Conference Session

Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Ekong, Western New England University; Vedang Chauhan, Western New England University; Janose Osedeme; Seyed Niknam, Western New England University; Richard nguyen

assembly line (b) sports car model, (c) airplane model 150 LEGO 3-in-1 creator sets were used. Parts were assigned numbers to enhance processcontrol. Each part used in assembling either of the two models (or both) was stored in a separatebin and assigned a specific part number (Figure 2). A total of 48 unique parts were required toassemble the two models. Three long tables and one short table were used for the assembly line.The long tables accommodated two stations, while the short one was used for a single station.Racks having double layers were used for each station. Each layer was used to hold parts for aspecific model. Two different sets of bins were used at the stations, each set holding parts for aspecific model. A separate bin was

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 3: Online Learning and the Impact of COVID-19

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tahsin Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Virginia Tech (primary) and Universidad EAFIT (secondary); Catherine Twyman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Matthew James, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Benjamin Chambers, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

2011 at Virginia Tech.Matthew B James (Associate Professor of Practice) Matthew James is an Associate Professor of Practice in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. After working in the Civil/Site Development engineering field for a number of years, he returned to Virginia Tech to pursue teaching. His primary role is teaching within the first-year general engineering undergraduate program. He also is interested in study abroad, expanding service learning opportunities for students, and serves as the faculty advisor for the Engineers in Action student design team.Benjamin Daniel Chambers (Associate Professor of Practice) Dr. Ben Chambers is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Design and Labs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Wickenheiser, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Marcia Gail Headley, University of Delaware

, andManufacturing, 12(2).[9] Schmidt, K., & Campbell, M. (2005, June). Incorporating Open Ended Projects Into AMachine Elements Course. In 2005 Annual Conference (pp. 10-745).[10] Keefe, M., Glancey, J., & Cloud, N. (2007). Assessing student team performance in industrysponsored design projects[11] B. A. Oakley, D. M. Hanna, Z. Kuzmyn, and R. M. Felder, “Best practices involvingteamwork in the classroom: Results from a survey of 6435 engineering student respondents,”IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 266–272, Aug. 2007.[12] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering designthinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, Jan. 2005.[13] D. Chachra and D. Kilgore, “Exploring gender

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Admissions, Transfer Pathways, and Major Selection

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danyelle Ireland, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Jordan Esiason; Amanda Menier; Rebecca Zarch

/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/undergraduate-education-enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states[2] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.“Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019”.Alexandria, VA, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest[3] M. M. Uddin, “Best Practices in Advising Engineering Technology Students for Retentionand Persistence to Graduation,” Journal of Technology, Management & Applied Engineering,36(1), 1–13, Jan. 2020.[4] B. K. Townsend and K. Wilson “‘A Hand Hold for a Little Bit’: Factors Facilitating theSuccess of Community College Transfer Students to a

Conference Session

LEES 7: Experiments in Experiential and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Cao; Jennifer Case, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jingshen Wu; Bingzhuo Liang

in the tool.Knowledge assessment has retained a significant weight to match the traditional assessmentsystem. The study presented here reports qualitative analyses of faculty and students' feelingsand experiences about the new engineering education assessment system described above. Thefindings will inform future reform at SDIM and be of use to other institutions that seek toimplement such a form of assessment.Research QuestionsOur analysis of the implementation of the new assessment system for PjBL sought to answer thefollowing research questions:A. Student perceptions: ● What are students' concerns regarding this new assessment system?B. Faculty perceptions: ● What challenges are faced by engineering faculty while assessing students

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division: Supporting and Evaluating Student Learning in BioE/BME Courses

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vibhavari Vempala, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University

’ identities and outcomes, we recommend that other BME programs explore ways toincorporate co-created experiential learning opportunities influenced by professional practiceinto BME curriculum.AcknowledgementsFunding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation NSF-EEC-1825669grant. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflectviews of the National Science Foundation References[1] R. A. Linsenmeier and A. Saterbak, “Fifty Years of Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Education,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1590–1615, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02494-0.[2] J. Rohde, J. France, B. Benedict, and A. Godwin, “Exploring

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chao Wang, Arizona State University

. 123nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, NewOrleans, Louisiana, June, 2016.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, “Integration of C Programming and IoT in a Raspberry Pi-controlled Robot Car in aFreshmen/Sophomore Engineering Core Class,” in Proc. 127th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, VirtualConference, June, 2020.[10] M. Georgiopoulos, I. Russell, J. Castro, et al., “A CRCD Experience: Integrating Machine Learning Conceptsinto Introductory Engineering and Science Programming Courses,” in Proc. 110th ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Nashville, TN, June, 2003.[11] B. Liu, F. Xie, “Investigating the Incorporation of Machine Learning Concepts in Data Structure Education,” inProc. IEEE Frontiers in Education 2020 Virtual Conference

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 1: Experiential Learning in Fluids, Structures, and Course/Lab Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Rebecca Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Christopher Schmitz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Katherine Ansell, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jessica TerBush, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; John Popovics, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[2] A. H. Greer et al., “Design of a Guided Inquiry Classroom Activity to Investigate Effects of Chemistry on Physical Properties of Elastomers,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 915– 923, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00528.[3] D. MacIsaac, “Report: AAPT Recommendations for the Undergraduate Physics Laboratory Curriculum,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 253–253, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1119/1.4914580.[4] W. Odell, “Aims and Methods of the Teaching of Physics 1,” Nature, vol. 31, no. 808, pp. 578–580, Apr. 1885, doi: 10.1038/031578g0.[5] R. A. Millikan and L. B. Avery, “SYMPOSIUM ON THE PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION

Conference Session

WIED: Support for All in the WIED Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danyelle Ireland, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Hyun Su Cho, University of Maryland Baltimore County

management) andauthentically interpreted (i.e., consider the nature of the engineering education context anddiversity of women’s experiences therein), an interdisciplinary approach that employs mixedmethods with a longitudinal design is warranted. Such a nuanced investigation of women’schoices and outcomes in undergraduate engineering education requires (a) analysis of large-scaleenrollment data to identify trends, (b) deep exploration of how contextual factors influencestudent motivation, and (c) integration of quantitative and qualitative data to draw inferences thatare grounded in relevant psychological and educational theory. This Work in Progress paper presents the preliminary results of an explanatory sequentialmixed-methods research

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Sander, The University of Iowa; Joshua Lobb, The University of Iowa; James Ankrum, The University of Iowa; Nicholas Bowman; Solomon Fenton-Miller, The University of Iowa

experiences to the director. As detailed below in the assessment, several recommendationswere noted that we will implement in year 2.The Student and Mentor responses for the ERLA can be found in Figure 3. Most students reportedmoderate to good gains in all the testing categories. Similar levels of gain were noted by thementors. (A) Student Responses (B) Mentor Responses Figure 3. (A) Student and (B) Mentor ERLA ReponsesThe focus group findings noted several positives of the program. First, the program fostered stronginterpersonal relationships amongst the REU students. Workshop coordinators and graduatestudents in the host laboratories were noted as being helpful and attentive. Several

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin Peters, University of San Diego

is a legacy that I will attempt to carry through my future research.Thank you Papa for every laugh, cry, and song. You will always be missed, but your impact willnever be forgotten.References[1] B. N. McDougall, “Mo‘okū‘auhau versus colonial entitlement in English translations of the Kumulipo,” American Quarterly, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 749–779, Sep. 2015.[2] M. A. Meyer, “Our own liberation: Reflections on Hawaiian epistemology,” Amerasia Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 139–164, 2003.[3] Nākoa Oliveira Katrina-Ann R Kapāʻanaokalāokeola and E. K. Wright, Kanaka ʻŌiwi Methodologies: Moʻolelo and Metaphor. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaiʻi Press, 2016.[4] P. Pascua, H. McMillen, T. Ticktin, M. Vaughan, and K

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Matthew, VentureWell; Surbhi Lipkin-Moore; Pedro Arce, Tennessee Technological University; Andrea Arce-Trigatti, Tallahassee Community College; Nathalie Lavoine, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Lucian Lucia, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Emre Selvi, Jacksonville University; Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary; Murat Tiryakioglu, Jacksonville University; Justin Hall, Jacksonville University; Ron Edelen, Jacksonville University; Jeffery Plumblee, VentureWell

that the “CoP needs a common goal that they can work oncollaboratively, that can take the group forward after the grant, that someone can help to lead.”Consequently, a product or goal that the group works towards may be equally as important as anemerging leader within the group, if the group plans to continue after form facilitation andsupport.ToolkitLeveraging the results discussed above, a CoP toolkit was developed to help guide facultydevelopment practitioners in the design, assessment and evolution of their own CoP based ontheir own unique contexts and needs. The toolkit (currently in draft form) can be found inAppendix B and includes the following recommended 9 steps needed to design and hone a CoPimplementation: 1. Start with A

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin Tyler, ANSYS - Granta Education Division; Nicola Stefani, ANSYS - Granta Education Division; Lakshana Mohee, ANSYS - Granta Education Division

(a) the ideal learning process, where prior knowledge acts as a scaffold, allowing for a more complete picture of the subject (b) the non-ideal learning process, where there is a disconnect between the prior and new knowledge, leading to gaps in subject knowledgeLearning involves students coming into the classroom with some prior knowledge on a subject,which can be gained through pre-requisite courses or simply from their day-to-day lives. In acourse, students are presented with some new topic knowledge. Ideally, the prior knowledge is ascaffold for the new information (Fig 1a), but unfortunately this does not always happen. In thesecond situation (Fig 1b), students are left with

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Goncher, University of Florida; Mengyu Li, University of Florida; John Mendoza, University of Florida

. Learn. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 247–298, 2000.[5] S. K. Kordova, G. Ribnikov, and M. Frank, “Developing systems thinking among engineers: Recent study findings,” in 2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings, 2015, pp. 50–53.[6] A. Goncher, J. Mendoza-Garcia, and M. Li, “WIP: Assessing baseline systems thinking in an introductory engineering design course,” 2021 ASEE Annu. Conf. Content Access, Virtual Online, 2021.[7] J. R. Grohs, G. R. Kirk, M. M. Soledad, and D. B. Knight, “Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 28, no. September 2017, pp. 110–130, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.003.[8] A. Gero

Conference Session

ERM: Mental Health and Wellness

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Luke Nyberg; Justine Chasmar, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Jodi Nelson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Marissa Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education

words to describe that unit of meaning. Afterthis reflection, each researcher worked through the full set of reflections, collectively building acodebook. The code creation continued as an iterative process, where researchers continued todiscuss the emergence of new codes and distinguishing between the meaning of each code. Afterthis more free-flowing iterative process, the researchers met again to refine and finalize thecodebook, identifying redundant codes and clarifying definitions. A final pass through each ofthe reflections was completed using the final codebook. The finalized codebook is provided inAppendix B, including examples of outputs of the open coding.Finally, from these codes each researcher independently identified themes in the

Conference Session

LEES 2: Stories of Intersectionality and Institutional Marginalization

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Desen Ozkan, Tufts University; Chelsea Andrews, Tufts University

Paper ID #37573Perspectives of Seven Minoritized Students in a First-YearCourse Redesign toward Sociotechnical EngineeringEducationDesen Sevi Ozkan (Postdoctoral Researcher) Desen Ozkan is a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) and the Institute for Research on Learning and Education (IRLI). She holds a Ph.D. from Virginia Tech in engineering education and a B.S. from Tufts University in Chemical Engineering. Her primary research is on interdisciplinarity and engineering decisions as they relate to broader social, political, and economic contexts.Chelsea Andrews (Research

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gillian Roehrig, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Ngawang Gonsar; Alison Haugh Nowariak, University of Minnesota

. 341, pp. 1455–1456, 2013.[12] S. Russell, M. Hancock and J. McCullough, “Benefits of undergraduate researchexperiences,” Science, Vol. 316, pp. 548–549, 2007[13] S. J. Basu and A.C. Barton, “Developing a sustained interest in science among urbanminority youth,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 3, 466-489, 2007.[14] R.H. Tai, C.Q. Liu, A.V. Maltese and X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,”Science, vol. 312, no. 5777, pp. 1143-1144, 2006.[15] M.M. Chemers, E.L. Zurbriggen, M. Syed, B.K. Goza and S. Bearman, “The Role ofEfficacy and Identity in Science Career Commitment Among Underrepresented MinorityStudents,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 469-491, 2011.[16] H. Thiry, S.L. Laursen and A. B. Hunter

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division - Integration of Engineering and/or Technical Rigor with Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Justice (DEIJ)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monica Palomo, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Pauline Muljana

(0.471) (0.838) (0.256) (0.312) (0.118) (0.820) consented All 18 participants 3.761 3.329 4.091 3.980 3.567 3.661 who consented (0.469) (0.682) (0.405) (0.313) (0.430) (0.781)Note. The cases included in this study were women students with increased self-efficacy or cognitive engagement ordecreased test anxiety. The values in bold text are either (a) increase in self-efficacy, (b) increase in cognitiveengagement, or (c) decrease in test anxiety. M is mean; SD is standard deviation.As far as the test anxiety, Student 3 initially had a low score (M = 2.600) and decreased at theend of the semester (M = 2.200), which was lower

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Simmons, University of Florida

, “Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 641–656, Dec. 2003.[13] A. Coso Strong, C. Smith-Orr, C. Bodnar, W. Lee, E. McCave, and C. Faber, “Early career faculty transitions: Negotiating legitimacy and seeking support in engineering education,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 97–118, Feb. 2021.[14] B. K. Jesiek, L. K. Newswander, and M. Borrego, “Engineering education research: Discipline, community, or field?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 39– 52, 2009.[15] T. van der Lippe and Z. Lippényi, Investments in a Sustainable Workforce in Europe. London, UK: Routledge, 2019.[16] A. A. Karakhan, J. Gambatese, and D. R. Simmons

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 3: Measuring Engineering Management

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain, Arkansas State University; Joni Pintu; Alexandr Sokolov, Arkansas State University; Ziaul Haque Munim

; Constantinou, C. (2009). An Investigation of thePotential of Interactive Simulations for Developing System Thinking Skills in Elementary School:A case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders. International Journal of Science Education,31(5), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749313[7] Huang, S., Muci-Kuchler, K. H., Bedillion, M. D., Ellingsen, M. D., & Degen, C. M. (2015).Systems thinking skills of undergraduate engineering students. 2015 IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344341[8] Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics: Initial results of a systems thinkinginventory. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), 249–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.198[9] Assaraf, O. B.-Z

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratory and SoC Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Spencer, Harvey Mudd College

properties by looking at a schematic 14 Use phase marge to analyze the stability of an amplifier in feedbackTable 3: Competencies Required in each Week of the Competency-Based Course Implementation (a) (b) Figure 1: Example Mastery QuestionsThe difficulty of the mastery questions needed to be carefully calibrated. The questions wereintended to be comparable in difficulty to exam questions, but they also had to be constructedwith a narrow focus on the skill being demonstrated. That narrow focus includes minimizingextraneous calculations. On the other hand, the fact that the mastery questions were reviewed inan in-person conference left space for open-ended

Conference Session

PCEE Session 2: Teacher Learning Experiences

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abeera Rehmat, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Alexandra Towner, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Helms; Jeffrey Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Julia Varnedoe; Marc Weissburg

a natural object virtual zoo walk Week 2 Design Challenge Part A: Discussion of applicability BID to solving Problem Definition and engineering problems Understanding Week 3 Design Challenge Part B: Introduction to structure, function, mechanism Ideation, Biological Analogies, (SFM) and biological analysis to evaluate and Low Fidelity Prototypes biological solutions Week 4 Independent Work: Nature Walk Found object investigation in relation to SFM and Test Planning Week 5 Design Challenge Part C: Prototype development Prototype Planning, Fabrication

Conference Session

Inclusivity at Two Year Colleges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Yowell, University of Colorado Boulder; Gabe Hanzel-Sello; Gary Barnak, Saddleback College; Michael Venn, Community College of Baltimore County

Paper ID #36751Mathematics Success for Underrepresented CommunityCollege Students through STEM Core: A Wrap-AroundStudent Services ModelJanet Yowell Janet serves as the Director of Strategic Community College STEM Initiatives for the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. In this capacity, she develops systems programming to positively affect two- to four-year transfer pathways in STEM (particularly engineering) for the college. She and her colleagues currently work with 31 community colleges nationwide (including in Colorado) to better prepare developmental math community

Conference Session

ERM: Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and MORE!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kai Jun Chew, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Holly Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Paper ID #37077Fundamental Engineering Course Test Beliefs and Behaviors:A Case Exploration of One InstructorKai Jun Chew (PhD Student) Kai Jun (KJ) Chew is an incoming Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. KJ's research interests primarily intersect assessment and evaluation, equity, and motivation in engineering education, with a pragmatic lens specifically looking into how to translate research findings into practice in engineering learning environments. KJ also strives to further scholarship examining assessments from the

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Online Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Gregg, Pennsylvania State University; Jacqueline O'Connor, Pennsylvania State University

the strengths of each regarding our data set [10][11][32]. We decided to use theMcCord and Matusovich [11] taxonomy because while our context was not identical, as ourparticipants were responding to a reflective prompt intended to encourage metacognition ratherthan collaboratively working on problem-solving in a naturalistic setting, the schema wasdeveloped and evaluated in a similar engineering education context.Our steps for coding all of the data were as follows: 1. We each independently coded sentence-by-sentence Assignment 1 for five of the participants using the agreed upon taxonomy [11]. 2. We then met and: a. Resolved coding discrepancies. b. Clarified our interpretations of the code descriptions given by

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Machine Learning, IoT, Writing Center Peer Tutors, Conceptual Modeling

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Clippinger; Ruth Pflueger, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Steven Nozaki, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College

Communication, Vol. 62No. 3, pp. 239-252, Sept 2019[5] Lerenmueller, Marc J., Sorenson, Olav, and Jena, Anupam B. “Gender differences in howscientists present the importance of their research: observational study” BMJ 2019;367:l6573[6] Clippinger, D., & Jernquist, K., & Nozaki, S., & Nitterright, F. A. (2019, June), ImprovingUndergraduate STEM Writing through Common Language as a Tool to Teach Engineering“Dialects” Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida.10.18260/1-2--32952[7] Clippinger, D., & Nozaki, S., & Pflueger, R. C. (2021, July), Quantitative Assessment ofWriting Register in Engineering Technology Students Paper presented at 2021 ASEE VirtualAnnual Conference Content Access, Virtual

Conference Session

We Love our MOMs (Mechanics of Materials)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Kidd, Louisiana Tech University; Ethan Hilton, Louisiana Tech University

Rinehart for their support andassistance on the continuing improvement on the project for this course, and the execution of thisstudy.References[1] G. B. Wright, "Student-centered learning in higher education." International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 92-97, 2011[2] R. Kay, "Evaluating the instructional architecture of web-based learning tools (WBLTs): Direct instruction vs. constructivism revisited." Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 33-51, Jan. 2013[3] S. A. McLeod, “Kolb - learning styles,” Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html, Oct. 2017.[4] I. Georgiou, C. Zahn, and B. J. Meira. "A systemic framework for case

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 1: Online or Remote Teaching and Curricular Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

L. Brent Jenkins, Kennesaw State University

each of 5-6 teams composed of 3-4 students and an instructor—each at a different off-campus location. B. Enable each team to view a single instance of the software and pass control from one teammate to another throughout the session. If control-passing is not possible, provide—at a minimum—program control to a pre-chosen student per session with screen sharing by teammates and the instructor. C. Provide sufficient video resolution during screen sharing (720p) to enable non-leader team members to clearly see the simulated equipment. Enable the instructor to monitor all team sessions simultaneously with the ability to full-screen a session at will. Provide a queued means for the instructor to receive

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wei Zhang, University of Louisville

. 9[10] Shigeo (Jeff) Ohshima. Scaling Flash Technology to Meet Application Demands.https://flashmemorysummit.com/English/Conference/Keynotes.html.[11] Gyusun Lee, Seokha Shin, Wonsuk Song, Tae Jun Ham, Jae W. Lee, and Jinkyu Jeong. 2019.Asynchronous I/O Stack: A Low-latency Kernel I/O Stack for Ultra-Low Latency SSDs. In 2019USENIX Annual Technical Conference (USENIX ATC ’19). USENIX Association, Renton, WA, 603–616. https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc19/presentation/lee-gyusun.[12] Jisoo Yang, Dave B. Minturn, and Frank Hady. 2012. When Poll is Better than Interrupt. InProceedings of the 10th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (San Jose, CA) (FAST’12). USENIX Association, USA.[13] Adrian M. Caulfield, Arup De, Joel Coburn

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of New Mexico; Elizabeth Moschella-Smith, University of New Hampshire; Mala Htun

link with retention. Research in Higher Education, 61, 330– 356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09564-wRussell, S. T., Sinclair, K. O., Poteat, V. P., & Koenig, B. W. (2012). Adolescent health and harassment based on discriminatory bias. American journal of public health, 102(3), 493- 495.Sigal, J., & Jacobsen, H. (1999). A cross-cultural exploration of factors affecting reactions to sexual harassment: Attitudes and policies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 760.Shupe, E. I. (2020). Beneath the surface of the sexual harassment label: a mixed methods study of young working Women. Sex Roles, 83(3), 179-192.Welsh, S., Carr, J., MacQuarrie, B., & Huntley, A. (2006). “I’m Not Thinking of It as