from the Ohio State University, and his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other underrepresented groups in mathematics, science and engi- neering.Prof. Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University Wenshen Pong received his Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He joined the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University in 1998. He teaches courses in Civil/Structural Engineering. Dr. Pong is a registered Professional Engineer in California. He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers
, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Dr. Wenshen Pong, San Francisco State University Wenshen Pong received his Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He joined the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University in 1998. He teaches courses in Civil/Structural Engineering. Dr. Pong is a registered Professional Engineer in California. He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Structural Engineers Association of California. He has published over fifty technical papers in the areas of Structural Control and Earthquake Engineering. Dr. Pong has been the Director of the School of Engineering at SFSU with 20 full
for Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) LLP. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low-rise and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20673Dr. Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University Dr
2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20688Where Resources End and Teaching Begins: Experience with Students withAutism Spectrum Disorders in the Freshman Engineering CurriculumDeana R. Delp, Arizona State University Deana R. Delp has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Arizona State University. She is currently a lecturer at Arizona State University for Engineering Academic and Student Affairs in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. She has previous industry experience as a systems engineer for General Dynam- ics Mission Systems, and as a research
intuitive and usable research guides, asmall subset of library website. Librarians and library staff create research guides that help usersfind information, locate databases and other information sources, and provide researchassistance. This study focuses on student use of the Cal Poly library’s aerospace engineeringresearch guide.Gathering data, feedback, and opinions from usability testing sheds light on how students seekand conceptualize information. Participant input often reveals design problems. Addressing anyparticipant misconceptions and library missteps through incremental improvements is a bestpractice in maintaining online content and teaching information literacy. In essence, insight intostudents’ mental models via usability testing of
research in the areas of his interest.Prof. Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University Wenshen Pong received his Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He joined the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University in 1998. He teaches courses in Civil/Structural Engineering. Dr. Pong is a registered Professional Engineer in California. He is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Structural Engineers Association of California. He has published over fifty technical papers in the areas of Structural Control and Earthquake Engineering. Dr. Pong has been the Director of the School of Engineering at SFSU with 20 full-time faculty and over 25 part
Engineering Education, 2017 Upper Division Students Teaching Engineering Skills to Lower Division Students through Underwater Robotics Andrew Hostler, Bridget Benson Electrical Engineering Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis ObispoAbstractMany engineering students just starting out in their undergraduate career face problems with gaininghands on skills relevant to today’s workforce. The plethora of math, physics, and general educationcourses students take in their first two years of college often precludes students from obtaining hands-onengineering experience until their junior year. This paper describes a
learning have been used to enhance student learning, participation, attitude,and overall achievement. This longitudinal study, conducted over fourconsecutive semesters, assesses students' skills in innovation, prototyping, anddesign through a project-based course. Students were given 16 weeks to develop afunctional gamma prototype that would be scored by external experts andteaching assistants. Furthermore, the scores would be compared to actualperformance on a design challenge (DC). The gamma prototype is board gamethat functions as a teaching tool of the prototyping pathway for medical devicedesign. The use of external experts and teaching assistants for validation asked thefollowing research question: “Can external experts and teaching
2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20693Introduction to Engineering Using Interactive Video in Support of a FullyOnline Flipped Classroom ApproachProf. John M Santiago Jr, Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 16 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40
tenured full professor. CSULB is a teaching-intensive institution and thus, he has taught classes at different levels from introduction to programming and data structures; to junior level classes in database design; senior level classes on database, web development, and senior projects; and finally to graduate classes in database systems. In 2014, Dr. Monge joined a team at Google that created NCWIT’s EngageCSEdu, an online living col- lection of peer-reviewed teaching instruments that use research-based techniques that retain and engage students, particularly effective in broadening participation in computing. Dr. Monge’s research inter- ests have evolved over time. Through his participation in an NSF sponsored
on molecular cooperativity in drug targeting, bio-sensing, and cell sig- naling. Current projects align along three main themes: local drug delivery, endothelial dysfunction in diabetes, and cooperative DNA diagnostics. Recent awards include the Jeanette Wilkins Award for the best basic science paper at the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Dr. Caplan teaches several classes including Biotransport Phenomena, Biomedical Product Design and Development II (alpha prototyping of a blood glucose meter), and co-teaches Biomedical Capstone De- sign. Dr. Caplan also conducts educational research to assess the effectiveness of interactive learning strategies in large classes (˜150 students).Miss Courtney Michelle DuBoisMs
the School of Engineering at San Francisco State Uni- versity. His primary research interests are in the direct synthesis, characterization, and applications of nanocomposites and nanostructures for energy generation and storage. ˜Mr. Gilbert Ramirez, Canada College Gilbert Ramirez is a Bay Area resident who is originally from Southern California. Gilbert is currently studying Mechanical Engineering and has 15 years experience in the mechanical trade. He will be attend- ing Santa Clara University this Spring and his goal is to teach engineering after graduation. In his free time, Gilbert enjoys spending time with his three children and training for triathlons.Mr. Javier Robert PiccolottiDr
, J.M.I. & Kay, B. (2015). Assessment of performance and student feedback in the flipped classroom; Paper # 12179. Proceedings 122nd ASEE Annual Conference. 8. Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E. & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work. Chem. Engr. Education, 34, 26-39. 9. Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. Business Education and Accreditation, 6, 33-43.10. Bishop, J.L., & Verleger, M.A. (2013). The flipped classroom: a survey of research. Paper # 6219. Proceedings 120th ASEE Annual Conference.11. Kay, R. & Kletskin I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach
20 years of domestic an international experience and professional skills in both industry and academia. Dr. Raeisi may be reached at rraeisi@csufresno.eduMr. Vidya sagar reddy Gopala P.E., California State University, Fresno Vidya sagar reddy Gopala received the B.E. in Electronics and Communication from Visvesvaraya Tech- nological University of India (2015). He is currently perusing M.S. in Computer Engineering at California State University,Fresno. He works as teaching and Graduate Assistant in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University, Fresno. His research interests include NOC, VLSI design, system testing, testable design and verification
2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20668Comparison of Traditional Face-to-Face and Online Student Performance inTwo Online-Delivered Engineering Technical ElectivesDr. Keith E. Holbert P.E., Arizona State University Keith Holbert is presently an Associate Professor in the School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engi- neering of Arizona State University (ASU). He earned his Ph.D. in nuclear engineering from University of Tennessee in 1989. His research expertise is in the area of instrumentation and system diagnostics including radiation
andmultidisciplinary collaboration, and insight to the non-engineering features of a problem thatmust be addressed.NAE Grand Challenges at the Viterbi School of EngineeringAs an advocate for the Grand Challenges, the Dean of USC’s Viterbi School of Engineering hasorganized two national summits and was instrumental in the establishing the Grand ChallengesScholars initiative that provides specialized programs for Grand Challenge engineers thatinclude: 1) hands-on research that is tied to the Grand Challenges, 2) interdisciplinaryexperiential learning with a variety of stakeholders, 3) experience with innovation andentrepreneurship, 4) global and cross cultural perspectives and ) service-learning. Over a quarterof engineering schools in the US have or are in the
Engineering Education. He is an entrepreneur with over 20 years of domestic an international experience and professional skills in both industry and academia. Dr. Raeisi may be reached at rraeisi@csufresno.eduMr. Vidya sagar reddy Gopala P.E., California State University, Fresno Vidya sagar reddy Gopala received the B.E. in Electronics and Communication from Visvesvaraya Tech- nological University of India (2015). He is currently perusing M.S. in Computer Engineering at California State University,Fresno. He works as teaching and Graduate Assistant in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at California State University, Fresno. His research interests include NOC, VLSI design, system testing, testable design
. Laura Palucki Blake, Harvey Mudd College Laura Palucki Blake is the Director of Institutional Research and Effectiveness at Harvey Mudd Col- lege, where her primary role is to coordinate data collection, interpretation and dissemination to support teaching and learning, planning and decision-making across the college.Sarah SilcoxMr. Joseph John Sinopoli, Harvey Mudd CollegeProf. Gordon G. Krauss, Harvey Mudd College Gordon G. Krauss is the Fletcher Jones Professor of Engineering Design in the Department of Engineering at Harvey Mudd College. His design research interests include improving the way designers interact with each other in the design process and how design process tools are applied. Prior to joining Harvey
using MATLAB/Simulink at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He is currently the advisor for the CPP Hyperloop team, and a co-advisor for the CPP ASHRAE club. He holds an active California PE license.Dr. Paul Morrow Nissenson, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Paul Nissenson (Ph.D. Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 2009) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He teaches courses in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and numerical methods. Paul’s research interests are studying the impact of technology in engineering education and computer modeling of atmospheric systems.Dr
University of California, Davis. His research interests include broadening access to and improving success in lower-division STEM education.Prof. Nicholas Langhoff, Skyline College Nicholas Langhoff is an associate professor of engineering and computer science at Skyline College in San Bruno, California. He received his M.S. degree from San Francisco State University in embedded elec- trical engineering and computer systems. His educational research interests include technology-enhanced instruction, online education, metacognitive teaching and learning strategies, reading apprenticeship in STEM, and the development of novel instructional equipment and curricula for enhancing academic suc- cess in science and
Education I: A Vision for a New Century. Chemical Engineering Education 34 (1), 16- 25.[5] Sparkes, JJ. (1989) Quality in Engineering Education. Engineering Professor’s Conference, Occasional Paper #1.[6] Felder, R.M., Woods, D.R., Stice, J.E., Rugarcia, A. (2000). The Future of Engineering Education II: Teaching Methods that Work. Chemical Engineering Education 34 (1), 26- 39.[7] Rangel, B., Guimaraes, A., Vazsa, A., Alves, F. (2016). Integrated Design Concept in Civil Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (3(A)), 1279– 1288. [8] Mills, J. and Treagust, D.F. (2003). Engineering Education-Is Problem-Based or Project- Based Learning the Answer?, Australasian Journal of
teaching online engineering classes since attending the Summer Engineering Teaching Institute at Ca˜nada College in 2012.Prof. Nicholas Langhoff, Skyline College Nicholas Langhoff is an associate professor of engineering and computer science at Skyline College in San Bruno, California. He received his M.S. degree from San Francisco State University in embedded elec- trical engineering and computer systems. His educational research interests include technology-enhanced instruction, online education, metacognitive teaching and learning strategies, reading apprenticeship in STEM, and the development of novel instructional equipment and curricula for enhancing academic suc- cess in science and engineering.Dr. Tracy
College Tom Rebold has chaired the Engineering department at Monterey Peninsula College since 2004. He holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree in electrical engineering from MIT, and has been teaching online engineering classes since attending the Summer Engineering Teaching Institute at Ca˜nada College in 2012.Eva Schiorring, Canada College Eva Schiorring has almost two decades of experience in research and evaluation and special knowledge about STEM education in community colleges and four-year institutions. Ms. Schiorring presently serves as the external evaluator for three NSF-funded projects that range in scope and focus from leadership de- velopment to service learning and experimentation with alternative
Geotechnics. Prior to joining the doctoral program, Medha was teaching Computer Science and Information Science classes at an engineering institute in Bangalore, India. Her research interests include hybrid/blended learning for engineering education; pedagogy of technology integration and cognitive and motivational processes of learning.Dr. Jean S Larson, Arizona State University Jean Larson has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer Systems Engineer- ing, and many years of experience teaching and developing curriculum in various learning environments. She has taught technology integration and teacher training to undergraduate and graduate students at Ari- zona State University, students at
, facility, and prior experience with programming. Research1 has shownbenefits in using tutorials via mobile and web applications to better engage students and helpthem learn at their own pace and level. The programming platform will be Matlab/Octave2 whichis a programming language initially developed for numerical computations. It is widely usedacross industry and academia and research institutions. Knowledge in Matlab/Octave is requiredin many of the engineering job openings, which makes it a very important technical skill that ourstudents have to master for a successful career as engineers.Knowledge of programming and specifically Matlab is a prerequisite for several classes taught atthe Schools of Engineering around the country and a Matlab
studiesrequirements (such as philosophy) into their engineering courses, and that such courses can, inthe long run, enable more ethically reflective engineering choices.ContextOne of us teaches engineering design courses and courses in mechanical engineering. One of usteaches a variety of ethics courses in the philosophy department. We met two years ago on ateam drawn together to design an ethics module for a course shared across several engineeringmajors. We are now in the process of piloting a full course in engineering ethics that we believewill be adopted by the university as a liberal arts course for engineering majors. This paperdescribes the approach we have pursued, often pointing out how it may be different from othersimilar courses at other
2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20716Making People and Projects: Implications for Designing Making-Based Learn-ing ExperiencesDr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams and Tooker Professor at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering design thinking, making and design innovation project courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical
affected the student’s performance in most areasincluding homework, tests and final exam.The student learning outcomes for this dynamics course are: (i) ability to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science and engineering principles to analyze engineering problems Interpretmathematical or scientific work;(ii) ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (iii) ability toidentify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; (iv) recognition of the need for, and anability to engage in life-long learning.The Working Model 2D project encouraged the students to apply independent research. Twowebsites were provided by the instructor; Interactive Physics Simple Machines – Lever[4] andWorking Model 2D Examples[5]. This dynamics course is required for all
mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Dr. James M Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jim Widmann is a professor of mechanical engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu University it Nepal. At Cal Poly, he coordinates the departments industry spon- sored senior project class and teaches mechanics and design courses. He also conducts research in the areas of creative design, machine design, fluid power control, and engineering education
engineering study abroad programs concentrates onundergraduate students. Statistics data shows that the number of graduate-level visitingscholars rises significantly in these years. The teaching strategy for undergraduate students isnot proper for them because the education for graduate students requires both advancedcourses and research. The students must learn the research methods, like literature review,computer-based simulation techniques, and analytical skills.This paper introduces two teaching models for graduate level visiting scholars in semester-long and year-long programs in ASU respectively. In the following parts, Section IIintroduces the motivation and goal of two visiting scholar programs. Section III describes theeducational model we