Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eun-young Kang, California State University, Los Angeles; Matthew Jackson, California State University, Los Angeles

earned a slightly lower GPA, theygraduated at a faster rate than the non-CAPS students. Early indicators show that 50% ofCAPS Cohort 2 scholars are on track to graduate in 4 years.4. Assessment and EvaluationThis section focuses on results of formative evaluation performed since Fall 2021. Formativeevaluation data was gathered by monitoring the implementation of the CAPS program activitiesconducted to achieve the program goals and by monitoring the implementation of the Mentor+advisement and mentoring to participating scholars, and other student support activities. Due tothe Covid-19 pandemic shut down and later shift to virtual classes, many activities normally heldwere not scheduled. Between August 2021 and December 2021, three main CAPS

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassandra McCall, Utah State University; Ashley Shew; Marie Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Denise Simmons, University of Florida; Lisa McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

, especially inengineering and other STEM fields [5].Collectively, we must create a culture that places less emphasis on medicalized labels andindividual accommodation and more on creating adaptive, flexible environments, policies, andsystems that are more widely accessible to all. Such principles are embedded within theUniversal Design for Learning (UDL; [29, 30]) framework that guides educators to createinstructional and assessment approaches that can be easily adapted to fit learners’ diverse needs.Adopting this approach also lessens faculty reliance on university-sponsored Disability ResourceCenters, which tend to focus on compliance and preventing disability discrimination lawsuitsrather than on supporting the social and identity formation of

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Manning, Clemson University; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Catherine Brawner; Rebecca Brent; Michael Tidwell, Clemson University

.) Catherine Mobley, Professor of Sociology at Clemson University, holds a B.A. in Sociology from Clemson University, Clemson, SC (USA), an M.S. in Policy Analysis from the University of Bath (England), and a Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Maryland (USA). Her primary areas of research are engineering/STEM education, environmental sustainability, food insecurity, and applied sociology. Much of Dr. Mobley’s research is interdisciplinary as she has collaborated with colleagues from across the university. She has over 30 years of evaluation experience, conducting community-level assessments and evaluating collaborative research efforts. Dr. Mobley has also been involved in extensive applied work in the community

Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

yongxin deng; Tuoyu Li; Min Ye, Zhejiang University

and application of higher engineering education evaluation index System from the perspective of multiple classification taking 97 double-first-class construction universities as samples”, China Higher Education Research, vol.2021, no.2, pp.10-15, 2021 (in Chinese)[4] Salamon & Lester. “The Tools of Government”. Oxford University Press, 2002．[5] R Rothwell & R Zegveld., “An assessment of government innovation policies”, Review of Policy Research, vol.1984, no.3, pp.436-444, 1984.[6] H Xinping, et al., “Quantitative research on the development policy text of Science and technology finance in China based on policy tools”, Journal of Information, vol.2020, no.1, pp.130-137, 2020 (in Chinese)[7

Conference Session

Transfer Programs at Two-Year Colleges in Engineering and Engineering Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Agniprava Banerjee, University of Texas at El Paso; Sara Rodriguez, University of Texas at El Paso; Benjamin Flores, University of Texas at El Paso

over the same period of time. Weanticipate that 13 students will participate in the 2022 cohort for a total of 56.Assessment of the program is conducted by a team of evaluators from the University ofWisconsin who are associated with the Aspire Alliance. The team is responsible for developingassessment questionnaires for individual activities and surveys for summative evaluation,contacting faculty and student participants, collecting data, and aggregating information forfunding-agency reporting. The common tool across RCs is an end-of-semester survey containing6 Scale questions and three open-ended questions. The surveys are modified for the mentors andmentees respectively to address various components of the fellowship including

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Linda DeAngelo, University of Pittsburgh; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kevin Binning; Natascha Buswell, University of California, Irvine; Jennifer Cribbs, Oklahoma State University; Erica McGreevy, University of Pittsburgh; Christian Schunn, University of Pittsburgh; Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin Kaufman-Ortiz, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Beverly Conrique, University of Pittsburgh; Carlie Cooper, University of Georgia; Danielle Lewis; Jacqueline Rohde, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

in math, science, and engineering settings,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 18, pp. 879–885, 2007.[10] H. S. Lee, L. Y. Flores, R. L. Navarro, and H. N. Suh, “Development and Validation of the Negative Outcome Expectations Scale in Engineering (NOES-E),” J. Career Assess., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 52–67, 2018.[11] S. Cheryan, S. A. Ziegler, A. K. Montoya, and L. Jiang, “Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 143, no. 1, 2017.[12] L. DeAngelo, M. Snowdsky, and S. Kurz, “Complexity and Double-Bind: Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Gendered and Raced Experience of First-Year Women Engineers” Manuscript in Preparation, 2022.[13] G. M. Walton and G. L. Cohen, “A question of belonging: race

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 2: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto; Emily Moore, University of Toronto; Andrea Chan; Lee Weissling; Dimpho Radebe, University of Toronto

14 10 13 10 9 5 0 RACIALIZED AGE18-30 RACIALIZED WHITE AGE31-45 AGE46-65 WHITEMEN AGE66+ WOMEN MEN WOMEN3χ2=17.91,df=6,p=.006This question was not intended to assess participants’ overall experience with barriers. Rather,we included it as the final item in a string of questions about specific structural barriers toleadership after piloting the survey with recent EL program

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Royce Francis, The George Washington University; Marie Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Rachel Riedner

the team to reflect on how appropriate the a priori codes might befor exploring the data corpus. Second, the dramaturgical analysis reflected the student’s identityproduction differently due to the focus on subtexts and “character development” themecategories recommended by Saldana [8]. Dramaturgical analysis requires the researcher to re-consider the data as a monologue; thus requiring the researcher to implicitly consider theinterview data themselves as a site of identity production. Another round of preliminary analysiswas conducted on the set of five first-round interviews with the remaining five participants tofurther assess the reasonableness of the codes and discuss additional emergent codes that arise tohelp refine our engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Rebecca Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

interest in the EER community,with over 200 applications from 20 countries. In the first year of the project, two cohortsparticipated in the JEE Mentored Reviewer Program. Across the two cohorts, 42 mentees havecollaborated with 18 mentors and three coaches, with some mentors and coaches participating inboth cohorts.Program EvaluationThe EER PERT project evaluation plan was designed to assess the project’s progress meetingstated objectives, the value of the program for mentees and mentors, the contribution of theprogram to connecting participants to the EER community, and the impact of the program onperceptions of inclusivity in EER. For the first two cohorts of the JEE Mentored ReviewerProgram, evaluation was conducted primarily through exit

Conference Session

Remediation and Curricular Changes to Improve Student Learning and Outcomes

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gianluca Guadagni, University of Virginia; Hui Ma, University of Virginia

, timing. Read about each of these in the rubric(will also be uploaded to iRubric) and see an example below.2. Review sessionA lesson plan for a ~60 minute review session for your course in which you showcase what you’velearned in the Teaching Methods course. As always you are invited to be creative with your approach.The review session is a detailed lesson plan that describes the specific sequence of actions you will taketo support students in reviewing for their assessments. The criteria include: motivation (connectingconcepts), common mistakes, visuals/slides, activities, timing. Read more about each of these in therubric and see an example below.Deadlines  By Monday November 22, you should contact the instructor of your math course to

Conference Session

ETD Technical Session 6 - Curriculum and Programs III

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Pouneh Abbasian, Texas A&M University

, 2015.[4] B. Peukert et al., "Addressing Sustainability and Flexibility in Manufacturing Via Smart Modular Machine Tool Frames to Support Sustainable Value Creation," Procedia CIRP, vol. 29, pp. 514-519, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.181.[5] D. Fine, Klier,J.,Mahajan,D.,Raabe,N.,Schubert,J.,Singh,N.,Ungur,S.,, "Howtorebuild and reimagine jobs amid the coronavirus crisis," Mckinsey & Company, April 2020.[6] Perry, T.S.: Tech Jobs in the Time of COVID: cybersecurity job openings explode, while the job market gets tougher for Web developers and Ruby experts. IEEE Spectrum, April, 2020[7] J. M. Müller, "Assessing the barriers to Industry 4.0 implementation from a workers’ perspective," IFAC

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 1: Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity (DEI)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Henry Claesson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Robert Hodge, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Eunsil Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jennifer Benning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

body of knowledge (PMBOK®)," Computers & Education, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 210-219, 2009. [3] R. Buchal and E. Songsore, "USING MICROSOFT TEAMS TO SUPPORT COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE BUILDING IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT," in Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEAA), 2019. [4] B. Rosen, S. Furst-Holloway and R. Blackburn, "Training for virtual teams: An investigation of current practices and future needs," Human Resource Management, vol. 45, pp. 229-247, 2006. [5] J. Lumseyfai, T. Holzer, P. Blassner and B. A. Olson, "Best Practices Framework for Enabling High-Performing Virtual Engineering Teams," IEEE

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 1: Experiential Learning in Fluids, Structures, and Course/Lab Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jim Sizemore, Mesa Community College

the initial steps of this work, faculty have not yet designed assessment instruments,and future work will require several semesters of data collection. Nevertheless, initial indicators, genericstudent evaluations, and overall grades are positive.Student success for this course was 67%, but two students with passing progress did not take the finalexamination and, therefore, count as failures (D, F, and W grades). If those students earned a passinggrade on the final exam, then student success would be 83%. For comparison, student success in face-to-face classes without these labs and quizzes was consistent, over many semesters, 70%. Indeed, thecurrent results do not deviate significantly from historical averages. Although the author can’t

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

binbin shao, Zhejiang University; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University; Liang Wang

suggests thatindividuals with high ESE are more likely to act when they believe they have theskills necessary to succeed [9]. In contrast, individuals who lack this belief tend to beless willing or able to act when faced with opportunities for entrepreneurship becauseof their perceived inability to perform well on tasks related to entrepreneurship [10].Previous research studies have found that ESE is not only used to assess theeffectiveness of educational programs, but is also one of the most reliable predictorsof EI [11]. Accordingly, several researchers have discovered that ESE plays animportant role in promoting a positive attitude toward starting a firm and pursuingentrepreneurship as a career [12], [13]. In addition, prior studies found ESE

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 1: Online or Remote Teaching and Curricular Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

L. Brent Jenkins, Kennesaw State University

schedules areavailable through the associated calendar.Implementation1. Any documents specific to a particular lab section can be posted in the Files section of that section’s team.2. A lab section starts in a common team and later separates into lab groups operating within private channels. The instructor can download an attendance spreadsheet from the common team at the start of the lab period and later complete an icon checkoff within each team’s private channel shortly after large group dismissal—both for attendance purposes and to quickly assess whether any temporary team reassignments are needed due to absences.3. Each team is expected to screenshare its simulator within Microsoft Teams [to enable instructor monitoring], even if

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manuel Rossetti, University of Arkansas; Edward Pohl, University of Arkansas; Bryan Hill, University of Arkansas; Xintao Wu, University of Arkansas; Ronna Turner, University of Arkansas; Wenjuo Lo, University of Arkansas; Jeffrey Offord, University of Arkansas

schoolwork) limits access to other activities (e.g., calling friends), assessments of how much effort will be taken to accomplish the activity, and its emotional cost [19]. Ability Beliefs “Ability beliefs refer to students’ perceptions of their ability as a fixed trait 5 that is beyond their control, or as something that can change and grow. When the ability is viewed as fixed, the effort may be seen as futile, and failure as due to a lack of ability.” [22] Growth One’s belief that their basic abilities can be developed [23], [24]. 6 Mindset Academic Self-evaluation of one’s ability and/or chances for success in the academic

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Samuel Garcia, NASA EPDC

was nonexistent [15]. The fourth strategy of the established model involvedgranting extensions when submitting homework assignments. Given the rapid transition to remoteinstruction, it was anticipated that a considerable representation of students, particularly those fromunderserved and challenging communities, would encounter personal and/or academic challengesamidst the unprecedented crisis. As such, the instructor of the course clearly emphasized, via emailand during lecture sessions, the willingness of granting extensions to those experiencing personaland family distress, internet disruptions, or difficulty completing homework sets [15].Based on its assessment, Marquez and Garcia reported that students exposed to the CIRE modelwere

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 2: Postcard Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Hicks; Michael Preuss; Matthew Alexander, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Rajashekar Mogiligidda, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; Mahesh Hosur

by the National Science Foundation Award #1928611. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Bucks, G. W., & Ossman, K. A., & Kastner, J., & Boerio, F. J., & Torsella, J. A. (2014,June), First-Year Engineering Courses' Effect on Retention and Student Engagement Paperpresented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--20499[2] Information request response from TAMUK Office of Institutional Research and Assessment(https://www.tamuk.edu/oira/index.html) on January 26, 2022.[3] Alexander, M. L., & Mogiligidda, R. R., &

Conference Session

ERM: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Elan Hope, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Derrick Satterfield, University of Nevada, Reno; Anitra Alexander; Alexis Briggs; Laila Allam, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

ethnic backgrounds agreed that racism has caused themto consider leaving engineering. Similarly, 36% of women agreed that peers try to exert authorityover them because of their gender. The prevalence of racism and sexism from this national surveyhighlight the necessity of addressing inequality within engineering doctoral education. This papersets a foundation for continued research assessing progress towards equity and justice inengineering graduate programs.Keywords: Graduate; Race/Ethnicity; Gender; I. INTRODUCTION This full research paper describes a quantitative survey of the discrimination experiencesof engineering doctoral students. Women and men from marginalized racial or ethnic backgroundsand

Conference Session

Capstones and Economics

Collection

ASEE Southeast Section Conference

Authors

David S Greenburg, The Citadel; Dimitra Michalaka P.E., The Citadel; Tyler Miner; Susan Kahn Huntington

Tagged Topics

Professional Engineering Education Papers

monitoring Work-In-Process. The automated businessprocesses enabled the real time analysis of sales data to determine market trends and inventorylevels, and determine the best allocation outcomes and supply chain monitoring.At regular intervals, the team reflected on how to become more effective, then made adjustmentsto behavior and processes accordingly. During the development effort IT and ProductionOperations held regular meetings with internal and external business functions in theorganization to determine which reports and or business processes are taking large sums of timeto complete or are inaccurate due to data discrepancies. Meeting assessments determined if SQLcode could be written to improve these reports or business functions, and how

Conference Session

DEI and Other

Collection

ASEE Southeast Section Conference

Authors

Charles D Newhouse P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Professional Engineering Education Papers

response to the global social reckoning, have recentlyevaluated academic programs to ensure equity within the curriculum and their practices [12].Questions have been raised about whether students that are weak in math should be excludedfrom some engineering curriculums because of poor math preparation or performance [13].There has been pressure to keep students enrolled in engineering regardless of math abilities.Recent national testing, such as the National Assessment of Educational of Educational Progress,known as the nation’s report card, show some of the steepest declines in math proficiency sincescores have been kept. Although there is controversy on the testing itself, results since thepandemic have shown that only 26 percent of eighth

Collection

2023 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Randy Hurd; Dustin Grote

frequency for an untestedcoin (U.S. half dollar). An example result is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of fundamental frequency vs. coin diameter from microphone lab.Student Response to Lab AssignmentsLab assignments were generally well received and feedback was predominantly positive. Myimpression was that students found the lab assignments to be more difficult than the average lab,but were typically not opposed to the work as they felt that the practiced skills would beapplicable to their future careers.After the completion of the class students were given a short anonymous survey to assess theiropinions of the lab assignments. The questions and student responses are summarized in Table.Students generally agreed that these assignments a

Conference Session

ERM: Teamwork makes the dream work!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rashmi Solanki, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Chad Kennedy, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Yash Shirke, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

interpretation is that itrepresents a “Nominal” measurement according to Stanley Stevens taxonomy of measurements6.In other words, if we are asking a “Yes or No” question, the 1D SOWT Index simply states thatif the SOWT index is greater than 0 then the answer is “Yes”. If it is less than or equal to 0, thenthe answer is “No”. If the TUS or GTS methods are used. This is arguably a fair assessment ofthe outcome. However, if the VTS method is used, there is more fidelity to the index with theadvent of consensus and normalization as shown in Table 5.Table 5: 1D SOWT Index Interpretation with consensus and normalization factored in.Consensus can only be applied if everyone on the SOWT analysis team has individual input as inthe VTS method. GWS and TUS

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Zhang, University of Louisville

4.9 I intend to enter a career that will use computer science.* 4.5 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 Post PreIncrease in Likelihood to Pursue a Science Career- Science Motivation QuestionnaireItems adapted from the Science Motivation Questionnaire II instrument further assessed participants’motivation to engage in STEM for career outcomes. Participants responded on the pre- and post-surveysto 5 Likert-type items in

Conference Session

Industrial Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Abel, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)

, not-for-profitorganization, or a student-defined project approved by the course instructor. The need expressed by the Client must lenditself to apply the knowledge, tools and methods the students are exposed to in the ISE curriculum to come up with aviable design. The teams will develop a set of alternative conceptual solutions based on deep analysis of clients’ and otherstakeholder’s needs and expectations as well as gather data and knowledge from relevant sources. They will propose apreferred concept based on a thorough assessment of the alternatives. The proposed conceptual solution will be detailedfurther into a preliminary design by the end of the fall semester. The second semester will focus on iterating detaileddesign, implementation

Conference Session

Computers in Education 2 - Programming 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Frank Vahid, University of California, Riverside; David May, University of California, Riverside

effect ofautomatic assessment on novice programming: Strengths and limitations of existing systems.Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2018 Nov;26(6):2328-41.[Zy1] zyLabs. zybooks.com, 2021.

Conference Session

PCEE Technical Session 6: Engineering Design in High School

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Figard, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Jacob Roarty; Samantha Nieto, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus; Adam Carberry, Arizona State University

and Technologies with a focus on engineering education. Her research interests span four related areas: democratization of engineering education, ways of thinking, engineering curiosity among pre-college students, and faculty development.Jacob RoartySamantha Linda NietoAdam R Carberry (Associate Professor) Dr. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engineering, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment techniques, and

Conference Session

WIED: Partnering with and Supporting the WIED Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carol Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Margaret Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE); Iris Rivero; Jessica Bennett; Gloria Blackwell

Public and Land-grantUniversities (APLU), the IChange Network engages institutions in a community oftransformation committed to advancing Aspire's strategic goals [45]. IChange engages teamsfrom participating universities in a three-year self-assessment and action planning process tosupport the universities in changing institutional policies and practices to create a more diverseand inclusive STEM faculty.The project will also partner with the NSF INCLUDES Coordination Hub (#1818635), whichleads the NSF INCLUDES National Network [46]. The Hub uses online community, webinars,and related events to strengthen a common vision among Network members while buildingconnections across education, industry, government, and philanthropy groups. The project

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 2: Enhancing Energy-Related Education with Student Design Projects

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University; Adrian Criollo; Ananya Reghupathi, Northeastern University; Ansh Shah, Northeastern University; Robert Lee, Northeastern University

students?" 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013, June. ASEE Conferences, 2013. https://strategy.asee.org/19695 [3] B. Maheswaran, "Teaching an Accelerated Course via Team Activities: Assessment and Peer Rating of the Team Impact". 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June. ASEE Conferences, 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26015 [4] B. Maheswaran, C. S. Stransky, and H. Kumarakuru, "Innovative Energy Elevator: a Physics and Engineering Wonder!". 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June. ASEE Conferences, 2018. https://peer.asee.org/30667 [5] B. Maheswaran, N. B. Tedori, E. J. Whitmore, B. L

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meredith Kirkmann, University of Maine; Rachel Mosier, Oklahoma State University

Undergraduate Soil Mechanics Classroom.” Paper presented at2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32557[17] Cooke, H. (2011). “Use of Soil Behavior Demonstrations to Increase Student Engagementin a Soil Mechanics Course.” Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--18398[18] Farnsworth, C. B., Welch, R. W., McGinnis, M. J., and Wright, G. (2013). “BringingCreativity into the Lab Environment.” Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2--19267[19] Nulty, D.D. (2008). “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: WhatCan Be Done?” Assessment and evaluation in higher education V.33. N.3. pp. 301–314.[20