 2012 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for her work on STEM integration with underrep- resented minority and underprivileged urban K-12 students.Dr. Siddika Selcen Guzey, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Dr. Guzey is a Research Associate at the STEM Education Center at the University of Minnesota. Her research and teaching focus on integrated STEM education.Mrs. Corey A Mathis, Purdue University Corey A. Mathis earned her B.S. in
). Remarks by the President at the Announcement of the "Change the Equation"Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/16/remarks-president-announcement-change-equation-initiative[8] Glanville, P., & Carl, M. (n.d.). Engineers in politics. Retrieved from https://www.asme.org/career-education/early-career-engineers/me-today/me-today-march-2013-issue/engineers-in-politics[9] Capaldi, Franco. Teaching Mastery in Statics Using the STEMSI Online Learning Environment. ASEE 2013 Fall Page 24.620.21Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference (2013) Washington D.C.
degrees, with others coming from a variety offields, course content is delivered from an industrial engineering perspective, where the use ofquantitative tools is emphasized.Graduates of the program over the years have typically been engineers and managers who havegone on to build successful careers in their respective fields of employment. Many have beenmilitary officers who have attained senior ranks in the Air Force and the Navy, the two militarybranches primarily served by this program. Although our civilian graduates have been fewer innumber until recently, they are no less successful in their chosen fields of endeavor. Among thelatter are a former vice president of a Fortune 100 company, the chancellor of a state university,and numerous
professional activities include: program chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineering Education; chair of a new IEEE program on Early Career Faculty Development; editorial board of IEEE/HKN The Bridge magazine; and ABET EAC program evaluator.Dr. Edward W. Chandler P.E., Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Chandler is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Milwaukee School of Engi- neering (MSOE). He received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Purdue University in 1985 and is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin. He previously was a Member of Technical Staff at L-3 Communications and currently performs systems engineering
, recent K-12 education reform efforts inthe U.S. and other nations have put a focus on engineering as a strategy for improving STEMeducation and integration1-3. In particular, there is a growing consensus that students needexposure to engineering early on in elementary school, when their initial career interests arebeginning to develop2. While efforts to provide engineering opportunities for elementarychildren have increased in the last decade3, 4, the creation of the Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS)5 has made explicit suggestions for introducing engineering into sciencecurricula, positioning it to become an integral part of science education.The inclusion of engineering in elementary classrooms has necessitated the creation of a newbody
with the necessary skill-set ofnew students, recruited by existing project team leaders to fill positions that becomeavailable as students graduate or as the project progresses. While effectively matching theinterest of upcoming students with project needs, the competitive approach also shiftsresponsibility for selections more fully to both student leaders and recruits, who live andwork with these choices. Beyond its immediate practical value, the competitive processexposes students to some dynamics of a real job search, better preparing them for their post-graduation career job search. It also provides an opportunity for students to practice at leastthree of the ABET Student Outcomes: functioning on interdisciplinary engineering teams(d
his career Dr. Belu published eight book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of the research interests. He has also been PI or Co-PI for various research projects United States and abroad in power systems analysis and protection, load and energy demand forecasting and analysis, renewable energy, microgrids, turbulence and wave propagation, radar and remote sensing, instrumentation, atmosphere physics, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education.Dr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng.)Prof. Tzu-Liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas, El PasoProf. Lucian Ionel Cioca, ”Lucian Blaga” University Sibiu, Romania
on engineering design learning with a focus on issues of context in design. Page 24.776.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Integrating Reflection on Experience into Engineering Education Jennifer Turns, Brook Sattler, Ken Yasuhara, Jim Borgford-Parnell and Cynthia J. AtmanIntroductionAssigning meaning to experiences is something we do all the time. Words are interpreted asfriendly or rude, job performances as successful or unsuccessful, reactions of interest or boredomas evidence of whether we are well suited for our current jobs or careers. Moreover
implementation wassuccessful in achieving the desired outcomes. Further, while the authors leveraged institutionaladvantages, the methods and content should be transferable to other types of institutions.IntroductionIn our experience, engineering is often viewed as a discipline for people who “don’t want to reador write much.” This has been particularly true of a sub-set of undergraduate students who seeengineering as a career path in which they can leverage their aptitude for math and science into astable, well-paying career. In this worldview, engineers are technical experts who are recipientsof problem definitions and apply scientific and mathematical principles to solve the problems ina technically elegant and efficient manner. This caricature of
-2014 was selected to serve as a Provost Fellow at Clemson. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Joining Hands: Using Consortia to Efficiently Create Easily Accessible International Experiences for Engineering StudentsAs globalization has continued to gain momentum as a central theme shaping the modernengineering economy, international experience and global preparedness have becomeincreasingly sought after attributes of graduates headed for industry, professional schools, andacademia. Both practicing engineers and researchers will, at some point in their careers, beexpected to work closely with collaborators across national, linguistic, and cultural boundaries.This fact is
at OSU he spent eight years at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) as a postdoc- toral researcher and member of the technical staff. There, his research on 2nd generation superconducting wire led to an R&D 100 Award in 2004. He received his Ph. D. in Materials from the Pennsylvania State University in 1998. Dr. Gibbons is a 2012 NSF CAREER awardee, as well. That program is designed to develop new environmentally benign piezoelectric materials, which can be used for a variety of sensing and actuation applications including sonar, ultrasound, energy harvesting, and microelectromechanical systems.Prof. William Joseph Stuart P.E., Oregon Institute of Technology BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Professor Joe Stuart
Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Assistant Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an Associate Director of Purdue’s Global En- gineering Program, leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recent recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and
Student Observations over the Last 25 Years R. William Graff, Paul R. Leiffer LeTourneau UniversityAbstractMost engineering faculty who have taught for over ten years have raised a question atsome point: “Is it me, or have students changed since I began teaching?”Using input from university statistics, faculty, staff, and student surveys, publishedliterature, and course grade records over twenty-five years, the authors have identifiedtwelve trends and observations regarding current students that impact student success andpreparation for engineering careers. While many of these trends are positive and shouldbe encouraged, a few are disturbing and should be
of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education”EvaluationUnder the direction of Eric Heller, Ed.D., the Research and Evaluation Group of the University ofMassachusetts’ Donahue Institute will conduct the evaluation of the courses. The evaluation will beorganized around the questions of the extent to which the education activities of the CHN increase publicawareness of the importance of science and technology to society and prepare undergraduate and graduatestudents in the participating institutions for careers in research as well as manufacturing related tonanotechnology. The assessment will be addressed from both an
learning: 95% SL versus 77% CL • Knowledge is structured around major concepts/principles: 100% SL versus 46% CL • Learning is shaped by the context in which it appears: 53% SL versus 0% CLIt was very apparent that while the CL students were aware that they were doing something, theSL students were more aware that they were learning and of how that learning impacted theirengineering career. It is likely that the SL first-year students have created a better understandingof the major concepts that create the structure for learning engineering because of theirinteraction with the upperclassmen and mentors.Attitude Toward ExperienceThe last element we considered in our comparison was the attitude of the students toward theexperience. Cronbach
the change observed in the same student population between the testand retest administrations of the ILS. Overall, students reported the same general preference forthe visual learning, but were less active, more sensing, and less global in the retest as comparedwith the test. It seems expected that learning style preferences of engineering students mightchange to some degree throughout a college career, since as faculty we would expect studentexperiences and skills (e.g. problem solving, etc.) to develop with time (we hope!). However,for test-retest administrations within the same semester, large changes in the learning stylepreferences would likely not be expected. At the same time, the 1st administration in the presentwork was conducted on
resources mature. The stated goal of thismodel is to allow undergraduate majors in Information Systems and Computer Science toassume positions in careers that evolve through technical knowledge areas and into management Page 10.215.4of information security. The resulting curriculum draft defines programs of one to four coursesand presents a linear spectrum of options that has in one extreme the single-course approach and “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”the track approach in the other. The
date. These content areas are dynamic in nature and will evolve astechnology itself evolves.In the second section, Engineering Tools, its focus is to address the necessary tools required toimplement the Content Standards. As stated, the goals outlined in the Engineering Toolssection consist of the following statements. “Engineering tools are essential in the simplification, management, and communication of complex tasks ranging from academic inquiry to personal application. Due to the complexity of these content standards, many of these tools are required for their meaningful exploration. Proficiency with these tools is expected to be acquired cumulatively over the tenure of a high school career.”It is important