Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 1 - STEM Outreach

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathleen Smits, The University of Texas at Arlington; Michelle Schwartz, The University of Texas at Arlington; Nathaniel Steadman, The University of Texas at Arlington

controlgroup of non-participants were surveyed using an amended S-STEM survey developed by theFriday Institute for Engineering Education at North Carolina State University. The generalstudent body’s perceptions decreased over time towards STEM between 6th and 8th grade forboth boys and girls; girls had lower STEM attitudes when compared to their male peers. Girlswho participated in the program over the course of at least two semesters saw an increase in theirSTEM attitudes while those who did not participate saw a decrease over the multiple semestersof surveys. Exposure to STEM through general enrichment opportunities did not show ameasurable correlation with interest and participation in STEM. Rather, the biggest indicator ofSTEM interest was access

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Subodh Bhandari, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Erika Dejonghe; Amar Raheja; Fang Tang; Zekeriya Aliyazicioglu, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

autonomy and UAV dynamics. They alsolearned to do the scientific literature review, and had an opportunity to improve written and oralcommunication skills. The participants were required to present a poster, give an oralpresentation of the research, and submit abstract (s) to student and/or professional conferences[1].In addition, the students participated in a series of research symposium and seminars designed toexpose them to a range of research topics, and engaged in professional development activitiesSeveral workshops were conducted throughout the 8- or 10-week periods that included Ethics inEngineering and Science, Graduate School Application Process and Financial Support, ResumeBuilding, Improving Oral and Written Presentation Skills, and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arun Srinivasa, Texas A&M University; Rujun Gao, Texas A&M University; M Cynthia Hipwell, Texas A&M University; David Seets, Texas A&M University; Andreas Polycarpou, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson, Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations; Mindy Bergman

Paper ID #37470WIP: Incremental innovation training as a means forpercolating faculty teaching culture change-A First LookRujun GaoM Cynthia Hipwell (Oscar S. Wyatt, Jr. '45 Chair II Professor)Chris Seets naMindy BergmanArun R Srinivasa (Assistant Professor) Dr Srinivasa is the Holdredge Paul professor and Associate Head of the Department for the UG progam at the Mike Walker '77 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. He obtained his Phd in Mechanics from UC Berkeley and has been active in pedagogical research and faculty development apart from his research work in Mechanics. He was the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tuncay Aktosun, The University of Texas at Arlington; Yolanda Parker; Jianzhong Su, The University of Texas at Arlington

Paper ID #38227THREE MENTORING PROGRAMS IN MATHEMATICSAT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON ANDTHEIR LOCAL AND BROADER IMPACTSTuncay Aktosun (Dr.) Dr. Aktosun is a professor of mathematics at the University of Texas at Arlington. His research area is applied mathematics and differential equations with research interests in scattering and spectral theory, inverse problems, wave propagation, and integrable evolution equations. He is involved in various mentoring and scholarship programs benefiting students. He has been the GAANN Fellowship Director in his department since 2006, the NSF S-STEM Scholarship Director

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Perspectives on Engineering Ethics Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University; Carla Zoltowski, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Dayoung Kim, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Lazlo Stepback, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

. Anyhope for a “science of ethics” must take into account these multi-faceted intersections of thenormative and empirical. We hope this paper helps seed conversations around such challengesamong engineering ethics scholars.AcknowledgementsThese materials are based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant Nos. 2024301 and 2130924. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] National Academy of Engineering., The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2004.[2] S. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A

Conference Session

WIED: Partnering with and Supporting the WIED Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carol Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Margaret Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Iris Rivero; Jessica Bennett; Gloria Blackwell

current and future offerings including thenewly created Equity Network.AcknowledgementsSupport for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation ADVANCE programunder Awards No. 2121930, 1209115, and 0811076. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] United States Census Bureau, Current Population Survey: PINC-05. Work Experience- People 15 Years Old and Over, by Total Money Earnings, Age, Race, Hispanic Origin, Sex, and Disability Status:2018. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time- series/demo/income-poverty/cps-pinc/pinc-05.html[2] R. Bleiweis

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ursula Nguyen, University of Texas at Austin; Catherine Riegle-Crumb

, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2021, Special Report NSF 21-321. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation; 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd. [Accessed: Feb. 1, 2022].[3] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, R. A. Layton, R. A. Long, M. W. Ohland, and M. H. Wasburn, “Who's persisting in engineering? A comparative analysis of female and male Asian, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White students,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 167-190, 2009.[4] E. M. Bradburn, S. Nevill, E. F. Cataldi, and K. Perry, Where are They Now?: A Description of 1992-93 Bachelor's Degree Recipients 10 Years Later (NCES 2007-159

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chandrasekhar Radhakrishnan; Yuting Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Z s н н s/E /Ϭ sϬ / (a) Diode Model (b) Diode Circuit Diode Current, I D DC Operating Point Diode Voltage, V D (c) Computation of operating point

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kanti Prasad, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Abdul Syed, University of Massachusetts Lowell

employing only two-stages, the design of amplifier is already complex, in that achievingperfect inter-stage matching becomes difficult thereby causing device failure as return losses are small. Toresolve this, the design of amplifier first stage is undertaken independently, and then the second stage iscascaded to form a two-stage amplifier along with matching networks, resulting in a reasonable value ofreturn loss for sustaining device operation in low to mid-5G ranges. Two GaN HEMT’s are used in these investigations for PA design, and being modeled using theNitronex/Macom-NPT series [6] and Triquint/Qorvo-TGF series [7] High Frequency (HF) transistor S-parameters. To model the device, the two port S-parameters of NPT series transistor are

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Massood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; James Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Omar Ochoa, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Radu Babiceanu, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Erin Chernak, The University of Texas at Arlington

. Pembridge Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniveristyRadu F. Babiceanu (Professor)Erin Elizabeth Bowen (A. Dale Thompson Professor of Leadership) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION COPYRIGHT TRANSFER FORMTitle of Paper: ________________________________________________________________________Author(s): ______ _____________________________________________________________________Publication: ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings Session #: ___________ PART AThe

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexandra Jackson; Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce Oestreich; Cheryl Bodnar, Rowan University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh

0.63 3.34 0.60 0.472 Interest 3.68 0.99 3.87 0.92 0.0003 3.75 0.96 3.93 0.93 0.011 Open 4.54 0.47 4.48 0.61 0.002 4.51 0.53 4.52 0.52 0.743 MindednessDuring the first year curriculum, Cohort 1's population showed significant increases in four outof the six sub-constructs, less Interest and Open Mindedness. However, Cohort 2's populationshowed significant increases in only Interest and Open Mindedness, hinting at a disconnectbetween the two cohorts in their first year of their program. Previous studies have indicated theimportance of determining student perceptions of projects and teaching styles to determinenecessary changes to ensure that students are

Conference Session

ERM: Mental Health and Wellness

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corin Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Lizabeth Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Gustavo Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Christina Nazar, California State University, Los Angeles

colleagues at Cal State LA she recently received an NSF grant called Eco-STEM which aims to transform STEM education using an asset-based ecosystem model. She is also a Co-PI on an NSF S-STEM grant called ENGAGE which is working to make a more robust transfer pathway for local Community college students. Dr. Thompson is a Co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE grant called KIND with other universities within the CSU. She is a co-advisor to Engineers without Borders, Critical Global Engagement, and oSTEM at Cal Poly.Gustavo B Menezes (Professor)Christina Restrepo Nazar © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Measuring

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 6: Monitoring, Evaluating and Research

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Dang, Purdue Engineering Education; Kirsten Davis, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Brent Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

education ofengineers. Both classes also offer formal training and activities focused on inter/cross-culturalcompetency development.The study reported here is based on survey data collected during multiple offerings of thesecourses over the span of three years, encompassing a total of 79 students. The survey consistedof items from the Global Engineering Competency-Situational Judgment Test (GEC-SJT),Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), and Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale-Short form(MGUDS-S). These three instruments, together, form a multi-faceted view of a student’spotential ability to perform and adapt in an international work environment. To analyze thesemeasures longitudinally, we compare students’ pre- and post-course scores on each

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Nadia Kellam, Arizona State University; Susannah Davis, University of New Mexico

the National Science Foundation under multiplegrants in EEC 1623105, 1914578, 1915484, 1913128, and 1751369. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Forin, T.R., Sukumaran, B., Farrell, S., Jahan, K., Bruckerhoff, T.F., and Lezotte, S., Revolutionizing engineering diversity. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. DOI:10.18260/1-2-- 30035.2. Forin, T.R., Farrell, S., Jahan, K., Hartman, H., Sukumaran, B., Dusseau, R.A., Bauer, S.K., Bruckerhoff, T.F., Zeppilli, D., and Lezotte, S

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhou Zhang, New York City College of Technology; Yizhe Chang; Sven Esche, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Andy Zhang, New York City College of Technology

Paper ID #37539Application of Internet of Things in Online Robotics ClassZhou Zhang (Dr.)Yizhe Chang Yizhe Chang is an assistant professor in mechanical engineering.Andy Zhang (Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, Conference: June 26 – 29, 2020 Zhang, Z., Chang, Y., Esche, S. K, Zhang, A., Application of Internet of Things in Online Robotics Class

Conference Session

ERM: Design!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Titiksha Singh, The State University of New York, College at Buffalo

components. Asengineering design teams define, scope, and research their problem the team will develop a sharedunderstanding of the problem and any complex system(s) underlying it. This conceptualization may thencontinue to evolve throughout their design process and deeply impact the direction of their project.Therefore, the degree and depth to which the team attends or conceptualizes the complexity of theunderlying problem will likely affect the effectiveness, adaptability, and longevity of any resulting designsolution. In this work we propose to examine how capstone engineering design teams attend tocomplexity within their design problems through a modified method for complex system mapping. Wedraw on complexity theory, and specifically the

Conference Session

ERM: Teamwork makes the dream work!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rashmi Solanki, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Chad Kennedy, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Yash Shirke, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

criterion selection and evaluation. Recognizing a need to haveconsistency in SWOT criterion evaluation, Kurttila et. al.5 applied a hybrid Analytic HierarchyProcess (AHP) with the SWOT analysis to evaluate forest certification. Stewart et. Al.7 applied asimilar hybrid AHP method to construction cases.The output of a weighted and scored SWOT analysis has long been established with a 2D plotshowing the S-W (y-axis) vs. the O-T (x-axis). Chang and Huang plotted the O-T vs. S-W axisinto a 2D graph to allow better visualization of the outcomes and offer suggestions based uponthe quadrant outcomes2. They coined these developments as the Quantified SWOT and theGrand Strategy Matrix (GSM) which is a reversal of the S-W vs. O-T plot although there is noreal

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University; Jennifer Kidd, Old Dominion University; Julia Noginova; Francisco Cima; Stacie Ringleb, Old Dominion University; Orlando Ayala, Old Dominion University; Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University; Kristie Gutierrez, Old Dominion University; Min Jung Lee, Old Dominion University

Collaborating with Preservice Teachers and Fifth Graders on Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Learning during a Robotic Design Process K. Kaipa, J. Kidd, J. Noginova, F. Cima, S. Ringleb, O. Ayala, P. Pazos, K. Gutierrez, and M. J. LeeAbstract.This work-in-progress paper describes engineering students’ experiences in an NSF-fundedproject that partnered undergraduate engineering students with pre-service teachers to plan anddeliver robotics lessons to fifth graders at a local school. This project aims to address an apparentgap between what is taught in academia and industry’s expectations of engineers to integrateperspectives from outside their field to solve modern societal problems requiring amultidisciplinary

Conference Session

ETD - ET Curriculum and Programs I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gloria Fragoso-Diaz; Billy Gray, Tarleton State University

] 1 Biology and Engineering [54] 1 Total 39* This particular publication included Electrical, Computer, Mechanical, and Civil Engineering,Civil Engineering Technology, and Modeling and Simulation Majors.NSF EffortsTo understand more about the amount of student retention efforts, the authors analyzedinformation publicly available in National Science Foundation NSF website [72], [73].Specifically, we selected two areas of funding: Scholarships in STEM network (S-STEM-Net)[73] and Broadening Participation in Engineering BPE [72]. To narrow the analysis, the criteriaused to define the starting point in our research, included the grant’s awards that had a “Startday” of January of 2020. That means work

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Ethics Education Assessment

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Clancy, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology; Ryan Thorpe

, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.[11] J. Haidt, The Righteous Mind. New York: Vintage Press, 2012.[12] J. D. Greene, Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.[13] V. Dranseika, R. Berniūnas, and V. Silius, “Immorality and bu daode, unculturedness and bu wenming,” J. Cult. Cogn. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 71–84, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s41809- 018-0013-y.[14] R. Shweder, N. Much, M. Mahapatra, and L. Park, “The ‘big three’ of morality (autonomy, community, divinity), and the ‘big three’ explanations of suffering,” in Morality and health, A. Brandt and P. Rozin, Eds. Routledge, 1997, pp. 119–169.[15] D. Kelly and S

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hüseyin Sarper P.E, Old Dominion University; Nebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University - Pueblo

101884.00 1.80 2.62 3.51 -0.23 4.39 Thrusting 9.75 101864.00 1.80 0.43 0.79 -0.06 0.90 Thrusting 9.80 101896.00 1.50 4.27 -2.27 3.52 5.98 Slowing 9.85 101874.00 1.20 0.18 -2.18 1.90 2.90 Slowing 9.90 101933.00 0.90 -4.40 -9.35 0.29 10.34 ImpactNote that 0.06 G at t = 8.85 is really zero and the bus is not moving. The acceleration (Y direction)values per 0.05 seconds are 0.58, 1.67, 3.48, …, 3.51, 0.79, -2.27, -2.28, and -9.35 at impact.Notice that right before impact, acceleration was negative at t = 9.80 s. This makes sense becausethe fuel was all consumed around starting

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Solnosky, Pennsylvania State University; Robert Leicht, Pennsylvania State University; Ziyi Wang, Pennsylvania State University

, construction processes, and sometimes architectural design. Common stakeholdersinclude faculty within the department who teach and advise, the students who must take the course(s), andindustry advisors' knowledge to be demonstrated by students they may hire.In this manuscript, we present the current design of a year-long capstone in architectural engineering,present the evaluative process undertaken for improvements, a stakeholder input analysis on the re-designprocess, then lastly introduce the resulting model that is currently being piloted. The fundamental challengeleading to the presented stakeholder review with considerations for a new approach is the tension betweenindividual learning and scholarship with the benefits of developing an effective

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 7 Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hillary Merzdorf, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Morgan Weaver, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Julie Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University

assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Julie S Linsey (Professor) Georgia TechTracy Anne Hammond (Professor) Dr. Tracy Hammond is the current Secretary of the Faculty Senate and passionate about Faculty governance. Hammond is Director of the TAMU

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Nickel; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University; Stu Thompson, Bucknell University; Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Abdelghany Abouelnagga; Natalie Kreusch, Bucknell University

set ofavailable tools as it continues to grow. A detailed description of the current state of the frameworkis provided in the EdTech Overview section.To evaluate the ontology, we presented the preliminary findings to engineering faculty andsolicited their feedback regarding (i) what type(s) of product they may already be using and why,(ii) what other type(s) of product may be of interest to them, and (iii) what type(s) of productis/are currently not of interest to them and why. Data were collected through one-hour-longfaculty interviews in which the use of the educational-technology tools was discussed amongother topics. Using this feedback, the resulting database of products continues to be refined,including respective type labels for each

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bailey Bond-Trittipo, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Nivedita Kumar, Florida International University; Tiana Solis, Florida International University

. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Future Career Pathway Perceptions of Lower-Income Computing Students Through the Lens of Capital Exchange1. BackgroundWhile significant broadening participation efforts in computing higher education have focusedon gender and race [1]-[3], the experiences of lower-income students in undergraduatecomputing education are as yet underexplored. One major effort focused on lower-incomestudents is the National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) program, a funding program designed to supportlower-income students to persist and succeed in STEM fields. The

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Liu, University of Toronto; Joanna Li, University of Toronto; Jenifer Hossain, University of Toronto

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chris Barr, University of Michigan; Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan; H. Scott Fogler, University of Michigan

plannedto be presented in a separate paper at the 2022 American Society of Engineering EducationNational Conference.Additional resources on SAFEChEWhile the majority of the SAFEChE initiative is built around the course specific industrialaccident focused modules, the SAFEChE team wants to have the website to be an additional hubfor other tools for processes safety to be used in other courses or possibly by studentorganizations. One core component of the chemical engineering curriculum that the websitedoes not have CSB modules for is the Chemical Engineering (or Unit Operations) Laboratorycourse(s). These labs tend to focus on more practical “soft” and less theory-based skills usingcalculations and equations taught in lecture classes. As a result

Conference Session

Statics Fanatics 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yemisi Oyewola, Utah State University; Brian Cowburn, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Ryan Barlow, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Wade Goodridge, Utah State University; Kurt Becker, Utah State University - Engineering Education

environmental and biological engineering students for Spring 2020, Fall 2020 and Spring 2021. Table 5.2 and Fig. 5.2 depict the change in the Mean and Standard Deviation of SE and PV for the combined Pre and Post Surveys respectively. Table. 5.1 Trend in the means of the SE and PV of environmental and biological engineering students for the 3 semesters SELF-EFFICACY PERCEIVED VALUEMajor PRE-SURVEY POSTSURVEY PRE-SURVEY POST-SURVEY S’20 F’20 S’21 S’20 F’20 S’21 S’20 F’20 S’21 S’20 F’20 S’21 4.35 3.86

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Lee, University of California, Santa Cruz; Dustin Palea, University of California, Santa Cruz

that can support lightweight, scalable, and relationallearning experiences of many types. In some sense, what we are after is a relational form ofmicrolearning, where learners can engage in short personalized learning experiences, but inrelational interactions embedded in and influencing a larger social system.AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge our fellow authors across the ongoing projects mentioned: RyanAnderson, Nisha Charagulla, Ana Guo, Atira Nair, and Rhea Sharma. This research was fundedby the National Science Foundation (IUSE: EHR) under Grant No. 1807388.References[1] M. K. Eagan Jr, S. Hurtado, M. J. Chang, G. A. Garcia, F. A. Herrera, and J. C. Garibay, “Making a difference in science education: the impact of

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 3: Online Learning and the Impact of COVID-19

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Natalie Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

responded topublic health concerns associated with the virus [6]. As a result, “lessons learned” have alreadybeen published about the barriers faced by student and professional teams in the academic andnon-academic workplaces, respectively [3]–[5]. This study is intended to contribute to this emerging body of knowledge about the behavior of virtual and in-person student design teamsoperating under pandemic-induced conditions.BackgroundTeam development can be described in terms of Bruce Tuckman’s four stages, which hedeveloped in the mid-1960’s based on an extensive review of the literature, and re-visited in1977 [1], [2]. These four stages are described in Table 1 below:Table 1: Tuckman’s Team Development Stages and Their Key Characteristics [1