: http://education.nasa.gov/implan/framewrk.html. Page 6.656.7“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”2. Center for the Education and Study of Diverse Populations, “New Mexico Content Standards and BenchmarksReference Guide,” URL: http://www.cesdp.nmhu.edu/standards/download/index.htm3. S. Horan, “Use of High-Power Model Rockets as a Laboratory for a Microcontroller Data Acquisition System,”A.S.E.E. Computers in Education, Vol. VI, No. 1, January-March 1996, p. 53-56.4. New Mexico Space Grant Consortium, “Student Launch
Vaidya,U.,1999, "Low Cost Manufacturing of Composite Integral Armor Using Resin Transfer and Resin Infusion Molding Processes", Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Flow Processes in Composite, 12th -14th July 1999, Plymouth, England. Page 6.659.7 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2001, American Society for Engineering Education3. Beck, W., 1993, “Designing the RTM process and product”, SME Technical Paper (Series) EM 1993, Publ by SME, pp 1-13.4. Beckwith, S. W., Hyland, C. R., 1998, ”Resin transfer molding: A
. Midkiff, C., J. Parker and S. Bell, Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Reform at The University of Alabama,Proceedings of the 1997 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference, pp. 150-156, Marietta, GA, March, 1997.9. URL: http://www.me.ua.edu/ME360/plc; ME 360 - Programmable Logic Controller Module.10. Parker, J. and D. Schinstock, Introduction to Hydraulic and Logic Systems in a Controls Course, 1996 ASEEAnnual Conference Proceedings, CD-ROM, Paper 3266, Washington, DC, June, 1996.11. URL: http://www.asme.org/students/design_contest/Y2001index.html; 2001 ASME Student Design Contest.JOEY K. PARKERJoey K. Parker is currently an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Alabama, wherehis teaching responsibilities include control
. economic outcomes. Ethics and Awareness of and commitment to Ability to build and maintain Ability to demonstrate the need for Ability to recognize the value of Ability to develop and maintain the adherence to ethical, OH&S network relationships that value Ability to treat all persons fairly, a high level of professional and cultural diversity and apply the trust and confidence of Equity without bias, and with respect. and quality standards. and sustain a team ethic
late. There may be no attack, no moment of epiphany, no catastrophe thatwill suddenly demonstrate the threat. Rather, there will be a slow withering, a gradual decline, awidening gap between a complacent America and countries with the drive, commitment andvision to take our place.”2. The Professional Science Master’s (PSM) Degree In response to this need a new type of degree, the Professional Science Master’s, wasestablished at research universities beginning in the early 2000’s using start-up funds providedby the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. It is designed for students who do not wish to continue on toa doctorate leading to an academic career but rather to enter the workforce with a master’sdegree, a degree now viewed by many as having
literature review ofgender in engineering education research papers and found the most often researched topicfocuses on recruitment and retention of female engineers. Perrucii pointed out the career pathsof women in engineering tends to be heavily influenced by life events, such as marriage andchild-bearing.4 Huang et al.’s National Center for Education Statistics report5 supports an overallnotion that much of the racial/ethnic and gender differences in the entry to science andengineering programs in postsecondary education can be explained by examining familyenvironment, family support, student behavior, and school factors across race/ethnicity andgender.Much of this literature focuses on underrepresentation in engineering and how it impacts
Engineering. He provides expertise in workforce development, competency models and assessments, and knowledge management with over 34 years of systems engineering experience from the US Air Force, government, industry, and academia. While serving in the Air Force, Dr. Gelosh worked as a systems engineer on the Space Shuttle as a member of NASA’s Vehicle Integration and Test Team where he was responsible for communications and payload integration and ensuring the Shuttle was ready for launch. Dr. Gelosh also taught electrical and computer engineering at the Air Force Academy in the early 90’s and later served as Deputy Department Head for Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology. Don
the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall. 3) http://www.vexrobotics.com/ 4) Hibbeler, R. C. (2010). Engineering Mechanics Dynamics, Twelfth Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall. 5) Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, NY, U.S.A.: David McKay Co. Inc. Page 22.893.8Appendix 1: Dynamic Systems Example Laboratory Slider Crank Laboratory VEX Optical Shaft Encoder
of the American Workforce.2. NAE. (2006). Enhancing the Community college Pathway Into Engineering Careers. Washington: National Academies Press.3. Hestenes D, Wells M, Swackhamer G 1992 Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher 30: 141-16.4. NAS. (2000). How People Learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.5. Evans, D.L., Gray, G.L., Krause, S., Martin, J., Midkiff, C., Notaros, B. M. Pavelich, M., Rancour, D., Reed- Rhoads, T., Steif, P., Streveler, R., & Wage, K. (2003, November). Progress on concept inventory assessment tools. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Boulder, CO
weekProfessional Development workshop, we drew upon the latest professional developmentliterature4-11. From this research base six core components of what constitutes „high quality‟professional development were found in multiple studies. These components include: Immersing participants (teachers) in inquiry, questioning and experimentation; Intensive and sustained support; Engaging teachers in concrete teaching tasks that integrate teacher‟s experiences; Focusing on subject-matter knowledge and deepening teacher content knowledge; Providing explicit connections between the Professional Development activities and student outcome goals; and Providing connections to larger issues of education/school reforms. The
. Page 22.1370.6Gibbons, B. A. (2003). Supporting elementary science education for English learners: A constructivist evaluation instrument. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 371-380.Kirpatrick, D.L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491-530.Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Literacy skills in science performance among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80(6), 651-671.Moll, L. C. (1990).Vygotsky and Education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (New York: Cambridge
Interdisciplinary Environment Along with Media Art and Marketing, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, 2007 3. Todd, R. H., Magleby S. P., Sorenson C. D., Swan B. R., and Anthony D. K.: A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America, Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 165 – 174, 1995 4. Amon C., Wesner J., and Hoff R.: Identifying and Implementing Projects for a Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Projects Course at Carnegie Mellon, Proceedings of the Page 22.1181.7 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006 5. Frei F. X.: The Four Things a Service Business Must Get
. Page 22.1588.7AcknowledgementsThe authors express our appreciation to the MEEN 360 and 404 students and inparticular to the Team Leaders: Mustafa Hallawa and Abdalla Abdalla.1 Griffin, Richard B., Terry S. Creasy “The Development of a Combined Materials/Manufacturing Processes Course at Texas A&M University,”ASEE Albuquerque, NM, June 2001.2 Griffin, Richard, Terry Creasy, and Jeremy Weinstein, “Laboratory Activity Using Rapid Prototyping and Casting,” ASEE Montreal, Canada, June 2002.3 Griffin, Richard and Creasy, Terry, “Design, Rapid Prototype, Cast, and Test an Aluminum Link,” National Educators Workshop Portion of ASEE Meeting, ASEE Portland, OR, June 2005.4 R. B. Griffin, K. T. Hartwig, R. Barber, T. New, and I. Karaman
enjoyed theMEA in some way. While most group projects are beneficial for the students they are almostnever very popular. To have some consistent feedback that says that students enjoy learning in thisway, even in a small majority, is a successful result.AcknowledgmentsFinancial support was provided by 1) National Science Foundation via Course, Curriculum, andLaboratory Improvement 071759: Collaborative Research: Improving Engineering Students’Learning Strategies Through Models and Modeling and 2) The Donald E. Bently Center forEngineering Innovation at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo.References1 Bowman, K. J., Diefes-Dux H. A., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2008). Models and Modeling in Engineering Education:Designing
instructors recognize some of the learning struggles that students must overcome. • Multiple grading scales provide course assessment possibilities that can accurately reflect student mastery of the covered material in spite of their learning style(s).TAARs • The process of working through quizzes individually first and then in carefully arranged teams seems to be a very good mechanism for facilitating active discussion and peer teaching among students. • Embracing TAARs as a primary teaching tool does require the instructor to give up some lecture time, so courses need to be planned accordingly to fit nicely within the semester schedule; text and class material that are used should be accessible for students
would be packaged in mission-specific HA/DR kits for partner nation use; 3. Develop modular, scalable, expeditionary housing systems that possess "green" electric power and water generation, waste and wastewater disposal, hygiene, and food service capabilities. Systems should be designed to blend in to natural/native surroundings and with minimal footprint; 4. Continued investigation and exploration into the realm of the possible with respect to “Immersive” training technologies. Objective is to flood the training audience environment with the same STIMULI that one would experience during actual mission execution. Where possible full sensory overload is desired much the same as experienced in combat. Specific S&T areas for
considered relevant information to thecourse. Thus, team-at-a-distance teaching supports experiential learning techniques and moreeffectively incorporates the knowledge and life lessons provided by the non-traditional studentsinto the content of the course.In a distance broadcast learning environment, the team-at-a-distance approach further supports alearner centered environment and diffuses impressions of hierarchy that can arise between“originating” and “receiving” or “satellite” sites. With an instructor(s) present at eachparticipating site (each regional campus), all sites enjoy a perception of equal importance andstature, and a mutual sense of support. Periodically throughout the course, all sites, at times, willbe originating and, at other
/survey/staying_course [4] J. T. Bell, H. S. Fogler, “Virtual Reality Laboratory Accidents”, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. [5] J. Harward, T. T. Mao, I. Jabbour, iLab Interactive Services – Overview, 2006. http://icampus.mit.edu/iLabs/Architecture [6] University of Houston, SMSL-Smart Materials and Structures Laboratory. http://rsmsl-1.me.uh.edu/ [7] A. Valera, J. L. Diez, M. Valles, P. Albertos, “Virtual and Remote Control Laboratory Development”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 35- 39, Feb 2005. Page 22.1663.8
for your teaching. Table 2 Participant Ratings of the Quality of the SLIs 2007 2009 Indicator of Quality N Mean N Mean Overall quality of course 9 3.67 6 4.16 Preparation of the instructor(s) 9 3.78 6 4.33 Level of participant engagement in the session 9 3.89 6 4.33 Time for participants to ask questions and/or share 6 4.16 9 4.00 comments Usefulness of information for your teaching 9
Foundation under GrantDUE-0939823. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1 Pimmel, Russ and Sheryl Sorby, “Writing Proposals to Meet NSF’s Expectations,” Workshop at 2008 ASEE Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, June 22, 2008.2 Olds, Bar: Evolution, Approaches, and Future Collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94,No. 1, pp. 13-25 (2005)3 National Research Council, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, Scientific Research in Education, Richard Shevelson and Lisa Towne, Editors, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2002)4 National Research Council
.Sheppard S., Macatangay K., Colby A., Sullivan W. M. (2009), “Educating engineers: designing for the future of thefield, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Base3.Felder R.M., Brent R. (2003),” Designing and Teaching courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 92, No 1, pp7-25.4.Thomas, J.W. 2000. A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.5.Savage R., Chen K., Vanasupa L. (2007),” Integrating Project-based Learning. New York, NY: Routledge Publisher6.Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway E., Marx R.W., Krajcik J.S., Guzdial M, Palinscar A. (1991),”Motivating Project-BasedLearning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning,” Education Psychologist, Vol. 26, pp. 369-3987.Brito C
subject of on-goingefforts.Bibliographic Information1. McDonald, D., “Data Acquisition in a Vehicle Instrumentation Course,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.2. Zhang, Y., S. Cui, Y. Wang, and C. Akujuobi, “Taking Action: Enhancing Engineering Technology Laboratories with LabVIEW-Based Graphical Development Tools,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.3. Lohani, V., P. Delgoshaei, and C. Green, “Integrating LabVIEW and Real-Time Monitoring into Engineering Instruction,” 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society of Engineering Education.4. Delgoshaei, P., V. Lohani, and C. Green, “Introducing Dataflow Programming in a
Librarianship 36:158-165, 2010.7. Meyers, KL, SE Silliman, and NL Gedde, A comparison of engineering students’ reflections on their first-year experiences, Journal of Engineering Education 99:169-178, 2010.8. Angelique, H, K Kyle, and E Taylor, Mentor and muses: new strategies for academic success, Innovative Higher Education 26:195-209, 2002.9. Khazanov, L, Mentoring at-risk students in a remedial mathematics course, Math and Computer Education 45:106-118, 2011.10. Rodger, S, and PF Tremblay, The effects of a peer mentoring program on academic success among first year university students, Canadian Journal of Higher Education 33:1-18, 2003.11. Thorsheim, H, H LaCost, and JL Narum, Peer mentoring of undergraduate research in
educator. It is through quality education that we prepare individuals for thechallenges of today and those of tomorrow.Bibliography 1. Free Management Library, Problem Solving, downloaded on February 19, 2007 from http://www.managementhelp.org/prsn_prd/prob_slv.htm. 2. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed in the 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 7, 1997 – 1998. 3. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’s Press. 4. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of
the CET department at DeVry Institute of Technology (Long Island City, N.Y.). He worked as a researcher for NASA - Langley Base in Hampton, Va., for two years. His research activities include embedded systems, software development for embed- ded systems with real time simulation, real time gaming simulation programming, and web application programming.Dr. Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology Andy S. Zhang earned his master’s in mechanical engineering from the City College of New York in 1987 and his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Graduate Center of the City University of New York in 1995. Zhang’s research area includes materials testing, product design and prototyping, CAD/CAE, and