Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ning Zhang, Central State University; Xiaofang Wei; Ramanitharan Kandiah, Central State University; Krishnakumar Nedunuri, Central State University; Subramania Sritharan, Central State University

characterizationon natural gas storage produced waters, Water Air Soil Pollut., 191, 33 – 54.Kondash, A., Warner, N., Lahav, O., Vengosh, A. 2014 Radium and Barium removal throughblending hydraulic fracturing fluids with acid mine drainage, Environmental Science andTechnology, 48, 1334 – 1342.McGarigal, K., Cushman, S., & Ene, E. (2012). FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern analysis programfor categorical and continuous maps. Retrieved fromhttp://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.htmlO’Donnell, A., Lytle, D., Harmon, S., Vu, K., Chait, H., and Dionysiou, D. 2016 Removal ofStrontium from drinking water by conventional treatment and lime softening in bench-scale studies,Water Research, 13, 319 – 333.Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Oil and

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Crilly, United States Coast Guard Academy; Richard Hartnett, United States Coast Guard Academy

waveform.References1. M. T. Taher, A. S. Khan. Comparison of simulation-based and hands-on teaching methodologies onstudents’ learning in an engineering technology program, QScience Proceedings (Engineering LeadersConference 2014) 2015:58 http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.582. M. T. Taher, A. S. Khan, “Effectiveness of Simulation versus Hands-on Labs: A Case Study forTeaching an Electronics Course, 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, June 2015.3. J. E. Corter, J. V. Nickerson, S. K. Esche, C. Chassapis, “Remote Versus Hands-On Labs: AComparative Study,” 34th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 20-23October 2004.4. D. May, B. Morkos, A. Jackson, N. J. Hunsu, A. Ingalls & F. Beyette (2022): Rapid

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

binbin shao, Zhejiang University; Wei Zhang, Zhejiang University; Liang Wang

Business Venturing, vol.13, pp. 295-316, 1998.[10] F. Wilson et al. “Gender, Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy, and Entrepreneurial Career Intentions: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education 1.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 31, pp. 387-406, 2007.[11] S. Karimi et al. “The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education: A Study of Iranian Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions and Opportunity Identification.” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 54, pp. 187-209, 2016.[12] A. Biraglia and K. Vita. “The Role of Entrepreneurial Passion and Creativity in Developing Entrepreneurial Intentions: Insights from American Homebrewers.” Journal of Small Business Management, vol. 55, pp. 170-188, 2017.[13] P. Piperopoulos and D

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Andrew Guernsey, Purdue University Northwest; Jacob Tietz, Purdue University Northwest; Quamar Niyaz, Purdue University Northwest; Xiaoli Yang, Fairfield University; Ahmad Javaid, The University of Toledo; Sidike Paheding, Michigan Technological University

fundamentally understand what is null, and howto avoid the run-time NullPointerException. Four main concepts are discussed in thismodule:  What is null?  How does null enter into the program?  What is NullPointerException?  How to avoid null & NullPointerException? First, we laid a basis on the concept of null. We discuss that null is a default value foruninitialized variables of reference type and its binary representation is all 0’s. We then discussthat NullPointerException is a run-time error that occurs when following conditions are met:  A method is called with a null object.  Attempted access to an instance variable of a null object.  A null object is passed as an argument.  Retrieving length or indices for

Conference Session

Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles Riley, Oregon Institute of Technology; Franny Howes, Oregon Institute of Technology; Yasha Rohwer, Oregon Institute of Technology

-the-depth-of-gender-bias/[4] Belle, D., Tartarilla, A.B., Wapman, M. et al. (2021). “I Can’t Operate, that Boy Is my Son!”:Gender Schemas and a Classic Riddle. Sex Roles 85, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01211-4[5] Poleacovschi, C., Faust, K., Roy, A., & Feinstein, S. (2021). Identity of EngineeringExpertise: Implicitly Biased and Sustaining the Gender Gap. Journal of Civil EngineeringEducation, 147(1), 04020011.[6] Haverkamp, A. (2018, June), The Complexity of Nonbinary Gender Inclusion in EngineeringCulture Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah.10.18260/1-2--31084[7] Rohde, J., & Kirn, A., & Godwin, A. (2017, June). Engineering Allies: The Personalities ofCisgender

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Statics and Dynamics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paris Weber, University of Washington; Seung-Jin Lee, University of Washington; Heather Dillon, University of Washington

. 2019. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/concept-maps-as-an-assessment-tool-for-evaluating-students-perception-of-entre preneurial-mind-set[7] S. M. Ferguson, R. W. Foley, J. K. Eshirow, and C. C. Pollack, “Refining Concept Maps as Method to Assess Learning Outcomes Among Engineering Students,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/refining-concept-maps-as-method-to-assess-learning-outcomes-among-engineeri ng-students[8] P. J. Cornwell, “Concept Maps In The Mechanical Engineering Curriculum,” Jun. 1996, p. 1.118.1-1.118.7. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2022. [Online]. Available: https

Conference Session

ERM: Design!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Santana, Harvey Mudd College; Andres Sanchez, Harvey Mudd College; Laura Palucki Blake; Leah Mendelson, Harvey Mudd College; Serena Mao, Harvey Mudd College; Magdalena Jones, Harvey Mudd College; David Chen, Harvey Mudd College

work is made possible through the generous grant from the Carl F. Braun Residuary Trust.The author extends special thanks to Drew Price and Aye Htut-Rosales for their critical feedbackand contributions. The opinions expressed in this work are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the acknowledged organization or individuals.References[1] S. L. Ash and P. H. Clayton, “Generating, Deepening, and Documenting Learning: the Power of Critical Reflection in Applied Learning,” 2009.[2] J. A. Moon, Reflection in Learning and Professional Development. Routledge, 2013.[3] R. Helyer, “Learning through reflection: the critical role of reflection in work-based learning (WBL),” J. Work. Manag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering 1

Collection

ASEE Southeast Section Conference

Authors

Nektaria Tryfona, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sindhu Chava, Virginia Tech; Ayush Dhar, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Taimoor Qamar, Virginia Tech ; Daniel Newman, The Boeing Company

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Professional Engineering Education Papers

, 2019 Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Center for Project-Based Learning, wp.wpi.edu/projectbasedlearning/ as of 11/9/2022.5 A. Bauchau and J. I. Craig, Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009, pg. 173– 221.6 J. Guo, X. Liu, S. Li and Z. Wang, “Bearing intelligent fault diagnosis based on wavelet transform and convolutional neural network,” Shock Vib., 2020, pg. 1-14.7 J.-D. Wu and J.-C. Chen, “Continuous wavelet transform technique for fault signal diagnosis of internal combustion engines,” NDT & E International, Volume 39, Issue 4, 2006, pg. 304-311.8 Wankhade, Suraj Sudamji and S. S. Jarikote. “Vibration analysis and experimentation of centrifugal pump impeller

Conference Session

Mathematics and Material Science

Collection

ASEE Southeast Section Conference

Authors

Rebekah L Martin, Virginia Military Institute; Charles D Newhouse P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Kacie Caple D'Alessandro, Virginia Military Institute

Tagged Topics

Professional Engineering Education Papers

Charles D. ”Chuck” Newhouse received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech after working nine years as a consulting structural engineer for MMM Design Group in Norfolk, Virginia. He spent three years teaching at Texas Tech University before joining the faculty at the Virginia Military Institute in 2008 where he is now the Charles S. Luck, Jr. ’20 Institute Professor in Engineering. He is also currently serving as the department head of the Civil and Environmental Engineering department.Dr. Matthew K Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of

Collection

2023 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Alexis Capitano; John Cook; Kathryn Johnson

summarized in Table 1, which alsoincludes illustrative quotes from the data. The subsections following Table 1 further describeeach category.Table 1: Categories, descriptions, and illustrative quotes resulting from the analysis process. Thetable continues on the following page. Category Description Illustrative Quote(s) Outdated Old material and outdated “We still, having a conversation the other day where Academics teaching practices can it’s like the students, well, what do we teach them in impact a student’s transitionmass transfer? Well, it’s distillation and I’m kind of into industry. like why do we teach them? I guess I understand why

Conference Session

S5B: Workshop X

Collection

14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference

Authors

Rachel McCord Ellestad, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Kevin Kit, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Richard M. Bennett P.E., University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Erin McCave, University of Tennessee at Knoxville; Andrey A. Puretskiy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Tagged Topics

Workshops

approach in class sessions in differentcourses, including: • Quick Review • Addressing muddiest point(s) • In Class Activities o TPS/conceptual MC o Problem solving o Mini-labs • Leading to the full assignmentWe will finish this section with working time and discussion on the development of a learningactivity for attendees.Part 5: Expectations and Lessons Learned (10 Minutes)In the final part of our workshop, our team will discuss expectations instructors should havewhen starting this process as well as lessons we have learned over several years of transition andsteady implementation of flipped classrooms. These discussions will include: • Time to implement/long term planning for flipped classroom

Collection

14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference

Authors

Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Miosotis Hernandez, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Lucie Tchouassi, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

and collaboration in expanding knowledge about (1 Lecture) different engineering disciplines. ● Students will be encouraged to continue exploring and learning about various engineering disciplines throughout their academic journey. ● Students will present their knowledge to their peers and have the opportunity to discuss and reflect.References: 1. Baldwin, A. (2020). College Success. OpenStax. 2. Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2018). Asking the right questions: A guide to critical thinking. Pearson. 3. Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Create new thinking by design. MIT Press. 4. Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fernando Romero Galvao, University of Massachusetts Amherst; Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs

capstone levels, and prepare students for success in theconstruction industry. References[1] Hoffman, H. F. (2014). Engineering and the capstone course. In The engineering capstonecourse (pp. 1-5). Springer, Cham.[2] Lee, N., & Kim, S. J. (2020, October). A Systematic Course Design Approach to Guide theDevelopment of a Construction Engineering and Management Capstone Course. In 2020Annual Conference Northeast Section (ASEE-NE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.[3] Debs, L., Romero Moraes, F., & Benhart, B. (2022). A Review and Comparison ofAssociated Schools of Construction (ASC) Capstone Course Content. In 2022 ASC 58th AnnualSchools of Construction International Conference (pp. 577-585).[4] Cecere, J. (2002, June

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Mosier, Oklahoma State University; Heather Yates, Oklahoma State University; Sanjeev Adhikari, Kennesaw State University; Amy Lewis, Oklahoma State University; Irish Horsey, Kennesaw State University

] Bigelow, B. F., Bilbo, D., Ritter, L., Mathew, M., and Elliott, J. W. (2016). “An Evaluation of Factorsfor Retaining Female Students in Construction Management Programs.” International Journal ofConstruction Education and Research. V.12 N.1. pp. 18–36.[2] Lopez del Puerto, C. L., Shane, J., and Guggemos, A. A. (2011). “Exploration of Strategies forAttracting and Retaining Female Construction Management Students.” Conference Proceedings,Associated Schools of Construction, April 2011.[3] Sewalk, S., and Nietfield, K. (2013). “Barriers Preventing Women from Enrolling in ConstructionManagement Programs.” International Journal of Construction Education and Research. V.9 N.4 pp.239–255.[4] Thevenin, M. K., and Elliott, J.W. (2018). “The Role of

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University; Mohsen Garshasby, Mississippi State University; Afshin Hatami, Mississippi State University

Paper ID #37158Cross Review of Collaboration in a Design-Build StudioSaeed RokooeiMohsen Garshasby (Assistant Professor) Mohsen Garshasby is an Assistant Professor in the Building Construction Science program at Mississippi State University. Dr. Garshasby is an architect, researcher, and educator who currently teaches collaborative studio(s) and integrated building systems within the College of Architecture, Art and Design at Mississippi State University.Afshin Hatami © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com

Conference Session

Transfer Programs at Two-Year Colleges in Engineering and Engineering Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mara Lopez, Arizona State University; Caroline Vaningen-Dunn

, experiences, and perspectives of ethnically diverse students as conduits forteaching them more effectively.” A recommendation from the conference that reflects the need toimplement culturally responsive teaching strategies is to “provide examples of successfulcontributors to science and math who are not white Euro Americans in academic materials.” It isimportant to increase representation of diverse scholars in academic materials in order to showstudents that their experience matters, their perspectives matter and so that they can see that theytoo can excel in the field. Culturally responsive campus environments have been shown to increase students’ senseof belonging, their persistence in college and degree completion rates, (Museus, S. D., Yi

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amr Hassan, University of Pittsburgh; Ahmed Dallal, University of Pittsburgh; Mohamed Zaghloul

learning, and collaborative learning.Mohamed Zaghloul Mohamed A. S. Zaghloul was born in Cairo, Egypt, in 1987. He received his B.E. degree in Electronics and Electrical Communications Engineering in 2009, and his M.Sc. degree in Engineering Physics in 2012, both from the Faculty of Engineering at Cairo University. In 2019, he received a Ph.D. from the Electrical and Computer Engineering department of the University of Pittsburgh, in developing optical fiber sensors for monitoring harsh environments. Since 2019, he has been appointed as an Assistant Professor in the same department of the same school. Zaghloul is a recipient of multiple research and teaching awards; he currently holds the John C. Mascaro Faculty Scholarship in

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 2: Long-Term Institutional Outcome Evaluations and Capstone Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yufang Jin, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Chunjiang Qian, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Sara Ahmed, The University of Texas at San Antonio

longitudinalresearch is plausible to generate additional values of REU society.AcknowledgmentThis work was funded and supported by National Science Foundation (#2051113).References[1] S. H. Russell, M. P. Hancock, and J. McCullough, "Benefits of undergraduate research experiences," Science, vol. 316, no. 5824, pp. 548-549, 2007.[2] D. Lopatto, "Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning," (in eng), CBE Life Sci Educ, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 297-306, Winter 2007, doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039.[3] D. Lopatto, "Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings," (in eng), Cell Biol Educ, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 270-7, Winter 2004, doi: 10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045.[4] M. C. Linn, E

Conference Session

ERM: Instruction and Engagement

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gibrán Sayeg-SÁNchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Miguel X. Rodriguez-Paz, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM); Cecilia Nuñez, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)

/00346543074001059.[4] A. Rodríguez-Muñoz, M. Antino, P. Ruiz-Zorrilla, and E. Ortega, “Positive emotions, engagement, and objective academic performance: A weekly diary study,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 92, no. September, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102087.[5] G. Heilporn and S. Lakhal, “Fostering student engagement in blended courses: A qualitative study at the graduate level in a business faculty,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100569.[6] Z. (Victor) Zhang and K. Hyland, “Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach,” Assess. Writ., vol. 51, no. November 2021, p. 100586, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586.[7] B. Marder et al

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gurupriya Ramanathan, Salisbury University; Sara Hagenah

drawn from the literature on preschoolengineering and social skills interventions. Once this was complete, teacher interviewswere analyzed in order to triangulate noticings and gain further detail on the nature of socialinteractions. Using descriptive coding (Saldaña, 2016) data from interview transcripts werefirst deconstructed into smaller, manageable sections and organized based on the researchquestion. For instance, data were coded for collaboration, problem-solving, teacherinvolvement, and individual work (where observed). In vivo coding was used to uncoverconcepts with “terms used by the participant(s) themselves” (Strauss, 1987, p.33), in thisinstance, the teacher for two reasons: a) to go beyond the codebook developed prior to thestudy

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Best Diversity Paper

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marian Kennedy, Clemson University; Cora Allard-Keese, Clemson University; Joshua Alper, Clemson University; Jennie LaMonte, Clemson University; Aubrey Baldwin, Clemson University

Paper ID #37687Work in Progress: Preparing Students for UndergraduateResearch Online and In the Classroom - Framework,Participant Reflections, and Lessons LearnedMarian S. Kennedy (Associate Professor) Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Clemson University. Her research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization of thin films. She also contributes to the engineering education community through studying the process/impacts of undergraduate research and navigational capital into graduate school.Cora Allard-KeeseJoshua D

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Breejha Quezada, Purdue Engineering Education; Emily Haluschak, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Aileen Ryan, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Katherine Schieltz; Congying Wang, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Amanda Johnston, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Alejandro Strachan, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tamara Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

. W52P1J2093009].Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations conveyed in this study are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Defense.References[1] Tzanova, S. (2021). Microelectronics Skill Alliance – Need Analysis of Microelectronics Sector. 2021 12th National Conference with International Participation (ELECTRONICA), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELECTRONICA52725.2021.9513727[2] Wang, K. W. (2020, May). (Keynote) Engineering research centers-past, present, and future. In ECS Meeting Abstracts (No. 13, p. 956). IOP Publishing.[3] Paolillo, J. G. P., & Estes, R. W. (1982). An empirical analysis of career choice factors among accountants, attorneys, engineers, and

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 2: Postcard Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Davor Copic, United States Coast Guard Academy; Nathan Barnes, United States Coast Guard Academy; Joshua Pennington, United States Coast Guard Academy; Alexandria Bass; Joseph Camean, United States Coast Guard Academy; Richard Freeman, United States Coast Guard Academy

,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018-June, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--29782.[3] L. Osgood and C. R. Johnston, “Design ability assessment technique,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2014, doi: 10.18260/1-2--20251.[4] C. Charyton and J. A. Merrill, “Assessing general Creativity and Creative engineering Design in first year engineering students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 145–156, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01013.x.[5] N. Dawe, L. Romkey, S. McCahan, and G. Lesmond, “User testing with assessors to develop universal rubric rows for assessing engineering design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016-June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.27118.[6] S. F. Kiefer and T. M

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division: Integrating Design Across the BioE/BME Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mostafa Elsaadany, University of Arkansas; Mary Jia, University of Arkansas; Jordan Crosby, University of Arkansas; Raj Rao, University of Arkansas

Paper ID #37671Integrating SolidWorks 3D Design and Simulation Modulesinto Introductory Biomedical Engineering Courses for theDevelopment of Employability SkillsMary S Jia A rising senior biomedical engineering student at the University of Arkansas.Jordan CrosbyRaj R. Rao (Professor and Department Head, Biomedical Engineering)Mostafa Elsaadany (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor - University of Arkansas | Department of Biomedical Engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comIntegrating SolidWorks 3D Design and Simulation

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seong Jin Kim, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Namhun Lee, Central Connecticut State University

). The Relationship of Student-Faculty Out-of-Class Communication to Instructor Immediacy and Trust. Communication Education, 48 (1), 41-47.7. Kim, S. J. & Lee, N. (2016). Team Building for Collaborative Learning Environment in Construction Education. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, June 26-29.8. Kim, S.J. & Lee, N. (2019). Key Factors in Construction Engineering and Management Education to Facilitate Student Engagement and Collaborative Learning. Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) Annual Conference, Denver, CO. April 10-129. Kortering, L. J. & Braziel, P. M. (1999). “Staying in School.” Journal of Remedial and Special Education, 20(2), 106-11310

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald Visco, The University of Akron; Nidaa Makki; Erin Stevic; Joshua Phillips, The University of Akron; Laura Carey, The University of Akron; Elle Bonnema

socioeconomic factors as well since some students may not have the transportationrequired for an in-person shadowing program.AcknowledgmentThis research is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation with award number#1726464. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] E. B. Fung, M. R. Frey, M. E. Valmont, D. E. Caffey-Fleming, M. Fraser, J. Williams, D. W. Killilea, E. Bogenmann, S. Livshits, and D. N. Boone, “Success of distance learning during 2020 covid-19 restrictions: A report from five STEM training programs for underrepresented high school and undergraduate learners,” The Journal of STEM

Conference Session

ETD - Technical Session 7 - ET Pedagogy I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Bimal Nepal, Texas A&M University; Shubham Torvi, Texas A&M University

Increase the Self-Confidence and Belongingness of First-Generation College Students in Biomedical Engineering. J Biomech Eng, 2021. 143(12).10. Shotton, H., E.S.L. Oosahwe, and R. Cintrón, Stories of Success: Experiences of American Indian Students in a Peer-Mentoring Retention Program. The Review of Higher Education, 2007. 31(1): p. 81-107.11. Geri, S., The Effects of Formal Mentoring on the Retention Rates for First-Year, Low Achieving Students. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 2005. 28(4): p. 853-873.12. Zakiya, S.W., et al., Hierarchical Mentoring: A Transformative Strategy for Improving Diversity and Retention in Undergraduate STEM Disciplines. Journal of Science

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katey Shirey, eduKatey LLC; Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

, visitwww.PurduePD.com.6. References[1] N. R. Augustine, P. R. Vagelos, and W. A. Wulf, Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC, 2005.[2] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018.[3] R. N. Coger and H. V De Silva, “An integrated approach to teaching biotechnology and bioengineering to an interdisciplinary audience,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 256–264, 1999.[4] M. A. Kanny, L. J. Sax, and T. A. Riggers-Piehl, “Investigating forty years of STEM research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Franny Howes, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

improvement groups.Figure 1 also shows the needs improvement group (n = 45)’s average scores in the nine outcomesand a grand average of 1.52. None of the outcomes reached 2 or a satisfactory score. The highestthree scored outcomes included outcomes 8 (an average of 1.76), 2 (an average of 1.67), and 9(an average of 1.66). The scores from the needs improvement group in demonstrating lab reportgenre convention, writing experimental processes, and providing an error-free document werebetter than those in other writing outcomes. The worst three scored outcomes included outcomes5 (an average of 1.34), 6 (an average of 1.42), and 7 (an average of 1.49). This group of studentsstruggled to interpret lab data, provide a productive conclusion, and develop

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandip Das, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

, "Active learning in engineering education: A review of the literature,"Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, pp. 223-231 (2004).[9] A. Khamparia and S. Rawat, “A comparison of lab-based and lecture-based teaching in acomputer network course. International Journal of Information and Education Technology”, vol.6, pp. 443-448 (2016).[10] “National Solar Jobs Census 2020” by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA),2021. Available online at: https://www.seia.org/solar-jobs-census[11] C. Li and M. Behnia, "Hands-on laboratory sessions vs. traditional lecture-based learning:who has better learning outcomes and why?", International Journal of Mechanical EngineeringEducation, vol. 45, pp. 222-235 (2017).[12] J. K. Vijayakumar and S. P. Deepika