Conference Session

ET Pedagogy II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Irvin Cooke Jr., Virginia State University; Jinmyun Jo, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

percent of the participants statedtheir sibling(s) did not have an influence on their decision to major in an engineering program.Fifty-four percent of the African American respondents and 40% of the Caucasian respondentsindicated their mother/female guardian had a strong positive influence on their choice of major.Thirty-one percent of the Caucasian respondents and 16.6% of the African Americanrespondents stated their mother/female guardian had a somewhat positive influence on theirdecision to enroll in an engineering major. Twenty-one percent of the Caucasian respondentsand 12.3% of the African American respondents felt that their mother/female guardian did nothave any influence on their choice of major.Fifty percent of the Caucasian

Conference Session

Technical Session 6: Modulus Topics Part 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald Erdei, University of South Carolina; Brantly Edward McCord, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; David M. Whittinghill, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

offering are moregregarious while students in the Spring 2019 offering are friendly yet reserved).AcknowledgementsThis work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Program underNSF Award # OIA-1655740. Any Opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of theNational Science Foundation. (http://scepscoridea.org/MADEinSC/acknowledgements.html).References[1] N. Thomas and R. Erdei, "Stemming stereotype threat: recruitment, retention, and degree attainment in STEM fields for undergraduates from underrepresented backgrounds," in 2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session - Ethics Across Contexts

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University; Lisa Elanna Burris, Ohio State University; Nan Hu, Ohio State University; Natassia Brenkus, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

reviewers for constructive comments.ReferencesAnderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.ASCE. (2017). Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.asce.org/code-of-ethics/.Bachmann, B. (2017). Ethical Leadership in Organizations. New York, NY. Springer.Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A Meta-analytic Review of Ethical Leadership Outcomes and Moderators. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 517–536.Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005

Conference Session

Green Energy Manufacturing and Sustainable Energy Management

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jung-Uk Lim, Liberty University; Kyung K. Bae, Liberty University; Hector E. Medina, Liberty University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation, Manufacturing

theAPVAWT capstone team has passed will be introduced to show how the engineering students ofthe team design and build the APVAWT system with the Liberty art students. 2.1 Decision Gate 1 – Stakeholder RequirementsThe 1st decision gate is to identify and confirm stakeholder requirements that guide the capstoneteam in understanding what is needed to be accomplished for the project and the class. Here,stakeholders represent all entities who are involved in this project: the capstone team, theclient(s), and the class instructor. Table 1 shows stakeholder requirements the team presentedand is required to fulfill. Table 1 – Stakeholder Requirements for Design and Construction of the APVAWT Task ID Name Description

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Peng Li, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

complicated virtual environments. It is uncertain that the grant program will continue to offerfree credits in the future. Third, students create their own accounts and therefore usermanagement is a problem.In the future, we plan to develop more labs on commercial, public cloud systems and use VirtualPrivate Network (VPN) to connect students’ virtual machines with a central server to providebetter support and monitoring when needed. We are also considering integrating automaticassessment scripts through the central server on the public cloud to provide immediate feedback,which has been done successfully in some labs on our in-house, cloud-based systems.REFERENCES[1] D. Puthal, B. P. S. Sahoo, S. Mishra and S. Swain, "Cloud Computing Features, Issues

Conference Session

Postcard Session: Experiential Learning as a High-Impact Student Experience

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glenda D. Young Collins, Mississippi State University ; Reuben F. Burch V, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Sheppard, S., Gilmartin, S., Chen, H. L., Donaldson, K., Lichtenstein, G., Eris, O., . . . Toye, G. (2010). Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES). TR-10-01. 4. Buse, K. R. (2009). Why they stay: The ideal selves of persistent women engineers. (Doctoral Dissertation), Case Western University, Cleveland, OH. 5. Byars-Winston, A., Estrada, Y., Howard, C., Davis, D., & Zalapa, J. (2010). Influence of social cognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science and engineering: a multiple-groups analysis. Journal of

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ergin Erdem, Robert Morris University; Sangho Shim, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

Technology.References1. E. Barnes, Lecture Notes on Computational Methods, Georgia Institute of Technol- ogy.2. A. Caprara, M. Fischetti and P. Toth, A heuristic method for the set covering problem, Operations Research 47 (1999) 730–743.3. A. Caprara, M. Fischetti and P. Toth, Algorithms for the set covering problem, Annals of Operations Research 98 (2000) 353–371.4. S. Chopra, E. Erdem, E. Kim and S. Shim, Column generation approach to the convex recoloring problem on a tree, Modeling and Optimization: Theory and Ap- plications (MOPTA, Bethlehem, PA, USA, August 2016), Volume 213 of the series Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, pp 39-53, 2017.5. S. Chopra, B. Filipecki, K. Lee, M. Ryu, S. Shim and M. Van Vyve, The convex

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra B. Nite, Texas A&M University; Brady Creel, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Jim Morgan, Charles Sturt University; Jowaher E. Almarri

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

(PCAST). “Transformation and opportunity: The future of the U. S. research enterprise,” Washington, DC: PCAST, 2012.[2] M. W. Ohland, and E. R. Crockett. “Creating a catalog and meta-analysis of freshman programs for engineering students: Part 1: Summer bridge programs,” in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Montreal, Canada: ASEE, June 16-19, 2002.[3] B. P. An. “The Impact of Dual Enrollment on College Degree Attainment Do Low-SES Students Benefit?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 0162373712461933, 2012.[4] A. Gamoran, A. C. Porter, J. Smithson, and P. A. White. “Upgrading high school mathematics instruction

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Omaima Almatrafi, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Huzefa Rangwala; Jaime Lester, George Mason University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

in the field studies reported here. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Arnold, A. (1999). Retention and persistence in postsecondary education: A summation of research studies. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation, 5.2. Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555-580.3. Hayes, R. Q., Whalen, S. K., & Cannon, B. (2009). Csrde stem retention report, 2008–2009. Center for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Andreas Febrian, Utah State University - Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1148806. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] C. A. Wolters, “Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation.,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 224–235, 1998.[2] J. H. Flavell, “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive– developmental inquiry,” Am. Psychol., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 906–911, 1979.[3] P. Pintrich, “The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing,” Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 231–236, 2002.[4] O. Lawanto, “Students

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Jiawei Zhang, Purdue University; Rebecca Kramer, Purdue University; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

affords us thechance to change our curriculum, making improvements based on teacher and student feedback;we will continue to do so, analyzing forthcoming results to gauge the success of the curriculumin changing student perceptions. The continuation of the project presents further opportunities toimmerse ourselves in student design experiences and uncover features that are influential forchanging student perceptions about engineering.AcknowledgementsThis materials is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1513175-DRL.References1. McGrath, E., Sayres, J., Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2008, October). Underwater lego robotics as the vehicle to engage students in STEM: The build it project's first year of

Conference Session

Pre-College: Fundamental Research in Engineering Education (2)

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University, Teacher Education and Leadership; Jared W. Garlick, Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

in relation toengineering-specific domains of thinking, such as Testing and Design Requirements (criteria andconstraints). Future studies can expand this assessment instrument by testing it in other middleschool classrooms, and they can validate later iterations of this instrument. References[1] Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Reviewof Educational Research, 85(4), 553-590.[2] Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: Trends in views andpractice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1122-1148.[3] Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvement to elementary

Conference Session

Dynamic Pedagogies for Engineering Dynamics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Kent Ralph Jensen, USAF; Kwangjin Yang, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

. Kinetics principle(s) and/or kinematics you Kinetics principle(s) and/or kinematics you would use: would use:     3. During a hammer thrower’s practice swings, the 4. Knowing that crank AB rotates about Point A 7.1-kg head A of the hammer revolves at a constant with a constant angular velocity of 900 rpm speed v in a horizontal circle as shown. If  = 0.93 clockwise, determine the acceleration of the piston m and  = 60, determine the tension in wire BC. P when  = 30. Kinetics principle(s) and/or kinematics you would use: Kinetics principle(s) and/or kinematics you

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Mendez, Indiana University-Purdue University Columbus

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

supportwas provided by the Role of Reflection in SoTL Faculty Learning Community program throughthe Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Center for Teaching and Learning.References[1] A. R. Carberry, M. Siniawski, S. A. Atwood, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Best Practices for Using Standards-based Grading in Engineering Courses,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, Jun. 26-29, 2016.[2] S. L. Post, “Standards-Based Grading in a Thermodynamics Course,” Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 173–181, Jan. 2017.[3] L. Nilson, Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2014.[4] J. J. Polczynski and L. E. Shirland

Conference Session

Computer-Based Learning in Chemical Engineering Courses

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew W. Liberatore, University of Toledo; Kayla Chapman

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

completed using challenge activities. For spreadsheets, challengeactivities allow students to enter formulas, functions, and calculated values to test their strengthsusing spreadsheets. With hundreds of numeric combinations on many problems, students canrepeat a new version of any question until they compute correct answer(s). With over 100 differentquestions, the most difficult spreadsheet skills can be identified from students’ success. Thenumber of attempts before correct and total attempts will complement the percent correct to givemultiple metrics. Over 9,000 questions were attempted by the 2018 cohort and will be analyzedhere. Responses from the 2019 cohort will be compared in the conference presentation.Challenge activity scores varied

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua M. Cruz, Texas Tech University; Noa Bruhis, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Suren Jayasuriya, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

program, 40% of the population is comprised of women, a stark contrast to thesmall percentage of women represented in more traditional engineering programs. We felt thatinterviewing a proportionally larger number of women in a context different than traditionalengineering programs might provide insight into their construction, understanding, and valuingof knowledge(s). We acknowledge that this might risk having the male student having tokenrepresentation, and a follow-up study and analysis plans to address this gender imbalance.Data Collection: Participants were recruited from the AME capstone course and were chosenbecause the course is only taken by students approaching graduation; we felt that these studentshad ample experience with the program

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nina Robson, California State University, Fullerton; Cynthia Gautreau, California State University Fullerton; Madeline E. Rasche, California State University, Fullerton

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

projects were well balanced. On average, the studentsshared that the biological concepts were a bit more difficult than the mechanical engineeringconcepts (65% v/s 62.5%). Standardized pre-/post-summer experience surveys were also usedto assess the impact of the course modifications on the participants’ scientific self-efficacy andimpression of research (Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences, SURE) [18]. Theresults from the SURE survey at the end of the Summer 2018 show that out of the 21comparative learning gains, the EGGN 122 freshmen and sophomore were higher than thenational average in 11 and lower than the average in 5 gains. In response to the survey results,the last semester of the program involved improving the students’ preparation

Conference Session

Capstone and Design Projects

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Honghong Liu; Gene Yeau-Jian Liao, Wayne State University; Chih-Ping Yeh, Wayne State University; Jimmy Ching-ming Chen, Wayne State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

. The minimumparking space length can be obtained from the solution of θ, which is Lmin = 104 cm. Lpmin thenhas to be 94cm. From the result that S+ Lp = 138 cm, and choosing Lp =100 cm > 94 cm, one canobtain S = 38 cm. The rear sensor should read a distance around dr = 30 cm at the turning point P.To avoid accident, the parking space length is set as L = 110 cm > 104 cm and is then used in thecriteria for parking space finding in Eq. (1). 9 Figure 7. The picture of the modified RC toy car.The toy car does stops after finding a proper parking space and start backing up to park.However the parked positions are not at the theoretical location and are also not identical

Conference Session

Latest Trends and Implementations in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Avneet Hira, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

). at 4. Morozov, E. Making it. The New Yorker (2014). at 5. Foster, T. Welcome to the maker-industrial revolution. Popular Science (2015). at 6. Chachra, D. Why I am not a maker. The Atlantic (2015). at 7. Moldofsky, K. The maker mom. (2015). at 8. Hatch, M. The maker manifesto. McGraw Hill Education (2014). at 9. Martinez, S. & Stager, G. Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. (Constructing modern knowledge press, 2013).10. Make. Maker Pro. (2014).11. Makerspace North. Makerspace north. (2014). at 12. The British Council. Maker library network. at 13. Chaihuo Maker Space. Shenzhen Maker Faire. (2015). at 14. Seeed. First open hardware gathering in

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Research to Practice: K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design (Part 1)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Grubbs, Baltimore County Public Schools; Greg J. Strimel, West Virginia University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

ontological framework. Lastly, upon examination of the cognitive processes K-12 students’ employ duringdesigning, few coding schemes actually are informed by educational philosophies, learningtheory, and STEM educational reform. Nor, do they indicate how students can be better equippedto learn and develop their cognition while designing. As researchers and educators moveforward, examining decision making strategies as well as normative models may provideadditional relevance to Design Cognition in terms of how students are performing in relation toeducational philosophies, learning theory, and STEM Educational reform. ReferencesAdams, R. S., Turn, J., & Atman, C. Y. (2003). Educating effective

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy Ruzycki, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Materials

rubrics and exemplars, and an assessment tool is being developed to provide tuningfeedback in order to refine the laboratories in future years.References:1. Bartolo, L. et.al (2008), The Future of Materials Science and Materials EngineeringEducation, Workshop on Materials Science and Materials Engineering Education, NSF,September 2008.2. Olson, G. B. (2000). Designing a new material world. Science, 288(5468), 993-998.3. Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineeringeducation. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121-130.4. Feisel, L.D., and Peterson, G.D.,(2002). The Challenge of the Laboratory in EngineeringEducation,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), 2002, pp. 367–3685. Edward, N. S

Conference Session

Assessment II: Learning Gains and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin James Call, Utah State University; Wade H Goodridge, Utah State University; Thayne L Sweeten Ph.D., Utah State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

forengineering students. Not only would this improve the normality of the data and decrease theneed for additional analytical processes that will reduce the statistical power, but it would alsoallow for improved understanding of student learning and improved assessment of curriculumimpact on student abilities.Funding and AcknowledgementsBenjamin Call is funded by Utah State University’s Presidential Doctoral Research Fellowship.We would like to thank all of the students who participated in the study.References1. Halpern, D. F., & Collaer, M. L. (2005). The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.2. Sorby, S., Casey, B., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

expressed herein are solely the authors’.REFERENCES CITED                                                                                                                        1 Lighthall, A. (2012). Ten things you should know about today’s student veteran. Thought & Action: The NEA Higher Education Journal, 80-89. Available at http://www.nea.org/home/53407.htm2 Lord, S., Kramer, K., Olson, R., Karsada, M., Hayhurst, D., Rajala, S., … & Soldan, D. (2011). Special Session – Attracting and supporting military veterans to engineering programs. Proceedings of the 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD, October.3 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2012). Annual benefits report fiscal year 2012. Available at

Conference Session

Fundamental: Tools and Content for K-12 Engineering Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian David Hartman, Oregon State University; Kimi Grzyb, Oregon State University; Katharine G. Field, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

-scientificchallenge: Energy production. It is hoped that students learning about bioenergy willhave a deeper understanding of energy issues facing the planet and be prepared to be apart of solving these issues in the future.ReferencesBittle, S., Rochkind, J., & Ott, A. (2009). The Energy Learning Curve. Retrieved 8/15/14 from: http://www.publicagenda.org/files/energy_learning_curve.pdfBolte, C. (2009). Enhancing pupils’ abilities to properly judge and make informed decisions in the field of renewable energy sources. In Proceedings of the Australasian Science Education Research Association (pp. 149–154).Chen, K. L., Huang, S. H., & Liu, S. Y. (2013). Devising a framework for energy education in Taiwan

Conference Session

Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey A Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tamara J Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. Page 26.556.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 DNA Extraction Using Engineering Design: A STEM Integration Unit (Curriculum Exchange) Target Grade Level: 6-8 En gr TEA MSE n gin eerin g t o Tran sform t h e E d ucat ion of An aly sis, Measuremen t , & Scien ce Authors and Contact: Corey A. Mathis Tamara J. Moore S. Selcen Guzey Purdue University Purdue University Purdue University mathisc@purdue.edu

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ethan Sclarsky, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ; Tyler Marquis Cooper, Rowan University; Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University; Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University; Andrea Jennifer Vernengo, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

Engineering Initiative I. An Education Outreach Manual in TissueEngineering. In: Pittsburg Uo, editor. 2010.9. Birol G, Liu S, Smith D, Hirsch P Educational Modules in Tissue Engineering Based onthe “How People Learn” Framework. Bioscience Education E-journal. 2006;7.10. Bhatia S. A disease-centered approach to biomaterials education and medical devicedesign. 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS; Boston, Massachusetts2011.p. 3617-9.11. Reichert W, Harris TR, Lemmons J, Mikos AG, Puleo DA, Schoen FJ, Temenoff JS.2011 Panel on developing a biomaterials curriculum. Journal of Biomedical Materials ResearchPart A. 2011;100A:802-16.12. Feldman D, Gombotz WR. Biomaterials Education: An academic and industrialviewpoint

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fei Hu, University of Alabama; Thomas Morris, Mississippi State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

; Geophysical Division, Science and Technology Directorate.[2] Stephen G. Katsinas, "America's Rural Community Colleges: Demographics, Challenges, and Opportunities", (a Briefing on Rural Community Colleges for the U.S. Department of Education), Washington, D.C. (invited talk). February 24, 2010.[3] K. Koscher, A. Czeskis, F. Roesner, S. Patel, T. Kohno, S. Checkoway, D. McCoy, B. Kantor, D. Anderson,H. Shacham, and S. Savage. “Experimental security analysis of a modern automobile”, In Proceedings of the 31st IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 2010.[4] Elinor Mills, “Hackers broke into FAA air traffic control system”, The Wall Street Journal, page A6, 2009.[5] Vanessa Fuhrmans, “Virus Attacks Siemens Plant-Control Systems

Conference Session

Development of Collaborative Skills in Construction Education

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Jason Mischung, Arizona State University; Jake Smithwick, Arizona State University; Kenneth Timothy Sullivan, Arizona State University; Anthony Perrenoud, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Construction

of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 890–900.5 Côté, S. (2014). Emotional Intelligence in Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology andOrganization Behavior, 1, 459–488.6 Frye, C. M., Bennett, R., & Caldwell, S. (2006). Team Emotional Intelligence and Team Interpersonal ProcessEffectiveness. American Journal of Business, 21(1), 49–58.7 Gibbs, N. (1995, October 2). EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE: THE EQ FACTOR. Time, Cover story.8 IRR113-3. (2009, January 1). Alignment During Pre-Project Planning: A Key to Project Success, Version 2.1.Retrieved January 1, 2013, from https://www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/more/ir113_3_v2_more.cfm9 Jordan, P. J., Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E. J., & Hooper, G. S. (2002). Workgroup

Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robyn Paul, University of Calgary; Lynne Gradon Cowe Falls P.Eng., University of Calgary

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

questionnaire.Self-Rating of Engineering Leadership Skills. The second part of the survey included a skillsquestionnaire that was developed based on the survey instrument created by Ahn et al.3. Ahnet al.’s survey contained 45 items specifically designed to measure outcomes in engineeringundergraduate students related to leadership, adaptability to change, and synthesis abilities3.Twenty of these items, principally the ones directly related to leadership, were chosen for theskills questionnaire (e.g. I independently initiate new individual or team projects and Imanage and organize my time efficiently). The participants were asked to rank the extent towhich they embodied each statement on a scale of one to four (1=rarely, 2=sometimes,3=frequently and 4

Conference Session

Research on Design Learning

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

). Page 26.1430.4 Table 1 – Coding scheme description and examples.Domain Category Description Example Refers to writing or presentation of the design “There are grammatical error[s] Communication work. throughout the paper.” Explicitly refers to one of the design concepts Design Concepts taught in class by using terminology taught in “The goal could [be] more specific.” class.Substance Refers