to remote learning necessitated by the Covid-19 pandemic gave rise to new educationallearning methods. Starting in 2020 and for an extended period of time, students were unable toattend class in person and relied on virtual learning. Panopto has been used since 2021 as a videomanagement system allowing instructors to record lectures live and post them for students towatch later. Despite mandates being lifted and students returning to class, students routinely askfor lecture videos to continue being posted to aid in study and reinforce comprehension. Thisstudy looks at the effectiveness of Panopto through the lens of engagement interaction with thevideos.This research looks at data for the Fall 2022 semester of an undergraduate
Paper ID #45817Enhancing Student Engagement in Electrical Engineering: The Impact ofHands-On Learning Tools on Student EngagementDr. Shobhit Aggarwal, The Citadel Dr. Aggarwal earned his Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication from Kurukshetra University, India in 2014, a Masters of Science and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2018 and 2023 respectively. After graduation, he served as an Embedded Firmware Engineer in an IoT-based Engineering organization in Charlotte and held a position as a Senior Embedded Software Engineer at a Fortune 500 electrical
of real-world project considerations [13].This study investigates the impact of project-based learning compared to the traditionaldemonstration-based method in a biomedical engineering laboratory course. Project-basedlearning, where students work on a semester-long project that incorporates multiple courseconcepts, may better simulate the iterative processes found in real-world research anddevelopment. Our goal is to evaluate how each teaching approach influences student outcomes,including self-efficacy, teamwork, collaboration skills, and knowledge communication. Bycomparing the learning outcomes of both approaches, this research aims to provide valuableinsights into effective teaching strategies for biomedical engineering laboratories. It
to master during the camp. This approach placed an additional cognitiveburden on students during the activity, detracting from its intended impact. To address this, futureiterations of the camp should integrate more practical, skill-focused instruction earlier in theprogram. Collaborating with the programming course to incorporate instruction on programmingand Arduino could make the BB84 QKD activity more interactive and less reliant onpre-assembled tools. This change would empower students to engage with the materials moredeeply and confidently. Introducing small-group collaborations or gamified elements could alsoincrease and enhance the collaboration among students. Finally, as this was my first experienceteaching a workshop of this kind
engineering education and practice, while also reinforcing foundational disciplinaryknowledge for students [2]. Devices that enhance instructional delivery include augmentedreality (AR) which provides immersive simulations for construction management education [16]and 3D hologram projectors that improve the presentation of STEM concepts in classrooms [17].These technologies collectively aim to enhance engagement by fostering active learning andmaking complex subjects more accessible and interactive [14] - [17].2.2. EdTech integration definitionTo facilitate the integration of EdTech into engineering education and support the assessment ofits impact on students' technical and professional skill development, it is essential to establish aclear
for the study was obtained from our Institutional ReviewBoard (protocol #IRB-FY2024-10). Shared survey data is only for students who filledout an IRB signed consent form at the beginning of the semester.ResultsSurvey Questions and Student Responses to Measure ImpactTable 1 outlines the survey questions designed to measure the impact of the bonus pointself-assessment rubric and peer evaluations on various aspects of student engagement,learning, anxiety alleviation, and overall course performance. The student responses inFigure 1 provide valuable insights into how these alternative grading practicesinfluenced their motivation and academic outcomes. Question Impact Area Survey
to providing hands-on learning experiences that enhance engineering education. As a student leader, I actively promote collaborative initiatives that empower my peers to engage in meaningful projects, fostering a deeper understanding of engineering principles and their impact on society.Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville Dr. Redahegn Sileshi, University of North Georgia, Gainesville, GA. Dr. Redahegn Sileshi is an associate professor of engineering at University of North Georgia, Gainesville. His research experiences and interests are in the areas of water quality analysis and stormwater management, largely focusing on small and large-scale infiltration studies. He has done extensive
Engineering Education, 2025 Impact of an Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Project on First Year StudentsAbstractIncreasing student interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)continues to be of significant importance in order to satisfy the increasing demand forprofessionals in these fields. The First Year Scholars program at Kennesaw State University(KSU) aims to introduce first-year students to the undergraduate research experience. Studentsare encouraged to apply for projects they find interesting, regardless of whether the projects arein their majors. This program helps students gain early research experience, which sets them on apath for future success. In this study, an
supervisors in the VM setup exist on thesame machine and the communication delay between them is little compared to having twodifferent Raspberry Pi’s to communicate. This communication and processing delay add up tothe latencies and we can see these reflections in Figure 3a and Figure 3b. a) Virtual Machine (VM) b) Raspberry Pi Testbed Figure 3 Workload Distribution ComparisonConclusionFrom the overall experience of iEDGE, we conclude that such an initiative for engaging next-generation engineers and scientists in hands-on implementation plays a pivotal role in bridgingthe disconnect between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Our REU student
practices do exist [3]. Although such research isabundant, research on how engineering students perceive instructors’ beliefs and behaviors isscarce. It is important to explore this side of the research domain because learning and teachingare interactive activities that involve a community [4], [5], and centering student voices in thedynamic between students and instructors is crucial in advancing a student/learner-centeredphilosophy and efforts in engineering learning and teaching [5]. In our study, we engage withstudent perception research by having current engineering students conduct secondary dataanalysis on an existing data set on instructors’ beliefs on test usage in fundamental engineeringcourses. The process involves having the
Paper ID #45424Understanding the Impact of an International Service-Learning Trip to Belizeon Mental Health: A Case Study of Students and FacultyDr. Amro Khasawneh, Mercer UniversityMs. Abby Anne McDowell, Mercer UniversityDr. Sarah K. Bauer, Mercer University Dr. Sarah Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering at Mercer University. Her primary research interests include water and wastewater treatment and renewable energy technologies. Her work focuses on developing techniques for the production of clean energy and clean water. She has also worked on a variety of projects to enhance
., “The Role of Attendance in Student Engagement in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., 2020.[5] S. Kumar et al., “Attendance and Performance in Laboratory Courses: A Case Study in Environmental Engineering,” J. Eng. Technol., 2019.[6] M. Davis et al., “Impact of Hybrid Course Delivery on Student Attendance in Engineering Programs,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2021.[7] T. Robinson et al., “Teaching Quality vs. Attendance: Which Has a Greater Impact on Student Performance?,” J. High. Educ. Res., 2022.[8] M. A. Karim, “Hybrid and Online Synchronous Delivery of Environmental Engineering During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study on Perception, Attitude, and Assessment,” Eur. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 01–11, Feb. 2021.[9
offering an immersive and interactive learning tool, this study seeks to bridgethe gap between theoretical instruction and practical comprehension, aligning with moderneducational approaches that prioritize experiential learning and technology integration toincrease cognitive engagement [8]. The study involved engineering students at various levels ofexperience to assess the application’s impact across a range of backgrounds. This researchemploys a quantitative survey to assess spatial ability and gather feedback on the application’susability and effectiveness. The findings will guide iterative improvements to the application,ensuring it meets educational needs and aligns with pedagogical best practices. Although thefocus is on rebar
MOM Belize programefforts, ensuring that the program continues to meet the needs of CJC and its community.Key Wordsneeds assessment; focus group; service-learning project; international partner; buildingcommunity partnershipsIntroductionDeveloping and participating in service-learning projects at the college level has the ability tofoster cross-cultural understanding, build capacity, and provide opportunities for faculty,students, and other participants to address real-world challenges through collaborative andeducational frameworks. Service-learning projects allow students and participants to engage inhands-on learning while working directly with communities to support locally-driven initiatives,often in areas such as infrastructure
preparedness, compromising theirability to succeed and progress.This study introduces a new strategy to enhance retention by implementing a structured,proactive advising model that emphasizes early, personalized engagement between students andfaculty advisors. This advising framework prioritizes frequent and clear communicationregarding placement and academic progress through personalized emails, one-on-one Zoommeetings, and in-person advising sessions. Mathematics placement, given its foundational role inengineering curricula, serves as the centerpiece of this advising model. The framework providesstudents with academic planning support, fosters meaningful student-faculty interactions, andcultivates student ownership of their educational
different knowledge levels and to engage diverse audiences—ranging from peers with similar backgrounds to novices unfamiliar with the research area. This skill not only proved invaluable for communicating within the team and disseminating progress outside the project, but also enhanced the student’s overall ability to convey complex ideas in an accessible and impactful way.During and immediately after the project, the student received multiple awards for their research,presentation skills, and also technical abilities. These successes along with a newly enhancedskill to clearly explain his ideas led to several job offers before graduation. Notably, in one jobinterview, the student had to describe complex computer science
collaborative learning compared to their normalexperiences in large classes with one instructor in conventional, analytically driven courseswithout peer support. The sample consists of 172 undergraduate students who responded to thepost-course survey open-ended questions. Active military and Veteran students represented 61%of the respondents.The peer learning activities embedded in their online course were facilitated by a paid peerleader that completed training to prepare them on how to communicate effectively, showempathy, and engage non-traditional students. The participants had three to four peer ledactivities per 9-week course that allowed them to increase interaction with others in the samecourse as well as a peer leader that had recently
’ responses to these questions. Question 5 explored the extent to which studentsperceived self-grading as a beneficial learning strategy. Approximately ninety percent of studentswere strongly agreed (60.5%) or agreed (27.9%) that self-grading provided them an opportunityto learn from their errors on homework assignments and apply those lessons to futureassessments, such as exams. Only a small percentage of students (11.6%) did not agree that self-grading was a beneficial learning strategy. No students strongly disagreed with the idea that self-grading could be a valuable learning tool. Questions 6 and 7 aimed to determine whether self-prepared equation sheets had a positive impact on student exam performance. Most students(83.8%) did not believe that
; any of these tools can effectively drive theviewer's attention to key information quickly, improving viewer engagement and setting the toneof a presentation.To understand Typography, one can approach the text as “a continuous field whose grain, color,density and silhouette can be endlessly adjusted” [6]. Effective visual communication can beachieved solely on the basis of Typography, if necessary, as Hierarchy, Alignment, andWhitespace are all ingrained components of effective Typography.Key tips for improving Typography include the following: • Urge research of effective font pairings to improve consistency and avoid using too many font styles. The site Fontpair is a helpful resource. • Encourage students to avoid widows, orphans
objective of this paper is to lay out the process for transformation of teaching effectivenessevaluation in an individual engineering academic department. An assessment of the current stateof teaching evaluation among faculty in the department will be presented, and the way forward toa more holistic evaluation strategy will be discussedBrief Literature ReviewThe methods and practices used to evaluate effective teaching have been met with scrutiny overthe last several years. Practices traditionally used to evaluate teaching effectiveness arecommonly viewed as flawed with no direct impact or incentive related to improving teaching inhigher education. These traditional methods rely heavily on student course evaluation methods[4]. While it has been
writing In-class activity2.1 Week 1: First In-person Meeting Activity: Setting Up Your Goal2.1.1 Use of MentimeterIn the first in-person class, the course expectations are introduced. A Mentimeter is used to makethe session interactive and engaging. The following questions are asked during the first meeting,allowing students to see their responses in real-time: How are you today? Use one word todescribe how you feel now. How do you rate your current writing skill? (0-100 points). Howmany journal articles (not including conference presentations) have you published so far? Whatare your expectations for this course? Have you used AI (e.g. ChatGPT) in your academic work?Which area(s) do you find challenging when starting to write? How are
and develop actionable solutions. Although this studycenters on freshmen, the findings suggest broader applicability, underscoring the potential ofLean and engineering practices to support students in building resilience and problem-solvingskills across various academic disciplines. Integrating these methods in academia not onlyempowers students but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement within educationalsettings, bridging the gap between industry practices and academic success.Literature ReviewLean tools like value stream mapping and the A3 process aid continuous improvement ineducation by visually structuring communication and problem-solving approaches [1]. Adaptingthese practices from manufacturing is challenging, but Lean’s
). • Confidence in Success: Just 22% of students rated their confidence in succeeding as "very high" (5 out of 5). • Preferred Mentorship: Industry professionals were the most preferred mentors, chosen by 15 students [3]. • Interest in Industry Engagement: A majority of respondents (27 students) expressed strong interest in industry-focused activities [3].Table 1 – Key Survey InsightsThese results highlight the need for a structured onboarding program that integrates academicsupport, professional exposure, and community-building efforts [6].Proposed Year-Long Onboarding ProgramSemester 1: Building Belonging and IdentityThe first semester focuses on helping students feel connected to the CPE community whilebuilding foundational
]. Requirements generation and evolution can continue through laterstages of design, influencing project and product success [3]. Requirements have also beenshown to impact the product and project costs [4]. They should elicit and embody the voice ofthe customer and be translated into technical specifications. Ultimately, they must be managedthroughout the design process and used in the testing and evaluation of the product. The Houseof Quality is used as a phase of the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) process to supportcollaborative design teams in these objectives [5]. This paper focuses on the implementation ofan intervention to assist students with requirements development in a Capstone design course.This will also be used to form a basis for later
to assess Student Outcomes as defined by ABET [1] Criterion 3, such as those re-lated to communication, teamwork, and producing design solutions. It can also be an opportunityto connect with the industry, which is a significant focus of some engineering programs [2], [3].Through a regular assessment of Capstone experiences, avenues for continuous improvement canbe identified to provide a meaningful experience through the best learning opportunity for stu-dents.Historic evolution and current Capstone practices at Virginia Military InstituteThe study provides valuable insights into the CE Capstone course at VMI, highlighting its evolu-tion, impact on students, and areas for improvement. The current Capstone course at VMI is a 3-credit course
manning the barricades, facultyhave a responsibility to educate students on the pros and cons of using generative AI.Acknowledging concerns about AI opens the door to engage students in solution-based thinking.For example, faculty and students may not be fully aware of the environmental implications ofusing generative AI tools. Engineering programs have an opportunity to educate students aboutthe environmental impacts of AI, which could help foster a culture of sustainability withinacademia. On a smaller scale, institutions can use AI concerns as a motivation to invest inenergy-efficient hardware, utilize renewable energy sources, and promote practices that reduceoverall energy consumption. Contextualizing AI includes greater exploration of what
Performance and EngagementThe data shows that female students reported a slightly higher average GPA (3.18) compared tomale students (3.16). Additionally, female students spent more time on coursework outside ofclass (13.05 hours) than their male counterparts (11.13 hours). This suggests that female studentsin the BCS program may be more academically engaged or face additional internal or externalpressures to excel in a traditionally male-dominated field.• Transfer Students and Program AttractionThe percentage of transfer students was more than double among male students compared tofemale students. This could indicate that male students are more likely to switch intoconstruction-related programs from other majors or colleges, possibly due to
high school curricula [7]. This imbalance inimplementation results in significant gaps in student exposure to essential AI principles. PBLoffers a promising solution by pairing real-world applications with ethical discussions, enablingstudents to grasp abstract AI concepts and understand their societal implications. Effective AIpedagogy involves hands-on activities like PBL that allow students to engage with real-worldproblems, fostering critical thinking and collaboration [3].An interdisciplinary approach of integrating AI education into existing curricula, rather thanreplacing current subjects demonstrates the practical relevance of AI skills, prepares students toapply them effectively in diverse, real-world contexts and future workplaces
prototypedevelopment further engage students and prepare them for careers in the medical device field.Drawing on two years of course implementation, this paper discusses the challenges, successes,and key outcomes of this approach, offering practical advice for educators interested in creatingsimilar industry-collaborative courses.IntroductionThe Twin Cities region is a global leader in the medical device industry, home to a thrivingecosystem of established companies, innovative startups, and renowned healthcare institutions.This dynamic environment drives both economic growth and advancements in medicaltechnologies, creating a high demand for engineering graduates who possess not only technicalexpertise but also practical, industry-relevant skills
, institutional policies,and departmental conditions that impact women’s advancement or hinder their advancement inSTEM fields. In Table 3, a framework is described based on the findings to show how the factorsrelate to a women’s career pathways from recent graduates through early and mid-careertransitions within the context of support and the context of barriers.Table 3: Conceptional Framework Early and Mid-Recent Graduates Career Context of Support TransitionsMath and science Intent and Entrance into an overall Entrance into discipline-self-efficacy builds willingness to STEM community and specific STEM and advance in network of support