, group structure, high stakes tests) [26-28], instead offering opportunities to recover from poor grades (e.g., submit test corrections forpartial credit, drop their lowest score) and build a growth mindset [e.g., 29]. Instructors shouldalso consider hidden curriculum related to overwork [30-32]. If we imply that engineeringstudents should always be studying, this might contribute to poor mental health. It might alsodiscourage students from persisting in engineering to earn their degree or enter the engineeringworkforce. Alternatively, we can encourage students to develop a healthy balance which includesattending to the eight dimensions of well-being via an array of activities.References[1] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Paper ID #15176A New Approach to Marketing and Outreach for Engineering LibrariesMs. Ellie Ransom, Columbia University Libraries Ellie Ransom is the Research Services Coordinator for the Science & Engineering Libraries Division at Columbia University. She is the liaison to the School of Engineering and Applied Science and the departments of Mathematics and Statistics. She works to create a robust workshop schedule for the science and engineering departments on campus. Ellie has a B.S. in Mathematics from North Carolina State University, a M.S. in Applied Mathematics and Statistics from Georgetown University and an M.S
represent male student perceptions of their role in the femalestudent experience.BackgroundTeam-based design courses are an integral part of engineering education. First-year designcourses, specifically, are foundational to introduce students to the field to increase interest andmaintain retention (Brannan & Wankat, 2005). With a shared emphasis on developing technicaland professional skills, first-year design courses also give students an opportunity to practiceskills that are necessary to the profession, within an authentic project context. However,gendered behavior can be present among student teams, which can negatively impact theexperience for female students. Analysis of gendered task assignment and female perspectivesare commonly
Paper ID #34344Measuring the Impact of a Study Abroad Program on Engineering Students’Global PerspectiveMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education and an M.S. student in Indus- trial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech (VT). Tahsin holds a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500 company. As an Engineering Education researcher, he is interested in enhancing professional competencies for engi- neering workforce development in academia
Paper ID #34546A Grounded Theory Analysis of COVID-19 Information and ResourcesRelayed Through University Webpages: Implications for a More InclusiveCommunityDr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw Hill Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Researcher. She currently heads Global People Research and Analytics at McGraw Hill, where she leads research leveraging employee data to generate data-driven insights for decisions impacting organizational Culture and Talent. Her research interests include assessing the impact and effectiveness of inclusion initiatives as well as employing in- novative, ethical and inclusive
+ Guest speaker Due: Reflection 2 Workshop 4 Encouraging an Inclusive Learning Environment, Connections in the Classroom, and Identity Safety + Guest speakers Due: Reflection 3 Workshop 5 Providing and Receiving Feedback + Guest speaker Due: Reflection 4 Workshop 6 Celebration of completion, individual presentations of learning Due: Final reflection and implementation plan Post-survey Post-survey link administered; due by end of semesterThe workshop curriculum was adapted from the national program to fit the institution’s HSIidentity and graduate student audience, such that participants framed their thinking within theuniversity-specific
thread requires further work, either to efficiently integrate inclusive teaching into theexisting reward system, or to fundamentally change what counts in engineering.ConclusionLet us conclude with a few comments about bridging the valley of neglect that we defined in theabstract to be the missing link that divides scholarly work about DEI from concrete changes thatbenefit students, employers, and the broader community. On the one hand, there is a phenomenalbody of literature informing the practice of engineering education in general, and inclusiveengineering education in particular. On the other hand, even at an engineering college where asizeable percentage of the engineering faculty volunteered for a three-year faculty learningcommunity
meaningful project skills andlearning which might be significant when considering the lower amount of effort required.References1. Gelmon, S. B. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact, Brown University.2. Lima, M., Oakes, W. C., & Gruender, J. L. (2006). Service-learning: Engineering in your community. Wildwood, MO: Great Lakes Press.3. Ropers-Huilman, B., Carwile, L., & Lima, M. (2005). Service-learning in engineering: A valuable pedagogy for meeting learning objectives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 155-165.4. Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Sommers, L. S. (1997). EPICS: A model for integrating service-learning into the engineering curriculum
effectively we can impress upon students the benefits ofgrowing grittiness. The discussion will center on EduGuide’s features, accessibility, and reportedeffectiveness.IntroductionThe research of Angela Lee Duckworth that culminated in her New York bestseller Grit: ThePower of Passion and Perseverance [1] brings forth two big ideas: first, that grit (comprised of aperson’s perseverance and passion) can be among the most important predictors of success, and;second, that one’s grit can indeed be self-developed. The popularity of these ideas hasencouraged a conflagration of efforts to incorporate and integrate grit into every facet of theeducation system, from curriculum development to personal and professional development.As posited by Duckworth, the
evaluation methods as applied to process control (NDE) and pedagogical methodology. Dr. Shull’s peda- gogical efforts include meta-cognitive strategy learning to improve student academic success, an interest in women’s issues within the engineering environment, integrated, experiential techniques to improve engineering students’ social emotional development as applied to teamwork and communication, and program assessment methods that minimize stakeholders’ efforts while maximizing the effectiveness of the measurement tool.Dr. Catherine Cohan, The Pennsylvania State University Catherine Cohan holds a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology and has been a research psychologist for over 20 years. Her areas of expertise include
related to culture, curriculum, and community to achieve adaptability, innovation, and shared vision. Alongside her research, Dr. Ogle has been active in the development of engaged learning and has led two interdisciplinary undergraduate translational research and education courses - Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries (CEDC) and Clemson Engage. Both courses include trips to developing countries, international internships and sig- nificant fund-raising to support projects with community partners. As a result of her efforts, the CEDC program grew from 25 students to over 100 from 30 different departments and was recognized by the Institute for International Education (IIE) with the Andrew Heiskell Award. As a
environments.”“To this end, we call on engineering educators, engineering administrators, and engineeringpolicy leaders to take deliberate and immediate steps to integrate global education into theengineering curriculum to impact all students, recognizing global competency as one of thehighest priorities for their graduates.”6.2 Looking Back Ten YearsAlthough the Newport Declaration received some publicity (it was published, for example, in theASEE Prism magazine), the impression of the authors is that it did not get a lot of attention.Nevertheless, by at least some measures, the response of engineering programs has beensignificant. According to the Institute of International Education, study abroad participation byengineering students has more than
challenges in civil engineeringeducation and proposing educational reforms and initiatives to address these challenges. At the1995 Civil Engineering Education Conference, 235 participants considered a wide range ofissues and collectively identified four major areas for focused action by ASCE: (1) facultydevelopment, (2) an integrated curriculum, (3) practitioner involvement in education, and (4) thefirst professional degree.1Following the 1995 conference, the ASCE Educational Activities Committee (EdAC) assumedresponsibility for the faculty development issue area. EdAC proposed to the ASCE Board ofDirection that a standing Committee on Faculty Development be established and provided withfunding to plan and implement a teaching effectiveness workshop
certified as an EFL and ESL teacher as well as a School Principal. Ari’s research and language revitalization interests include Mikasuki, Salish Ql’ispe (aka Salish-Pend d’Oreille, Montana Salish, and Flathead Salish) and Safaliba. His ethnographic work documents situated practice in grassroots policy initiatives and school-based activism among the Safaliba in rural Ghana. His language documentation includes conceptual metaphors and formulaic language in Salish Ql’ispe and Safaliba. He also explores applications of task-based language teaching in the pedagogy of revitalization. His practitioner papers analyze integrated content and language instruction, academic English instruction for graduate students, and asset-based
in ways that reinforce existing power structures. This underscores theimportance of critically assessing educational materials for their role in upholding or challenginghegemonic narratives within the engineering discipline and broader society–an avenue that wewish to explore further.From an STS perspective, policy is considered an integral part of infrastructure, as it shapes thecontext of the specific places in which scientific and technological work unfolds. Policies dictatewhat is built, how it is used, who has access to it, and the norms of its use and conversely, theconsequences of a lack of transparent policy around how spaces are regulated. Yet, policies alsomust be translated and performed, and those performances are in part guided
. Person C: (nodding) Actually, I needed that too. Person A (host): Thanks for letting us know. Come to think of it, we've been going for a while, so why don't we do one more discussion round and then take a 15-minute break? (people nod agreement; discussion continues).In an engineering education context, we have used the Circle Way format to facilitate facultydiscussions on engineering curriculum design. We have also used it as the discussion format fora graduate-level course on signal processing, where technical topics discussed in the prior week’sclass were placed in the center for the class to explain, comment on, and ask questions about.The Circle architecture can be used to hold both intellectually and affectively difficult
online resources such as the Mentor-Connectwebsite and webinars had been informative and motivating. Two others specified that havingface-to-face interactions via the Grant-Writing Workshop had enhanced their overall experience.A few representatives from Cohort 2 did volunteer some specific recommendations. However,these emerged on an individual basis, precluding the development of cohesive themes on thistopic. Instead, the recommendations are detailed individually: • One respondent stated that he/she would like to share curriculum that his/her program had developed using ATE funds with other institutions. While not directly related to improvements in Mentor-Connect per se, the representative would have appreciated guidance
data framein the pre-program data was not collected from an identical frame in the post-program datacollection. In effect, this would bolster the representation of women in their programs notbecause more women were recruited, but because the set of units used for the data wereexpanded to include new, more gender-balanced sub-disciplines. However, because ES-UPrecommends creating these types of program expansions or features (“multiple pathways”) as away to increase women, variation in the data frame speaks to the benefits of using this strategy.Nonetheless, the authors were not able to identify if this had occurred among the seven schoolsused in the study.References[1] U.S. Department of Education, “Integrated Postsecondary Education Data
sense of global citizenship totake hold in a student's life in both present and future behaviors.MethodsThis research is part of a larger study funded by the National Science Foundation invested indeveloping curriculum tools to teach sustainability more effectively as an integrated part ofcoursework from sophomore to senior year in engineering and other science majors. This largerstudy is currently in its third year and operates on the principle that certain majors/disciplineshave unique psychographic characteristics that influence the manner in which they engage insustainability topics and that best practice instruction methods for engineering students are likelyto differ from those in other disciplines.The institution involved in this study
environment (ALOE) to provide a practical learning environmentthat facilitates developing many of the needed technical and soft skills without the inherentdifficulty and cost associated with radio frequency components and regulation. We define sixlearning stages that assimilate the standardization process and identify key learning objectivesfor each. We discuss our experiences when employing the proposed methodology at BarcelonaTech in Spain, compare the approach with an equivalent class at Virginia Tech in the US andmake the following observations: (1) The complexity of standards need to be abstracted andpresented in a form suitable for a given class. (2) Educating about cellular communicationsstandards is most effective when students are immersed
reliable ethicalpractices. Engineering ethics is defined as: “(1) the study of moral issues and decisionsconfronting individuals and organizations involved in engineering and (2) the study of relatedquestions about moral conduct, character, policies, and relations of people and corporationsinvolved in technological activity” [1]. Engineering ethics has been increasingly emphasized inengineering curricula. The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) hasspecific student outcomes related to ethical considerations. Despite the need for ethical decision-making among the undergraduate civil engineers, incorporating ethics into the curriculum hasnot been an easy task.In some academic institutions, ethics courses could be offered by a non
/03043797.2016.1158789 [2] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. Lundeberg, and C. F. Bunting, “Problem-based Learning: Influence on Students’ Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 253–280, Apr. 2011, mAG ID: 2137085812. [3] A. Wiek, A. Xiong, K. Brundiers, and S. van der Leeuw, “Integrating problem- and project-based learning into sustainability programs: A case study on the School of Sustainability at Arizona State University,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 431–449, Aug. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2013-0013/full/html [4] A. C. B. Reis, S. C. M. Barbalho, and A. C. D. Zanette, “A
., 2017). Lastly, consumers often believe that they want a product that is loadedwith features but later may be overwhelmed by the product’s complexity (Rust et al., 2006). Itbecomes clear that a sharper focus on stakeholders and features is a critical requirement forproduct success and an integrated approach is needed to help students navigate thesecomplexities. A systems engineering approach for undergraduate design education has been applied in firstyear to capstone design courses to help students with designing systems (Simoni, et al., 2016).The advantages of the approach are that one set of models or views is applicable to a widevariety of design problems making the common approach easier for students to learn and facultyto teach and assess
Paper ID #16481Leveraging New Platforms to Provide Students with a Realistic SoC DesignExperienceDr. Andrew Danowitz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Andrew Danowitz received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University in 2014, and is currently an Assistant Professor of Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. His engineering education interests include student mental health, retention, and motivation.Antonio Leija, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Antonio Leija is now a Test Engineer at Green Hills Software in Santa
inindustry or in everyday life.A common complaint from industry regarding new engineering graduates is their lack of hands-on practice [4], particularly with actual equipment. This may be due in part to the general lack ofactual engineering experience for engineering faculty [5]. Ralston and Cox write, “Leaders inU.S. engineering education point to increased ‘real world’ skills as crucial for meeting thechallenges of engineering in the future” [6].Experience plays a central role in the learning process [7] and therefore is an important part ofthe engineering curriculum. Kolb writes, “Knowledge results from the combination of graspingand transforming experience. Grasping experience refers to the process of taking in information,and transforming
their preparedness for the program they have undertaken, their ability andlevel of commitment to meet the demands of a challenging curriculum, their capability to becompetitive in their field after graduation, and whether their academic workload leading todiminishing quality of life in other areas. These sources of anxiety may be exacerbated for firstgeneration college students, students suffering under financial duress, or both.Studies of anxiety remediation strategies among engineering students are typically conductedwith an eye to improving a particular course or program overall so as to benefit future students.While these efforts may result in average or program-cultural decreases in student anxiety, pointsources of anxiety for individual
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and his M. S. in Civil Engineering in 2015. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy within engineering. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineering Education PhD undergraduate student at Purdue University. Previously a high school educa- tor for six years with a masters in education curriculum and BS
Paper ID #14546More Comprehensive and Inclusive Approaches to Demographic Data Col-lectionMr. Todd Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette Todd is a PhD Student in Engineering Education at Purdue University who’s research is focused on en- trepreneurship education and entrepreneurship education as a component of modern engineering educa- tion efforts.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through
components of the system is shown in Figure 2. Fig. 2: Block Diagram of UHD Sustainability Garden Automated Irrigation SystemTo collect solar energy, two RENOGY® 250W mono-crystalline black photovoltaic panels areused6 (Figure 3). An Air Primus Air40 wind turbine7 (Figure 4) is used to provide a secondarysource of energy in addition to the solar panels. The wind turbine is mounted to a steel pole at aheight of 23’ and contains an integrated charge controller that allows the wiring to be directlyconnected to the battery bank. It requires a 7 mph wind to begin spinning the turbine blades. Therated output is 160 watts given a 12 mph wind speed.Other major components of the renewable system include the batteries for energy storage (two100 Ah
participation inthoughtfully organized service that is conducted in and meets the needs of the communityand that is integrated into and enhances the academic curriculum of the students; andprovides structured time for the students to reflect on the service activity in such a way asto gain further understanding of course content. (Bringle & Hatcher, 1995) The studentsdo a verbal reflection once every 2 weeks. The plan is to provide the following questionstowards the end of the project. This will help us have a record of what students havelearning. Page 26.1367.5There are currently about 15 active members in SWID and 5 of them are working on thecommunity