University and has mentored more than 30 undergrad- uate and graduate business plan teams since 2002. In 2010, Carol’s teams won more national business plan competitions than teams from any one university in the 25 year history of the competitions. Carol has won two national awards for innovation in entrepreneurship pedagogy and won the prestigious University of Arkansas Alumni Association Faculty Distinguished Achievement Award for Teaching in 2009. She earned a Ph.D. in Strategic Management with an Entrepreneurship Concentration from the University of Georgia in 1988. Page 22.944.1 c
AC 2011-19: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STUDENT COMPETITIVE AC-TIVITIES AND THE ENTREPRENEURIAL MINDSETDonald M Reimer, Lawrence Technological University Donald Reimer is a Senior Lecturer in the College of Engineering and Director of Entrepreneurial Pro- grams, College of Engineering, at Lawrence Technological University. He teaches Corporate Entrepreneur- ship for Engineers and Structured Approaches to Innovation in the Lear Entrepreneurial Program. Mr. Reimer is the faculty advisor for the Lawrence Tech Chapter of the Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Organi- zation. He serves as a Kern Fellow in the Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network. Mr. Reimer also serves as the Program Director for the Coleman Foundation Faculty
rich.First, we begin with an overview of the relationship between the individual and the community,including a review of the literature, focusing on the transition from personal characteristics ofentrepreneurs to the broader understanding of the entrepreneur in situ. Second, we propose anew way to think of the innovation cycle, based on the virtues of creativity, diligence, andwisdom, which are informed by other virtues, such as compassion, justice, and stewardship.Finally, we consider practical pedagogy and case studies (including experiences of our studentauthor) to teach entrepreneurship using the virtues, which may help faculty to move beyondsimple teaching of skills towards a positive influence to increase student entrepreneurialbehavior.2
operations, with rapid development, prototyping, and validation of client technology. AllIntellectual Property generated during the project is owned entirely by the client. This modelremoves many of the constraints of industry partnerships and technology transfer, and iscurrently being used by the University as both an incubator for student/faculty/staff innovation aswell as a means to acquire solid, industrially relevant projects for Senior design students.Problem-Based Learning within a Multidisciplinary, Industrial Project-Based ContextProblem-Based Learning (PBL) has been an extremely successful model for both medical andtechnology education;1,2 our experiences with multidisciplinary student teams working onindustry-provided challenges in a
, cultural and environmental impacts oftechnology and innovation. Engineering graduates from traditional programs are lacking in skillsrequired to be successful after graduation. The engineering dual degree program encompassesthe liberal arts, experiential education, and cultural and international exposure producingengineers ready for the real-world work environment.Some research attention has been focused on traditional three-two programs orBachelors/Masters programs; however little has been focused on dual degree programs whereengineering and non-technical fields are paired together. These dual degree programs produceengineering graduates who are well rounded and can function in the society of today and thefuture. Through the incorporation of
aware of the complex and multi-faceted problems faced byindustry. This paper describes our efforts to introduce the entrepreneurial mindset into ourundergraduate engineering students, primarily through a program that is transforming ourfaculty.We have completed two years of a program at Baylor University designed to help engineeringeducators teach innovation and become innovative in their teaching, and have received anothergrant to greatly expand it. This paper will present the background of the program, theassessment of the first two years of the program and its impact on student learning, and futureexpansion of the program. We will also discuss lessons learned and best practices, including thenecessity of working across disciplinary
, communicate ideas, understand and exercise real world ethics in challenging situations, and experience other “real-world” dilemmas faced by innovators.The University of Florida College of Engineering (UF COE) has depth in education and researchacross a broad spectrum of disciplines with 11 departments, over 270 faculty members and over$100M in annual research expenditures. The COE has recently engaged in a strategic planningprocess which reinforced that the college is well positioned to provide students and faculty witha full innovation educational experience as the College is: Comprehensive, as the 14th largest school of engineering in the US in undergraduate enrollment and 6th largest in graduate enrollmentvi, with ~8,300 students and
. Page 22.622.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Enhancing the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Freshman EngineersAbstract:On page 1 of Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the NewCentury cites the most critical task of engineering educators: “first and foremost, engineeringeducation must produce technically excellent and innovative graduates.” This report furtherstates “it is agreed that innovation is the key and engineering is essential to the task of helpingthe United States maintain its economic leadership and its share of high technology jobs.” Thegoal of our research is to benchmark and identify creativity and innovation skill sets in first-yearengineering
Development Co. (Royal Dutch Shell), Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and AMP Inc. In his later years in these corporations he was responsible for leadership in innovation and technology management. For the last 12 years, he has been teaching environmental and interdisciplinary engineering at Penn State-Harrisburg, Harrisburg Community College, Grand Valley State University, and principally for the last 8 years, Calvin College. At Calvin College, he has been one of the Principal Investigators in the program to bring an entrepreneurial mindset to the education program.Steven H. VanderLeest, Calvin College STEVEN H. VANDERLEEST is a Professor of Engineering at Calvin College, Vice-President of Re- search & Development at
innovators, investors, and industry. Internal sources are students and faculty of IRE.The focus of this paper will be in detailing the entrepreneurial process for investors, innovators,students, and faculty. The process used by industry is discussed in a separate paper and will notbe addressed here. Students are encouraged to pursue their own ideas as projects during theirattendance, since combining education with the pursuit of personal interests fosters an interest inentrepreneurship13. Some ongoing examples include a fluid dynamics based portable generatorand a low cost computerized custom-fit clothing tailoring process.Process overview:For external sources, such as innovators and investors, confidentiality agreements (CDA) aresigned before
enterprises and entire communities.The authors propose a multi-level multi-dimensional perspective for assessing the effectivenessof entrepreneurship education programs while introducing a measurement model as a criticalcomponent. The effectiveness of entrepreneurial education programs is difficult to measureprecisely, particularly in a shorter time, due to the nature of entrepreneurship education programoutcomes which researchers need to wait years before students graduate and then contribute tothe creation of innovation or new venture in their later carrier. According to Rouse and Morris[2], mental models are the mechanisms whereby humans generate descriptions of system purposeand form, explanations of system functioning and observed system states
Engineering Entrepreneurship. He is also currently serving as a Special Issue Guest Editor of the International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management. Dr. Pistrui is a member of the Kern Family Foundation’s Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network Advisory Board. In 2009 he was appointed as a Senior Fellow at the Austrian Economics Center in Vienna. He is also an honorary board member of the American Southeast Europe Chamber of Commerce. Dr. Pistrui served on the Board of Directors, Executive Committee, and was Vice President, of the Family Firm Institute (Boston, MA, 1998-2001). He served as Program Chair for the Family Firm Institute 2000 Annual Conference (Washington, DC). Dr. Pistrui appears
AC 2011-503: BRINGING A TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP CUR-RICULUM ONLINE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDJames V. Green, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. James V. Green leads the education activities of Mtech at the University of Maryland as the Di- rector of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior Lecturer and Associate Director with Mtech, Dr. Green designs and teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. He leads Mtech’s international entrepreneurship education initiatives to include establishing and managing partnerships. Dr
and economic approaches. The initial offering of the business-based GSSEprogram did not include a formal means of interfacing GSSE students with capable andinterested engineering and agricultural science students at CSU. Rather, any such interfacesbetween GSEE teams and engineering/science students were achieved on an ad hoc basis andresulted in varying degrees of success. Accordingly, in 2009 a Course and Program Grant wasobtained from the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) to formalize alinkage between GSSE Masters students and graduate students within the College of Engineering(COE) and College of Agricultural Science (CAS), respectively. The NCIIA grant hasfacilitated the development of a new program in
AC 2010-589: ENGINEERING ENTREPRENEURIAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAMS:PLANNING, OPERATING AND GROWINGDonald Reimer, Lawrence Technological University Donald Reimer is a Senior Lecturer in the College of Engineering and Associate Director of the Lear Entrepreneurial Program at Lawrence Technological University. He teaches Corporate Entrepreneurship for Engineers and Structured Approaches to Innovation in the Lear Entrepreneurial Program. Don is the faculty advisor for the Lawrence Tech Chapter of the Collegiate Entrepreneurs’ Organization. He serves as a Kern Fellow in the Kern Entrepreneurial Education Network. Don also serves as the Program Director for the Coleman Foundation Faculty
Engineering Entrepreneurship Minor. She was awarded the 2005 Price Foundation Innovative Entrepreneurship Educators Award – Stanford University REE Conference (Roundtable for Entrepreneurship Education) and 2006 ASEE Kauffman Outstanding Entrepreneurship Educator Award. In January 2010, Liz stepped down as Director of the E-SHIP Minor to help define expansion plans for undergraduate entrepreneurship education across Penn State. Liz is co-Director of the Lion Launch Pad, a new student-centric on-campus business incubator. The Lion Launch Pad supports entrepreneurial teams from across Penn State, with the goal establish viable innovation companies.Angela Shartrand, National Collegiate
AC 2010-220: BUSINESS BASICS FOR ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS: A CASESTUDY ON A NEW GRADUATE COURSEMcRae Banks, Worcester Polytechnic Institute McRae C. Banks is professor of Entrepreneurship and Strategy, and founder and former director of the Collaborative for Entrepreneurship & Innovation at WPI. Additionally he is immediate past chair of the ASEE Entrepreneurship Division and a founding advisor of the Kern Family Foundation's KEEN Program. He is the founder of five startups in the academic and private sectors and has been immersed in engineering and science entrepreneurship for over 15 years, and entrepreneurship generally for over 25 years
propulsion methods. If an entrepreneur could anticipate technological advancesthat interact with a critical need to move away from fossil-fuel-based transport,innovative business ventures could emerge. The Tech Clinic has embarked on a proof ofconcept aimed at golf courses and the fleets of low speed vehicles that are used as golfcarts.Specific engineering studies that emerge from the entrepreneurial ambitions of the clinicare to examine the practicality of various approaches to the “greening” of golf coursesand their fleets of vehicles. The golf cart presents a particularly inviting target for greenengineering. It is (whether electric or gasoline powered) a nonessential means oftransportation used to play a game, and uses fossil fuels for
that are in trouble. They are brought together to develop newor innovative products. It is very important in the entrepreneurial mindset that a managementstyle be established by the CEO/professor that fosters teamwork with a free spirit ofbrainstorming new products. This structure provides real-world situations as in industry.Students must demonstrate their product to the CEO/professor, their peers, and industrialadvisors.Foundation for Entrepreneurial SpiritLawrence Technological University (LTU) was founded in 1932, as a result from Henry Fordand the educational community requesting part-time programs in the evening. At that time, therewere no colleges or universities in the Detroit area that offered evening courses. The Dean ofEngineering
-secondary education for the ACM Transactions on Computing Education.Prof. Jon Down, University of Portland Page 24.867.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Leveraging University Entrepreneurship Center Programs as a Means to Enrich Engineering Education1. IntroductionAs engineering curricula evolve to include greater emphasis on entrepreneurship and innovation,it is imperative to leverage well-developed resources that exist on many campuses. Today, morethan 2,600 colleges and universities in the U.S. offer some form of entrepreneurship educationand more than
load-balanced techniques for routing pack- ets in wireless and wired networks, performance analysis and optimization of network parameters, rapid prototyping of autonomous robots, and networked health-monitoring device in healthcare applications. In 2011, he won an award from the Global Consortium of Entrepreneurship Centers for teaching innovations in a team-taught multi-disciplinary course.Dr. Frank Klassner, Villanova UniversityDr. Vijay Gehlot, Villanova University VIJAY GEHLOT is an Associate Professor and Graduate Programs Director in the Computing Sciences Department at Villanova University. He received a Bachelor of Engineering (Hons.) in Electrical and Electronics from Birla Institute of Technology and
School of Business, University of Windsor As Director, Research and Interdisciplinary Learning at the Odette School of Business’ Entrepreneur- ship Practice and Innovation Centre, Dr. Schlosser has worked with other faculties to develop an en- trepreneurial culture on campus. Her collaboration with University of Windsor’s Law and Engineering faculties has attracted more than $1.7 million in funding in the past 5 years. She has been honoured with multiple research and teaching awards. She serves as Secretary, CCSBE, and Associate Editor, Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. She has published 34 journal articles, book chapters and cases and has delivered 55 conference presentations since 2004. She was
Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Quantitative Assessment of All-Class Project-based Undergraduate Course on Graduates Career Dr. Emil H Salib, Eric Walisko Integrated Science & Technology Department, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA salibeh@jmu.edu, waliskev@dukes.jmu.eduAbstractThe process of creating innovative technology applications is shifting to smaller developmentteams of entrepreneurial minded individuals who use a dynamic landscape of tools and muchcreativity. This new work environment calls for novel methods to best prepare its work force. Inthis paper we describe an All-Class Project-based
faculty development, community building, peer review of learning materials, and dissemination of educational innovation. She is PI for the project ”Learning from the Best: How Award Winning Courseware has Impacted Engineering Education.” This research focuses on determining how high quality courseware is being disseminated and how it is impacting the culture of engineering education as measured by changes in student learning, teaching practices, and the careers of the authors of these materials.Elizabeth Nilsen, National Collegiate Inventors & Innovators Alliance (NCIIA) Elizabeth Nilsen is Senior Program Officer for Epicenter at NCIIA. Her professional focus is on the de- velopment and growth of STEM and
Paper ID #10373The Design of a Graduate Level Course in Entrepreneurship: Ownership Is-suesDr. Perry Samson, University of Michigan Perry Samson is Professor of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences and Professor of Entrepreneur- ship in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan. He holds an Arthur F. Thurnau Pro- fessorship at the University of Michigan in recognition of ”outstanding contributions to undergraduate education” and is the recipient of the 2009 Teaching Innovation Award at the University of Michigan and a past recipient of the College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching Award. In 2010 Perry
Paper ID #9911The UT TRANSFORM ProjectDr. David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso David Novick is the Associate Dean of Engineering for Graduate Studies and Research, Professor of Computer Science, and Mike Loya Distinguished Chair in Engineering. He formerly directed UTEP’s Kauffman Campus Initiative and now serves as co-director of UTEP’s Mike Loya Center for Innovation and Commerce. He leads the College of Engineering’s Task Force on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, which includes participants from colleges across the university. Dr. Novick, who is a graduate of Harvard Law School, teaches UTEP’s course
.Not having available necessary resources he puts together ateam of unassigned (read: difficult to deal with personalities) employees and partially succeedsonly to see his effort stolen away by his envious boss, who trapped him to sign a non-exclusivepatent waiver. Neverheless, the team does not give up and comes up with a number ofbreakthrough solutions (eliminating the need for hard drive, RAM, and other peripherals). Aprototype is created, but it crashes, is ugly and the price is still too high. More innovations areneeded and the team stands up to the task, creating a computer operated by virtual glove and newlook designed by the next-door artist.Issues for class discussion: entrepreneurship, creativity, diversity, leadership, teamwork
disciplines. They are encouraged to meet outside the class hours(during the lab hours) with their team members from the paired courses. The hope is to mixvisual artists, analytically minded engineers, and venture-oriented business students together insmall teams to catalyze innovation, with anthropology students as ethnographers and moderators.Since they have to form teams, we have a common assignment by the second week to post theirbios at a common Blackboard community site. They will have the next three weeks tocommunicate with each other and determine the team make-up. We get involved if they areunable to form teams on their own; we help them make up their minds. During the lab hours (seebelow) the engineering and arts professors teardown our
Page 23.1133.3answering these four questions: 1. Nature and magnitude of change - What magnitude of change – an incremental innovation or a paradigm shift (due to product/venture/entrepreneur? – not clear with out something else. So added some suggestions)? (incremental or significant) 2. Responsibility - What type of organization is responsible for the change or paradigm shift? (profit or non-profit) 3. Role - What is the role of the individual is leading the change? (entrepreneur, small business owner/operator, self-employed, intrapreneur) 4. Type of change - What type of change is being proposed or implemented? (product, process, concept) This classification
Paper ID #7214User-Based Approach to Teaching and Learning Product DesignDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Raviv is a Professor of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Florida Atlantic University. In December 2009 he was named Assistant Provost for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. With more than 25 years of combined experience in the high-tech industry, government and academia Dr. Raviv developed fundamentally different approaches to ”out-of-the-box” thinking and a breakthrough methodology known as ”Eight Keys to Innovation.” He has been sharing his contributions with profession