focuses on human-centered design, visualization, and cognitive psychology. He studies how people un- derstand and reason with visualizations, and how interacting with visualizations influences learning and thinking processes.Ms. Ying Ying Seah Ying Ying Seah is a Ph.D. candidate in Technology in the Department of Computer Information Tech- nology at Purdue University. Her research interest mainly focuses on developing and validating novel curricular approaches and technology-enhanced learning environments in STEM education, integrating scientific and engineering thinking in the relevant disciplines. Specifically, her current project focuses on designing, implementing, and validating a Learning by Design curricular
Texas A&M University, post- graduate training in evaluation at The Evaluators Institute (TEI) at George Washington University and the AEA/CDC Summer Evaluation Institute. Besides teaching, she has worked as an evaluator in grants awarded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Currently she is the internal evaluator for the projects Recruiting, Retaining and Engaging Academically Talented Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups into a Pathway to Successful Engineering Careers (PEARLS) and for Building Capacity at Collaborative Undergraduate STEM Program in Resilient and
weremanufacturing (45%), business (24%) and research (27%). Only 5% of respondents consideredtheir career to be in academia, which is consistent with future career interests of freshmenrespondents.Audience of Communication MisconceptionsTo better understand student misconceptions, data from freshmen were compared to datacollected from post-graduate employees. With regard to frequency of communication, Likert-type scale distributions for freshmen expectations and post-graduate employee data werestatistically the same for technical employees (different disciplines), technical managers andexternal employees (contractors, suppliers, etc.). Significant differences in distributions weredetermined for technical employees (same project area) (p = 0.049), non
scaledreplication into other legacy industrial cities. Circling back to the mature pilot at the close of thegrant, researchers examined demographic differences in the influence of the BCE2 programmingusing data from the final two cohort years. Furthermore, we also explored elements of theprogramming that influence place attachment shown by program alumni.Methodological ApproachIn previous examinations of the C-EEEM, researchers identified the challenges of measurementfor a program with a focus on multidimensional diversity [2]. By design, the program assemblescohorts of students that have a broad range of education, skills, and experiences – includingstudents from high school, community college, and research universities – into teams forcommunity projects
computervision and deep learning.The main goal of this paper is to report on our approach to close the gap between domain expertsin agriculture and computer scientists by developing a practical, hands-on activity in the form ofa workshop or tutorial specifically targeted at agricultural engineers and practitioners interestedin applying computer vision techniques to solve agricultural problems. The tutorial consists ofspecific examples like detecting and counting bees, segmentation of fruit trees and automaticfruit classification. The examples for the tutorials are chosen because of their simplicity ofimplementation and because they are also easily expandable into more complex projects. Forexample, the segmentation tutorial can be used to estimate
RED NSF RevED project at Rowan University.Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is Interim Dean and Professor and Founding Chair of Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Henry M. Rowan College at Rowan University (USA). She is the immediate past president of ASEE. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in inductive pedagogy, spatial skills, and inclusion and diversity. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning, and she was 2014-15 Fulbright Scholar in Engineering Education at Dublin
faculty, chair and Associate Dean at San Jose State University’s College of Engineering.Prof. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Cal State LA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has also focused on improving student success and has led a number of engineering education projects. He is currently the Director of the First-Year Experience program at ECST (FYrE@ECST) and coordinates engineering education activities at the college of engineering, computer science and technology (ECST). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Impacts
educational projects to enhance environmental engineering education while at Rowan University. Dr. Bauer is an active member of ASEE and the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and currently serves as the Faculty Advisor for Rowan’s Student Chapter of SWE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Integration of Environmental Humanities Modules into the Environmental Engineering ClassroomAbstractIn today’s rapidly changing world, engineers and scientists are challenged with solving themultitudes of environmental and social problems our society is currently facing. The rapidgrowth of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research and pedagogy iscritical for
with higher spatial ability (79% of graduating engineering students) maintain a highlevel of spatial ability and graduate with only a slightly higher overall GPA than theircounterparts with low spatial ability.Given past work in this area [1,3,9], it would appear that either the curriculum at Stevens is notas reliant on spatial skills in order to be successful, or that students are able to work around anydeficiencies in these skills that they might experience. As the design courses at Stevens, an arenawhere students are most likely to need greater levels of SVS, are almost exclusively basedaround teamwork and group projects, students with lower levels of spatial ability may be aidedby their group for example.As discussed in previous work
, University of St. Thomas Krista is an undergraduate Elementary Education and STEM Education major at the University of St. Thomas.Abby Bensen, University of St. ThomasMs. Emma Michelle Monson, University of St. Thomas Emma Monson is an undergraduate studying Elementary Education with a STEM co-major at the Univer- sity of St. Thomas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Math of OK GoIntroduction Grammy Award-winning rock band OK Go places mathematics concepts at the heart ofits exciting music videos. Through the OK Go Sandbox project, the band has partnered with thePlayful Learning Lab at the University of St. Thomas to create several education
expertise in mechanical engineeringwas required. Thus, during a departmental faculty meeting two senior professors were selected forhelping the students with technical issues; one professor in the area of thermo-fluidics and the other inmaterials, machine tools and manufacturing. Each one was given one and half (1.5) credit hours of releasetime per semester for mentoring the undergraduate students with their specific technical problems, suchas technical projects and their oral presentations, preparing them for job interviews, writing technicalpapers for publication in journals and conference proceedings, etc. Both the professors maintained awritten document like a log-book or field notes for each mentoring session. These are powerful tools, forthe
design introductory level engineering courses to increase factual knowledge. Hydeet al. stated that people, hoping for engineering education to change, assume that increasingenvironmental content make practicing engineers more environmentally sensitive [1]. For acourse to change attitudes, and develop environmental concern and activism among students, itneeds to be designed specifically for affective learning [4], [5], [26]. Utarasakul [27], Al-Balushiand Al-Amri [28] have mentioned the importance of active learning tools, such as ProblemBased Learning or Project Based Learning, and collaborative learning in effectively engagingstudents in environmental education to achieve the aforementioned student outcomes. To addressthe relationship between
. degree in physics from Villanova University, and an M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania. I was a communication system engineer at General Electric in both military and commer- cial communication satellite operations for over nine years. I establish technical, college level, programs of study for modernized classroom and laboratory curricula including online course platforms, and inte- grated technologies. I have been involved in several grant efforts as the author and project director that have enhanced the programs at Bucks. I am currently the PI of an NSF ATE grant to increase the num- ber of engineering technicians in Southeastern Pennsylvania. This grant involves a
Reality Processing Plant for Chemical Engineering Process DesignAbstractThis work-in-progress study will explore technology aided education in the form of a VirtualReality (VR) application used to support learning outcomes in a chemical engineering capstonecourse. VR has the ability to immerse users in a simulated environment and provide them withexperiential learning opportunities. Most undergraduate chemical engineering students arerequired to design a chemical plant for their capstone design project without ever having visitedor interacted with a full-scale processing plant and could benefit from the immersive experiencethat the VR tool would offer. This study will be conducted over a two-year period fromSeptember 2019 to May 2021
of the scales and an acceptable level of internal consistency wasestablished for each dataset (Table 2).The Innovation Self-Efficacy (ISE) scale represents an average of five items that measureconfidence in one’s ability to “ask a lot of questions,” “experiment as a way to understand howthings work,” and “connect concepts and ideas that appear, at first glance, to be unconnected.”ISE was measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from “Not confident” (0) to “Extremelyconfident” (4).Engineering Task Self-Efficacy (ETSE) also measures confidence in one’s ability to “conductexperiments, build prototypes, or construct mathematical models to develop or evaluate adesign,” “design a new product or project to meet specified requirements,” and
compare it with the traditional regression method. Additionally, studentswill learn how to manage the data set for better prediction as well as the key factors that mayaffect the overall forecasts.As far as the application of the proposed model in a classroom setting, one can use the model foreither two 4-hr labs or a one-semester project, which includes data collection, modeling, andvalidation. For the lab instruction, the instructor can guide through the data collection andmanaging procedures as well as the primary data set for the region of interest during the first lab.The instructor can then teach how to use open-source functions and their functionality formodeling. In the second lab, the instructor can introduce how to train and validate
various disciplines areprovided in [2]. We are currently engaged in a large project that seeks to evaluate how theDesign Days contribute to advancing engineering students’ design problem solving skills. Acrucial aspect of this larger project, which is the focus of this work in progress paper, is todevelop a tool to characterize the design problems at the center of Design Days. The aim is tosupport instructors developing new Design Days activities or evaluating and improving existingones.A useful framework for characterizing problems in general - and design problems in particular -is provided by David Jonassen in his paper Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving [3] andbook Learning to Solve Problems [4]. It describes the ability to problem
departments, colleges, and theuniversity leadership to work towards a more open and equitable scholarly landscape. Whilesome larger institutions have spoken out about these issues this project focuses on theperspectives from a specific group of faculty at a public land-grant institution and will, thus,contribute to an understanding of the issues at play and possibilities for future advancement inPRT guidance.IntroductionResearchers have long expressed concerns about the impact promotion, rank, and tenure (PRT)guidelines have on the publishing practices of academics [1-4]. As a baseline, studies [1-4] haveshown that faculty members expect a strong research and publication record to be crucial foradvancement under PRT guidelines. Research also shows
Railway Lightweighting Water Containers and Plastic Waste The Built Environment Material Properties and Structural Sections Electric Cars—Sustainability and Eco DesignFigure 6: The Five Step Method developed by Professor Ashby and coworkers [25]1. Unpacking the proposal—identifying timeline, objectives, and other key project objectives2. Stakeholder analysis—Identifying stakeholders and their influence on the project outcomes3. Fact finding—researching project and stakeholder needs4. Forming a judgement—analyzing impacts of facts on the three capitals of sustainability5. Reflection—looking at the outcome of fact analysis and determining if objectives
evolved over the semesters. The course was first offered in the F2015 semester fora total enrollment of 59 students; it included bi-weekly course meetings and most of thereflective assignments, team projects, guest speakers, and final oral presentations discussedabove. Unfortunately, many of the students taking CHE 150 in the F2015 semester were alsoenrolled in organic chemistry together, and this course conflicted with the academic successworkshop, so only 28 students attended the in-person component. The 31 students concurrentlyenrolled in organic chemistry wrote reflective essays instead to replace those in-personexperiences. In the F2016 semester, the academic success workshops moved to being offeredweekly, and students received additional
interdisciplinary research projects focused on engineering and other STEM disciplines which have been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Rodriguez has also worked with the project Engaging Latino Students for Transfer and College Completion a national initiative focused on helping institutions strengthen Latina/o student engagement, transfer, and college completion. She has also served as a New Mathways Project Mentorship Program Coach for the Charles A. Dana Center, supporting college implementation of mul- tiple mathematics pathways, acceleration to complete college level math courses quickly, and intentional use of strategies. Dr. Rodriguez has presented at conferences at the national, regional, and local
engineering design research focuses on developing computational representation and rea- soning support for managing complex system design. The goal of Dr. Morkos’ design research is to fundamentally reframe our understanding and utilization of system representations and computational reasoning capabilities to support the development of system models which help engineers and project planners intelligently make informed decisions at earlier stages of engineering design. On the engineer- ing education front, Dr. Morkos’ research explores means to enhance engineering education, improve persistence in engineering, and address challenges in senior design education. Dr. Morkos’ research is supported by government [National
learning andconcludes that even brief activities introduced into the lecture can increase learning. The entirecourse need not be project-based. Simply adding discussions can have a positive impact onstudents’ intrinsic motivation [19]. If we use Bonwell and Eison’s [20] definition of activelearning as “anything that involves students doing things and thinking about the things they aredoing,” the possibilities are vast. Nie and Lau [1] found adding small activities that encouragestudents to explore in-depth, analyze, discuss, write, apply, or question increased students’ deepprocessing strategies and increased self-efficacy. Felder and Silverman [21] also conclude that asmall number of techniques such as alternating lecture with pauses for
risk. Item 1: “Don’t you have a duty to complete the project given to Conventional you whether you like it or not?” Item 2: “Is your action consistent with your discipline’s professional code?” Conventional Scenario 2 — “Racing Car” 2 Items Flagged The student team has designed a racing car that enables children with Scenario disabilities to experience driving without actually being in control. Summary Some parents ask you to lie to their child to solidify the illusion. Item 1: “Do your actions respect
technology issues.Sometimes, another university library’s renovation has inspired renovations such as Duke,University of North Carolina, and North Carolina State libraries. Recently, the TAMU Librarieshave undertaken several renovation projects to address insufficient instruction and study spacesand improve and consolidate service areas in addition to other issues. The Sterling C. Evans(Evans) Library renovated the first, fourth, and sixth floors to improve student spaces andinstruction spaces that the students can use when not in use. These renovations includedimprovement of student study spaces, renovation of the coffee shop, creation of a prayer room,and a graduate study lounge. Other libraries on campus had similar renovations. The
engineering problems, which are oftenopen-ended, complex, and ill-defined with many unknowns and variables. For example, studentsmay learn how to measure certain parameters or engineering properties related to a flow or heatexchanger system from these lab activities, but they do not necessarily understand how thosemeasurements are used in the design of flow or heat exchanger systems in food processing, whatother variables to consider, and how those variables are interrelated and can affect the design andoperation of such systems.The department curriculum includes a senior-level capstone design course for AE majors and amulti-semester project course for AET majors. In these senior-level project-based courses,students are tasked with applying their
ofpractices such as observing what people do, interviewing people, brainstorming andcommunicating ideas, and building and testing prototypes [2]. Across all educational settings,researchers argue that engaging students in human-centered design experiences can help themaddress real world problems and develop human-centered, experimental, collaborative,metacognitive, communicative, and creative mindsets [3]–[5].Why Human-Centered Design in Engineering? While traditional engineering curricula emphasize technical and analytical problem-solving skills, in the last few decades attention has shifted toward engineering design skillsdeveloped through project based or experiential learning [6]–[12]. Broadly speaking, this shiftattempts to address the
industry. On a team is where oralcommunication is so important. Team projects are something we all have in our curriculums. AtBaylor, a survey showed most students approach team projects by dividing the tasks and then Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Copyright © 2020, American Society for Engineering Education 8putting the project together just in time, involving little interaction. In the real world you must workwith other people, usually in person, to get something done. You never know who might be on theteam but, no matter who is on the team, at some
$25,000 (~ USD $17,000) were provided by the Office of the Pro ViceChancellor Education (PVCE) of UNSW. The digital uplift program ran over a six month period in 2016and was coordinated by two project managers of the Office of the PVCE. The personnel involved inthe digital uplift for the mechanics course comprised the two project managers, the three lecturersSUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 5 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Implementation of Blended Learning for a Large Size Engineering
: 2 • Thinking Creatively: Students are asked to implement one of the techniques for brainstorming related to their final course project in which they design a puzzle, and submit a reflection paper in which they discuss whether they think their creativity was enhanced by what they learned from the module, and how they were creative in designing the puzzle based on what they learning in the module about creativity. • Learning from Failure: Students work in teams to complete a design project in which they control the movements of a robot which delivers parts from one platform to another in a workcell layout that the teams create collectively. They are asked to write reflections at the end of the