Paper ID #45817Enhancing Student Engagement in Electrical Engineering: The Impact ofHands-On Learning Tools on Student EngagementDr. Shobhit Aggarwal, The Citadel Dr. Aggarwal earned his Bachelor of Technology in Electronics and Communication from Kurukshetra University, India in 2014, a Masters of Science and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 2018 and 2023 respectively. After graduation, he served as an Embedded Firmware Engineer in an IoT-based Engineering organization in Charlotte and held a position as a Senior Embedded Software Engineer at a Fortune 500 electrical
for the study was obtained from our Institutional ReviewBoard (protocol #IRB-FY2024-10). Shared survey data is only for students who filledout an IRB signed consent form at the beginning of the semester.ResultsSurvey Questions and Student Responses to Measure ImpactTable 1 outlines the survey questions designed to measure the impact of the bonus pointself-assessment rubric and peer evaluations on various aspects of student engagement,learning, anxiety alleviation, and overall course performance. The student responses inFigure 1 provide valuable insights into how these alternative grading practicesinfluenced their motivation and academic outcomes. Question Impact Area Survey
Engineering Education, 2025 Impact of an Interdisciplinary Engineering Design Project on First Year StudentsAbstractIncreasing student interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)continues to be of significant importance in order to satisfy the increasing demand forprofessionals in these fields. The First Year Scholars program at Kennesaw State University(KSU) aims to introduce first-year students to the undergraduate research experience. Studentsare encouraged to apply for projects they find interesting, regardless of whether the projects arein their majors. This program helps students gain early research experience, which sets them on apath for future success. In this study, an
participate in out-of-class engagement activities [4].The National Academy of Engineering identified in 2001-02 that the Engineer of 2020 (E2020)must possess key attributes, such as strong analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creativity,communication skills, be lifelong learners, be dynamic, agile, resilient, and flexible, ethical,leadership skills, professional, and business and management skills [12]. Polmear et al., [13]studied the impacts of out-of-class engagement activities on the attainment of E2020 outcomesfor civil engineering students. They state that out-of-class engagement activities are extremelyimportant, especially for underrepresented student groups. Simmons et al., [2] reported thatengineering students identified jobs and sports
Paper ID #45424Understanding the Impact of an International Service-Learning Trip to Belizeon Mental Health: A Case Study of Students and FacultyDr. Amro Khasawneh, Mercer UniversityMs. Abby Anne McDowell, Mercer UniversityDr. Sarah K. Bauer, Mercer University Dr. Sarah Bauer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering at Mercer University. Her primary research interests include water and wastewater treatment and renewable energy technologies. Her work focuses on developing techniques for the production of clean energy and clean water. She has also worked on a variety of projects to enhance
., “The Role of Attendance in Student Engagement in Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., 2020.[5] S. Kumar et al., “Attendance and Performance in Laboratory Courses: A Case Study in Environmental Engineering,” J. Eng. Technol., 2019.[6] M. Davis et al., “Impact of Hybrid Course Delivery on Student Attendance in Engineering Programs,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2021.[7] T. Robinson et al., “Teaching Quality vs. Attendance: Which Has a Greater Impact on Student Performance?,” J. High. Educ. Res., 2022.[8] M. A. Karim, “Hybrid and Online Synchronous Delivery of Environmental Engineering During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study on Perception, Attitude, and Assessment,” Eur. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 01–11, Feb. 2021.[9
advocate for promoting diversity in technology disciplines with a robust engineering education background in academia. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Voices of Student Apprenticeship: Exploring the Unique Needs and Perspectives of Community College StudentsAbstract This paper explores student perspectives on a paid and credit-bearing technologyapprenticeship program offered by a community college in a large metropolitan area. Theprogram is offered in collaboration with a large non-profit organization that brings together localbranches of Fortune 500 companies to offer apprenticeship positions in the software engineeringtechnology field. The goal of this paper is to
offering an immersive and interactive learning tool, this study seeks to bridgethe gap between theoretical instruction and practical comprehension, aligning with moderneducational approaches that prioritize experiential learning and technology integration toincrease cognitive engagement [8]. The study involved engineering students at various levels ofexperience to assess the application’s impact across a range of backgrounds. This researchemploys a quantitative survey to assess spatial ability and gather feedback on the application’susability and effectiveness. The findings will guide iterative improvements to the application,ensuring it meets educational needs and aligns with pedagogical best practices. Although thefocus is on rebar
MOM Belize programefforts, ensuring that the program continues to meet the needs of CJC and its community.Key Wordsneeds assessment; focus group; service-learning project; international partner; buildingcommunity partnershipsIntroductionDeveloping and participating in service-learning projects at the college level has the ability tofoster cross-cultural understanding, build capacity, and provide opportunities for faculty,students, and other participants to address real-world challenges through collaborative andeducational frameworks. Service-learning projects allow students and participants to engage inhands-on learning while working directly with communities to support locally-driven initiatives,often in areas such as infrastructure
preparedness, compromising theirability to succeed and progress.This study introduces a new strategy to enhance retention by implementing a structured,proactive advising model that emphasizes early, personalized engagement between students andfaculty advisors. This advising framework prioritizes frequent and clear communicationregarding placement and academic progress through personalized emails, one-on-one Zoommeetings, and in-person advising sessions. Mathematics placement, given its foundational role inengineering curricula, serves as the centerpiece of this advising model. The framework providesstudents with academic planning support, fosters meaningful student-faculty interactions, andcultivates student ownership of their educational
academic community as a reviewer for the American Society of Engineering Education. This role allows her to influence the quality and direction of engineering education research, ensuring that it remains rigorous and impactful. Mercy is also deeply committed to mentoring the next generation of scholars. She has served as a mentor to undergraduate and precollege students, guiding them through their academic and research journeys. Her mentees have presented their work at various prestigious conferences and symposia, including the NC A&T Undergraduate Research Symposia, Emerging Researchers Network Conferences, and American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Conferences. This mentoring work not only showcases
different knowledge levels and to engage diverse audiences—ranging from peers with similar backgrounds to novices unfamiliar with the research area. This skill not only proved invaluable for communicating within the team and disseminating progress outside the project, but also enhanced the student’s overall ability to convey complex ideas in an accessible and impactful way.During and immediately after the project, the student received multiple awards for their research,presentation skills, and also technical abilities. These successes along with a newly enhancedskill to clearly explain his ideas led to several job offers before graduation. Notably, in one jobinterview, the student had to describe complex computer science
collaborative learning compared to their normalexperiences in large classes with one instructor in conventional, analytically driven courseswithout peer support. The sample consists of 172 undergraduate students who responded to thepost-course survey open-ended questions. Active military and Veteran students represented 61%of the respondents.The peer learning activities embedded in their online course were facilitated by a paid peerleader that completed training to prepare them on how to communicate effectively, showempathy, and engage non-traditional students. The participants had three to four peer ledactivities per 9-week course that allowed them to increase interaction with others in the samecourse as well as a peer leader that had recently
’ responses to these questions. Question 5 explored the extent to which studentsperceived self-grading as a beneficial learning strategy. Approximately ninety percent of studentswere strongly agreed (60.5%) or agreed (27.9%) that self-grading provided them an opportunityto learn from their errors on homework assignments and apply those lessons to futureassessments, such as exams. Only a small percentage of students (11.6%) did not agree that self-grading was a beneficial learning strategy. No students strongly disagreed with the idea that self-grading could be a valuable learning tool. Questions 6 and 7 aimed to determine whether self-prepared equation sheets had a positive impact on student exam performance. Most students(83.8%) did not believe that
; any of these tools can effectively drive theviewer's attention to key information quickly, improving viewer engagement and setting the toneof a presentation.To understand Typography, one can approach the text as “a continuous field whose grain, color,density and silhouette can be endlessly adjusted” [6]. Effective visual communication can beachieved solely on the basis of Typography, if necessary, as Hierarchy, Alignment, andWhitespace are all ingrained components of effective Typography.Key tips for improving Typography include the following: • Urge research of effective font pairings to improve consistency and avoid using too many font styles. The site Fontpair is a helpful resource. • Encourage students to avoid widows, orphans
objective of this paper is to lay out the process for transformation of teaching effectivenessevaluation in an individual engineering academic department. An assessment of the current stateof teaching evaluation among faculty in the department will be presented, and the way forward toa more holistic evaluation strategy will be discussedBrief Literature ReviewThe methods and practices used to evaluate effective teaching have been met with scrutiny overthe last several years. Practices traditionally used to evaluate teaching effectiveness arecommonly viewed as flawed with no direct impact or incentive related to improving teaching inhigher education. These traditional methods rely heavily on student course evaluation methods[4]. While it has been
experience or Co-op/Internshipexperience.On the other side, the high school students involved in this research program were all 10thgraders and most of them did not take physics and calculus when they faced the designchallenge. During the “Mind Your Brain” challenge, most high schoolers revealed that they hadno idea of the designing procedures, even though they didn’t know the differences between themost commonly used unit systems, the international unit system, and the U.S. Customized unitsystem. They frequently misused the two separate unit systems in one single calculation, whichbarely happened in their rival group.Most high schoolers could not fully understand the impact and momentum of a movingobjective, which is critical to the design of the
paper presents a methodical approach used to develop asynchronous web-basedengineering classes at undergraduate level.Challenges of Online TeachingCurrently, most online courses offering is in one of the following three formats: synchronous(zoom), asynchronous (web-based), or hybrid format with some in-person component. In asynchronous format (zoom), classes are offered at a set time and students are expected to log inin during that time. While this format provides a direct line of communication betweeninstructors and students, the instructors find it difficult to keep the class engaging. Also, it isdifficult to assess if students are paying attention during the class. If the instructor focuses oncreating opportunities for students to engage in
-institution) funded program built on the theoretical framework oflegitimate peripheral participation [3] with an emphasis on inclusivity, community, and belonging[4]. To date, the Program has increased Scholar retention, academic performance, and engagementwith student support services relative to peers [5].As part of the Program, an annual faculty workshop was designed to catalyze and sustaincollaborations between NCC and HU STEM faculty. The workshop consisted of interactivemodules to facilitate directed discussions and produce deliverables. We will share the lessonslearned, obstacles overcome, and the outcomes of the collaborative process of hosting this type ofworkshop. The paper documents the process used to identify workshop outcomes and
A Case Study on How to Implement Applied Learning as an Institutional Baccalaureate Graduation RequirementAbstractThe definition of applied learning has broadened from hands-on assignments to assisting studentsto develop essential knowledge and skills through contextualized real-world learning to preparefor employment, community engagement, and further education through courses or co-curricularactivities. Applied learning includes experiences such as practicum, undergraduate research,internships, clinical placement, civic engagement, service learning, cooperative learning, andindependent/directed study. Research on applied learning in the classroom shows that it is anaccepted method to reach student learning outcomes and
writing In-class activity2.1 Week 1: First In-person Meeting Activity: Setting Up Your Goal2.1.1 Use of MentimeterIn the first in-person class, the course expectations are introduced. A Mentimeter is used to makethe session interactive and engaging. The following questions are asked during the first meeting,allowing students to see their responses in real-time: How are you today? Use one word todescribe how you feel now. How do you rate your current writing skill? (0-100 points). Howmany journal articles (not including conference presentations) have you published so far? Whatare your expectations for this course? Have you used AI (e.g. ChatGPT) in your academic work?Which area(s) do you find challenging when starting to write? How are
needs of diverse student populations. This study focuses on understandingstudents’ challenges during ICPs and identifying strategies to enhance inclusivity andengagement in ICPs before these challenges become barriers that prevent some students fromparticipating and negatively impact their learning outcomes.Inclusivity within ICPs is a multifaceted issue that spans various dimensions, includingaccessibility, resource availability, team dynamics, mentorship, and program structure. Studentsfrom underrepresented groups, especially those facing heavy academic and financial constraints,as well as lacking prior experience, often encounter additional challenges. For example, resourceconstraints such as lack of funding and limited access to role models
and develop actionable solutions. Although this studycenters on freshmen, the findings suggest broader applicability, underscoring the potential ofLean and engineering practices to support students in building resilience and problem-solvingskills across various academic disciplines. Integrating these methods in academia not onlyempowers students but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement within educationalsettings, bridging the gap between industry practices and academic success.Literature ReviewLean tools like value stream mapping and the A3 process aid continuous improvement ineducation by visually structuring communication and problem-solving approaches [1]. Adaptingthese practices from manufacturing is challenging, but Lean’s
). • Confidence in Success: Just 22% of students rated their confidence in succeeding as "very high" (5 out of 5). • Preferred Mentorship: Industry professionals were the most preferred mentors, chosen by 15 students [3]. • Interest in Industry Engagement: A majority of respondents (27 students) expressed strong interest in industry-focused activities [3].Table 1 – Key Survey InsightsThese results highlight the need for a structured onboarding program that integrates academicsupport, professional exposure, and community-building efforts [6].Proposed Year-Long Onboarding ProgramSemester 1: Building Belonging and IdentityThe first semester focuses on helping students feel connected to the CPE community whilebuilding foundational
]. Requirements generation and evolution can continue through laterstages of design, influencing project and product success [3]. Requirements have also beenshown to impact the product and project costs [4]. They should elicit and embody the voice ofthe customer and be translated into technical specifications. Ultimately, they must be managedthroughout the design process and used in the testing and evaluation of the product. The Houseof Quality is used as a phase of the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) process to supportcollaborative design teams in these objectives [5]. This paper focuses on the implementation ofan intervention to assist students with requirements development in a Capstone design course.This will also be used to form a basis for later
introduced to create multiple-attemptassignments with randomized variables and immediate feedback. The challenges of implementingeffective practice and feedback loops in engineering education are addressed by this tool, whileminimizing the additional instructor workload. The methodology was implemented in threeengineering courses: Statics, Dynamics, and Traffic Engineering Significant improvements instudent motivation, engagement, and achievement of learning outcomes are demonstrated byresults from student surveys and ABET assessments. Increases in ABET student outcomeachievement ranging from 6.3% to 28.6% across the three courses were observed following theimplementation of this tool. Positive student perceptions of the tool's impact on their
Engineering Education, 2024 Engineering Research Experience via Exploring Mechanical Anisotropy of 3D-printed StructuresAbstract3D-printing, an additive manufacturing method, involves layer-by-layer deposition of materials.Unlike conventionally manufactured materials, the mechanical strength of 3D-printed structuresis highly dependent on the printing orientation due to the weak interface between depositedlayers. Two five-week long summer research projects were designed and implemented to exploremechanical anisotropy, engaging teams of undergraduate mechanical engineering students atdifferent stages of their college degree with diverse technical maturity. Research teams weretasked with providing 3D-printing design guidance to
to assess Student Outcomes as defined by ABET [1] Criterion 3, such as those re-lated to communication, teamwork, and producing design solutions. It can also be an opportunityto connect with the industry, which is a significant focus of some engineering programs [2], [3].Through a regular assessment of Capstone experiences, avenues for continuous improvement canbe identified to provide a meaningful experience through the best learning opportunity for stu-dents.Historic evolution and current Capstone practices at Virginia Military InstituteThe study provides valuable insights into the CE Capstone course at VMI, highlighting its evolu-tion, impact on students, and areas for improvement. The current Capstone course at VMI is a 3-credit course
manning the barricades, facultyhave a responsibility to educate students on the pros and cons of using generative AI.Acknowledging concerns about AI opens the door to engage students in solution-based thinking.For example, faculty and students may not be fully aware of the environmental implications ofusing generative AI tools. Engineering programs have an opportunity to educate students aboutthe environmental impacts of AI, which could help foster a culture of sustainability withinacademia. On a smaller scale, institutions can use AI concerns as a motivation to invest inenergy-efficient hardware, utilize renewable energy sources, and promote practices that reduceoverall energy consumption. Contextualizing AI includes greater exploration of what
Performance and EngagementThe data shows that female students reported a slightly higher average GPA (3.18) compared tomale students (3.16). Additionally, female students spent more time on coursework outside ofclass (13.05 hours) than their male counterparts (11.13 hours). This suggests that female studentsin the BCS program may be more academically engaged or face additional internal or externalpressures to excel in a traditionally male-dominated field.• Transfer Students and Program AttractionThe percentage of transfer students was more than double among male students compared tofemale students. This could indicate that male students are more likely to switch intoconstruction-related programs from other majors or colleges, possibly due to