research is needed to investigatehow teams will continue to experience the characteristics of a guiding coalition as they shift andchange throughout their change process. These findings are limited to data collected from theRED team members; it is beyond the scope of this project to collect data from individualsexternal to the team, though that would increase the validity of the findings. Next steps for thisresearch include disaggregating our analysis to investigate how contextual differences acrossteams impact the team formation processes—while some of these differences emerged in ourinitial analysis, further investigation is warranted.References[1] J. P. Kotter, Leading Change. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.[2] S. ten
learning.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the students who participated in this study by completing surveysand providing feedback, as well as the student who pulled together the survey data into electronicform for analysis. References[1] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson. "Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 87-101, 2005.[2] C. A. Bodnar, D. Anastasio, J. A. Enszer and D. D. Burkey. "Engineers at play: Games as teaching tools for undergraduate engineering students." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 147-200, 2016.[3] B. D. Coller, D. J. Shernoff and A. Strati. "Measuring Engagement
Cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232-244. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.002 (2015).11. J. Harackiewicz, A. Durik, K. Barron, L. Linnenbrink-Garcia & J. Tauer. “The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105-122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105 (2008).12. C. Hulleman, S. Schrager, S. Bodmann & J. Harackiewicz. “A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?” Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):422-49. doi
approach has led to the development and adoption of design strategies that measure learning and teaching efficacies across his service in various institutions of higher education. . A geophysicist by academic training, he began to design multimedia applications for teaching and learning in the late 1990’s, developing his first online course in 1996. Since then, he has helped a few hundred faculty from varied disciplines develop hybrid and online courses. He has also taught traditional, hybrid and online courses ranging in size from 28 to 250. He is also co-developer of a Digital Academy which was a finalist for the Innovation Award by the Professional and Organizational Development Network and an Innovation Award
Learning and Teaching, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 277-284, June 2009.[8] Harrison, R., and Thomas, M., “Identity in Online Communities: Social Networking Sites andLanguage Learning,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, vol. 7, no. 2,pp. 109-124, 2009.[9] Brady, K., Holcomb, L., and Smith, B., “The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites inHigher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benfits of Ning in Education,”Journal of Interactive Online Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151-170, 2010.[10] Hung, H., and Yuen, S., “Educational Use of Social Networking Technology in HigherEducation,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 703-714, 2010.[11] Chan, P. Graham-Day, K., Ressa, V., Peters, M., and Konrad, M
in Canada,” 2010. Retrieved from: http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2012/rs gc-serc/NS3-46-2010-eng.pdf.[3] E.A. Cech, “Culture of disengagement in engineering education?" Science, Technology & Human Values vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42-72, 2014.[4] W. Cummings, and O. Bain, “Where Are International Students Going?” International Higher Education, vol. 43, 2015.[5] R. Rockland, D. Bloom, J. Carpinelli, L. Burr- Alexander, L., Hirsch, and H. Kimmel, “Advancing the “E” in K-12 STEM education,” Journal of Technology Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 53-64, 2010.[6] S. Catsambis, “Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 32, no
. Atman, O. Eris, J. McDonnell, M. Cardella and J. Borgford-Parnell, “EngineeringDesign Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2016, pp. 201-226.[6] M. Zhang, F. Zhong and J. Yan, “Construction of the Course System for GasGeology Based on Training Objectives,” Education Teaching Forum, pp. 70-73, Jan.2019 (In Chinese).[7] X. Liu, S. Zhang, A. Chen, J. Li and B. Li, “Construction of Practical TeachingSystem for Resource Exploration Engineering in Kunming University of Science andTechnology,” Chinese Geological Education. vol. 27, pp. 32-35, 2018 (In Chinese).[8] S. Liu, J. Liu, W. Zhang and C. Chen, “Research on Problem and Strategy forChinese Engineering Practice Education
that faculty implementing active-learningmodules receive adequate training in classroom best practices.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Santa Clara University Office of Faculty Development forthe support of the Teaching with Technology grant to develop the course modules and hands-onactivities applied in this work and our two colleagues for their willingness to experiment and usethe developed teaching modules.Bibliography[1] S. Freeman, S. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt & M.P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 11(23), 2014, pp. 8410- 8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23
gateway to computer-based technology,” Journal Special Education Technology, Vol. 12(3), pp. 195–206. 1994.[12] S. Sorby, “Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students”. International Journal of Science Education. Vol 31(3), pp 459-80, Feb. 2009.[13] S. Sorby, “Spatial Skills Training to Improve Student Success in Engineering,” 2012 Specialist Meeting—Spatial Thinking Across the College Curriculum, pp. 1– 4, 2012.[14] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, Vol. 84(2), pp. 191-215. 1977.[15] A. Bandura, Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman. 1997.[16] “Teaching Tip Sheet: Self-Efficacy”, American Psychological Association
within the structure or mechanism can these external loads generate a reaction? 3. How can these forces be identified and calculated? 4. Will the weight of a member influence support reactions or the motion generated? 5. Can the orientation of the structural members influence the load distribution? 6. In what direction(s) will loads on members or connectors be generated? 7. What is the configuration of the structural members on the bridge or crane? Will they affect the calculations? 8. What assumptions can be made for the given structure or mechanism in order to carry out specific calculations? 9. Is the type of cross-sectional area of structural members important in design? If so, why? 10. How can a free-body diagram (FBD) be
session prove that the program is on the righttrack. With this experience under the belt, more and better research projects can be planned andundertaken by the college in the future and will hopefully attract more student participants. It isfurther hoped that Principia’s success will inspire other small colleges to pursue similarundergraduate research endeavors.References[1] S. Khandani, "Engineering Design Process," Saylor, Pleasant Hill, 2005.[2] "Shakhatreh, H., Sawalmeh, A., Al - Fuqaha, A., Dou, Z., Almaita, E., Khalil, I., Othman, N. S., Khreishah, A., and Guizani, M.," Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, 2018.[3] A. Mackenzie, "Optar AI," Optar AI, 1 January 2018. [Online
Communication, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127-131, 1974.[7] Diederich, N. A., & Schroeder, S. J., “Effect of Writing Centers and Targeted Pairings on Students Repeating First-Year Composition,” Learning Assistance Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 17-26, 2008.[8] McDonald, M., “Respectful Alignment of Programs as a Possible Factor in Remedial Writers' Pass Rates,” Learning Assistance Review, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85-101, 2017.[9] Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A., “Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula, courses, and support systems.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 325-328, 2003.[10] Burkett, A. R., & Dunkle, S. B., “Technical writing in the undergraduate curriculum
four categories described above.Considering the average grade obtained over all reports in each class for all experiments, I couldthen check the improvement of the class within the same semester. I could also observe theimprovements in average scores for the same engineering class over time as it progressed alongthe four labs in successive semesters.ResultsI was the faculty instructor for the labs under consideration and relevant to this study, in thefollowing semesters: (F= Fall Semester; S= Spring Semester).Table 1 – Lab Assignment Sequence from Fall 2013 to Fall 2018Lab\Semester F 13 S14 F14 S15 F15 S16 F16 S17 F17Physics 1 x x x
., “Reasserting the Philosophy of Experiential Education as a Vehicle for Change in the 21st Century,” The Journal of Experiential Education, Vol. 22(2), pp. 91- 98, 1999. 3. Henry, X. X. D., Zhang, L., Nagchaudhuri, A., Mitra, M., Hartman, C. E., Toney, C. A., and Akangbe, A. A., “Experiential Learning Framework for Design and Development of Environmental Data Acquisition System Enhances Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Courses,” 2015 ASEE Conf. Proceedings, Seattle, WA, June 14-17, 2015, Paper ID 11520 4. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1984. 5. Harb, J. N., Durrant, S. O., and Terry, R. E., ”Use of the
). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & society, 4(2), 139-158.Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. Classics of organizational theory, 6, 450-459.Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & society, 20(4), 441-464.Adams, R., Evangelou, D., English, L., De Figueiredo, A. D., Mousoulides, N., Pawley, A. L., ... & Wilson, D. M. (2011). Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 48-88.Alinsky, S. D. (1989). Rules for radicals: A practical primer for realistic radicals. Vintage.Baillie, C., Ko, E., Newstetter, W., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2011). Advancing diverse and inclusive
do but can communicate that to those outside the department. Using individuals who specialize in communication...that is a plus.” Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science FoundationREvolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments Participatory Action Research Grant Nos. 1540042 and 1540072CREATING STRATEGIC
East Carolina University, and Co-Director of ECU’s pan-institutional STEAM Education Research Cluster. His research focuses on the teaching and learning of earth and environmental science content, environmental education, and STEM instruction. He is a former high school earth science teacher who has served as PI, Co-PI, or Evaluator on NOAA, NSF, NIH, US Department of Education, IMLS, state, and foundation funded projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Using an Immersive Classroom Simulated Environment for Math and Science Discourse Development in Pre-service TeachersAn interdisciplinary team of researchers from East Carolina University (ECU)’s College
teams.References: [1] Rutar, T., & MS, B. S. (2011, June), A Modular Project Management Approach to Undergraduate Senior Design Projects Paper presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/17350 [2] Lawanto, O., & Cromwell, M., & Febrian, A. (2016, June), Student’s Self-Regulation in Managing Their Capstone Senior Design Projects Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. [3] Chen, Z. (2017, June), Applying Scrum to Manage a Senior Capstone Project Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27605 [4] Porter, J., & Wright, G., & Morgan, J
ethical dilemmas." In Proceedings, 33rd Annual,Frontiers in Education Conference. 2003.[12] Shuman, Larry J., Mark F. Sindelar, Mary Besterfield-Sacre, Harvey Wolfe, Rosa L. Pinkus, Ronald L. Miller, Barbara M. Olds, and Carl Mitcham. "Can our students recognize and resolve ethical dilemmas." In Proceedings, 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition. 2004.[13] Johnson, Deborah G. Ethical Issues in Engineering. Prentice-Hall, 1991.[14] Vesilind, P. Aarne, and Alastair S. Gunn. Hold Paramount: The Engineer’s Responsibility to Society. Nelson Education, 2015.[15] Holsapple, Matthew A., et al. "Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery." Journal of
, Expert conceptualizations of the convergence of Taylor series yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oklahoma, 2009. 6. Jason Martin, Michael Oehrtman, Kyeong Hah Roh, Craig Swinyard, and Catherine Hart- Weber, Students’ reinvention of formal definitions of series and pointwise convergence, in Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, edited by S. Brown, S. Larsen, Karen Marrongelle, and Michael Oehrtman (SIGMAA on RUME, Portland, OR, 2011), Vol. 1, pp. 239–254 [http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/RUME_XIV_Proceedings_ Volume_1.pdf]. 7. Danielle Champney and Eric Kuo, An evolving visual image of approximation with Taylor series
/or First Generation College Students at The University of Akron," Journal of STEM Education, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 14-20, 2005.[10] S. Lynch, T. Behrend, E. P. Burton and B. Means, "Inclusive STEM-focused high schools: STEM education policy and opportunity structures," in Annual conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, 2013.[11] National Research Council, "Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics," National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 2011.[12] S. L. Colby and M. Ortman Jennifer, "Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060," US Census Bureau, 2015
Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(1).7. Savage, R.N., Chen, K.C. and Vanasupa, L., 2007. Integrating project-based learning throughout the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 8(3/4), p.15.8. Selvi, E., Soto-Caban, S., Taylor, R.S. and Wilson, W.R., 2011. Similar Consecutive Bridge Design Projects for Freshmen and Sophomore Level Engineering Courses. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education. Vancouver, B.C., Canada, June 26-299. Clayton, G., 2010. Introducing engineering design using impromptu design projects. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education. Louisville, KY
support of NSF (DUE #1505066) and WSU VancouverResearch Mini-grant for this research project.References 1. Berthouex, P. (1996). Honing the writing skills of engineers. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 122(3), 107-110. 2. Donnell, J., Aller, B., Alley, M., & Kedrowicz, A. (2011). Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/1/papers/1503/view 3. Conrad, S., Kitch, W.A., Pfeiffer, T.J., Smith, T.R., and Tocco, J.V. (2015). Students Writing for Professional Practice: A Model
Hundigopal , Xiaoxin You, Increasing high school girls' self confidence and awareness of CS through a positive summer experience, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.36 n.1, March 20047 Rogers, S., S. Harris, I. Fidan, and D. McNeel, "Art2STEM: Building a STEM Workforce at the Middle School Level," ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011.8 Inna Pivkina , Enrico Pontelli , Rachel Jensen , Jessica Haebe, Young women in computing: lessons learned from an educational & outreach program, Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, March 04-07, 2009, Chattanooga, TN, USA9 Tyler-Wood, Tandra, et al. "Bringing up girls in science (BUGS): The effectiveness of an afterschool
mechanism to deal with studentabsences. The format of CRs also motivates key principles of student learning, includingstimulating intrinsic motivation and curiosity, enhancing cognition and memory, and developingmetacognition and self-regulation. This system of complementary readiness assessments allowsfor students with different learning styles to use whichever suits their learning more.1 Velegol, S. B., Zappe, S.E., and Mahoney, E. 2015. The Evolution of a Flipped Classroom: Evidence-Based Recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education 4(3):1-37.2 Leicht, R.M, Zappe, S.E., Messner, J. I. and Litzinger, T. 2012. Employing the Classroom Flip to Move "Lecture"Out of the Classroom. Journal of Applications and Practices in Engineering
undergraduate students” witha stated mission “to graduate engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset so they can createpersonal, economic, and societal value through a lifetime of meaningful work.” Including anentrepreneurial mindset in an engineering curriculum, discussed more completely in a paper byKriewall and Mekemson’s,9 is one where unmet customer needs are coupled with traditionalengineering approaches to problem solving and can lead to potential benefits to both individualstudents and to society as a whole. Similarly, presentations from 2015’s ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition concerning Epicenter10, the National Center for EngineeringPathways to Innovation showcased another inspiring example. Their stated mission “…is toempower U.S
learning in engineering andmedicine: determinants of students’ engagement and persistence. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2), 8.[9] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4 (pp. 71-81). New York: AcademicPress, 1994[10] Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(10),32-43.[11] Collins, A., Brown, J. S. & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making Thinking Visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6-11, 38-46.[12] Dong, J., & Warter-Perez, N. “Project-Based Learning Using Tablet PCs: A Practice to Enhance Design Components inEngineering Instruction,” in Proceedings of the American
quality improvement systems of the program may well require acultural shift of the institution’s administrators and faculty.ConclusionsFor continuous improvement processes, ABET’s Criterion 4 focuses the primary mechanismprogram improvement on appropriate assessment and evaluation of student outcomes (whatstudents need to know and be able to do at the time of graduation), e.g., data driven improvementactions based on demonstrated student learning (or lack of such learning). The AUN-QA criteriahave a much broader focus on quality improvement, asking programs to use a wide variety ofinputs within their quality system. Some of the measures of quality included in the AUN-QAcriteria include traditional output measures, e.g., Criterion 10’s
Northridge were able to graduate as mechanical engineerstrained to think, design, and operate using system-level skills.Bibliography[1] Kirkpatrick, A., & Danielson, S., ASME VISION 2030’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MECHANICALENGINEERING EDUCATION. Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition[2] Youssef, G., & Kabo, J. M., Machine Design: Redesigned Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition[3] Katz, R., Integrating Analysis and Design in Mechanical Engineering Education Procedia CIRP, Volume36, 2015[4] Towhidnejad, M., & Hillburn, T., An Overview of GRCSE: Graduate Reference Curriculum for SystemsEngineering Paper presented at World Congress on Engineering Education 2013[5] Lee, T
[lesson]&[activity] Describe the campus - foot, bicycle, and vehicle Transport with case study of Highway funding issues in the traffic - identify problem areas, then Denmark/Sweden train/ferry government (postponed 36 times). use the engineering design process to transport; Kandersteg Switzerland car Then have teams of 2 or 4 develop and develop solution(s) (Liz Adams) transport on train