practices whilenavigating their graduate programs. I discuss the findings as they relate to concepts in literatureand my own auto-ethnographic experience. I also provide researchers, students, faculty, staff,and policy makers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) academiawith recommendations. Finally, I present the research community with areas for furtheracademic study.IntroductionProblemThere is a dearth of knowledge pertaining to graduate students with disabilities. Publicationsregarding the enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of this population are scarce. Similarly,little is known about the retention and graduation rates of graduate students with disabilities [1],[2]. More generally, there is a gap in knowledge
engineering doctoral student retention as an organizational science issue wouldalso shift the responsibility from the faculty advisor-advisee relationship, which is oftenconsidered pivotal from a student-persistence perspective, to higher education leadership who arepositioned to drive organizational change.Likewise, intersectionality informed our choices throughout the research process, beginning withour explicit goal of amplifying the voices of students from multiple historically-excluded groups.We sought to recruit students from a diverse sample of engineering doctoral programs andmaximize our sample from multiple historically-excluded groups. Thus, our sample does notproportionally represent the population of U.S. engineering doctoral students
thatstudents (and faculty!) don’t fall behind. Motivating timely submissions can be done via incentive,disincentive, or both—typically, an instructor chooses a policy that works for them and stays withthat throughout a course.However, courses vary widely in terms of subject matter, expected workload, type of deliverable,and more. Comparing late policies across courses involves a significant variable: the course itself.As such, we set out to study the impact of late policies on submission behavior for a particularcourse by rotating among them within the same offering. The premise here was that by holdingthe students, instructors, and content constant, it may be possible to then attribute outcomes andbehavior more precisely to the late policy in use at
, Texas State University Araceli Martinez Ortiz, PhD., is Research Associate Professor of Engineering Education in the College of Education at Texas State University. She leads a comprehensive research agenda related to issues of cur- riculum and instruction in engineering education, motivation and preparation of under served populations of students and teachers and in assessing the impact of operationalizing culturally responsive teaching in the STEM classroom. As executive director of the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research, she collaborates on various state and national STEM education programs and is PI on major grant initiatives through NASA MUREP, NSF Improving Undergraduate STEM Education and NSF DUE
that such a community is apragmatic and effective means of educating students as these students get “involved in thinking,questioning, and actively seeking knowledge” [11]. But to launch such a community, there hasto be some guidance and structure for students to participate, as well as some allure to students inknowing they will benefit from participating within the learning community. Students tend totrust the guidance of faculty when it comes to matters concerning scientific writing. Facultymembers in turn can generally empathize with the trials and tribulations of writing that graduatestudents endure [2] and can also recognize that these students need more writing supportresources at their disposal. With this in mind, an initiative by four
Energy (CE) Education is the evolution of traditional disciplines toeducate candidates in the multidisciplinary field of clean energy. According to the University atBuffalo Regional Institute, growth in clean energy technologies and manufacturing in recent yearshas increased the demand for engineers and technicians trained in these areas [1].This paper summarizes survey and interview findings, recommends a curriculum for teaching theskills essential to clean energy technicians, and emphasizes the transferability of skills to servemultiple disciplines. The participants were selected to understand the problem from the point ofview of clean energy education stakeholders in New York state. The qualitative and quantitativefindings were compared
AC 2010-1228: CONSTRUCTING MATHEMATICAL AND SPATIAL-REASONINGMEASURES FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTSLaura L. Pauley, Pennsylvania State University Laura L. Pauley, Arthur L. Glenn Professor of Engineering Education and professor of mechanical engineering, joined the The Pennsylvania State University faculty in 1988. From 2000 to 2007, she served as the Professor-in-Charge of Undergraduate Programs in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering. In 2003, Laura received the Penn State Undergraduate Program Leadership Award. Dr. Pauley teaches courses in the thermal sciences and conducts research in computational fluid mechanics and engineering education. She received degrees in mechanical engineering
troubling in the face of the changing demographics ofthe U.S. population. The proportion of white students in undergraduate enrollment fell from80% in 1978 to 70% in 1997. During the same period, the proportion of underrepresentedminorities (URM) in undergraduate enrollment increased from 15.7 to 21.7%.3The Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Education andHuman Resources has expressed concern that the facts that the majority of Americans arewomen, and that the proportion of Americans aged 18-22 who are URM is expected to riseabove 40% by the year 2015, have profound implications for STEM education. It concluded thatunless STEM education becomes much more inclusive than it has been in the past, the U.S. willbe
understanding ofcommunity-university partnerships in engineering service-learning programs by exploring theperspectives of advisors and community partners in a well-established engineering service-learning program. In part inspired by the existing service-learning literature, this study addressesthe question: Why are individuals and local community organizations involved in engineeringservice-learning partnerships? This study utilizes a single case study design, with data collectionincluding in-depth interviews with community partners, faculty and program administrators(n=11) affiliated with the EPICS program at Purdue University. All interviews were transcribedand coded thematically. A set of deductive codes were developed and applied based on a
, Oklahoma, September 24-26, 2017 • Mansy & Bileha, A New Model for Code Compliance, Smart, Sustainable and Healthy Cities, CIB-MENA 2014, Abu Dhabi, UAE, December 14-16, 2014Prof. Jeanne M. Homer, Oklahoma State University Professor Homer received her Bachelor of Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and her Master of Architecture from Arizona State University in Tempe. She has been a practicing ar- chitect in Chicago, Phoenix, and Oklahoma. While she was practicing, she taught at the Art Institute of Chicago and at Arizona State University before teaching in Stillwater full time for 17 years. Profes- sor Homer received the 2013 International Education Faculty Excellence Award, the 2007 ACSA
how to avoid paradigm paralysis.III.2 Working in TeamsAfter a brief introduction at the first class meeting, students are divided into groups of six orseven. They then spend a few minutes getting acquainted with one another. Each student is thenasked to stand and introduce all of the other students at his/her table. At subsequent classmeetings during the first three weeks of the semester, new groups are formed at the beginning ofthe class period and the exercise is repeated. After the first three weeks most of the studentsknow one another and, because of their familiarity, are more comfortable when assigned to ateam. Faculty participate in this process and get on a first-name basis with the students.Team problem solving exercises are used
impact: • Positive Attitude Shifts: Students reported transitioning from passively completing tasks to actively contributing ideas during team discussions. This shift was attributed to the collaborative structure of the Hackathon, which required ongoing communication and problem-solving. • Skill Development: Many participants noted that the program deepened their understanding of robotics fundamentals and introduced them to new methodologies, such as Design Thinking, which they found particularly valuable for solving complex problems. • Challenges in Team Dynamics: Some students expressed concerns about the varying skill levels among team members, which occasionally placed additional
, or any of the other toolsprovided to them. In order to mitigate those concerns, a few basic tutorials regarding labequipment were provided in 2011 and more robust tutorials are planned for the 2012 course. Itshould be noted that for many students, it is their first time using this equipment. The typical oncampus course has many teaching assistants to assist students, but we frequently found thatstudents would not contact online teaching staff for assistance for the laboratory portion.A point of concern that some faculty may have is the use of a virtual oscilloscope and functiongenerator. It could be claimed that this equipment is not an accurate representation of their "realworld" counterparts. The user interfaces presented are far simpler
. Support the women that you have in your program or on your faculty. Different people need different support but different does not make something less. Plants have different needs as far as water and sunlight but they all provide food, beauty, and oxygen. • Educate yourself. Read feminist literature, read literature about the history of racism in the united states. Listen to women who are willing to share their stories and voice their concerns, then believe those women. Don’t let confirmation bias fool you. Remember that one woman’s opinion is one woman’s opinion, we are individuals with different experiences, expectations etc. – if one woman says the department is “fine” your work is not done
, smart and resilient cities, and (3) the development of engineers who not only have solid technical and practical knowledge, but also social understanding for, through infrastructure, address local and global challenges on humanitarian, environmental, social and equity issues. (iii) EDUCATION RESEARCH: Related to STEM education, Miguel Andrés is developing and applying contemporary pedagogies and tools for innovation and student empowerment to address climate change. Currently, Miguel Andrés is developing teaching and evaluation pedagogy that directs a philosophy of seeking excellence as a pillar to eradicate corruption.Milagros Izel Jiménez (Civil Engineering) © American Society for Engineering
intercultural environment). For instance, McCormick etal. [15] examined a service-learning program at Tufts University which was deemed a valuablecomplementary resource to the conceptual knowledge taught in college-level courses.Theyobserved that the experience could motivate students to self-develop a scaffolding approach tounderstand the practical constraints on real-life issues they confronted during the service-learning experience. Johri et al. [9] re-designed a freshmen course focusing on developingpartnerships between colleges and international organizations to provide a scaffolding learningexperience to undergraduate students, in which the positive influence of student motivation wastied to contextualized real-life projects.However
(TIGER) at the University of Colorado, Boulder. TIGER is part of the national Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning (CIRTL) network, which is dedicated to the development of the next generation of STEM faculty. Blanford worked with the TAR fellows to facilitate the development and execution of the Teaching-as-Research projects referred to in this study.Ms. Corrina Ladakis Gibson, University of Colorado, BoulderMr. Eric Donnelly Kenney Page 25.851.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Introduction to Engineering: Preparing First-Year
or give an answer. I feel very disconnected from my learning.” [$25K-50K] “I did not expect I would fear the lives of my family put at risk every single day. But the science goes on as some of faculty members would say. Or find ways Mature values 3 to be productive. News flash, I am not productive, and I cannot be productive when my safety or my family's safety is threatened every single day
Paper ID #48333The Narrative Turn in Engineering Education Research: Theory and MethodDr. Angela Minichiello, Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, inclusion, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #26450Creating a Successful Pathway to Graduate Studies: The Student IntegratedIntern Research Experience (SIIRE)Dr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in
sealevel rise, global temperature rise, warming oceans, shrinking ice sheets, declining arctic sea ice,glacial retreat, extreme events, and ocean acidification.1 To many, these reasons signal thatsignificant changes to the status quo are imminent.While these issues present challenges to our current way of life, they also provide a new outlookon the world and opportunities for careers and product development. Where there are challenges,there are also opportunities. The goal of this project was to train the next generation of workersto address these challenges. While jobs in the green economy were once rare, that is quicklychanging. Relatively few years ago there was no such thing as green building certifications,carbon cap and trading programs, and
”, “Diversity Efforts” and “Faculty Endowed Recognition” awards. Her career spans local and international borders and have included roles in educational research, program administration, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. Dr Benjamin's research agenda explores issues related to minoritized student experiences, doctoral-level program quality, and engineering education. She is constantly envisioning novel ways to promote educational equity and consistently applies an educational quality lens to her scholarship.Kristin L Schaefer (PhD Student) Kristin Luthringer Schaefer is a licensed professional engineer (PE) and a licensed secondary teacher (grades 6-12), both in Texas, as well as the owner of her own
AC 2011-260: INFORMED INFLUENCE: PREPARING GRADUATE EN-GINEERS TO PRESENT WITH POWER INSTEAD OF JUST POWER-POINTChristine G. Nicometo, University of Wisconsin - Madison Christine G. Nicometo is an associate faculty associate in the Engineering Professional Development (EPD) Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Within EPD, she teaches technical commu- nication courses in three programs: Technical Communication Certificate (TCC); Masters of Engineering Professional Practice (MEPP); and Masters of Engineering Engine Systems(MEES). Through the College of Engineering, she also directs the New Educators Orientation Program. She has been an active member of ASEE since 2006.Traci M Nathans-Kelly, University of
policies at the statewide and systemwide level may mandatechanges to curriculum, funding priorities, resource allocation, program accreditation andadmissions practices. At the heart of such change, new processes for communication betweeneducators and system leaders, and with students would need to emerge. Transfer policies mayrequire the redesign of organizational structures, articulation agreements, and coordinationmechanisms. Such change necessitates commitments from policymakers, higher educationadministrators, and discipline faculty. Such changes would also involve employers, regional andnational economic priorities, and engineering transfer student geographic mobility. Specific toengineering education, a cultural change in our institutional
/sampling frequency is being met!For other assessment schemes, such as projects and presentations, one may assign a weighting factorfor each of them, that depends on a number of factors that contribute to its approximation of a unitimpulse function (including level of difficulty, time duration, accessibility to resources, etc.), incomparison with a conventional one-or-two hour exam, as is done in [15].VII – Facts and Figures – A Data Snapshot from the International SceneIn 2013, a short engineering education survey was distributed to 233 engineering educatorsaffiliated with the engineering faculties of four leading universities in Lebanon (the Middle East).The survey included a number of questions on issues ranging from the number of
’ fast adoption of innovative and available new technologies. Agrowing concern for engineering instructors and among college writing instructors is that ofArtificial Intelligence (AI) being widely available to students. Although these technologies arenot a main topic of the work presented here, they can potentially impact the teaching of technicalwriting and the assessment of student outcomes, as well as engineering teaching in general. AI asa tool for text development and even to produce numerical solutions to textbook-type problems isknown and is getting more powerful. But it is not clear how capable AI is of correctly handlinggraphical information and integrating it with text. Therefore, its use by students to generatetechnical reports could
Paper ID #29674Student performance in partially flipped ECE laboratory classesDr. Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Dallal is an assistant professor at the department of electrical and computer engineering, Unversity of Pittsburgh, since August 2017. Dr. Dallal primary focus is on education development and innovation. His research interests include biomedical signal processing, biomedical image analysis, and computer vision, as well as machine learning, networked control systems, and human-machine learning.Dr. April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh April Dukes (aprila@pitt.edu) is the Faculty and Future Faculty
underdevelopedcommunity outside the U.S.Although PBSL opportunities are expanding at educational institutions nationwide, much of thefindings on their impacts are anecdotal.10-11 Some faculty have begun to assess PBSL programsand have found that PBSL does, in fact, cultivate stronger learning outcomes, entrepreneurship,cultural awareness, and community-mindedness. However, comprehensive and rigorousassessment methods have not yet been implemented.10 Also, given that the number of studentsparticipating in PBSL activities may be small or unrepresentative of the undergraduateengineering student population at large, it is difficult to draw conclusions that can be generalizedabout this promising instructional strategy.One of the main differences between PBSL and
andmanpower available through the E3 and RCWE programs, and include the following: (1) aSummer Bridge Program, which will provide seven weeks of preparation in Calculus, Physics,Chemistry, and English prior to the students' freshman year; (2) cooperative learning courses inthe first year math and science courses; (3) monthly socials which provide an opportunity tointeract with successful professionals from industry and academia; (4) supplemental classes infreshmen Calculus, Physics, and Chemistry to provide a solid foundation to build-on; (5)continuation of cooperative learning classes in sophomore in Differential Equations; (6)interacting with a select group of department Faculty Advisors and Project Coordinators duringtheir full undergraduate
controllability),3. Reliability4. Safety (and equipment protection)5. Efficiency (and profitability)6. Operation during transitions7. Dynamic performance8. Monitoring and diagnosisThe topics have been selected to cover the most common issues in process plants and to reinforceprior learning, but they are not meant to be all-inclusive. Instructors can modify the topics toinclude their own insights or to emphasize unique aspects of a specific course and project. Page 12.1366.2 These topics are not new and have been recognized as important. However, they are notaddressed in standard engineering science courses (e.g., fluid