when assigning final grades. Graded assignments and final grades differ fromassessment because assessment is similar to a distributed parameter model while assignmentsand final grades are similar to a lumped parameter model. Program assessment is focused onproviding demonstration of student knowledge or skill directly linked to a specific programoutcome.4 Grades depend on a faculty member’s expectations for a course, course objectives,and the particular grading policy. Grades are often norm-based and reflect a student’s standingrelative to others within a class or on a test. Assessment is based on a student’s absoluteperformance on a specific measurable aspect of an outcome For example, on an exam, the average might be 80%, but it is
begsthe question of why there should be public hearings at all. Nietzsche, in his responsev to von Hartmann’s manipulation of Hegel’s “world-process,”agreed that ethics could not be based on any chimerical allusion to Natural Rights. But whileRousseau, Kant and Hegel posited a moral foundation in man’s historic (social) nature, and theinevitable movement toward global freedom, Nietzsche felt that an optimistic allusion to historyand “world-process” would prove similarly fruitless. He agreed that his supra-historical viewwas nihilistic, and morally debilitating, but none-the-less felt his to be the inevitable conclusionof adequate reflection (and that the inevitable chaos would be embraced by “great” men—whowould thus become noble, blonde
activity. A frustrating learning environment can be created unexpectedly, in whichsome students will be negatively influenced. As observed by the author, at the end of eachindividual-based programming lab, there was always 10% - 15% of the class who got reallyfrustrated. They either asked for extra time to finish the assignment or quit further working onthe unfinished work.Secondly, due to lack of enough guidance, it is hard for the students to capture the majorproblem solving skills. This can be reflected by the insufficient confidence of the students intheir programming capabilities. As experienced by the author, even after taking the programmingclass, the students would often provide feedback like: • “[I] need more labs.” • “[I] need
was formed from the following sets of questions: Page 23.521.4 Goal setting: Questions 1, 6, 7, 9, 14 Applying appropriate knowledge and skills: Questions 5, 10, 12 Engaging in self-direction and self-reflection: Questions 8, 13 Locating information: Question 11 Adapting learning strategies to different conditions: Questions 2, 3, 4Circle your answers to these questions using these guidelines for 1 to 5. 1-Strongly agree 2-Agree 3-Neutral 4-Disagree 5-Strongly Disagree1. I prefer to have others plan my learning 1 2
It is imperative that distance-learning faculty know thelearning preferences of their students and their familiarity with various instructional methods sothat curricula can be designed effectively. Effective online courses are those that engage thelearner while reflecting the instructor’s personality through the content.5 The intent being toutilize the appropriate method and format for instruction provided the instructional goalfacilitates its use.The design of an online course greatly affects its quality. In addition, the role of an online facultymember changes from lecturer to facilitator. Proper media selection for the content of an onlinecourse can either help or hinder the facilitation process, particularly the critical student-to
Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales”, chapter 14 in F. Pajares, T. Urban, editors, Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescence; Information Age Publishing, Inc., USA, 2006, pp. 307-337.5. D.Chachra, F.Olin, D.Kilgore, H.Loshbaugh, J.McCain, H.Chen, “Being and Becoming: Gender and IdentityFormation of Engineering Students”; 2008 American Society for Engineering Education 2008 conference paper;Austin, TX .6. J.Zubizaretta, The Learning Portfolio, Reflective Practice for Student Learning, chapter 4 “ElectronicLearning Portfolios” Columbia College, Anker Publishing Company, Inc. , Boston, MA, 2004.7. J.Dixon, “Focus Group Facilitation Guidelines”, adapted from the Centre for Higher Education Quality,Monash University 2005. Accessed from the internet, January, 3
task group to frame the problem.SampleThe survey was developed and distributed using the college’s on-line Qualtrix system. All of thecollege’s approximately 275 departmental teaching faculty (professors, clinical faculty, andlecturers) were requested to take the survey. These instructors are distributed over 11instructional units. The survey was available for approximately 3 weeks near the end of theautumn 2012 semester. Two reminders were sent during this time. The resulting response ratewas 77 (28%), and the responses reflect a fairly representative sample of departments and jobtitles.Tables 1 and 2 depict the distributions of the sample with respect to department and job title
, Brown, & Cocking, 2000). Adaptive experts (Hatano & Inagaki, 1986), onthe other hand, are able to think more fluidly and solve problems that they are unfamiliar with(often called “novel problems” in the AE literature), as well as the typical problems in their field.Frequently, adaptive experts actively seek new contexts, reflect on their own understanding, andconsider multiple viewpoints (Bransford et al., 2000; Wineburg, 1998).Engineering can be thought of as the creative application of fundamental principles to solve aproblem given limited resources. Because engineers may be required to solve a different problemunder different limitations each on project, engineering students need to strive to be adaptiveexperts, and engineering
. Theirimpact on student learning was also partially reflected in student responses to other open-endedquestions. For instance, students were able to provide important justifications when prompted todiscuss energy sources with an advocate of a particular approach, such as “You have to factor inthe cost, the power it supplies, and the effectiveness over X amount of years.” “The best way toselect an energy source is to focus on being environmentally friendly first. Then find the mostcost effective that will produce enough energy for your needs.” Students also commented on themost important things they learned through the game such as “The most important thing that Ilearned was to be environmentally friendly rather than being the most cost and energy
study and referenceScreencasts can be used to provide guided analysis practice. In analysis-heavy classes (where theapplication of a few governing principles or equations to many situations make up the bulk of thecontent), screencasts showing the instructor working all the way through problems can be auseful resource for students who need extra guidance. There are many different ways ofpresenting this guided analysis.Some students spend all their time in class furiously taking notes as accurately as possible. Theymay not have time to reflect on what they’re writing or to absorb the concepts. The inherenttime-disadvantage of lecture can be overcome by a screencast because of its repeatability.Posting a screencast of an example problem discussed
massing of their on site to begin theabstraction needed for simple computer modeling, and noted key building span andequipment dimensions for drafting to scale.While documenting, students were cautioned to think carefully about what exactly theywere photographing. The aim was not just to document but also to reflect on the degree towhich these elements are visible or hidden, carefully integrated or artlessly stuck on, andlocated by an architectural vision or an engineering necessity, or even both. Studentsrarely show such structure and mechanical elements in studio designs, and yet they mustbe present in any real building. It is our hope that as the students leave our lecture courseson structures and building technology they will begin to take
implemented in a holistic fashionthroughout a company under top management leadership.We have also observed that the mindset in industry of keeping product, manufacturing,and quality initiatives separate and mutually exclusive is also reflected in academia,where manufacturing engineering and manufacturing engineering technology programs atuniversities in the U.S. teach product design ideas, manufacturing practices and qualityconcepts as independent notions. This hampers students’ ability to make the strongconnection between these concepts that is necessary if they are to lead companies whichwill use these best practices as strategic tools for their business operations to realizequantum improvements in their processes and productivity.In this paper
assessing the impact of the degree, and determining where potential students were andwhat their master’s degree education might prepare them for, the program looked at the growthrate (employment projections) of the various employment opportunities related to the MS inTechnology degree. The information below reflects current information on employment trends,and differs from the employment trends as originally evaluated in support of the degree in 2006-2007. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), occupations in the master’s degreeeducation category are expected to grow the fastest, about 22% (2010-2020 projected).4 StandardOccupational Classifications (SOC) 11-3051 reported that for Industrial Production Managers,the job outlook for 2010
!! • Students identify, find, and use appropriate resources (this and previous point are usually “staged” or “progressively disclosed”) • Students work in permanent groups • Learning is active, integrated, cumulative, and connected Page 23.698.6Figure (3) shows the generalized PBL process Problem Description Present solution to Idea Generation – problem and Reflection What do we know? Assumptions Integrate information
%) -18% (80%)Improvements occurred in the areas of properties, mass conservation, and energy conservation. A slightdrop occurred in the second law conceptual understanding and a larger drop in understanding of work. Inthe case of work, the students averaged an 80% initially and it makes up a small number of questions.Qualitative observations were that as reflected in Table 2, students worked more on homework and in amore much more timely fashion than observed in the past. The one-on-one interactions helped better dealwith issues in problem-solving, including the issue of how students approached problems. This appearsto be indicated in the improvement in the Final Exam scores. In addition, the instructor interactions toenhance student performance
sharing their experiences validated their desire to complete a degree inengineering technology, a similar opportunity may help students who are wavering more in theirdesire to complete their degree.AcknowledgementsThe outreach studied in this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation Broadening ParticipationResearch Initiation Grants in Engineering (BRIGE) Award #0927095. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.Many thanks to the undergraduate students and alumni who have worked so hard on this outreach project and whowere willing to share their insights: Juan Fleming, Jennifer Henry, Yassaman
the final product.One other question that is informative is their view of the project requirements. Of theresponses, 34.8% of the responses were “nearly” identical, and 52.2% of the practitionersthought that the capstone project requirements were “similar”. Combining the “nearly identical”and “similar” responses results in 87% of the practitioners viewing the project as emulating their“real-world” experience.This response provides valuable insight to the program. Only 13% didn’t view their experienceas “real-world”. Since one of the objectives is to provide an experience that is as “real-world” aspossible, it is beneficial to know that the class reflects one of the objectives. Due to the structureof the course, a significant amount of time is
. The final parameter analyzed was the mean GPA; thisincreased from 2.57 to 3.03, an 18% improvement. Overall, these were significant improvementsover the classes that did not use these hands-on Multisim projects.Instructors also reflected on their use of Multisim in these classes, “I have taught Digital LogicDesign courses without labs, with labs using hardware (breadboard, ICs, resistors, etc.), and withlabs using Multisim simulator. I find Multisim to be extremely useful and it has helped me inteaching complex topics with quick hands-on examples. This has enabled me to cover conceptualtopics in more depth and, usually, more topics quickly. Student response has been very positiveand their assessment of learning has improved significantly
to manufacturing optimization. As part of a five member mul- tidisciplinary team, she and her colleagues developed a successful undergraduate course on sustainable design and manufacturing using new pedagogy for both face-to-face and on-line environments, spon- sored by NSF funding. Currently, she supervises Kettering University’s renowned Co-operative Educa- tion Department, Center for Culminating Undergraduate Experiences, Center for Excellence in Teaching & Learning, Academic Success Center, Office of the Registrar and Library as well as the First Year Expe- rience, Supplemental Instruction and Integrated Reflective Learning Program. Previously, she has worked in industry, state and local government
and point across. Watching and interactingwith the teachers was my favorite part because I got to see how they approached each step of thelesson and how they interpreted the activity.” Her comments during a reflection period held onthe last evening in the Dominican demonstrated that she appreciated a crucial concept in Page 23.816.8international aid: we must NOT approach these activities as “Americans coming to the rescue.”“One suggestion is next time instead of us doing all the teaching I think the teachers at theworkshop should have a lesson plan that we as a group can take back and use in the classroom.”This statement showed an
theentire class. Only one of the American students was allowed tobe on the presentation team. A panel of judges, consisting ofengineering professors and industrial engineers, was also in theaudience. After one week of hard work, the student teams wereable to present an array of surprising solutions, and a winningteam was identified. The winning team was presented an award of a chance to race on theHemsbach Superkart track, where Sebastian Vettel, the current world Formula 1 champion,learned racing. The week concluded with catered sandwiches and a time for teams, tutors,industrial engineers, and faculty to mingle and reflect on the past week.The American engineering education experiences at both Virgina Tech and SDSMT areevaluated by ABET. The
Page 23.842.2issues. The experimental skills in circuits and electronics of many graduate students are stilldeveloping and not all of the graduate students in the GTA pool are interested in the subjectmatter. This lack of experience and interest is much more difficult to overcome, yet is quicklysensed by the undergraduates taking the course who will reflect this in their comments on thequality of instruction at the end of the semester. Thus, the selection of the instructor for thelectures has been a critical factor to the successful introduction of guided self-learning inexperimental techniques using LiaB.Development of online circuits laboratory course for on-campus studentsMotivation: While a physical lecture was also incorporated in the
guest speaker to return prior to the first due date in order to assist the students in producing qualityFigure 1: Still from an Animated Powerpoint Video videos.Lessons LearnedA few of the lessons learned that the author would like to share with other considering the use ofstudent projects to generate video content to flip their course: Page 23.869.4 • Graduate students are not necessarily great at writing pre- post- quiz questions. The questions that they generated tended to be: too easy, confusing, or reflected the poor English skills of my international student
readily available resource for individual study, studentsalso seemed to find the app useful for in-class discussions, peer to peer review of problems andpeer tutoring. Overall, students have shown a strong interest in using mobile apps that can assist theirlearning, and we believe that our findings behoove educators and researchers to develop andutilize smartphone applications because of its great potential to be used as a learning tool.Regarding the development of a mobile app for an Engineering Economics course, our improvedapp has reflected the feedback from the student users and implemented many modules to helpstudents reinforce the key concepts and improve their problem-solving skills. The app has beenmade available freely through Apple
. Aligningexpectations and outcomes more closely will help engineering integrate more easily intoelementary classrooms. Engineering curricula that is better aligned with developmental standardsand goals is more likely to remain a strong aspect of elementary education.AcknowledgementThis work was made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation DLR 0822261.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Carr, R. L., Bennett IV, L. D., and Strobel, J., "Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 US states: An analysis of presence and extent", Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 101
and building with professional modeling materials in mind,and designing for how each light fixture would be attached to the existing structure. Specialattention was paid to the quality of light, appropriate use of construction materials, and thecraftsmanship of the model and drawings. Additionally, reflectivity, translucency andtransparency were to be considered. Students were permitted to use the following modelingmaterials: foam core, museum board, chip board, bass wood, balsa wood, and vellum. If anyadditional materials were desired to be used, prior instructor approval was required, andmaterials were approved on a case by case basis based on material appropriateness and materialworkability. Overall, if a student wished to use a material
incorporate many good features that are found in different previous Page 24.17.4applications. Unlike most of the other systems that use Google Map, our project adoptsOpenStreetMap [8], which is open-source and free to use. It also allows us to generate updatedand customized maps (e.g., community and local attractions) to reflect map change immediately.Overall, our project objective is to design a customized, cost-effective, efficient and user-friendlybus location and tracking system specifically for the CTfastrak project.The proposed work involves mobile phone application development, database and networkcommunication between the mobile
training andimprovement projects utilizing industrial engineering concepts, computer science concepts,supply chain and inventory management concepts, quality concepts, Lean and Six Sigmaconcepts, electronics, and technical writing. Figure 3 shows a summary of the types of projects Page 24.20.5completed during the seven year period for which the data was collected. The top ten types ofprojects reflected in this data directly relate to a professional certification i.e., Lean Six Sigmacertifications, Certified Manufacturing Technician (CMT), Computer Aided Design (CAD)certifications, Certified Supply Chain Professional (CSCP), Certification in
. National ScienceFoundation (Award DUE-1042030). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and/orrecommendations are those of the investigators and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References [1] Kilgore, D., Atman, C. J., Yasuhara, K., Barker, T. J., & Morozov, A. (2007). “Considering Context: A Study of First‐Year Engineering Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 321-334. [2] Olds, B. M., & Miller, R. L. (2004). “The Effect of a First‐Year Integrated Engineering Curriculum on Graduation Rates and Student Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, 93(1), 23-35. [3] Pendergrass, N. A., Kowalczyk, R. E., Dowd, J. P., Laoulache, R. N., Nelles, W., Golen, J
)including facilitators who were trained as engineers and able to provide research relevant to effectiveteaching practices and learning theory for large engineering courses, 3) introducing a range of effectiveteaching practices, so faculty were able to apply and adopt teaching strategies in which they were mostcomfortable with, 4) allowing time for reflection on faculty’s individual teaching practices whilesubsequently incorporating active discussion with fellow engineering participants and facilitators to gainfurther perspective, and 5) building a sense of community by collaborating with fellow engineeringparticipants and facilitators through group work.To assess the impact of our Teaching Circle, we utilized Murray’s Teaching Behavior Inventory