Conference Session

Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech; Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #11396Synthesis of Engineering Undergraduate Students’ Out of Class InvolvementMs. Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech Rongrong Yu is a PhD student at the Educational Research and Evaluation Program in School of Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. degree in psychology and a M.Ed. degree in educational psychology. Her research interests include K-12 student mathematics and science achievement, STEM and gender, and co-curricular involvement.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech Dr. Denise R. Simmons, PE, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in Civil &

Collection

2015 Public Policy Colloquium

Authors

Christine Cassel, National Quality Forum

Computer Science and integrative Joe McCannon, ConsultantBiology, University of Texas at Austin William B. Rouse, Director of the Center for Complex SystemsJames P. Bagian, Director, Center for Healthcare Engineering and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technologyand Patient Safety Elizabeth Teisberg, Professor of Family and communityMelinda Buntin, Chair of the Department of Health Policy, Medicine, Dartmouth CollegeVanderbilt University School of Medicine Deryk Van Brunt, President and Chairman, HealthyMolly Joel Coye, Chief Innovation Officer, UCLA Health System Communities InstituteGary S. Kaplan, Chairman and CEO, Virginia Mason Health

Collection

2015 ASEE Zone 3 Conference

Authors

Cory Mettler; Nathan Ziegler

performance on test 3 was dismal at best. Thereare a number of possible explanations for this that will be discussed in detail in the Limitationssection of this paper. Table 4. Student scores on test questions taught using AT vs TL (when different, problem numbers of 2015 tests are provided) EE222 EE321Test 1 Method 2015 2014 improvement Test 1 Method 2015 2014 improvementProb 1a/b AT 82.3% 83.1% -0.96% Prob 2 AT 73.3% 76.1% -3.68%Prob 1c TL 65.2% 38.2% 70.80% Prob 3 TL 82.3% 71.7% 14.78%Test 2 Method 2015 2014 improvement Test 2 Method

Conference Session

Evaluation: Diversity in K-12 and Pre-college Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherina V Tarnai-Lokhorst P.Eng., FEC, Camosun College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

students. U of T EngineeringNews 1–6 (2015). at 44. Vingilis-Jaremko, L. How Science Clubs Can Support Girls’ Interest in Science. Learn.Landscapes 3, 155–160 (2010). 45. Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F. & Keating, D. P. Trajectories of Educational Aspirations ThroughHigh School and Beyond: A Gendered Phenomenon  ? Can. J. Educ. 35, 239–258 (2012). 46. Little, A. J. & León de la Barra, B. a. Attracting girls to science, engineering and technology: anAustralian perspective. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 34, 439–445 (2009). Page 26.1734.14 47. Shapka, J. D. & Keating, D. P. Effects of a

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cem Karacal, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville; Hasan Sevim, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

Materials Management END 442E (IME Elect) 3 Engineering Economy END 312 (IME 345) 3 IE Elective at B END XXX (IME Elect) 3 Management and Organ. END 431 (IME 430) 3 TOTAL 18 21Senior: 33 Credits at SIUE IE Fall CR Spring CR Facilities Design IME 484 (END 432E) 3 QC and Assurance IME 465 (END 422) 3 3-D Modeling in Product Design IME 375 3 IE Elective at A II IME Elect (END XXX) 3 IE Elective at A I IME Elect (END XXX) 3 IE Elective at A III

Conference Session

Assessing URM Programs Targeting the K-16 Continuum

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise Hum, Cañada College; Anna Marbella Camacho, Cañada College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

shaped containersto observe related rates in action, use play dough to create volumes of revolution, and cutspherical coordinate shapes out of cantaloupe, oranges, and watermelons. A sample schedule ofdaily activities for the trigonometry and pre-calculus group can be found in Appendix A, and a Page 26.491.5link to the Math Jam Toolkit with best practices and more details about the program can befound in Appendix B.4. ResultsIn order for students to take major courses in engineering and other STEM fields, they mustsuccessfully complete college level math classes from trigonometry through calculus andbeyond. From previous studies, Math Jam has

Conference Session

Non-Canonical Canons of Engineering Ethics

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donna M Riley, Virginia Tech; Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Joseph R. Herkert, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society, Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Paper ID #12488What is gained by articulating non-canonical engineering ethics canons?Dr. Donna M Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Prof. Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.) Amy E. Slaton is a Professor of History at Drexel University. She write on issues of identity in STEM education and labor, and is the author of Race, Rigor and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line .Dr. Joseph R. Herkert, Arizona State University Joseph R. Herkert, D.Sc., is Lincoln Associate Professor of Ethics and Technology (Emeritus) in

Collection

2015 ASEE Workshop on K-12 Engineering Education

Authors

Cheryl Farmer, University of Texas, Austin

from such an activity,and discussing tradeoffs between efficiency and accuracy. Following the activity, participantswill divide into groups to explore alignment with different sets of standards, including NextGeneration Science Standards and Common Core State Standards in both English/Language Artsand Mathematics. Groups will report their results and discuss implications for making suchconnections in their own curricula.Workshop Description. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed workshop that, atminimum, explicitly addresses the following (maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives Page 18.17.3 b. Hands-on

Collection

2015 ASEE Zone 3 Conference

Authors

Luis Rodriguez; Gail Coover; Dalelia Davis; George Johnson; Oumar Kaba; Angela Frey; Andrew Pham; Amihan Huesmann

outcomes (retention/graduation rates and exit surveys) of the pilot run of the program measured so far bode well for the potential impact of the WiscAMP Excel Program on URM student success in STEM.Bibliography1. Dweck, C. S. (2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books.2. Dweck, C. S., Legget, E. L. (1988) “A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality”, Psychological Review 953. Hurtado, S., Eagan K., HERI Research Brief (2010) Degrees of Success: Bachelor’s Degree Completion Rates among Initial STEM majors. Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA4. Figueroa, T., Hughes B., Hurtado, S. (2013) “Supporting Future Scientists: Predicting Minority Student Participation in

Conference Session

Research to Practice: STRAND 4 K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design (Part 2)

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayora Berry, Boston University; Don DeRosa, Boston University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

architects of change, (b) provide a professional learning vehicle foreducators to reflect on practices and develop content knowledge, (c) inspire a sense of ownershipin curriculum decision-making among teachers, and (d) use an instructional approach that iscoherent with teachers’ interests and professional goals. This preliminary study evaluates theeffects of a CDB professional development program, the PTC STEM Certificate Program, ontwenty-six K-12 teachers who participated in 62 hours of engineering education professionaldevelopment over a six month period. Participants learned about industry and educationengineering concepts, tested engineering curricula, collaborated with K-12 educators andindustry professionals, and developed project-based

Collection

2015 ASEE Workshop on K-12 Engineering Education

Authors

Mohamad Musavi, University of Maine; Cary Edward James, Bangor High School; Ali Abedi, University of Maine

-created outreach programs.Intellectual Merit: By offering a highly active and transformational educationalexperience to both teachers and students, this learning model will expand understanding of ourenvironment and how to most effectively address critical problems using engineering and sciencesolutions. Engaging a highly diverse group of participants will increase our understanding of effectivecommunity inclusive learning methods.Workshop Description. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed workshop that, atminimum, explicitly addresses the following (maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives b. Hands-on activities and interactive exercises c. Materials that participants can take with them d

Conference Session

Continuing Professional Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell L Springer PMP, SPHR, SHRM-SCP, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mark T Schuver, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

applicability to needed employment skills?  Given the many demands on the new cohort of program participants, what impact might be expected to time to graduation?  Will the average age of the professional learner go up with the above presented life-phase shift?  Will there be greater need for career and financial services in support of the many Page 26.1559.17 competing economic considerations?References1 Levine, A. & Dean, D. (2013). Generation on a Tightrope. San Francisco, CA.: John Wiley and Sons.2 Gurian, M. and Annis, B. (2008). Leadership and the sexes: Using gender science to create success in

Collection

2015 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Ranjan K Sen

, R. Bradshaw, and N. Weizenbaum. FlumeJava: Easy, Efficient Data-Parallel Pipelines. In PLDI, 2010. 12. S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, and S.-T. Leung. The Google File System. In SOSP, 2003. 13. S. Melnik et al. Dremel: Interactive Analysis of Web-Scale Datasets, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 3, No. 1 14. C. Olston, B. Reed, U. Srivastava, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Pig Latin: a Not-so-Foreign Language for Data Processing. In SIGMOD, 2008.
 15. Hive. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hive, 2009.
 16. G. DeCandia et al. Dynamo: Amazon’s Highly Available Key-value Store, SOSP 07, October 14-17, 2007, Stevenson, Washington, USA 17. Zookeeper project zookeeper.apache.org Proceedings of the 2015 American

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

framework for authentic learning environments’. Educational technology research and development, 48(3), pp. 23–48.55 Herrington, Jan, Reeves, Thomas C., Oliver, Ron and Woo, Younghee (2004) ‘Designing authentic activities in web-based courses’. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 3–29.56 Oliver, Ron and Herrington, Jan (2000) ‘Using situated learning as a design strategy for Web- based learning’. Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education, pp. 178–191. Page 26.329.1757 Bannan, B (2012) ‘Design research and twice exceptional children: Toward an integration of motivation, emotion and

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Coso Strong, Georgia Institute of Technology; Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel; Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #12167What makes an undergraduate course impactful? An examination of stu-dents’ perceptions of instructional environmentsDr. Alexandra Emelina Coso, Georgia Institute of Technology Alexandra Coso is a Postdoctoral Fellow at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning. She completed her Ph.D. in 2014 in Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Tech. Prior to her time at Georgia Tech, she received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include graduate student experiences in engineering programs, engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Workshop on K-12 Engineering Education

Authors

Meagan C Pollock, National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity

impacts a person’s belief in his or her own ability to be successful in a course, class,college, and career. This session will equip educators with strategies to support studentparticipation, persistence, engagement and success in STEM, to ultimately increase theparticipation of women and students of color in engineering careers. Join us to use engineeringthinking to infuse more equity into your classroom!Workshop Description. Please provide a detailed description of the proposed workshop that, at Page 18.13.3minimum, explicitly addresses the following (maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives b. Hands-on activities and

Collection

2015 ASEE Workshop on K-12 Engineering Education

Authors

William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

detailed description of the proposed workshop that, atminimum, explicitly addresses the following (maximum 4,000 characters): a. Learning objectives Page 18.8.3 b. Hands-on activities and interactive exercises c. Materials that participants can take with them2015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form_EPICS_HCD_submit.docx Page 2 of 8 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic Engineering: Representing & Emphasizing the E in STEM” Presented by Dassault Systems

Conference Session

Student Recruitment and Retention in ET Programs

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Scott McCrae, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis; Eugenia Fernandez, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

). Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.7. Levitz, R., & Noel, L. (1989). Connecting students to institutions: Keys to retention success. In M. L. Upcraft and J. N. Gardner (Eds.) The Freshman Year Experience. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.8. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and research from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.9. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.10. Hoyt, J. E., & Winn, B. A. (2004). Understanding retention and college student bodies: Differences between drop-outs, stop-outs, opt-outs, and transfer-outs. NASPA

Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gloria J Kim, Northwestern University; Mark E. Law, University of Florida; John G. Harris, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

USA.2. Jamieson, L. and J. Lohman, Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education, ASEE, Editor. 2012: Washington, DC.3. Loshbaugh, H. and B. Claar. Geeks are chic: Cultural identity and engineering students’ pathways to the profession. in Proc. ASEE. 2007.4. Lord, S. and J. Chen, Curriculum Design in the Middle Years, in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B.M. Olds, Editors. 2014, Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA.5. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice., et al., How people learn : bridging research and practice. 1999, Washington, DC: National

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Tactical Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric G Meyer, Lawrence Technological University; Mansoor Nasir, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

movementincluding social networks and fitness communities, as well as a grassroots community(quantifiedself.com) that is interested in flipping the traditional health and wellness from a top-downmodel to one that inspires individuals, families and communities to gain “self-knowledge throughnumbers” (Wolf, 2010). These enthusiastic participants can derive their motivation from two ormore philosophies; type “A” do not fully trust health and wellness books, doctors, etc… while type“B” think that the self-awareness that they gain from QS is as beneficial as the data itself.The QS theme was initially identified because it was specifically related to the authors’ areas ofexpertise in Biomechanics and Biosensors. Some of the readily accessible examples

Conference Session

Research & Evaluation on K-12 Teachers and Teaching.

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis Nadelson, Utah State University; Anne Seifert, Idaho National Laboratory; J. Kade Hendricks, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

STEM content learning standards.Given the potential for gains in student knowledge of the work of STEM professionals,particularly in engineering through engagement in the core STEM practices, there is justificationfor assuring that K-12 teachers are prepared to and are supported in teaching in ways that engagestudents in core STEM practices. We maintain that there is a need to offer professionaldevelopment that enhances teacher capacity to help them shift their teaching to better engage Page 26.232.3a Irvin, P. S., Saven, J. L., Alonzo, J., Park, B. J., Anderson, D., & Tindal, G. (2012). The

Conference Session

Two Year College Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso; Oscar H. Salcedo, University of Texas, El Paso; Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso; Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas, El Paso; Mariano Olmos, El Paso Community College; Tonie Badillo, El Paso Community College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

(circa Feb 2009). There were seven (7) articulationagreements developed: (a) the foundation agreement between the UTEP College of Engineeringand the EPCC Engineering Program, that established the principles and practices of collaborationon developing seamless engineering education for El Paso region students. This agreementsupports student advancement and completion of EPCC and UTEP associate / engineeringdegrees, and (b) a specific articulation agreement with and between each UTEP Department ofEngineering and the EPCC Engineering program. Page 26.1369.6Cooperative Foundational Engineering Course DevelopmentThe

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Gordon W Skelton, Jackson State University; Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. (2000). “Attaining self-regulation, A social cognitive perspective.” In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, 13-39.2. Winne, P.H., and Perry, N.E. (2000). “Measuring self-regulated learning.” In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, and M. Seidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, Orlando, FL, Academic Press, 531-566.3. Perry, N.E., Phillips, L., and Hutchinson, L.R. (2006). “Preparing student teachers to support for self-regulated learning.” Elementary School Journal, 106, 237-254.4. Zimmerman, B. J., and Campillo, M. (2003). “Motivating self-regulated problem solvers.” In J. E. Davidson, and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), “The nature of problem solving”, New

Conference Session

Assessment and Outcomes: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University; John T. Demel, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

compare and do they predict academic performance?” Educational Psychology, 20(3), 365– 380, 2000.[14] M.S. Zywno, “A contribution to validation of score meaning for Felder–Soloman’s index of learning styles.” In Proceedings of the 2003 Annual ASEE Conference. Washington, DC: ASEE, 2003.[15] E. Hames and M. Baker, M. “A study of the relationship between learning styles and cognitive abilities in engineering students.” European Journal of Engineering Education. 40, 2, 167-185, May 2015.[16] L. W. Anderson, D. R. Krathwohl, B. S. Bloom. “A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing.” Longman, 2005.[17] Z. Abidin, R. Ziegler, R. Tuohi, “Learning Styles amongst Engineering Students in Malaysia, South Africa and Finland

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shweta Chopra, Iowa State University; Prashant Rajan, Iowa State University; Chad M Laux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International

respectiveuniversity internal review board (IRB) for approval. Any unforeseen changes or issues during theresearch study was immediately brought to the attention university IRB. No changes to the studydesign was initiated without first securing approval from the IRB. In order to ensure completeprofessional oversight over the data collection process, researchers established a secure onlinerepository where all the data collected in the form of written notes, audio and visual recordingswere uploaded. Access to the data on this repository is limited to researchers and IRB.V) Recruitment of subjects At the time of recruitment of subjects: (a) a short introduction and purpose for the study,(b) an explanation of what will be required of participants, (c

Conference Session

ETAC/ABET Related Issues

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Crichigno, Northern New Mexico College; Ivan Lopez Hurtado, Northern New Mexico University; Raul R Peralta, Northern New Mexico College; Alfredo J. Perez Ph.D., Columbus State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

mixed messages that may arise from the facultyor students interviews. Some examples here are: a) the SSR included the program admissionpolicy for 2010-2011 and the one for 2012-2014; b) both the college course transfer policy andthe departmental were included.The subsections related to Student Performance Evaluation, Transfer Students and TransferCourses were thoroughly explained including even redundant details. The reason is that lack ofdetail may cause unnecessary questions when the evaluation team is reviewing the transcripts.This section allows explaining the potential reasons for courses that were taken without theappropriate pre-requisites (which many times are easily explained because of a change in catalogand course descriptions).One

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey C. Evans P.E., Bucknell University; Michelle Oswald Beiler P.E., Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

engineers fully aware of their social responsibilities and better able toconsider related factors in the decision-making process, institutions must require course work inthe humanities and social sciences as an integral part of the engineering program. Thisphilosophy cannot be overemphasized. To satisfy this requirement, the courses selected mustprovide both breadth and depth and not be limited to a selection of unrelated introductorycourses.I.C.3.d. (2) (b) Such course work must meet the generally accepted definitions that humanitiesare the branches of knowledge concerned with man and his culture, while social sciences are thestudies of individual relationships in and to society. Examples of traditional subjects in theseareas are philosophy

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Divisions

International

classroom-based pedagogies of engagement, and cooperativelearning strategies in particular. The paper is a follow up to previous work by the author, onviable strategies to improve the classroom environment of engineering colleges in the Region. Atthe start, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks of engineering education in theRegion. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings on teaching/learning practices in engineeringcolleges of the Region, sheds light on the pros and cons of the lecture format, and examines theliterature on meanings and substance of different active learning protocols focusing oncooperative engagement strategies. It also identifies common barriers to reformation, and arguesthat any meaningful change in Region’s

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park; Thomas M. Philip, University of California Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

(2000).18 L. L. Bucciarelli, Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 33, 141–149 (2008).19 Orit Parnafes and Andrea A. diSessa, Hum. Dev. 56, 5–37 (2013).20 B. Jordan and A. Henderson, J. Learn. Sci. 4, 39–103 (1995).21 Joane Nagel, Ethn. Racial Stud. 21, 242–269 (1998).22 Micaela di Leonardo, Fem. Stud. 11, 599–617 (1985). Page 26.855.14

Conference Session

Reporting Out: Dissemination of Several NSF Projects of Interest to Two-Year Colleges

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Jerry O'Connor, San Antonio College

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

Math 2414 College Algebra Calculus II (Pre-Calculus track) # Students 14 8 - Enrolled (EDGE 1) # Students 4 1 1 Enrolled (EDGE 2) # Students 16* (4-A; 5-B; 7* 1 earned 7-C) (2-A; 3-B; 2-C) (1-A) Productive Grade credit Table 4. Math Enrollment EDGE SU 2014 (*One student earned credit in two Math classes) SDEV ENGR 1201 # Students Enrolled